Family violence prevention advocate Kym Valentine wants changes to alcohol delivery laws
For people experiencing domestic violence fuelled by alcohol, it can be a different story.
"Abuse may be the bomb, alcohol the fuse, but delivery is like the guided missile that is the match," said family violence prevention advocate Kym Valentine.
The former Neighbours star wants changes to how alcohol delivery laws operate to help make a difference for people experiencing domestic violence.
"I can't tell you the measure of difference [this] would make for people," she said.
"This is not a cure all, but this is one of the most powerful and immediate levers the government can pull to reduce the frequency and severity of domestic violence."
A recommendation for lawmakers to review existing alcohol legislation was made after a national "rapid review" into preventing violence against women in May 2024.
The report also included calls for more regulation of gambling and alcohol industries.
If you need help immediately call emergency services on triple-0
All state and territory leaders agreed to review their jurisdictions' relevant laws in September 2024, to take practical steps to speed up action against gender-based violence.
South Australia was the first to do so and has proposed changes to alcohol delivery services — something advocates want the rest of the country to follow suit on.
The proposed amendments would change the hours when alcohol can be ordered from 8am-10pm to 10am-10pm.
It would also add in a two-hour buffer period from ordering alcohol to delivery.
This is something which could act as a "circuit breaker" in family and domestic circumstances, according to Ayla Chorley, who is the chief executive officer of the Foundation for Alcohol Research & Education.
Ms Chorley said these changes were "common sense" measures.
"We're at a crisis point with family and domestic violence in this country, and what that means is that we have to look at all options," she said.
"This is just one of the levers that state and territory governments can consider and can pull at this point in time."
Ms Chorley said there were some concerns about the influence of "very powerful" alcohol lobby groups.
"We have no doubt that they are pushing very much for these reforms to be weakened," she said.
She said it was important for SA to lead with its proposed legislative changes and "send a message" to other states and territories.
In a statement, South Australia's Consumer and Business Affairs Minister Andrea Michaels said SA was the "leading the nation" with these reforms.
"We were the first state to release a draft bill for consultation," she said.
Ms Michaels said consultation had closed and feedback from all stakeholders was being considered, ahead of the bill being introduced to parliament later this year.
With the state election being held in March 2026, the amendments will need to pass before then, otherwise, like all legislation which does not pass before the parliament is dissolved, it will lapse.
Executive director of peak body Alcohol Beverages Australia, Alistair Coe, said it was important that any changes made were targeted and "fit for purpose".
"It's been quite a few years since the liquor laws in South Australia were reviewed, so we very much welcome this review," he said.
"We want to make sure that the measures that are taken are evidence based and do exactly what is intended.
"We certainly don't want to disadvantage the vast majority of people that drink alcohol responsibly and also order alcohol responsibly."
Mr Coe said the alcohol industry did not support the two-hour delivery buffer.
"The two-hour delivery window is very convenient for many people," he said.
"It's important to note that convenience does not equal harm."
For Ms Valentine, she wants to see South Australia take a strong stance which can be followed by other states and territories.
She urged the premiers and chief ministers who agreed to review alcohol laws to act.
"Live up to what you promised," she said.
