logo
Trump reignites proposal that could change prison system forever

Trump reignites proposal that could change prison system forever

Daily Mail​3 days ago
President Donald Trump called for an end to cashless bail, a bold move that could overhaul the way the American prison system works. Trump claims the financial-based bail system results in a rise in crime, and he called for it to come to an end.
' Crime in American Cities started to significantly rise when they went to CASHLESS BAIL. The WORST criminals are flooding our streets and endangering even our great law enforcement officers. It is a complete disaster, and must be ended, IMMEDIATELY!,' he wrote on Truth Social on Monday.
Crime, in fact, is not on the rise in most American cities right now. The latest national and city-level data for 2025 actually show violent crime, murders and shootings declining during the first six months of the year. Some reports indicate the U.S. is on track for the lowest property and violent crime rates since national record-keeping began in the 1960s.
The president has - in recent days - posted other items on social media that are tied to the prison system, including an AI-generated video of Barack Obama being arrested at the White House. Trump also has called for Alcatraz, California's infamous island prison, to be reopened.
While Trump signed criminal justice legislation into law during his first term that reduced certain mandatory minimum sentence and expanded eligibility for early release, he did not take on the bail system. Trump has had his own experience with cash bonds in order to stay out of prison.
He had to post a $175 million bond to New York in a case involving his business practices. And he was required to post $200,000 bond in his election subversion case in Georgia, which he did so after surrendering at the Fulton County Jail in Atlanta in August 2023.
But Trump falsely claimed in May 2024 that he had to put up bail in his New York hush money case, saying New York City was violent because other defendants did not have to post bail. He was actually released on his own recognizance, like many charged with a non-violent crime. And in two federal cases - one in Washington, DC, over his attempts to overturn the 2020 election, and one in Florida over his post-presidency retention of classified documents - Trump was released on his own recognizance.
A cashless bail system would see defendants released based on factors like flight risk or a danger to community and not on ability to pay. However, the system may not work like Trump wants it to. A study in California earlier this year found 70 percent of suspects released on zero-dollar bail, reoffended. The state recently ended its current money bail system. The data showed suspects released on zero-dollar bail were twice as likely to be rearrested for felonies and three times as likely to be rearrested for violent crimes compared to those who had to post bail, CBS News reported.
Proponents of cashless bail, however, say it could decrease prison populations as a cash bail system sees people being detained in jail, sometimes for lengthy periods of time while awaiting trial, solely because of their inability to pay. Illinois, in 2023, became the first state to eliminate the use of cash bail. But the move didn't decline prison populations as much as expected, a study from the Center for Criminal Justice at Loyola University in Chicago found.
'What's changing is that the means of release are changing,' David Olson, a co-director of the center, told ABC News . 'People don't have to post the money, and rather than being released in a few days when they come up with the money, they're being released in a day or two.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil pares gains on possible US OK for Chevron to renew Venezuelan operations
Oil pares gains on possible US OK for Chevron to renew Venezuelan operations

Reuters

time21 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Oil pares gains on possible US OK for Chevron to renew Venezuelan operations

