logo
Man held for murder in Sundargarh

Man held for murder in Sundargarh

Time of India10-07-2025
Rourkela: A 25-year-old supervisor of a crusher unit was arrested by Birmitrapur police in Sundargarh district on Thursday for allegedly killing a man, who worked as welder there, following a dispute over cooking dinner.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The accused, Dibyanshu Pandey, a native of Sasaram, Bihar, allegedly struck Nanhe Sharma (47) with an iron pipe during an altercation at their workplace on July 5, police said. Both men were residing at the currently non-operational crusher unit in Lase, Birmitrapur.
According to Inspector In-charge R P Nag, the incident occurred around 8:30 PM during Bahuda Yatra when the two men got into a heated argument over dinner preparations.
The dispute turned violent, resulting in both men sustaining injuries. Sharma was struck on the head with an iron pipe by Pandey.
The unit's owner, Swatantra Dubey, discovered both men injured when he visited the premises after they failed to answer his calls. Both received medical treatment, after which Sharma returned to his home in Bisra while Pandey stayed with Dubey.
Sharma succumbed to his injuries on July 8 at the Bisra Community Health Centre.
His son, Ritwik Sharma, filed an FIR against Pandey at the Birmitrapur police station on Wednesday.
Police have recovered the iron pipe used in the assault. Following the post-mortem examination on Thursday, the victim's body was handed over to his family.
"We have arrested the supervisor and are conducting further investigations into the case," said Inspector Nag.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Special Ops 2.0' review: Kay Kay Menon-led suspense thriller often resists momentum
‘Special Ops 2.0' review: Kay Kay Menon-led suspense thriller often resists momentum

Scroll.in

time4 hours ago

  • Scroll.in

‘Special Ops 2.0' review: Kay Kay Menon-led suspense thriller often resists momentum

The second season of Special Ops returns to JioHotstar five years after creator Neeraj Pandey first introduced Research and Analysis Wing agent Himmat Singh (Kay Kay Menon). In 2021, Pandey presented Himmat's origin story in Special Ops 1.5: The Himmat Story. Special Ops 2.0 – a true sequel – picks up the story of the senior operative and his hand-picked team of spies as they find themselves caught up in a complex issue that threatens national security. Directed by Pandey and Shivam Nair, Special Ops 2.0 moves away from traditional field operations towards the unseen battleground of cyberwarfare. The new season turns its focus to digital threats, artificial intelligence conspiracies, financial fraud and the murky web of political-corporate collusion. Episode one is a sprawling one-hour introduction that sets up the kidnapping of Bhargava (Arif Zakaria), a tech entrepreneur tied to a classified government project. At the same time, a RAW officer (Tota Roy Chowdhury) who was monitoring Bhargava's movements at a summit in Budapest is attacked in Delhi. While this premise has potential, Bhargava never leverages his supposed genius to contribute meaningfully to the narrative, remaining strangely passive for someone with the nation's future in his hands. Himmat and his team are tasked with tracking down Bhargava and ensuring his safe return. But the enemy is always one step ahead of Himmat's field agents. The narrative unfolds over seven days (and seven episodes), a structural choice that promises urgency but doesn't always deliver. There are also echoes of Pandey's film A Wednesday! (2008), with a common man, traumatically affected by institutional corruption, threatening the system. The show's attempt to offer a cautionary take on the implications of AI and next-generation technologies is both timely and effective. A subplot involving a banking scam and fraudulent loans occupies a large part of Himmat's bandwidth. There's commentary on the uneasy nexus between politics, big business and tech – where personal and corporate interests distort national priorities. However, the screenplay by Pandey, Deepak Kingrani and Benazir Ali Fida lacks tautness. Entire sequences are bogged down by unnecessary visual fillers – cars making full U-turns after being instructed to, endless walking shots, numerous drone views that serve little narrative purpose. It's a suspense thriller that often resists momentum. Kay Kay Menon remains the show's anchor. His portrayal of Himmat Singh exudes intelligence, resolve and quick thinking in a time of crisis. Menon rarely misses a beat as he portrays a professional nearing retirement while dealing with emotional upheaval in his personal life. The show also features returning characters such as Farooq (Karan Tacker), Avinash (Muzzamil Ibrahim), Juhi (Saiyami Kher), Ruhani (Shikha Talsania), Abbas (Vinay Pathak), Chadha (Parmeet Sethi) and Banerjee (Kali Prasad Mukherjee). Gautami Kapoor plays Himmat's wife Saroj, while Revathi Pillai plays their daughter Pari. Among the new cast, Tahir Raj Bhasin is a mixed bag. As the sinister Sudheer Awasthi, his backstory lacks narrative punch, and Bhasin underplays the menace and unpredictability the role requires. Prakash Raj, however, delivers one of the stronger performances as a bureaucrat grappling with his wife's illness and a broken system. Some supporting performances fall short, particularly the foreign actresses, including an Austrian girlfriend and a Russian honey trap. The fight scenes are long and often excessive. At times, Special Ops 2.0 seems more invested in presenting itself as an international espionage epic than in telling a focused, compelling story. Still, Himmat's emotional vulnerability this season adds depth to a character who has otherwise been defined by duty and stoicism. Special Ops 2.0 is an ambitious follow-up that leans more on visual style and fight choreography than on pace and spycraft. Kay Kay Menon's steady presence, along with strong support from the senior cast, give 2.0 a solid foundation, but the new season stumbles under the weight of padding. Play

