GE2025: Are independent candidates a new force to be reckoned with?
Jeremy Tan, who ran in Mountbatten SMC, and Darryl Lo who contested in Radin Mas SMC, join Steven Chia and Otelli Edwards to talk about lessons learnt from their campaigning and their future after GE2025.
Here is an excerpt of the conversation:
Steven Chia, host:
Are there other parties wooing you guys? Have you been talking to them?
Darryl Lo, independent candidate for Radin Mas SMC:
Just smaller parties for now. Because I think insofar as my campaign (went), it probably didn't hit the mark whereby bigger parties are interested in my candidacy.
Jeremy Tan, independent candidate for Mountbatten SMC:
For myself, just having conversations with just generally everybody. I don't think, other than the PAP, everybody is very satisfied with their performance in general. I think they are mostly quite disappointed in their performance.
If it was an ideal situation, we wanted to see the Workers' Party increase its vote share. We wanted to see PSP, SDP, maybe get a seat or two, then some NCMP (seats) for people like us. But that totally did not happen. We kind of went back to status quo.
Steven:
How do you read that? The results, we got to admit, were surprising for many, but it basically is a clear sign that the population is choosing to go in this direction. How do you feel about that?
Jeremy:
I read that in terms of how in places where the Workers' Party contested, the absolute votes increased and was higher than the PAP, but yet the PAP still has more seats, and the Workers' Party didn't gain any additional (seats).
So going forward, I will do some political advocacy on the boundaries, because we want to be able to speak directly to our residents, walk the grounds, but we don't know which wilderness we are walking to, honestly.
Otelli Edwards, host:
So you're worried about 2030. Is it going to your decision whether you're going to stand in the next election? It hinges on the electoral boundaries?
Jeremy:
Yes, because I'm a resident of Marine Parade (Braddell Heights GRC) and that is where I experienced a walkover. So now I must consider honestly how to tackle Marine Parade and also Mountbatten at the same time, because I don't know if Mountbatten would be part of Marine Parade. Anything could happen. MacPherson has been in and out of Marine Parade multiple times.
Steven:
And you have a similar view on that right, Darryl?
Darryl:
Yeah. Because I've been living in Radin Mas for most of my life. And I think in this (election) for instance, part of West Coast was also included in Radin Mas, so we wouldn't know how the boundaries are going to shift in 2030.
I think a lot of people are asking, 'Oh, why don't you walk the ground earlier? Why don't you do walkabouts earlier?' But you won't know which ground you're walking.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
23 minutes ago
- CNA
Singapore firms trail region in plans for automation, AI; expect limited job impact: Study
SINGAPORE: Companies in Singapore are less ambitious than firms in other Southeast Asian countries when it comes to future automation plans, a new survey has found. Their approach appears to be "incremental" and "pragmatic", which may be because of concerns over job losses and displacement, according to the States, Markets and Regional Integration report, released on Tuesday (Jul 22). The report also found that the majority of Singapore companies polled see automation leading to either an increase in headcount or no change. In comparison, businesses in the Philippines, for instance, expect more job displacement due to automation. Automation can refer to the use of artificial intelligence, industrial robots, production and machinery automation, general software and information technology or other tools. The report sought to understand how businesses in seven Southeast Asian countries view four areas of economic transformation: automation and digitalisation, sustainability practices, regulation and governance, and cooperation through regional institutions. Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Vietnam were included in this study. In Singapore, the survey was led by National University of Singapore (NUS) in collaboration with the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), and involved trade associations and chambers including the Singapore Business Federation (SBF) and the American Chamber of Commerce in Singapore. The report was released a week before an upcoming IPS-SBF conference titled "Global-City Singapore: SG60 and Beyond". Prime Minister Lawrence Wong and Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong are expected to speak at the conference, which will be held at the Sands Expo and Convention Centre on Jul 29. Researchers received 209 responses from companies in Singapore, but only 101 were valid – the others did not meet the threshold of completing at least 25 per cent of the questions. The survey was conducted in 2023 and 2024. WHERE THINGS STAND Automation is widely adopted in Singapore, but the study found that implementation of automation occurs at a lower level. About 13.2 per cent of companies reported that they do not use any automation in their business, and nearly 70 per cent use automation in only up to 25 per cent of their business processes. Around 14 per cent of Singapore respondents have automated between 26 and 50 per cent of their tasks, while only 2.63 per cent use automation in more than half of their work. None of the Singapore businesses surveyed reported that they are fully automated. 