
Patients would rather see a GP than pharmacists and nurses, study finds
The review of 33 existing studies, from the University of Southampton, also found patients often like to choose a specific doctor to maintain continuity of care.
Trust and confidence decreased when patients wanted to see a GP but were directed to a nurse or other health worker instead, it added.
The study noted people also wanted easier ways to book GP appointments, clearer phone options, shorter recorded messages, and simple online routes with quick responses.
It comes after the Government published its 10-year health plan which intends to massively increase use of the NHS App, as well as recruit more GPs.
An improved app will give patients more control over booking, moving and cancelling appointments, as well as quicker access to medics and other forms of care.
The new study, published in the British Journal of General Practice, suggested confidence and trust scores appeared to be lower when people wanted a face-to-face appointment and received a call instead.
The public also wanted clear details on the roles of different NHS workers, it found.
Lead author Helen Atherton, professor of primary care research, said: 'Patients want a deeper connection with their doctor's practice, better communication, and the choice to see the right professional in the best way for them.
'The NHS needs to better understand what people want so it can shape its services to work for patients.
'Ignoring these fundamental needs will only exacerbate the issues it currently faces.'
Writing in the journal, Prof Atherton and colleagues added: 'Patients wanted a nearby practice, with clean waiting rooms, easy appointment booking using simple systems and with short waiting times, and to be kept informed about the process.'
In particular, researchers found that, for medication reviews and long-term conditions, patients preferred seeing someone they were familiar with.
The research also suggested that, where a patient's condition was worsening, 69.5% of patients reported preferring to consult a GP than a pharmacist and 42.7% strongly agreed or agreed that they would prefer to consult with a GP rather than a pharmacist.
Professor Kamila Hawthorne, chair of the Royal College of GPs, said: 'It's really encouraging to see how much patients value the care, and continuity of care, their GP provides – there are some things that only a GP can do for their patients, but it's also important that patients don't feel somehow short-changed if they're offered an appointment with another member of our highly-skilled multi-disciplinary team.
'Not all patients need to see a GP. Procedures such as blood tests, routine management of non-complex long-term conditions, the monitoring of repeat prescriptions, or assessment of a painful joint, for example, can be carried out by some of the various other members of the team who now work in general practice, such as nursing staff, mental health professionals, clinical pharmacists and physiotherapists.
'This also alleviates workload on GPs, allowing us to spend time with those patients with complex health needs who really do need our expert medical attention.
'However, we know that even when working as part of multi-disciplinary teams, patients often struggle to access their GP when they need to – and we share their frustrations.
'This is due to decades of under-funding of general practice and poor workforce planning, which has meant patient need for our care has escalated in recent years, while GP numbers have sadly not risen in step.
'We need thousands more GPs, and the recently published 10-Year health plan commits to providing these.
'We're now looking ahead to the revised long-term workforce plan, due later this year, to see how the Government plans to recruit more GPs and keep more GPs in the profession for longer – but also address some of the nonsensical issues GPs are reporting that they can't find appropriate employment upon qualification.'
Henry Gregg, chief executive of the National Pharmacy Association, said: 'It's not surprising that people want to see a GP when they go to a GP surgery but all our research and experience shows that people are very happy to visit a pharmacy if they can access treatment or advice quickly without having to wait to see a GP.
'Pharmacists are highly trained medical professionals who offer first-class care for a range of ailments quickly and conveniently and will send patients to a GP or hospital if needs be.
'Increasingly people will be able to pop into a community pharmacy and see a highly qualitied pharmacist for things like screening, check-ups, HRT, weight management or ongoing care without lengthy waits, freeing their NHS colleagues in hospitals and GPs to do more and offering patients the choice and convenience we all want to see.'
Royal College of Nursing chief nursing officer, Lynn Woolsey, said: 'Nursing staff are an integral part of any general practice delivering a range of services to patients.