HOUSTON, July 24 (Reuters) - Oil pared gains on Thursday afternoon following a Reuters report that U.S. President Donald Trump's administration may allow Chevron to resume operations in Venezuela. Brent crude futures were up 26 cents, or 0.38%, to $68.77 a barrel by 1:14 p.m. CDT (1814 GMT). U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures rose 44 cents, or 0.67%, to $65.69 per barrel. Earlier in the session, WTI had been up more than a dollar and Brent crude came near that level. "The news about Chevron being able to go back into Venezuela and get oil going again just took the knees out of the market," said John Kilduff, partner at Again Capital LLC. Kilduff said the market does not expect the Trump administration will open up Venezuela to other U.S. oil companies. "This is a unique one-off," he said. Oil was stronger on news Russia was planning to cut gasoline exports to all but a few allies and nations Mongolia, with which it has supply agreements. "Russia looking to cut off gasoline exports gave the market a boost," said Phil Flynn, senior analyst with Price Futures Group. "The market was looking for a reason to go higher." Early in the session, futures gained on the previous day's report of a U.S. crude inventory draw and on hopes for a trade deal between the U.S. and the European Union that would lower tariffs. "The U.S. crude inventory draw and the trade efforts are adding some support to prices," said Janiv Shah, an analyst at Rystad. On Wednesday, two European diplomats said the EU and the U.S. were moving toward a trade deal that could include a 15% U.S. baseline tariff on EU imports and possible exemptions. This could pave the way for another major trade agreement following the Japan deal. Also on Wednesday, U.S. Energy Information Administration data showed crude inventories fell last week by 3.2 million barrels to 419 million barrels, far exceeding analysts' expectations in a Reuters poll for a 1.6 million-barrel draw. Oil prices were also supported by a suspension of Azeri crude exports from the Turkish port of Ceyhan and a brief halt to loadings at Russia's main Black Sea ports which has since been resolved. BP (BP.L), opens new tab said organic chlorides were detected in some of the oil tanks in the terminal at Ceyhan, adding that oil loading continued from some of the tanks with chloride levels assessed to be within normal specifications, while export activities via the BTC pipeline also continued. Traders will watch for further news on loadings from Ceyhan and Novorossiysk, which together make up around 2.5% of global oil supply at 2.5 million barrels per day, according to Reuters calculations based on loading data from the region. Russia and Ukraine held peace talks in Istanbul on Wednesday, discussing further prisoner swaps, though the two sides remain far apart on ceasefire terms and a possible meeting of their leaders. "Next to watch would be the demand indicators as we are in the peak season and any upside or downside would impact refining margins," Rystad's Shah added.

Trump EPA aims to repeal vehicle emission rules after revoking greenhouse gas endangerment finding
Trump EPA aims to repeal vehicle emission rules after revoking greenhouse gas endangerment finding

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

Trump EPA aims to repeal vehicle emission rules after revoking greenhouse gas endangerment finding

WASHINGTON, July 24 (Reuters) - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency plans to repeal all greenhouse gas emission standards for light-duty, medium-duty, and heavy-duty vehicles and engines in the coming days after it removes the scientific finding that justified those rules, according to a summary of the proposal. In a draft of a summary of the forthcoming proposal, seen by Reuters, the agency is expected to say that the Clean Air Act does not authorize the EPA to impose emission standards to address global climate change concerns and will rescind the finding that GHG emissions from new motor vehicles and engines endanger public health or welfare. It is also expected to justify rescinding the endangerment finding by casting doubt on the scientific record used to make the finding. "We further propose, in the alternative, to rescind the Administrator's findings because the EPA unreasonably analyzed the scientific record and because developments cast significant doubt on the reliability of the findings," the summary says. The U.S. Supreme Court, in its landmark Massachusetts v. EPA case in 2007, said the EPA has authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and required the agency to make a scientific finding on whether they endanger public health. In 2009, the EPA under former President Barack Obama issued a finding that emissions from new motor vehicles contribute to pollution and endanger public health and welfare. It was upheld in several legal challenges and underpinned subsequent greenhouse gas regulations. The summary also says that one of its rationales for repealing the vehicle standards is that the required technology to reduce emissions would risk greater harms to public health and welfare. Former President Joe Biden's administration said the standards would hike upfront vehicle prices but save consumers money in the long run after accounting for lower fuel costs. The agency is likely to announce the proposal in the coming days, according to a source familiar with the matter who asked not to be named. The EPA said it had sent its proposal to reconsider the endangerment finding to the White House for review on June 30. "The proposal will be published for public notice and comment once it has completed interagency review and been signed by the Administrator," the agency said. The agency did not comment on the tailpipe rules. The rescinding of all vehicle emission standards is the latest - and most extensive - attempt to put a quick end to EPA tailpipe rules that were forecast to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 49% by 2032 over 2026 levels. Some 29% of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions come from the transportation sector, according to EPA data. The EPA forecast that between 35% and 56% of all sales between 2030 and 2032 would be EVs to meet the requirements. The Trump administration has taken a multi-pronged approach to dismantling rules designed to improve vehicle efficiency, reduce fuel use and boost electric vehicles, including ending the $7,500 new EV tax credit and $4,000 used EV tax credit on Sept. 30 and has frozen billions of dollars in EV charging funding for states. Under legislation signed by President Donald Trump earlier this month, automakers face no fines for failures to meet fuel efficiency rules dating back to the 2022 model year. Last year, Chrysler-parent Stellantis paid $190.7 million in civil penalties for failing to meet U.S. fuel economy requirements for 2019 and 2020 after paying nearly $400 million for penalties from 2016 through 2019. GM previously paid $128.2 million in penalties for 2016 and 2017. In June, Trump signed three congressional resolutions barring California's electric vehicle sales mandates and diesel engine rules. Trump approved a resolution to bar California's landmark plan to end the sale of gasoline-only vehicles by 2035, which has been adopted by 11 other states and representing a third of the U.S. auto market. California has filed suit to overturn the repeal.