'While no firms in the Singapore sample report full automation, most firms have adopted at least some form of automation, an indication of the country's universal exposure to digitalisation, even among smaller firms,' the report said. In terms of advanced automation, 21 per cent of Singapore respondents said they had adopted the use of industrial robots in their processes, second only to Cambodia at 21.9 per cent. As for artificial intelligence and machine learning, Malaysia topped the rankings at 24 per cent, followed by Singapore at 19 per cent. 'These trends suggest an openness to advanced technologies, though full transformation remains gradual,' the report said. Looking ahead to the next three years, Singapore-based companies have expressed 'strong intentions' to deepen automation, but at a slower pace than respondents in neighbouring countries. For example, 39.6 per cent of Cambodian firms, 33 per cent of Malaysian businesses and 31 per cent of Indonesian companies plan to automate more than 50 per cent of their tasks in the next three years. By contrast, only 5.4 per cent of Singapore firms intend for more than half of their tasks to be automated in the same period. Singapore firms' 'steady, incremental approach' reflects their measured pace of technological adoption, which is shaped by sectoral demands and workforce considerations, researchers said. They noted that investment in digital technologies is widespread in Singapore, but focuses on operational efficiency and incremental increases in automation, instead of transformational change and large-scale technological overhauls. 'This indicates a measured and pragmatic approach to integrating new technologies, possibly reflecting concerns over potential job losses and displacement as well as the need to move forward in tandem with retraining or upskilling to complement new automation processes,' the report said. IMPACT ON EMPLOYMENT A majority of the Singapore companies polled also expect automation to have a limited impact on employment compared with firms in some Southeast Asian countries. Around 40 per cent of Singapore respondents expect no change in headcount due to increased automation, while 27.3 per cent predict some increase in employment. Another 28.6 per cent of respondents see the number of employees being somewhat reduced, and 1.3 per cent of those polled expect head counts to be reduced significantly. 'This relatively balanced outlook suggests that automation in Singapore is viewed as a tool for augmenting – not replacing – human capital. It also underscores a confidence in the adaptability of the workforce,' the report said. Among the countries studied, the Philippines stood out as a majority of respondents – 68.3 per cent – expect that automation will reduce employment, indicating stronger concerns over labour displacement, the report said. Vietnamese firms also hold a similar 'balanced view' to Singapore, with 34.4 per cent of respondents expecting no change and 24.2 per cent expecting some increase in employment. A larger portion of Malaysia and Indonesia firms expect more hiring due to automation – 47.4 per cent of firms in Indonesia and 36.3 per cent of businesses in Malaysia anticipate that they will hire more staff as they implement their automation plans. OTHER FINDINGS The study also found that businesses in Singapore have a 'relatively strong preference' for working with business associations and trade associations and chambers (TACs) when it comes to navigating issues. Over 86 per cent of respondents allocate more than 25 per cent of their effort toward this type of engagement, the report said. 'This may suggest that a strong majority of firms in Singapore are confident in cooperating with business associations and TACs.' They also maintain a 'notable level of independent activity', with 26 per cent of Singapore-based firms allocating between 81 per cent and 100 per cent of their effort to working alone. By contrast, 64.3 per cent of Singapore businesses do not put much effort into working with other firms. Dr Faizal Bin Yahya, senior research fellow at lPS, said: 'In this context, rather than just 'hunting in a pack' with other firms for overseas opportunities, firms would need the involvement of the TACs or work directly with TACs in order to do so.' On the issue of sustainability, companies in Singapore said regulatory mandates and customer expectations are more effective in motivating change, rather than pressure from civil society. If the government introduced new strict environmental laws and penalties, 17.6 per cent of respondents said they would be willing to invest more than 15 per cent of their annual operating costs to improve their environmental practices. If major clients pressure the company to reduce environmental harm, 26.7 per cent of respondents said they would invest more than 10 per cent of their annual operating costs. 'While firms recognise the value of environmental responsibility, investments remain modest in general or reputational scenarios,' the report said. 'Willingness to invest increases significantly when customer expectations are introduced.'
