Spike in Used Car Purchases? Here's What You Need to Know About Transferring Insurance
New Delhi [India], August 2: India's second-hand car market is booming. In 2024 alone, over 54 lakh used cars were sold--outpacing new car sales, which stood at 4.1 million. Several factors are driving this trend: the widening price gap between new and used vehicles, stricter emission norms pushing up prices of new models, and the rise of organised platforms that make the resale process easier and more transparent.
However, amid the excitement of choosing the right model and finalising the paperwork, one important step is often overlooked--transferring the insurance policy.
Why Insurance Transfer Is Non-Negotiable
Under the Motor Vehicles Act, it is mandatory that car ownership must be transferred to the new owner within 14 days of purchase. While the Act doesn't explicitly penalise delays in updating the insurance, failing to transfer the policy can lead to own damage (OD) claim rejections because of mismatched ownership. This leaves the new owner financially vulnerable in the event of an accident.
"An untransferred insurance policy puts both the buyer and seller at risk. When making a claim, mismatched ownership details can effectively render the insurance void, as if there were no coverage at all." - Mallikarjun Mallannavar, Chief Claims Officer at Royal Sundaram
The Step-by-Step Transfer Process
Transferring car insurance is simpler than it sounds--and it's one of the most important steps after buying or selling a car. Here's how you can do it:
Step 1: Inform the insurer
Notify the insurance company about the change in ownership as soon as the sale is complete.
Step 2: Gather the required documents
You will need the following documents:
-Form 29 and Form 30 (available from the RTO)
-Vehicle's Registration Certificate (RC)
-Pollution Under Control (PUC) certificate
-Existing insurance policy documents
-No Objection Certificate (if the vehicle was financed)
Step 3: Submit the documents
Submit these documents to both the insurer and the Regional Transport Office (RTO).
Step 4: Vehicle inspection
Depending on the insurer, a quick vehicle inspection may be required.
Step 5: Pay the transfer fee
A small fee is charged to process the insurance transfer.
Step 6: Receive the updated policy
Once approved, the insurer will issue an updated policy in your name as the new policyholder.
What Happens If You Skip It?
Apart from legal penalties, you may find yourself without insurance cover in case of an accident. Third-party claims, although mandatory, may be delayed if policy details don't match the ownership. The previous owner could also be dragged into legal complications if the car causes damage or injury after the sale.
"Failing to transfer the insurance can land the previous owner in legal trouble if the car is involved in an accident," says - Mallikarjun Mallannavar, Chief Claims Officer at Royal Sundaram. "That's why transferring the policy isn't just a formality--it's a crucial legal safeguard."
Final Thoughts
As more Indians opt for pre-owned vehicles, understanding the legal and financial implications of car insurance is crucial. Insurance transfer is not just paperwork--it's a vital step to ensure continued protection. Whether you're buying or selling, make sure the insurance is updated promptly to avoid complications later.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
38 minutes ago
- The Hindu
CCI admits complaint against Google over AdTech dominance charges, orders wider probe
Fair trade regulator CCI has ordered a detailed investigation into Google's conduct in the online display advertising market on a complaint filed by the Alliance of Digital India Foundation (ADIF). In an order passed by CCI on Friday, the regulator said it has decided to club the complaint with ongoing investigations in similar cases and directed the Director General (DG) to carry out a consolidated probe into Google's conduct in the AdTech ecosystem. "The DG is directed to investigate the various alleged practices of Google in Online Display Advertising services and/ or AdTech intermediation services and submit a consolidated investigation report in the matters, accordingly," it added. The order comes in response to a detailed complaint filed by ADIF alleging that Google has engaged in anti-competitive practices across various layers of its advertising technology stack. In its complaint, ADIF alleged that Google, through its multiple group entities, has engaged in anti-competitive conduct by self-preferencing its own services in the AdTech ecosystem, including tying and bundling of its publisher ad server (DFP) with its ad exchange (AdX), and linking access to YouTube ad inventory with the use of its demand-side platform (DV360). ADIF, which represents startups, companies and individuals, also alleged that such practices not only harmed publishers and advertisers but also foreclosed the market for competing AdTech service providers. The CCI said that the participation