"Lives actually depend on you fulfilling the promise that you made."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
a minute ago
- ABC News
UN urges Australia to halt deportation of man to Nauru while complaint investigated
The United Nations has urged Australia to halt plans to deport a man to Nauru while it investigates the human rights implications of his case. Australia is seeking to deport three people released under the NZYQ decision to the tiny Pacific nation in exchange for an undisclosed payment but their removal has been stalled since February due to court challenges. The men, one of whom has a prior murder conviction, were among a group of hundreds released into the community following the High Court's dramatic 2023 ruling that their indefinite detention was unlawful. The United Nations' Human Rights Committee wrote to the Australian government last week requesting the deportation of one of the trio be halted while they consider his complaint to the body, which was submitted days earlier. It cannot compel the government to follow its direction, which it issued as an interim measure while the matter is under investigation. "The principle is simple; if your visa is cancelled, you have to leave Australia," Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said in a statement. "That's a pretty consistent principle, applied in every functioning immigration system around the world." But the Human Rights Law Centre, which is representing the man, argues the government has an international legal responsibility not to deport people to places where they might be killed or suffer inhumane treatment. Their complaint to the United Nations on behalf of their client argued that sending him to Nauru breached this obligation because he would not be able to access adequate medical treatment, would be separated from his family, could face violence or discrimination and there is no guarantee the Nauruan government would not deport him back to Iraq, where he faces the risk of persecution. "This insidious plan affects more than just three people. It shows the Albanese government believes that some people in this country deserve fewer rights than others, and deserve repeated, lifelong punishment," associate legal director Josephine Langbien said. "These deportations would set a dangerous new baseline for how all migrants and refugees can be treated. We must demand better from our political leaders." In February, the government announced it had struck a deal with Nauru, which offered to grant visas to members of the NZYQ cohort in exchange for payment. The group — many of whom were convicted of violent offences but have served their sentences — were previously being kept indefinitely in Australian immigration detention because they had failed character tests but also had no reasonable prospects of deportation. That was until the high court's landmark decision in the case of one man, identified only as "NZYQ", triggered the cohort's release into the community. The judgement sent the government scrambling to find an alternative solution, which included attempts to monitor the cohort using ankle bracelets and curfews. But that too had to be reworked when the High Court ruled the cohort could not be treated punitively. Announcing the deal with Nauru, Mr Burke said he expected that more than the three men would eventually be deported after the initial legal challenges were cleared. It is the first test of the new laws that the government passed last year to strengthen its powers to send people without a visa to a third country for resettlement. In the interim, the government has promised the High Court that the man would not be removed from Australia until his case was resolved. Court documents show he was convicted of a crime and sentenced to a total of five years' jail before being released on parole and taken into immigration detention. His lawyers argue the ruling about his visa was not made lawfully. It is unclear when the High Court will make a judgement in the case. "The Albanese government claims to respect international law and urges other countries to do the same," Ms Langbien said. "It must demonstrate that respect by following this direction from the UN Human Rights Committee and halting these deportations."
ABC News
a minute ago
- ABC News
Man attacked by machete in Central Square Shopping Centre calls for ban to be implemented sooner
For 33-year-old Saurabh Anand a trip to his local shopping centre became a matter of life and death. "It is a trauma of hell that I went through," Mr Anand told 7.30. At about 8pm on a Saturday night, the sales representative collected his prescription at Central Square Shopping Centre in Melbourne's inner west when a group of teenage boys allegedly attacked him with a machete. "I used my other hand to feel all the damage that was done. "I couldn't feel any sensation in my wrist or fingers." Until now, he's been too scared to identify himself, but a fortnight on from the attack, Mr Anand is speaking out. He shared confronting photos with 7.30, showing how his arm was nearly severed in the alleged attack. Mr Anand was rushed to the Royal Melbourne Hospital for surgery and has told 7.30 he cannot believe he still has his hand. "To be very honest, I cannot believe that whatever instinctive reaction or safety mode I went into got me to a position where I was able to keep my hand together," he said. Four teenagers, all aged between 14 and 15, have been charged with offences ranging from assault to robbery. Mr Anand is in Melbourne on a temporary visa and has a limited support network, so his mother flew in from New Delhi late last week to care for him. In her first media interview since her son's attack, Kirun Anand said she feared the worst after learning of the incident through global news reports. "He's my only son and he's my life," Ms Anand told 7.30. Mr Anand says having his mother here under these circumstances