Independent Singapore
26 minutes ago
- Independent Singapore
'No career, no friends, no way out: Is the government sector a dead end?'
SINGAPORE: In the corridors of a government bureau, an employee sits gaping vacantly at the computer screen. Around, co-workers chatter over cups of steaming coffee, while others scroll through their phones nonchalantly. In the silence, a digital clamour is posted to Reddit: 'Anyone else miserable working in the government sector?' It was a question that hit a nerve with several fellow public servants and netizens. The original poster depicted a drab picture — a noxious workplace where gossip is currency, ambition is castigated, and people turn on others in a frantic clamber for limited prospects. 'Some in my department don't even pretend to look busy,' the poster bewailed. 'They openly play games on their phones. Others spend half the day gossiping… Information is weaponised. I don't have a single friend here, and I trust no one.' However, most hurtful was the comparison to peers in the private sector: 'Most of my friends earn several times more. Their grind feels worth it. I'm so jealous of my friend who resigned without a job lined up—she could afford to. I feel stuck here forever.' A familiar struggle What ensued was a torrent of reactions; a few were compassionate, others critical, but all profoundly expressive of the current public service experience. 'It sounds like a localised issue,' one netizen said. 'There are government departments where work overflows and people are swamped.' Another, more battle-hardened from experience, offered his opinion without the euphemisms: 'I've worked in three different agencies and all of them burnt me out mentally and physically. If you're pushing for promotion, you're in the rat race, but if you want to earn more, you need to get out. Government experience may not translate well to the private sector. It's your call.' For many, the sentiment was that the 'iron rice bowl,' a rewording for job security in the public sector, comes with its veiled risks. 'Sure, it's stable,' one commenter said. 'But it's an iron bowl on boiling water.' Is the grass greener? As the poster's observation triggered arguments, an obvious theme surfaced — the legend of the 'better' sector. See also AI may impact high-skilled professional jobs the most in SG 'Private sector may not necessarily be better,' several Redditors pointed out. 'You could be overworked and underpaid. At least here, you're underpaid but not overworked!' For the others, the stress-free pace of government work was a secret blessing: 'It's good to have little to do and still be earning income, lol.' However, not everyone viewed it that way. Others talked of government jobs with overwhelming assignments, extreme KPIs, and diminutive recognition. 'I work in the public sector too,' one netizen joined. 'It's always so busy for us—I wonder what line of work you're in!' The real enemy — disillusionment Underneath the opinions over workload, compensation, and status lies something more profound — disillusionment. The original poster's disappointment and misery aren't just about cash or toxic colleagues; it's about that sense of being trapped in a system where work devotion and trustworthiness don't result in progress, and effort doesn't always equate to reward and promotions. 'Even the scholars don't make as much as those in the private sector,' the original poster wrote. 'But at least they have the prestige.' Why am I staying? What would it take to leave? The thread echoed a universal truth — workplace unhappiness isn't exclusive to any one segment. Office politics, exhaustion, and inertia can be found in both public and private realms. What's important is positioning one's values with the environment, and not being scared of re-evaluating one's path. The original poster may still be at that solitary small table. But in expressing his frustrations online, he has kindled an unpretentious and candid dialogue, one that might help others ask the same tough question: Why do I stay? And what would it take to leave?
CNA
10 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: As Singapore builds up, can it hold on to its memories?
