logo
Year after exodus, silence fills Panama island threatened by sea

Year after exodus, silence fills Panama island threatened by sea

RTÉ News​03-06-2025
Streets once filled with children's laughter have fallen silent on a Panamanian island where almost all residents left a year ago due to the threat of the sea swallowing their homes.
The evacuation of around 1,200 members of the Indigenous Guna community to a new life on the mainland was one of the first planned migrations in Latin America due to climate change.
The exodus from Gardi Sugdub in the Caribbean left those who remained with a sense of sadness, said Delfino Davies, who has a small museum on the island with spears, jars and animal bones.
"There are no friends left or children playing," he said.
Gardi Sugdub now has the silence of a "dead island," he said.
Dusty desks and empty classrooms are all that remain of a school that once bustled with children.
Many of the island's wooden houses are padlocked.
"There's no one here. Sometimes I get sad when I'm here alone," Mayka Tejada, 47, said in the small store where she sells bananas, pumpkins, clothes, toys and notebooks.
Like Davies and about 100 others, she decided to stay.
But her mother and two children, aged 16 and 22, moved to one of the 300 houses built by the Panamanian government in a new neighbourhood called Isber Yala on the mainland, a 15-minute boat ride away.
Gardi Sugdub, the size of around five football fields, is one of 49 inhabited islands in the Guna Yala archipelago - also known as San Blas - which scientists warn is in danger of disappearing by the end of the century.
'I'll die here'
Sitting in a hammock in her earthen-floor house filled with the aroma of medicinal herbs, 62-year-old Luciana Perez said she had no intention of leaving.
"I was born in Gardi and I'll die here. Nothing is sinking. Scientists don't know, only God," she said.
Ms Perez said that she was not afraid because since she was a child she had seen big waves and rising waters flooding houses at times.
Steven Paton, a scientist at the Panama-based Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, said climate change meant that sea levels were expected to rise by up to 80cm.
"Most of the Guna Yala islands are about 50cm above sea level," he said. "They'll be underwater."
Ana Toni, CEO of the United Nations' COP30 climate conference, said that the mass evacuation "shows the reality we already have to face on the planet."
Footpaths, water, electricity
The arrival of the rainy season has left puddles dotting the dirt roads of Gardi Sugdub.
In contrast, in the new settlement of Isber Yala - "land of loquats" in the Guna language - the streets are paved and have footpaths.
The concrete houses have flushing toilets and there is a plot of land to grow vegetables.
On Gardi Sugdub "we lived crowded together, and I had to go fetch water from the river in a small boat," said Magdalena Martinez, a 75-year-old retired teacher.
In Isber Yala, water is available for an hour in the morning, she said.
"I can fill the buckets. And I have electricity 24 hours a day," said Ms Martinez, who lives with her granddaughter in the new neighbourhood.
Ms Tejada's children also have no regrets about leaving the island, she said.
"I miss them, but they're happy there. They have a place to play football and walk around," Ms Tejada said.
While the island's school relocated to Isber Yala, its dilapidated clinic remained in Gardi Sugdub.
"Before, people came on foot. Now, they have to travel by land and sea to get here. There are fewer visitors," said 46-year-old doctor John Smith.
Some of the islanders divide their time between the two communities, while others visit occasionally to check on their homes.
This week, there will be more activity than normal: seven jars of chicha - a fermented corn drink - are ready for Isber Yala's first anniversary.
Ms Martinez is looking forward to the celebration, even though it will be bittersweet.
Although she may not see it herself, "the islands will disappear because the sea will reclaim its territory," she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US special envoy Witkoff visits food distribution centre in Gaza
US special envoy Witkoff visits food distribution centre in Gaza

