Major changes coming for Alabama CDL drivers
These changes are meant to improve road safety and streamline certification processes. These are aligned with federal guidelines and safety priorities.
As part of the implementation of National Registry II, and following Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration regulations, ALEA will only accept DOT medical certifications via electronic submission from authorized medical providers starting June 23.
Key information for CDL Holders:
Paper medical cards and online uploads will no longer be accepted.
CDL holders can view or update their DOT medical card or self-certification by visitingwww.alabamadl.alea.gov under the 'Commercial Drivers' tab.
Check that your self-certification category is accurate. To make changes, use the SubmitSelf-Certification option under the Actions tab.
If your DOT Medical Card information is missing or incorrect, please contact yourmedical examiner.
ALEA will transition to the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators' Modernized Version of the CDL Skills Test on July 1. The update includes major revisions to the Vehicle Inspection and Basic Control Skills portions of the test, while the Road Skills portion will stay the same.
Key updates to the Skills Test:
Vehicle Inspection:The revised VI section removes redundant steps and places greater emphasis on safety-critical components. Updated terminology and test items reflect the latest technological advancements in commercial vehicles.
Basic Control Skills:The BCS test will now consist of four maneuvers, introducing Forward Stop and Forward Offset Tracking. These additions are based on crash data indicating high rates of frontal impacts and side swipes involving commercial motor vehicles. The updated maneuvers will better assess a driver's ability to control a vehicle in real-world scenarios.
Alabama's CDL Supplemental Guide for Modernized Testing can be picked up at ALEA Driver License Offices across the state or downloaded by clicking here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Werner loses again on issue of deaf driver, but dollar amounts are a lot lower
Werner Enterprises has lost on appeal in a case that at one point saw it facing a $36 million penalty for not hiring a deaf driver–later reduced by a federal court–who had gone through a company training program. The financial stakes in the case brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission under the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act are now about $335,000, a far cry from a jury's decision in 2023 to award deaf truck driver Victor Robinson about 107 times that figure. The unanimous decision last week from an Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals three-judge panel fully affirmed all the September 2023 decisions from both a jury trial in the U.S. District Court for Nebraska and later decisions handed down from the bench over post-trial motions. The affirmation includes a reduction in the original punitive damages awarded by the jury. That reduction came after the court ruled that EEOC awards are capped at $300,000. The EEOC was the plaintiff in the case on behalf of Victor defendants along with Werner (NASDAQ: WERN) included Drivers Management LLC, which is Werner's training subsidiary. Werner made several points on appeal, all of which were rejected by the appellate court. A recap of the case in the recent appellate court decision noted that Robinson had a 'medical variance' from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). That waiver is needed for a deaf driver to obtain a CDL. It was obtained in 2015. With the variance in hand, Robinson enrolled in Roadmaster, the driving school owned by Werner. His training involved not just a regular trainer but also an interpreter for the deaf, 'who communicated with Robinson from the backseat of the vehicle throughout the process,' according to the court's recap of the case's history. In September 2016, Robinson completed the training and received his CDL. But soon after, according to the recap of the case by the appellate court, Werner Vice President of Safety and Compliance Jamie Hamm told him on a call, 'I'm sorry, we can't hire you because of your deafness.' The call took place, according to the court, after Robinson had been told he had been preapproved for employment by recruiter Erin Marsh in an email. After calling Marsh–using a relay service for the phone call–the two talked about, according to the court, ''the job, the orientation, providing interpreting services,' and other general matters.' The district court's decision in January 2024 to award back pay to Robinson of about $35,000 lists several driving jobs Robinson had after not being hired at Werner, none of which lasted very long; only one, with Stan Koch Trucking, reached 12 months. Other jobs on his record included with J.B. Hunt (NASDAQ: JBHT) and U.S. Xpress, now part of Knight Swift (NYSE: KNX). The roughly $335,000 award is a combination of the punitive damages, capped at $300,000, and the backpay. In a May 2024 series of decisions on post-trial motions in the case, the district court summed up the basis for the jury's decision against Werner. 'The jury determined that Robinson was qualified to perform the job to which he applied, he could have safely performed the essential functions of the job with a reasonable accommodation, and Werner's refusal to hire Robinson was not based on business necessity,' District Court Judge John Gerrard wrote. There were multiple issues raised by Werner in its appeal over events in the trial. They included the question of 'causation' and whether Robinson's dismissal was because of his deafness; whether Robinson's overall driving record (which included several accidents) could be introduced to the jury; Werner objections to the admission of emails sent between Werner executives on the decision-making to deny Robinson employment; whether hiring a deaf driver would provide 'undue hardship' for Werner; and whether the FMCSA waiver meant Werner could not deny Robinson employment on the basis of his deafness. Ultimately, the appellate court did not side with Werner on any of the points made in its appeal. An email to Werner seeking comment had not been responded to by publication time. More articles by John Kingston At a conference of mostly green investors, AlFleet pushes marriage of AI and trucking Another broker liability case knocks at Supreme Court door, this one involving C.H. Robinson XPO rating cut by S&P, agency cites continuing weak freight market The post Werner loses again on issue of deaf driver, but dollar amounts are a lot lower appeared first on FreightWaves.
