Plane that crashed and killed 3 in Boca Raton had rudder issues immediately after takeoff, NTSB says
During the late morning of April 11, a Cessna 310R departed from Boca Raton Airport bound for Tallahassee International Airport and crashed shortly after takeoff, killing all three family members onboard: 81-year-old Robert Stark, 54-year-old Stephen Stark and 17-year-old Brooke Stark.
A person on the ground, 24-year-old Pablo Tafur, was hospitalized with non-life-threatening injuries after losing control of his car while driving through the crash's fireball and crashing into a nearby tree.
On Wednesday, the National Transportation Safety Board released its preliminary report on the crash, revealing some of the circumstances surrounding the accident.
The plane's rudder could only turn left
According to the NTSB, the crash happened during the aircraft's first flight following an annual inspection and was conducted under Part 91 for personal use.
Surveillance and witness video obtained by the NTSB showed that the plane veered left immediately after takeoff and entered continuous left turns.
"Shortly after rotation, the airplane yawed to the left and continued in a left turn until the plane went out of view," the NTSB described from one of the videos.
Preliminary Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) data revealed that the plane made at least nine 360-degree turns, indicating that the aircraft could only make left turns and that one of the pilots reported having issues with the rudder.
"According to preliminary air traffic control recordings, one of the pilots reported that they were having a problem with the airplane's rudder and that they could only make left turns," the NTSB said.
As the plane went down, it initially struck trees in a road median before making impact on Military Trail near Interstate 95 and continued to a set of Tri-Rail tracks. The wreckage was extensively fragmented and burned, the NTSB said.
"The wreckage was highly fragmented, and there was a [post-impact] fire," the agency noted.
During its findings, the NTSB found that the plane's fuselage, including the cockpit, sustained "significant thermal damage" from the fire and most of the fuselage and cockpit had been consumed by the flames. Additionally, all the major components of the airplane were found at the crash site.
According to the NTSB, when the rudder was found, it exhibited impact and thermal damage, and the rudder continuity was intact for the right side. However, the left ruddle cable had fractured at both ends, showing signs of tension overload.
"The left rudder cable was fractured near the rudder pedal attach point and at the rudder bellcrank," the NTSB said. "The separated cable ends exhibited a splayed, broomstrawed appearance, consistent with tension overload separation."
From its findings, the NTSB said the damage suggested there was a possible rudder control malfunction that limited right turns.
When it came to the flight controls, the NTSB found that continuity was generally established for aileron and elevator systems, with breaks consistent with impact forces and recover efforts.
According to the NTSB, investigators found that both engines showed impact damage but had signs of normal operation before the crash, and that the propellers exhibited torsional and bending deformation, consistent with power at impact.
Following it preliminary investigation, the NTSB concluded that the plane experienced a rudder control issue shortly after takeoff, restricting it to only turn left. Despite both engines operating normally, the inability to control the rudder likely led the pilots to lose control of the aircraft and crash.
The NTSB said the crash will be investigated further to determine exact causes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
44 minutes ago
- Washington Post
My vintage shopping challenge for a wedding outfit: Part two
We and our third-party partners process personal data including through the use of cookies, pixels, and other tracking technologies to provide, analyze, and improve our services; personalize your experience (including content); and personalize ads on and off the services. Learn more and manage your preferences at our Privacy Policy
USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
There will be more floods like Texas. We can't afford to stand on the sidelines.