of ADIF, which represents key stakeholders in the start-up and digital ecosystem, could bring additional insights to the probe and there was no legal barrier to clubbing the matter with the ongoing investigation. The Commission said it was prima facie satisfied that Google's conduct warranted scrutiny under Section 4 of the Competition Act, which deals with abuse of dominant position. It directed that the matter be clubbed with four existing cases and a consolidated report be submitted after investigation. "Allegations made by ADIF in the present matter already form part of the allegations being investigated in the Publishers Case (supra), in terms of the proviso to Section 26(1) of the Act, the commission decides to club the present matter," the CCI said. However, in its response, Google denied the allegations and said it operates in a competitive AdTech market in India, with players like Xandr, Amazon Ads and the Trade Desk. It maintained that its products are interoperable and not tied. However, the CCI said these aspects will be examined during the course of the investigation. "We are reviewing the CCI's orders. We welcome the CCI's decision to dismiss one part of the complaint. We remain confident that our ongoing work with the CCI will affirm that Google's advertising practices have consistently benefited advertisers, publishers, and users, and are fully compliant with competition law," according to Google spokesperson. In a separate order, the CCI dismissed a complaint filed by ADIF against Google, concluding that the allegations raised were already examined and settled in previous cases. The CCI said it is not convinced by the reasons stated by ADIF for distinguishing its allegations from the issues examined in previous orders passed by the regulator. "The issues examined in the previous order may be 'the same' or 'substantially the same'. "Therefore, the present matter is directed to be closed forthwith in terms of the provisions of section 26(2A) of the Act," the regulator added. ADIF had cited four main concerns, including prohibition on third-party technical support advertisements, restrictions on 'Call Ads' on desktops, lack of transparency in ad rankings, and allowing competitors to bid on trademarked keywords. "All the four instances of alleged unfair and discriminatory conditions imposed by Google upon advertisers as part of its Google Ads Policies as raised by ADIF in the present matter, have already been examined in substance and set to rest by the commission in its previous decisions," the competition watchdog said.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Telangana RERA penalises builder for not registering project, building more parking slots than allocated units
The Telangana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TGRERA) has imposed a penalty of ₹2.85 lakh on the promoters of Showri Pearl, a residential project in Medchal-Malkajgiri district, for carrying out construction in violation of RERA norms. Telangana RERA has fined a local real estate promoter ₹ 2.85 lakh for violating RERA norms in Medchal. (Picture for representational purposes only)(Pixabay) "For violation of Sections 3 and 4, ie, for non-registration of the project Showri Pearl apartment, the developer is liable for a penalty under Sections 59 and 60 respectively; therefore, they are directed to pay a penalty of Rs. 2,85,992," the order said. "The developer is further directed to restrict the number of demarcated car parking slots to fifteen (15), in alignment with the number of sanctioned residential units, and the Apartment Owners Association is advised to ensure equitable allocation and amicable resolution of parking arrangements among allottees," TGRERA said. According to the complaint, the developers, including Aduri Prathap Reddy and Bommidi Srinivas Rao, were found to have created 20 parking slots despite receiving approval for only 15 residential units, and failed to register the project as required under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. An inspection revealed the construction of an unauthorised fourth floor and five additional flats. Also Read: Telangana RERA fines Hyderabad developer ₹4.2 lakh for promoting real estate project without RERA registration Background of the case The penalty follows a complaint filed by Manepally Krishnaveni, one of the allottees in the Showri Pearl apartment complex. The complainant alleged several irregularities by the promoters, including the construction of 20 parking slots despite only 15 sanctioned flats, non-registration of the project under RERA, non-disclosure of drainage and electrical plans, and structural cracks in the building, the order showed. According to the order, the complainant stated that no specific parking spots were initially allotted, leading to significant inconvenience. Later, boards were installed to designate parking slots. However, the homebuyer said their assigned spot was next to the watchman's room, while another slot was placed directly in