Time Business News
11-07-2025
- Time Business News
My Experience Using Nexterix for MC Look Up
As someone actively involved in freight coordination and logistics management, motor carrier (MC) look ups are a routine — and critical — part of my workflow. Whether I'm verifying a new carrier, checking compliance, or reviewing a company's safety and insurance history, I need fast, accurate, and reliable information. After struggling with slow and outdated systems for far too long, I started using Nexterix — and it completely changed the game. Here's a look into my personal experience using Nexterix for MC look ups, and why I now depend on it daily. When I first came across Nexterix, I was honestly skeptical. I'd used several MC Look up tools in the past, and most of them either had outdated data, confusing interfaces, or slow load times. But Nexterix was different from the start. The interface was clean and intuitive, and I didn't need any kind of tutorial to figure it out. I simply entered the MC number of a carrier I wanted to verify, and within seconds, a detailed and organized profile appeared on the screen. Everything I needed — company name, DOT number, safety rating, authority status, insurance details, and inspection history — was right there in one place. No flipping through different sites. No guesswork. Just clear, fast results. Accuracy is everything in logistics. Hiring a carrier without properly checking their MC status or operating authority can cost a business thousands. I've seen it happen. That's why I appreciated how Nexterix pulls data from verified federal sources like FMCSA and displays it in real-time. I've compared its information to official records, and it always matches — down to the smallest detail. This accuracy gives me the confidence to make quick, informed decisions when time is tight. I don't need to cross-check five websites anymore. Nexterix saves me the hassle and ensures I'm always on the right track. What used to take 10 to 15 minutes — switching between platforms, confirming carrier safety ratings, checking insurance coverage — now takes less than one minute with Nexterix. It's helped me speed up my carrier approval process significantly. During busy days when I'm juggling multiple shipments, that time-saving difference means a lot. I also love how Nexterix keeps a history of my previous searches. This comes in handy when I need to revisit a carrier I looked up weeks ago or cross-reference a previous entry. I don't have to re-type or dig through files — it's all there and easily accessible. One of the main reasons I continue using Nexterix is how it supports my compliance practices. Every carrier profile clearly shows whether the company has active authority, up-to-date insurance, and clean safety records. If there are red flags, Nexterix highlights them immediately. It's helped me avoid working with non-compliant carriers, which reduces liability risks and protects my reputation with clients. The ability to see crash data, inspection reports, and safety scores all in one place allows me to evaluate carriers far more thoroughly than I could before. On the rare occasion that I had a question or needed help understanding a data point, Nexterix's support team was quick to assist. They're not just technical reps — they understand the logistics industry and speak the same language. That's a rare and valuable quality in a tech provider. The support team also seems genuinely interested in user feedback. They're constantly improving features, and I've noticed updates roll out that directly addressed things I had previously thought about — like faster report generation and smarter data grouping. My experience using Nexterix for MC look ups has been nothing but positive. It's fast, reliable, and built for professionals who can't afford mistakes when it comes to choosing motor carriers. Since switching to Nexterix, I've eliminated guesswork from my carrier vetting process, saved hours every week, and improved my overall logistics operation. If you're in the transport, brokerage, or freight industry and you're still using outdated or inefficient methods to verify carriers, I highly recommend giving Nexterix a try. For me, it's become an essential tool — not just for MC look ups, but for ensuring that every shipment I move is backed by the right information. Ask ChatGPT TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Yahoo