SINGAPORE: When the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) launched its draft master plan last month, most of the conversation focused on how many new homes would be built – at least 80,000 in more than 10 new neighbourhoods over the next 10 to 15 years. It's not surprising. In land-scarce Singapore, housing is one of the most talked about and debated topics. But tucked away in the 47-point media release and stack of annexes was a concept for several so-called 'identity corridors' that were first introduced in URA's Long-Term Plan Review in 2022. What are identity corridors? And how can they help foster Singapore's national and urban identity? CITIES REPRESENT SOCIAL IDENTITY In their 2013 book The Spirit of Cities: Why the Identity of a City Matters in a Global Age, political scientists Daniel A Bell and Avner de-Shalit argue that every city expresses a set of distinctive values or ethos. In that book, Singapore is strongly associated with the ethos of nation-building. This too, is hardly surprising. Singapore's position as a thriving and liveable global city today is very much an outcome of our nation-building efforts. The outcome of these efforts is clear. The IMD World Competitiveness Index 2025 ranks us as the second most competitive economy in the world. But this progress comes with big changes. As Singapore's economy grew rapidly, so too did the changes in its urban landscape. The kampungs that dotted our island made way for high-rise public housing with cleaner and more modern living conditions. The old National Library building, much-beloved by students and readers of that era, gave way for the Fort Canning Tunnel. In some instances, brand new spaces were created to cater to our socio-economic needs. For instance, the Marina Bay district was developed as an extension of the Central Business District (CBD), which had become increasingly crowded as global banks and corporations flocked to Singapore during its rapid growth as a financial hub through the 1990s and 2000s. This is not unique to Singapore. In many cities, rapid economic development can result in equally rapid changes in the urban landscape. These can have implications for a city's social fabric. For instance, Google's entry into Zurich has given rise to extensive gentrification and a spike in housing costs and consequent public unhappiness and protests. Protesters blamed large banks and companies for driving up housing costs and accessibility. In land-constrained cities, heritage sites and buildings can be particularly vulnerable in the face of rapid economic and urban transformation. A 2024 report by the World Monuments Fund identified rapid urbanisation and overtourism as top threats to heritage conservation. At the same time, cities cannot survive without economic growth. The first cities of the world had emerged due to the confluence of economic and human activity within their boundaries. Cities today continue to thrive as key nodes in global trade and finance. Even as Singapore continues to grow as a major economic and financial hub, it will need to preserve aspects of the city that reflect citizens' memories, identity and aspirations. PRESERVING SINGAPORE'S ZEITGEIST In response to a question that was posed to me during the launch of the 2025 draft master plan, I had mentioned that '(w)e want to plan for our future climate needs, our socio-economic needs; but at the same time, we want to preserve some of the spaces that sort of define the zeitgeist of Singapore'. Like Bell and de-Shalit, I too feel that Singapore's identity is very much defined by our nation-building efforts. It is therefore important that we conserve some of the spaces that have played key roles in our nation-building story. The NatSteel building that was recently proposed for conservation is a good example of this. However, Singapore's national identity is much more than our nation-building journey, important as that may be. It comprises a rich tapestry of cultural practices and lived experiences that have accreted over multiple generations. This is where the URA's identity corridors will play an important role in conserving and even enhancing the identity and heritage that already exist in many of our iconic spaces and neighbourhoods. For instance, the Historic East corridor includes culturally rich and ethnically diverse neighbourhoods such as Geylang Serai, Joo Chiat and Katong. By linking up these neigbourhoods, the Historic East identity corridor provides a more cohesive and integrated experience of these neighbourhoods' heritage and identity. This can in turn generate greater interactions between visitors and residents and interest in the traditional crafts and food that continue to be found in these neighbourhoods. Think you know all about Katong-Joo Chiat? There's so much more to discover! From old-school charm to modern experiences, go on an exciting adventure with Toufiq, our urban designer, and local heritage business owner Michael as they reveal the best-kept secrets of the Historic East Corridor. Have ideas to shape the future of our Identity Corridors? Sign up for our visioning workshops at: #DMP2025 #SpaceForOurDreams #IdentityCorridors #Katong #JooChiat #ExploreSG Posted by Urban Redevelopment Authority on Wednesday, November 13, 2024 Cities are much more than just buildings and infrastructure. They are living repositories of the shared memories, stories and traditions of the people who live in them. The two need not be mutually exclusive. Through sensitive urban planning, our built environment can be planned and designed to highlight and enhance our rich cultural heritage and foster a sense of belonging among residents. Even as Singapore continues to experience rapid economic and urban transformation, there remains a need to preserve and grow the Singaporean spirit or zeitgeist. This means ensuring a lived environment that both protects and expands on our rich cultural identity. Dr Woo Jun Jie is Senior Lecturer at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore. He researches global cities in Asia, with a strong focus on urban governance, policy design and economic development. He is the author of several books on the emergence and development of global financial hubs in Asia.
