Florida becomes second state to ban fluoride in public water
Gov. Ron DeSantis signed SB 700, also known as the Florida Farm Bill, into law Thursday. The bill doesn't specifically mention the word "fluoride," but it effectively bans the chemical compound by preventing "the use of certain additives in a water system." It will go into effect July 1.
"What this does with respect to putting fluoride in the water supply is it basically doesn't allow that anymore in the state of Florida," DeSantis said during a news briefing Tuesday afternoon before he signed the bill.
The governor also signed SB 56 into law on Tuesday, a bill brought forward by Sen. Ileana Garcia, R-FL., that criminalizes any form of weather modification, including cloud-seeding, which is used to bring rain to places that need it. Supporters of weather modification argue that it can hinder the impacts of global warming. Garcia fainted during the briefing on Tuesday while discussing the bill but quickly recovered and continued her remarks.
DeSantis called the fluoridation of water "forced medication," saying that it violates "informed consent." He also said the mineral has been proven to negatively impact pregnant women and children, inviting medical professionals, including Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, to talk about the mineral's side effects.
A study published in 2019 suggested that IQ levels were slightly lower in kids whose mothers had higher measures of fluoride in their urine during pregnancy, but its research was far from conclusive.
The governor argued that there are other ways residents can get access to fluoride if they'd like, and stressed that the mineral shouldn't be mandated by governments.
"There's nothing preventing you in your house from adding fluoride to your water," he said.
DeSantis, a Republican, signed the bill in Miami, where Mayor Daniella Levine Cava vetoed a fluoride ban that the county commission passed last month. NBC South Florida reported the commission voted 8-4 in favor of overriding Cava's veto on Tuesday.
DeSantis mentioned the commission vote in his briefing Tuesday afternoon, saying that they "voted the right way."
Cava, a Democrat, has openly criticized the plan to ban fluoride in the state.
"I am deeply disappointed by the Florida Legislature's decision to pursue a statewide ban on water fluoridation, a decision that disregards the overwhelming consensus of dentists, doctors, and medical experts and will end a practice that has been in place for decades to protect our health," she said in a statement issued last month.
Florida is following in the footsteps of Utah, where Gov. Spencer Cox, also a Republican, signed a bill in late March prohibiting any person or government entity from adding the mineral to the state's water systems, making it the first state to do so. It will go into effect on Wednesday.
The anti-fluoridation movement has been gaining popularity, seemingly fueled by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has said drinking fluoridated water has no "systemic advantage."
Major public health groups, including the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Dental Association, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, support adding fluoride to water, saying that drinking fluoridated water keeps teeth strong and reduces cavities. All studies have shown that it reduces tooth decay by 25%.
Legislation to ban fluoride has circulated in Kentucky, Massachusetts, Nebraska, Wisconsin and North Carolina. Hawaii, which has never mandated water fluoridation, has the 'highest prevalence of tooth decay in the United States' among its children, with only 11% of its residents served by fluoridated community water systems, according to a 2015 study of third graders throughout the state by the State Health Department.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
Masked ICE agents detain former Afghan interpreter who helped U.S. military
WASHINGTON — An Afghan who moved to the United States after working for the U.S. military in his home country was seized by armed, masked immigration agents, put in a van and taken out of state, attorneys and members of Congress said Tuesday. Identified only as Zia by members of Congress and his attorney out of concern for his safety and that of his family, the man had worked as an interpreter for the U.S. military during the war in Afghanistan. He was in the United States legally and was arrested after an appointment in Connecticut related to his application for a green card under a program to protect people who worked for U.S. forces, according to human rights advocates, his attorney and members of Congress. Since starting his second term in January, Republican President Donald Trump has pursued a broad crackdown on immigration. 'What happened to him is the worst kind of abhorrent violation of basic decency,' Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., told reporters on a call with advocates to draw attention to the case of Zia and at least two other Afghans who worked for the U.S. and have been seized by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE. 