'They lead public health clinics, run screening and vaccination programmes, support patients in the management of chronic disease and can diagnose and prescribe.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Doctors' leader boasts of 'left-wing' views while demanding 29% pay hike as NHS faces cancelling thousands of ops due to FIVE DAYS of strikes
A 'leftwing' doctor's leader warned only emergency care would be covered if medics walk out on strike for five days next week, putting thousands of routine operations at risk. Dr Emma Runswick, deputy chairwoman of the British Medical Association, said that resident doctors were not seeking to 'bring the NHS to its knees' with their latest walk-out in search of an eye-watering 29 per cent pay rise. But she admitted that only emergency and maternity care would continue if they go ahead with five consecutive days of strikes starting at 7am on July 25. Health Secretary Wes Streeting will meet BMA representatives this week for talks in an effort to avoid industrial action - having told doctors they cannot have more money. Ministers and distinguished medics have criticsed the decision, coming at a time when billions is being ploughed into the NHS in a bid to clear backlogs and improve patient care. IVF pioneer, Professor Robert Winston, resigned from the BMA last week, saying the strike could cause 'long-term damage' to people's faith in doctors. Appearing on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Dr Runswick was asked is she was a 'militant leftie'. 'Oh yeah I am leftwing but that doesn't necessarily reflect the variety of views that that doctors have,' she said. She also complained that some specialist residents were only being paid £34 per hour, adding: 'You would pay a plumber more.' Mr Streeting is reportedly sympathetic to improving working conditions for doctors, but will not budge on salaries. Reacting to the BMA announcement last Wednesday, Mr Streeting called the move 'completely unreasonable' and urged the union to 'abandon their rush to strike', while health chiefs warned strikes are 'unfair to patients'. Mr Streeting told the Commons on Thursday: 'We have put the NHS on the road to recovery, but we all know that the NHS is still hanging by a thread, and that the BMA is threatening to pull it.' Lord Winston quit his membership following the strike announcement, writing in The Times: 'I've paid my membership for a long time. I feel very strongly that this isn't the time to be striking. 'I think that the country is really struggling in all sorts of ways, people are struggling in all sorts of ways. 'Strike action completely ignores the vulnerability of people in front of you.' A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) said: 'The BMA have accepted the Health Secretary's offer to meet and we expect that to happen this week.' Some 90 per cent of voting resident doctors backed the strike action, with the BMA reporting a turnout of 55 per cent. The union has said that resident doctors need a pay uplift of 29.2 per cent to reverse 'pay erosion' since 2008-09. In September, BMA members voted to accept a government pay deal worth 22.3 per cent on average over two years. The 2025-26 pay deal saw resident doctors given a 4 per cent uplift plus £750 'on a consolidated basis' – working out as an average pay rise of 5.4 per cent. The BMA call for a 29.2 per cent uplift is based on Retail Prices Index (RPI) inflation, the measure of average changes in the price of goods and services used by most households. Mr Streeting has said that the 'majority' of BMA resident doctors – formerly known as junior doctors – did not vote to strike and has called the forthcoming action 'completely unreasonable'. However Labour has also been accused of crying 'crocodile tears' - as it prepares to make walkouts even easier. Angela Rayner 's radical workers' rights Bill will soon scrap the 50 per cent turnout threshold which unions must meet to hold legal strike action. Last night Conservative business spokesman Andrew Griffith told the Mail the Government's comments were 'totally hypocritical'. He said: 'The unions are already licking their lips at the Employment Bill, which will unleash waves of low threshold strikes. By reducing the turnout required to trigger a strike, Labour are guaranteeing even more strikes. They are effectively giving unions the whip hand at the worst possible time.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
No, age isn't just a number – and the sooner we realise that, the happier we will be
Sitting in a cafe recently, I saw a poster advertising a barista training course for young people interested in a career in hot beverages. Things in the NHS being what they are, I enjoyed losing myself in a fantasy future spent standing behind a sleek, shiny machine, having witty exchanges with customers and colleagues as I skilfully poured smooth, foaming milk into silky dark espresso, tipping and turning each cup to create my own unique artworks on the coffee surface. That was until I read the small print, which included the rather brutal definition of 'young people' as aged 18 to 24. I realised, with an internal gasp, that my limited ability to pour liquid without spilling it was not the only obstacle to this career choice. There was a core personal reality here from which I had become totally untethered: the passing of time. This untethering is bad news for anyone interested in building a better life. A lot of nonsense is spoken and sung and written on plates and pencil cases about how we should all stay young and never grow old. But I've discovered as a therapist and as a patient in psychoanalysis that the capacity to anchor yourself in the reality of time passing is fundamental to good mental health, and to the potential for life to get better. Whether it's infancy, toddlerhood, childhood, adolescence, young adulthood, midlife, early old age or your final chapter, every new life stage brings the opportunity to mourn the loss of what has gone before, to grow through and around it, and develop into the person you are right now. It is a chance to work through something and change. So buying into the 'age is just a number' philosophy – consciously or unconsciously – robs us of the valuable experience of feeling rooted in our personal timeline. Of feeling rooted in something true. Middle age has a reputation for being staid and frumpy. But when I got stuck into the interviews about this life stage for my book about growing up throughout adulthood, I saw that it can be a particularly fertile period for people who can face the reality that there will soon be more time behind them than there is ahead. Recognising this obvious but shocking fact meant this chapter of their lives was not lacklustre, but more full of life than the ones that went before, fuelled by a different kind of energy. This moment was a chance to make important changes and focus on what they really wanted from their second half. As I now enter my midlife, I am clearly struggling to truly believe that my 'young person' chapter is ending. I think it's because I don't want to accept the losses. We expect the feelings of loss that follow a death. As devastating as this grief can be, it can sometimes feel more understandable than the losses that come with life, development and growth. My young daughter has helped me to see this very clearly, forcing me to face ordinary losses that leave me totally gutted. Her 'gooster', which a week later became her scooter will never again be a 'gooster'. I was not prepared for this loss of a word that seemed so entirely her, which has now been so carelessly dropped by her – but longingly clung to by me. This is my most painful work of motherhood so far. Aside from the sleep deprivation. And the mastitis. OK, maybe not the most painful, but it's up there. How to let these parts of her go, while understanding they are still inside her somewhere; how to let her become her own person, rather than getting so caught up in my own feelings about who she has been to me. How to hold and love her tightly and loosely at the same time, giving her the space to grow into the child, then adolescent, then adult she will be. Some mornings, I collect her from her cot and am momentarily stunned: who is this child who looks so much older than the toddler I sang to sleep last night? Where is my baby? It's that moment of shock – like the internal gasp when I read the small print of the poster in the cafe – that jolts me out of my comfortable bubble, reintroducing me to the devastating reality of the passing of time and the losses it brings. The good news is that when the bubble pops, growth becomes possible. If we can allow ourselves to move in and out and back again through the different life stages – as my daughter moves through toddlerhood, and as I move into midlife – we can grow around our younger selves, not away from ourselves. It's like Gianna Williams told me, speaking of her work as a child, adolescent and adult psychoanalyst: 'We're always finding the infant, the young child, the adolescent in the patient. Like the circles in a tree, they're all there.' That's what it means to me to grow up, rather than just growing older. And if we can keep doing that, then we have a chance at building a better life until our very end. Moya Sarner is an NHS psychotherapist and the author of When I Grow Up – Conversations With Adults in Search of Adulthood Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
‘I had Botox and nine days later I couldn't breathe'
ITV's This Morning aired a segment on Botox and one woman admitted that she felt her 'body shutting down' just nine days after receiving 'fake Botox' A woman has opened up on the terrifying moment she was rushed to hospital after being injected with 'fake Botox'. During Monday's (July 14) episode of This Morning, three guests appeared on the daytime show to share their real-life stories and the reality of botched procedures. Among them was Lynsey Wanless, who admitted that she felt her 'body shutting down' just nine days after reversing the injections. Ahead of the show she candidly opened up and said: "I went to get botox in someone's house, I've had it before so I didn't think it would be an issue.' She added: 'I had no idea anti-wrinkle treatments could be dangerous but nine days later I was in hospital. I felt like my body was shutting down and I couldn't breathe. This has ruined my life." A This Morning survey has shown that half of women who have undergone non-surgical cosmetic procedures required medical assistance afterwards, and 15% ended up in hospital or A&E. Highlighting the findings on This Morning, the research aims to raise awareness of the rise of 'cosmetic cowboys' in the rapidly-growing aesthetics industry and what viewers should look out for if undergoing treatments themselves. The investigation found that half the cosmetic procedures happened in non-clinical settings including living rooms or kitchens. Respondents also said half of aesthetic procedures were not carried out by someone medically qualified. Speaking on the shocking results, This Morning's GP Dr Zoe Williams said: 'I was shocked by the results of our This Morning survey. I understand that cosmetic procedures are highly attractive and a low price tag is incredibly tempting but I urge our viewers to be vigilant, advocate for themselves and ask questions to ensure the treatments they are receiving are safe." She added: 'As an absolute minimum you should have evidence that the person is appropriately qualified and if injectables are being used, knowledge of who has prescribed them.' On Tuesday, July 15, This Morning regular, Ashley James, will also candidly open up her own experience and says: 'There's so much shame and secrecy surrounding non-surgical cosmetic procedures, and yet so many people – especially women – are having them, whether they admit it or not. 'This Morning's investigation made me realise that I'd never thought to check whether anyone giving me botox was medically qualified, or whether the products being used were licensed in the UK. I'd just assumed they were. That's frightening. I wish I'd known more about the risks from the start, and I know I'm not alone.' During the discussions on the show over the next couple of days, viewers will hear practical advice and guidance from Save Face, who operate a Government-approved register to find accredited practitioners.