is heartbreaking. "She cries every night and every day seeing my condition because no parent would want their kids to be in such a state," he said. Steve Devono is a regular customer at the Central Square Shopping Centre and says he fears for his safety after what happened to Mr Anand. "You're not safe anywhere. Anywhere. I reckon it was terrible what they've done to that man," Mr Devono told 7.30. In the wake of the alleged attack, Victoria Police confirmed they have increased patrols in the area. Mr Devono says their presence is welcome. Traders have told 7.30 that there is only one security guard employed full-time by the centre, between 12pm and 7:30pm. 7.30 requested an interview and put written questions to Central Square Shopping Centre about this claim, but it declined to respond. Local florist Igli Musa says one security guard at the centre, which has more than 50 traders, isn't enough. "I do think that maybe security needs to be increased a little bit, especially during school holidays when these things tend to happen more," he said. Mr Musa also believes security guards should have more powers and resources. "I have done my security course before, and what we get taught, I think security guards should have a little bit more power when it comes to jumping into situations and having that power to detain," he told 7.30. The alleged machete attack on Mr Anand follows other high-profile incidents inside major shopping centres across the nation. The chief executive of the peak body Shopping Centre Council of Australia, Angus Nardi, declined an interview request from 7.30 but acknowledged knife crime is an issue, in a written statement. "A key ongoing problem is people bringing dangerous knives and weapons to our shopping centres, and in certain cases with the possible intent to use those weapons," he told 7.30. In May, at Melbourne's Northland Shopping Centre, a brawl allegedly between rival gangs involving machetes prompted the Victorian government to bring forward a machete ban to September. Under an amnesty, bins will be placed at police stations to collect weapons. Mr Anand believes these measures should have been implemented sooner. "This [ban] would roll out in September," he said. "But do we still have enough measures to control all the weapons that are being sold?" Asked for his response to Mr Anand's concerns, Victorian Police Minister Anthony Carbines released a statement to 7.30. "What happened to Mr Anand was horrifying and our thoughts are with him during this very difficult time," he said. Figures released to 7.30 from Victoria Police show offences at Melbourne's 13 largest shopping complexes have risen eight per cent year-on-year and have now returned to above pre-pandemic levels. Source: Victoria Police/Crime Statistics Agency, Victoria The centres captured in the Victorian data include major complexes such as Chadstone Shopping Centre, Southpoint in Cheltenham and Preston's Northland. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Victorian government passed laws allowing Protective Services Officers (PSO) to be redeployed from train stations to shopping centres, sporting precincts and populated areas. Unlike security guards, PSOs are armed and have powers of arrest. However, in a statement to 7.30, Victoria Police confirmed the laws had not been used to deploy PSOs to shopping centres and there aren't any active plans to do so. "Victoria Police has used these laws to deploy PSOs to the Land Forces Expo and Australian Grand Prix," a Victoria Police spokesperson said. 7.30 understands a key reason they haven't been used is that it would leave railway stations exposed, given the government's commitment to staff 220 metropolitan train stations and four regional hubs. Shadow Victorian Police Minister David Southwick is calling for the government to hire more PSOs to deploy them directly to shopping centres. "Five years ago, Labor changed laws to allow PSOs into shopping centres but they've done nothing to make it happen," he said. But security experts aren't convinced PSOs are the solution. Security consultant Luke Percy-Dove has worked with shopping centres for 30 years. He says while high-profile incidents at shopping centres are concerning, they aren't common enough to warrant PSOs. "If these sorts of rare instances, like [what] happened at Bondi, if these became more regular, then we would have to look more seriously at what the next level of security [is] applied to public spaces," he said. In Queensland, laws are now in place allowing police to use handheld metal detectors to search and seize weapons from people in public places. Police allege one man had two knives at a Townsville shopping centre last week. Across Queensland in the past fortnight just under 11,500 people have been scanned and 77 weapons seized. Victoria Police Minister Anthony Carbines told 730 the government had strengthened laws to give police similar capability. "We have also given Victoria Police expanded stop and search powers so they can continue to seize a record number of weapons off our streets," he said. Currently, security guards have limited powers; generally they can only report, detain and deter. The CEO of the peak body for security companies in Australia, Bryan de Caires, says classifying security guards as frontline workers would give them the power by law to detain individuals. "If someone is obstructing or hindering them doing their duty, they have grounds either to detain that person or to get them to leave, otherwise, there are consequences," he said. Mr de Caires is also aware of the police's ability to respond. "We're certainly not advocating the additional powers like police because police are the police, security is not the police," he told 7.30. Mr Percy-Dove said some security companies were reluctant to train their guards to intervene due to potential legal issues. "If they overstep, use too much force in proportionate