Republicans plan to use threat of third Trump impeachment as key issue to boost their standing in midterm races
Republicans plan to use threat of third Trump impeachment as key issue to boost their standing in midterm races

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Republicans plan to use threat of third Trump impeachment as key issue to boost their standing in midterm races

Republican strategists say they plan to make a major midterm talking point from the threat of a third impeachment against Donald Trump that could come if Democrats retake the House. 'We know what the stakes are in the midterm elections,' John McLaughlin, a Trump pollster, told NBC News. 'If we don't succeed, Democrats will begin persecuting President Trump again. They would go for impeachment.' Right now, Republicans hold an eight-seat advantage in the House, walling the president off from a third impeachment, but that could change if the Democrats surge in 2026, as the president's party typically suffers during midterm elections. Still, according to Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., who led the party's second impeachment against Trump over the January 6 insurrection, the Democrats themselves plan to focus more on what they see as the president's 'terrible agenda.' 'We've already impeached him twice,' Raskin told NBC. 'So obviously that's not a complete solution, given that he is able to beat the two-thirds constitutional spread. So I don't think anybody thinks that's going to be the utopian solution to our problems.' Both House impeachments — first for an alleged offer of quid pro quo with Ukraine to go after Joe Biden, then for the Capitol riot — did not have enough votes to secure convictions in the Senate. During the second Trump administration, the president has continued to face attempts to initiate new impeachment trials, including from Michigan Democrat Shri Thanedar in the spring and a June effort over the administration's Iran strikes, though none of these have come to pass. Impeachments may not be coming any time soon, but Republicans face a variety of other risks to their three-party majority control of the federal government. The president's job approval rating has dipped to 37 percent, according to Gallup, the lowest of this term and just above Trump's lowest-ever approval rating, driven by hemorrhaging support from independent voters. A majority of Americans also oppose his signature One Big, Beautiful Bill, which contains a series of tax cuts and restrictions on social programs like Medicaid. The party also continues to face fallout and internal division over the White House's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files scandal, in which Trump and his allies campaigned on releasing materials related to the notorious financier's sexual misconduct, only to backtrack as more information concerning Epstein and Trump's long-time friendship came to light. The president has lashed out at his own base for seeking information about the scandal, which he calls a Democratic ' hoax,' while House Speaker Mike Johnson effectively ended business in the lower house until after its upcoming summer recess to avoid Democratic amendments calling for the release of the files. Meanwhile, former White House ally (and GOP mega-donor) Elon Musk has vowed to form his own political party, in the face of disagreements with the Trump administration over spending policy and the Epstein saga. repeatedly delayed double-digit tariffs take full effect on major U.S. trading partners.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store