'He actually worked and risked his life in Afghanistan to uphold the values and rights that are central to democracy,' Blumenthal said. Blumenthal and two other Democrats, Reps. Jahana Hayes, who serves Zia's district in Connecticut, and Bill Keating, who represents the Massachusetts city where Zia is being held, all pledged to fight for his release. A judge has issued a temporary stay preventing Zia's removal from the United States, but he remains in detention. Asked for comment, the Department of Homeland Security said the Afghan national entered the U.S. on Oct. 8, 2024, and is under investigation for a 'serious criminal allegation,' adding, 'All of his claims will be heard by a judge. Any Afghan who fears persecution is able to request relief.' The emailed statement from DHS provided no further details. Zia's attorney, Lauren Petersen, said he was approved for humanitarian parole in 2024 due to a direct threat from Afghanistan's Taliban rulers. She said he has no criminal history and, when asked about DHS's saying he was under investigation for a 'serious criminal allegation,' she said she had no understanding of what they were referring to. Humanitarian parole is a form of temporary permission under American law to be in the country for 'urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit,' allowing recipients to live and work in the United States. More than 70,000 Afghans entered the U.S. under former President Joe Biden's 'Operation Allies Welcome' initiative following the Taliban takeover in 2021, according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The Trump administration's immigration crackdown has included mass deportations and reversing 'temporary protected status' granted to people already in the U.S. who cannot return to their home countries due to armed conflicts, natural disasters or other extraordinary events. U.S. agencies have moved to terminate that status for some 14,600 Afghans. Shawn VanDiver, the founder of #AfghanEvac, the main coalition of veterans and advocacy groups that coordinated resettlements of Afghans with the U.S. government, said on the call with reporters and lawmakers that he was aware of at least two other Afghans detained after being admitted to the United States because they had worked for the U.S. military. He said his group, and veterans organizations, were working for their release. 'It's about whether this country honors its word to those who risk everything,' he said.
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump reaches trade deal with Japan that includes 15% tariff
"I just signed the largest trade deal in history - I think maybe the largest deal in history - with Japan," Trump said Tuesday night during a White House reception with Republican lawmakers. More: Trump announces trade deal with Philippines and 19% tariff Japan is the fourth largest trading partner of the U.S. behind Canada, Mexico and China. Trump did not disclose the full details of the deal but said Japan would "invest $550 Billion Dollars into the United States," with the U.S. receiving 90% of the profits. He said Japan has also agreed to open its country to trade on products that include vehicles, rice and other agricultural products "This is a very exciting time for the United States of America, and especially for the fact that we will continue to always have a great relationship with the Country of Japan," Trump said. Trump officials had suggested being close to a deal with Japan ever since the president in April postponed sweeping reciprocal tariffs on goods from most countries. More: 'No extensions will be granted': Trump vows new tariff deadline is a firm one Since the April delay, the Trump administration has imposed a lower 10% universal tariff on goods from most countries including Japan. But Trump has set an Aug. 1 deadline for the higher tariff rates on some 170 countries to kick in. Speaking early on Wednesday in Tokyo, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said he had received an initial report from his trade negotiator in Washington but declined to comment on the specifics of the negotiation. Trump's Japan announcement came after the president earlier in the day touted a new trade deal with the Philippines that coincided with the country's president, Ferdinand Marcos, visiting the White House. Trump's three other trade deals are with the United Kingdom, Vietnam and Indonesia. Contributing: Reuters Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
GOP faces Epstein dilemma in Congress, voters back home