front of it, blocking their vehicle's movement. "The buyer further contends that the approved building plan permitted only three floors, comprising a total of 15 flats (five flats per floor). However, the promoters constructed an additional unauthorised fourth floor, increasing the total number of flats to 20, thereby constituting unauthorised construction of five additional flats," the order said. The complainant claims the approved plan allowed only nine car parking spots, but the builder marked 20 slots in the cellar, causing congestion and blocked access. Refuting the claims, the promoters said that the complainants inspected and approved the flat and parking space before buying it, showing they were satisfied at the time. The promoters also claimed that the project was built with proper approval from the Godhumakunta Grampanchayat and said the complaints about extra floors and parking are irrelevant. RERA findings and directions After hearing both parties, the Authority found that the promoters had committed violations of Sections 3 and 4 of the RERA Act by failing to register the project despite having more than the required number of units. "Upon perusal of the sanctioned plan, as well as submissions made by both parties, it is evident that the project consists of 15 residential units, clearly exceeding the threshold of 8 apartments. Hence, the project does not fall under the exemption contemplated under Section 3(2) of the RERA Act," TGRERA said. As per the rules, the project should have been registered under Section 3(1). Since the builder failed to do so, they have violated the law and are now liable under Sections 59 and 60 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, the order said. Thus, TGRERA ordered the developer to pay a penalty of ₹2.85 lakh for not registering the project. On the issue of car parking, TGRERA found that the promoter had marked 20 car parking slots in the cellar area, five more than the 15 residential units sanctioned in the approved layout plan. The Authority held that such deviation could lead to confusion and disputes among flat owners and directed the promoters to restrict parking allocation to only 15 slots. "Authority is of the view that, to avoid overcrowding and to ensure optimal utility of space for all allottees, the developer shall restrict the number of car parking slots to 15, in accordance with the number of sanctioned units. The apartment owners' association is accordingly advised to resolve this matter amicably and in consensus with all stakeholders," TG RERA said in its order. The promoter of the real estate project could not be reached for a comment. Also Read: Telangana RERA fines developer ₹14.9 lakh for failing to register project, asks realtor to refund money to buyers No structural defect established, says Authority While the complainant alleged visible cracks and possible structural defects in the building, the Authority stated that no sufficient evidence was provided to establish a defect as defined under Section 14(3) of the Act. It advised the residents to document such issues thoroughly and notify the promoter in writing for further redressal.
Economic Times
4 hours ago
- Economic Times
Want to avoid tax on gifts? Know the 50k rule, eligible relatives
iStock Taxable gifts should be declared under 'Income from other sources' while filing the income tax return. As per Section 56(2) (x) of the Income Tax Act, if cash or assets exceeding Rs.50,000 are received without consideration from a non-relative, the amount is taxable as income under the head 'Income from other sources'. For immovable property, if the stamp duty value exceeds Rs.50,000 and no consideration is paid, the market value is considered taxable. Similarly, movable assets like shares or jewellery attract tax if their aggregate fair market value crosses Rs.50,000. Gifts are tax-exempt when received from a 'relative' as defined under the Act, which includes spouse, siblings, parents, grandparents, grandchildren, as well as any lineal ascendant or descendant. Gifts are also exempt when received on the occasion of marriage, or under a will or inheritance. For immovable property transfers, executing a registered gift deed is recommended. Although no income tax may apply, stamp duty is generally payable on the basis of respective state laws. To reflect change of ownership, the mutation process must also be completed with local authorities. Reporting gifts in ITR Taxable gifts should be declared under 'Income from other sources' while filing the income tax return. Even though exempt gifts do not incur tax liability, they should be documented with supporting papers for future clarity or scrutiny. Points to note Retain documents like gift deeds, PAN details and ID proofs of both parties. Gifts from multiple non-relatives must be aggregated to assess the Rs.50,000 limit. Stamp duty liability is determined by state-specific rules, irrespective of the tax exemption. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of