11-07-2025
- Yahoo
Tesla is already trying to expand its Robotaxi service to Arizona
Tesla has applied to test and operate autonomous vehicles in Arizona in a bid to bring its fledgling robotaxi service to the Metro Phoenix area, the state's Department of Transportation confirmed to TechCrunch. Tesla contacted the Motor Vehicle Division under the Arizona Department of Transportation on June 26 to begin the certification process, a spokesperson said in an emailed statement. The company, which launched a limited robotaxi service in South Austin last month, expressed interest in operating within the Phoenix Metro area, according to the department. Tesla has applied for both autonomous vehicle testing and operating with a driver and testing/operating without a driver. A decision is expected at the end of the month, the DOT MVD spokesperson said. The company's contact with the state's DOT was first revealed by Tesla influencer Sawyer Merritt earlier on Thursday. Tesla's reach-out came from Casey Blaine, the company's senior counsel for regulatory, and she has already held a virtual meeting with the state's DOT as well as with Arizona's Commerce Authority, according to emails obtained by TechCrunch through a records request. Those conversations are in preliminary stages, according to the emails, with Blaine asking a DOT representative to introduce him to Maricopa County government and law enforcement officials ahead of any launch. Blaine did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Tesla launched in June a limited robotaxi service in South Austin that is currently only open to people the company invites. But CEO Elon Musk wrote Thursday on his social media platform X that Tesla plans to expand that service further into the city soon. He also said Tesla is waiting on regulatory approvals to launch robotaxis in the Bay Area, which he said will happen in a 'month or two.' Musk's robotaxi ambitions may bump up against regulatory reality, at least in California. Arizona, California, and Texas — all states Musk wants to see Tesla robotaxis — have different requirements. In California, companies that want to test and eventually deploy autonomous vehicles have to receive a series of different permits from the Department of Motor Vehicles. Those permits cover the various stages of testing autonomous vehicles with and without a human safety operator behind the wheel, and eventually deploying a driverless vehicle. However, companies that want to operate a robotaxi service must also receive permits from the California Public Utilities Commission. A California DMV spokesperson said in an emailed statement that Tesla has held an autonomous vehicle testing permit for public road testing with a safety driver since 2014. 'If Tesla intends to conduct driverless testing or deploy autonomous technology, it must apply for the appropriate permit,' the CA DMV statement reads. 'To date, Tesla has not applied for either a driverless testing or deployment permit.' The process in Arizona isn't as arduous, although there are steps to navigate. Under Ariziona statute, autonomous vehicle companies are required to follow a self-certification process for either testing with or without a driver, as outlined on the ADOT website. This doesn't mean Tesla — or any AV company that completes the self-certification process — can operate a robotaxi service that charges for rides. Any company that wants to operate a ride-hailing service, human or robot driven, apply for a Transportation Network Company permit. Waymo, the Alphabet-owned autonomous vehicle company, operates a driverless robotaxi service in about 315 square miles of the Metro Phoenix area, which includes downtown, Tempe, Scottsdale, Chandler, parts of Mesa, and trips to and from the Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport. The company recently launched a new program that allows teens, with parental permission, to hail robotaxis in Phoenix. Waymo holds the appropriate AV and TNC permits in Arizona. The company also has all of the required permits to deploy and operate a robotaxi service in Los Angeles and the Bay Area, along with numerous Silicon Valley cities, in California. Waymo also operates a robotaxi service in partnership with Uber in Austin and Atlanta. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