The debate around the disgraced financier and the Justice Department's recent review of his case, which found no evidence of a highly speculated client list or that Epstein had not committed suicide in 2019, has left Republicans in Congress between a Trump rock and MAGA hard place. More: Family feud: Trump at odds with MAGA movement on multiple fronts "A very large group of Americans that have been concerned about this issue, that thought the administration or thought that Republicans were issuing a promise in good faith, are now realizing that perhaps they aren't operating as honestly as they had perhaps appeared," Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-New York, told USA TODAY. "The erosion of trust is something that once you lose, it's very difficult to come back," she added. Tensions over how to address the Epstein case have engulfed the GOP-led House and threatened to backlog other legislative priorities. This week, the House Oversight Committee agreed to subpoena testimony from Ghislaine Maxwell, a longtime Epstein aide serving a 20-year prison sentence for conspiring with the financier. At the same time, pressure to address the Epstein scandal before the entire House prompted Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, to cut the chamber's schedule short and send lawmakers home a day early for their beloved summer breaks that serve as a vital opportunity to reconnect in person with constituents. Adding to the drama is Trump, who has a long personal history with Epstein and who has asked members of his party to move on from the issue while calling his supporters who do not "weaklings." Business not as usual Drama over the handling of Epstein's case review, which many GOP supporters are calling insufficient, butted into business on Capitol Hill as lawmakers worked to pass Trump's push for $9 billion in spending cuts to public broadcasting and foreign aid. Even after House leadership managed to temporarily quell dissent and see the budget measure through, lawmakers returned to Washington this week with some as irate as ever. "I would like the House to follow order, (that) would be really nice," Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Georgia, told USA TODAY. "We should probably be voting on all our appropriation bills and we're not. So, there's a lot of things I would like to see done." Johnson said on July 21 there would not be a vote on anything Epstein-related, saying he wants to give the Trump administration "space" to address the issue first. His comment underscored how House operations are at something of a standstill with attention still caught on a controversial, years-old criminal case. "I think he's scared. I think he's terrified," Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Kentucky, said of Johnson on July 21. Massie has spearheaded a bipartisan effort with Rep. Ro Khanna, D-California, to force the administration's hand in publicizing files. Republican voters were "promised this, they expected this, and it's not happening," Massie said. "But at the same time, he feels an allegiance to President Trump, who's gone against the MAGA base on this. So I think he's torn." Lawmakers brace for reception back home Disputes in the House are unfolding ahead of the five-week break from Washington. Lawmakers will head home to their states and districts, and Republicans are expecting to face some scrutiny from disgruntled constituents. A Reuters/Ipsos poll taken July 15-16 found 69% of Americans believe the federal government is hiding details about Epstein's clients. Trump's popularity has taken a hit. A Quinnipiac University poll around the same time found 63% of voters disapprove of how his administration is handling the issue. Republicans this year have already faced heated town halls back home, prompting leadership to encourage members to quit holding events. "There are a lot of people here in the swamp who think that, 'Oh, well if we spend five weeks on vacation, the pressure for this will dissipate,'" Massie said. "I don't think it's going to dissipate. I think it's going to build." 2026 midterms loom ahead Could the pressure build to next year's midterms? Potentially. "Democrats didn't put the Epstein matter into the public domain," House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said in a press conference on July 14. "This was a conspiracy that Donald Trump, (Attorney General) Pam Bondi and these MAGA extremists have been fanning the flames of for the last several years, and now the chickens are coming to roost." Democrats already have the historical edge next November as the party that does not hold the White House typically performs better in midterm elections. Both Democratic and Republican presidents suffered stinging defeats that led to them losing one or both chambers of Congress during the 1994, 2006, 2010, 2018 and 2022 campaign cycles. For the 2026 elections, Democrats say they plan to hit their GOP opponents with recent controversial moves, including Trump's sweeping tax, policy and spending bill that could affect millions of Americans' Medicaid coverage, as well as the cuts to public broadcasting and global programs. Epstein may be one more name on their list of talking points - and Republicans such as Massie are sounding the alarm now. "It will follow each individual Republican through the midterms. It will follow people into their primaries," Massie said. "Did you support transparency and justice or did you come up here, get elected and fall into the swamp?"