Flash floods and other extreme weather events such as hurricanes, tornados, earthquakes and tsunamis are nature's way of doing business. But the disasters they trigger are based on our choices. Normally, July Fourth is a day to celebrate life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. This year, a foot of rainfall over central Texas and the resulting Guadalupe River flash flood overwhelmed any such joy with heartbreak – grief over the loss of life, especially the deaths of so many young children. After the mourning will come reflection: are such tragedies inevitable? Or can we change things? Moving forward, can we do more to protect ourselves and our kids? And if so, how? The good news? We can do better – much better. Our vulnerability to such hazards is largely the result of our past decisions and actions. What we've done, we can undo. The bad news? To reduce future risk will take decades. It will also require profound change (not a change in values, but changes in culture and behavior): We must start with learning from experience instead of repeating mistakes. Worldwide and here in the United States, natural hazards inflict loss of life and economic destruction that varies year-to-year but on average has increased by a factor of three over 35 years. Many see this as an unavoidable consequence of population growth and economic development. But the trend results most fundamentally from our deep attachment to place (not only to the banks of the Guadalupe but also the slopes of Lahaina, the neighborhood of Altadena, the town of Asheville and the city of New Orleans). We all have a love of 'home' that fosters policies favoring 'rebuild as before.' In this act we condemn those who follow to a never-ending cycle of repetitive loss. What airlines and commercial aviation can teach us Contrast this with the past half-century in commercial aviation. Aviation fatalities peaked in 1972 at over 2,300. At that time there were only some 4.7 million commercial flights a year. In 2023 there were fewer than one hundred fatalities in the face of 37 million commercial flights. Commercial aviation has become roughly twice as safe each decade over the last 50 years. The decline is widely attributed to the establishment of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) in 1967. The world of aviation sees each catastrophe as a lesson and to be taken to heart. Instead of continue-as-before, the culture vows (in less colorful language) that 'this must never happen again.' Note that the task is more doable with air travel, sentiment and attachment play little role. But still, America could learn a crucial lesson from aviation, establishing a Natural Disaster Reduction Board (NDRB) that would use similar strategies to tackle natural hazards. We need to forestall such emergencies at the get-go. Natural disasters don't simply begin suddenly, hours or minutes before a storm develops. They arise gradually from vulnerabilities we create and accumulate for years or decades, when we choose to locate our homes and businesses on floodplains and other dangerous sites, when we settle for less-than-rigorous building codes, when we implement and then rely on fragile infrastructure (such as roads, electrical power, and communications that may appear robust in fair weather but that fail us precisely when they're most needed). That's why the Association of State Floodplain Managers advocates for 'No Adverse Impact.' They want to moderate practices such as levee-building that reduces the hazard at one location while increasing the hazard downstream. The association also wants to limit new settlement on floodplains behind such levees. The Guadalupe River was hit this time around, but each day, hundreds of similar vulnerabilities lining some 2,000 watersheds across the United States are one day closer to their own catastrophic failure. These disasters are close-to-hardwired into our future. If we can't easily unwind such past decisions, at a minimum we should avoid sowing the seeds of new ones. Extreme weather is natural. Humans create disasters they trigger. We need to embrace change. Flash floods and other extreme events such as hurricanes, tornados, severe winter storms, earthquakes and tsunamis are nature's way of doing business. However, the disasters they trigger are a human construct – and are reshaped and continually evolving in response to the decisions we make and actions we take that determine where and how we live and work. Take forest fires for example. In the early 1900s, federal policies were enacted to suppress all fires. But by the second half of the century, forest managers realized the practice was increasing the risk of larger fires and endangering national parks and forest ecosystems, so prescribed burns were reinstituted. But if the challenge of providing resilience for a continually reinvented society seems daunting, it is in part because we are attempting to solve tomorrow's problems using only yesterday's tools. We need to harness new meteorology, new social science on risk communication and emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and robotics for every aspect of emergency management. We must maintain focus on people and relationships. On a dangerous planet, emergency management demands a professional workforce and close collaboration across that workforce – spanning first responders, emergency managers, weather forecasters, hospitals and more. The essential innovation will draw from scientists and engineers of every discipline. The coordination must extend across all levels of government, federal, state and local. It must span both the public and private sectors. But every bit of this coordination depends utterly on a rich, vibrant web of personal relationships. What's more, the larger public is no mere bystander. Each of us bears personal responsibility for our safety and for that of our families. Our children will be the ones to prevent future disasters Finally, we must equip our kids. This for two reasons: first, if it's going to take decades to implement changes needed in our culture and ways of doing business, then most of that workforce will be today's school children (extending even to the as-yet unborn). Accordingly, K-12 public education should place greater emphasis on the causes and working of natural hazards and on concepts of emergency management. This may seem a minor detail in the scheme of what today's kids have to learn on their road to adulthood. But the benefits transcend public safety. Hazards grab kids' attention and serve as a portal through which they can develop a broader interest in science and engineering. They help acquaint young people with the connections linking natural science – food, water and energy resources – and civics. Second, our kids may face circumstances where they find themselves on their own. We must empower them. News accounts credit youth camp counselors along the Guadalupe River with moving kids to safety without benefit of adult instruction. The Declaration of Independence closes in this vein: 'And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.' Let's live this out. Let's get real about what it takes to maintain life, to live free, and to pursue happiness on a generous but sometimes dangerous planet. William Hooke is a former executive direction of the American Meteorological Society and also served as National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration deputy chief scientist and senior scientist to the U.S. Secretary of Commerce. He chaired the White House interagency Subcommittee for Natural Disaster Reduction and was a member of the United Nations International Council for Science planning group on natural and human-induced environmental hazards and disasters. He authored "Living on the Real World: How thinking and acting like meteorologists will help save the planet," and has blogged since 2010 at Living on the Real World.
Washington Post
21 hours ago
- Washington Post
Trump: European countries to buy U.S. weapons for Ukraine
We and our third-party partners process personal data including through the use of cookies, pixels, and other tracking technologies to provide, analyze, and improve our services; personalize your experience (including content); and personalize ads on and off the services. Learn more and manage your preferences at our Privacy Policy