‘Cash-for-sex scandal': Punjab and Haryana HC disposes of PIL, asks petitioner to approach magistrate
‘Cash-for-sex scandal': Punjab and Haryana HC disposes of PIL, asks petitioner to approach magistrate

Indian Express

time5 hours ago

  • Indian Express

‘Cash-for-sex scandal': Punjab and Haryana HC disposes of PIL, asks petitioner to approach magistrate

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on Wednesday disposed of a public interest litigation seeking forensic analysis of audio clips allegedly involving a senior IPS officer in an alleged cash-for-sex scandal, directing the petitioner to approach the competent Magistrate under the relevant provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). A division bench headed by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu, with Justice Sanjiv Berry, passed the order during resumed hearing of the matter. The case had earlier come up on May 5, when a bench comprising Chief Justice Nagu and Justice Sumeet Goel had directed the State of Punjab to file its response. The petitioner, Supreme Court Advocate Nikhil Saraf, represented by Advocate Amit Sharma, had sought an independent forensic examination of two viral audio recordings and the disclosure of the name of the officer allegedly referred to by a woman constable during her arrest under the NDPS Act. Appearing for the State of Punjab and the Director General of Police, Senior Advocate Salil Sabhlok questioned the maintainability of the petition. He submitted that the audio clips were 'inaudible, doctored and unverified,' and argued that the petition was motivated, lacked genuine public interest, and had been filed without exhausting available remedies. He also submitted that the complaint against the officer was still pending before the DGP. In response, Advocate Amit Sharma argued that the affidavit filed by the State 'appeared to have been submitted without even reading the petition.' He submitted that the State had failed to address the material placed on record, including evidence of systemic failures, prior judicial findings of breakdowns in criminal enforcement, and continued institutional inaction despite specific court directions. 'This petition is not about any single officer,' Sharma told the bench. 'It brings to light a larger pattern of silence, complicity, and selective protection.' He referred the court to several annexures, including High Court orders documenting delayed FIRs in rape and murder cases, instances of non-compliance with court directions, and the imposition of ₹1 lakh costs on the officer now at the centre of the present petition. Sharma also reminded the bench that in another case, the same DGP had submitted that a gangster's interview had not taken place in Punjab, a claim later contradicted by official records, prompting the court to seek an affidavit in that matter as well. He further submitted that the petitioner had approached multiple statutory bodies, including the DGP, the Chief Minister's Office, the State Women's Commission, and the Police Complaints Authority, but none had taken action. 'If the State believes the audio recordings are false or inaudible, the remedy lies in forensic analysis, not institutional denial,' Sharma argued. After hearing both sides, the bench disposed of the PIL with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Magistrate concerned under appropriate provisions of BNSS. It also observed that if the Magistrate failed to act, the petitioner would be at liberty to return to the High Court.

Property fraud case: Man held after 11 years
Property fraud case: Man held after 11 years

Time of India

time14 hours ago

  • Time of India

Property fraud case: Man held after 11 years

New Delhi: A conman, who had been evading arrest in a Rs 15-lakh property fraud case since 2014, was nabbed from northwest Delhi's Krishan Vihar, police said on Thursday. A Delhi court in 2015 had declared Arun Sharma (43) and his wife proclaimed offenders in the case. While Sharma was arrested recently, his wife is still absconding. In 2014, Sharma, who was under financial stress, struck a deal with the complainant, Jitender Dhingra, to sell his house in Rohini's sector 16 for Rs 65 lakh and took an advance of Rs 15 lakh, a senior police officer said. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi However, he later sold the property to someone else and fled with Dhingra's money. The property was registered under the name of Sharma's wife and the agreement was also signed in her name, the officer added. "When he failed to return the money or execute the sale, Dhingra lodged a police complaint. Both Sharma and his wife, who was also involved in the conspiracy, were declared proclaimed offenders," the officer said. According to police, a team was formed to trace the accused and found that Sharma had shifted to Gujarat's Vadodara where he continued defrauding people. Recently, he returned to Delhi and was tracked to a rented house in Krishan Vihar. A raid was conducted and he was arrested, cops said. PTI

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store