to whatever was occurring and somebody gets injured, that brings risk to the shopping centre operator [and] creates risk for the provider of the security officers," he said. Security guards at Westfield shopping centres now have body-worn cameras; its owner, the Scentre Group, reported it had increased security presence and measures in its 2024 annual report. Scentre Group declined 7.30's request to observe operations in its centres, but instead supplied the ABC previously unreleased footage showing its security guards wearing the devices on their protective vests. The ABC first revealed in March that the cameras had been deployed. Mr de Caires says the body-worn cameras are likely to become commonplace in shopping centres. "We are seeing a greater use of that technology partly as a protection and partly as a deterrent because if people know they're being recorded, they behave in slightly different ways," he said. 7.30 also requested interviews regarding security measures with Scentre Group — which partly owns Westfield — and Vicinity Centres, which owns Northland and Chadstone Shopping Centres in Melbourne. Both declined to take part. As for Mr Anand, the 33-year-old says he's now too frightened to go back to his local shopping centre. "I barely can muster any courage of going out of my own home to the same place where I usually went for a quick walk and come back home," he said. But he faces another challenge. His temporary visa is due to expire next month and he needs to continue his medical treatment. "I cannot go back [to India] with such an impalement or such an injury on my arm," he said. "All my surgeries are done here, all my surgeons, my follow-up appointments are organised here. His mother says she is concerned about how her son will receive medical treatment and wants the Australian government to help. "I want to say that the community and government to help him," Ms Anand told 7.30. Watch 7.30, Mondays to Thursdays 7:30pm on ABC iview and ABC TV Do you know more about this story? Get in touch with 7.30 here.
ABC News
a minute ago
- ABC News
Automatic systems unlawfully cancelled 964 jobseekers' payments in two years, watchdog finds
Almost a thousand jobseekers had their income support payments unlawfully terminated over two years, the federal watchdog has found, cautioning the breach likely had a "profound if not catastrophic" impact on vulnerable people. The cancellations occurred automatically under the Targeted Compliance Framework, a system set up to monitor "mutual obligations", which are the conditions people have to meet to continue receiving payments, like job hunting and attending interviews. New laws introduced after the Robodebt scandal require agencies to consider the jobseeker's circumstances before cutting off a payment, which did not occur in 964 cancellations between April 2022 and July 2024. "Imagine that if you were already living under the poverty line, so you can't necessarily afford to pay rent, to feed yourself, to clothe yourself, but imagine then that that income is cut off for four weeks or more," Commonwealth Ombudsman Iain Anderson said. "What are you supposed to do? That's the type of catastrophe that we are talking about." The Department of Employment and Workplace Relations paused the cancellation of payments in July last year, but the watchdog found it took too long to act after identifying the issue. It then informed the Commonwealth Ombudsman in December that it had not implemented the new legislation, which was passed two years earlier, sparking an investigation into how the lapse occurred. In his findings, the Ombudsman invoked conclusions from the Robodebt royal commission that warned automated processes in the delivery of support payments can have serious impacts on highly vulnerable people. "[The Robodebt royal commissioner] noted that automation requires a lot of care and skill to make sure that things don't go wrong," Mr Anderson said. "And while this is not the same as Robodebt, in that it wasn't a deliberate intention of doing things wrongly, there just wasn't the adequate care and skill being employed to ensure parliament's instructions in terms of the legislation were properly implemented." The department was involved in developing the new laws, according to the Ombudsman, which shifted the requirement from the secretary "must" cancel payments to "may" if they determine the recipient failed to meet their obligations without an acceptable excuse. "That big change required the individual circumstances of each jobseeker to be considered before their payment was cancelled, and that's the step that they didn't do — instead the system went on automatically cancelling payments," he said. The report makes seven recommendations, including that the department not resume cancellations until the errors have been corrected and that systems are put in place to provide ongoing assurance that the framework complies with the law. All the recommendations be accepted by the department and Services Australia. The Ombudsman is also investigating whether the decision-making process that leads to cancellations is fair and reasonable, and the role of employment agencies, with the findings to be released in a second report later this year. Under the framework, recipients accrue demerit points if they fail to meet their obligations without a valid reason, which can lead to their payments being suspended, reduced or cut off. More than 883,000 Australians are currently on the scheme, according to government data. A separate review by Deloitte into the framework's computer system — which was completed in June but is yet to be publicly released — found it had become "increasingly unstable, with volatility directly impacting compliance function operation" and increasing the possibility of unexpected results "including flawed determinations". Employment Minister Amanda Rishworth did not respond to a request for comment.