Irish Examiner

timea day ago

  • Irish Examiner

US special envoy Witkoff visits food distribution centre in Gaza

US President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy has visited a food distribution site in the Gaza Strip operated by an Israeli-backed American contractor whose efforts to deliver food to the hunger-stricken territory have been marred by violence and controversy. International experts warned this week that a 'worst-case scenario of famine' is playing out in Gaza. Israel's near 22-month military offensive against Hamas has shattered security in the territory of some 2.0 million Palestinians and made it nearly impossible to safely deliver food to starving people. Envoy Steve Witkoff and the US Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, toured a Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) distribution site in Rafah, Gaza's southernmost city, which has been almost completely destroyed and is now a largely depopulated Israeli military zone. Steve Witkoff, centre, and Mike Huckabee, centre left, visiting a food distribution site in Gaza City (David Azaguri/US Embassy Jerusalem via AP) Hundreds of people have been killed by Israeli fire while heading to such aid sites since May, according to witnesses, health officials and the UN human rights office. Israel and GHF say they have only fired warning shots and that the toll has been exaggerated. In a report issued on Friday, the New York-based Human Rights Watch said GHF was at the heart of a 'flawed, militarised aid distribution system that has turned aid distributions into regular bloodbaths.' Mr Witkoff posted on X that he had spent more than five hours inside Gaza in order to gain 'a clear understanding of the humanitarian situation and help craft a plan to deliver food and medical aid to the people of Gaza'. Humanitarian aid is airdropped to Palestinians over Khan Younis, in the Gaza Strip (Abdel Kareem Hana/AP) Chapin Fay, a spokesperson for GHF, said the visit reflected Mr Trump's understanding of the stakes and that 'feeding civilians, not Hamas, must be the priority'. The group said it has delivered over 100 million meals since it began operations in May. All four of the group's sites established in May are in zones controlled by the Israeli military and have become flashpoints of desperation, with starving people scrambling for scarce aid. More 1,000 people have been killed by Israeli fire since May while seeking aid in the territory, most near the GHF sites but also near United Nations aid convoys, the UN human rights office said last month. The Israeli military says it has only fired warning shots at people who approach its forces, and GHF says its armed contractors have only used pepper spray or fired warning shots to prevent deadly crowding. Officials at Nasser Hospital in southern Gaza said on Friday they received the bodies of 13 people who were killed while trying to get aid, including near the site that US officials visited. GHF denied anyone was killed at their sites on Friday and said most recent shootings had occurred near UN aid convoys. Mr Witkoff's visit comes a week after US officials walked away from ceasefire talks in Qatar, blaming Hamas and pledging to seek other ways to rescue Israeli hostages and make Gaza safe. Mr Trump wrote on social media that the fastest way to end the crisis would be for Hamas to surrender and release hostages. The war was triggered when Hamas-led militants killed about 1,200 people, mostly civilians, on October 7 2023 and abducted 251 others. They still hold 50 hostages, including about 20 believed to be alive. Most of the others have been released in ceasefires or other deals. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry. Its count does not distinguish between militants and civilians. The ministry operates under the Hamas government. The UN and other international organisations see it as the most reliable source of data on casualties.

Caribbean LGBTQ+ activists celebrate as court strikes down colonial-era laws
Caribbean LGBTQ+ activists celebrate as court strikes down colonial-era laws

Irish Examiner

timea day ago

  • Irish Examiner

Caribbean LGBTQ+ activists celebrate as court strikes down colonial-era laws

Activists have hailed a historic judgment striking down colonial-era laws that criminalised gay sex in St Lucia as a step forward for LGBTQ+ rights in the Caribbean country. This week the Eastern Caribbean supreme court found that the island's so-called buggery and gross indecency laws, which criminalised consensual anal sex, were unconstitutional. In a joint statement to the Guardian, a group of activists who were the claimants in the case described the judgment as 'deeply personal' but added that there was 'still work to be done'. We know not everyone will agree with the ruling – and that's OK. We're not asking anyone to change their beliefs. What we are asking for is fairness. "These laws were outdated and violated the basic human rights of LGBTQ+ people. Striking them down is just the beginning of creating a safer, more inclusive Saint Lucia for all of us,' the statement said. Speaking to reporters at a press conference after the judgment, attorney Veronica Cenac, who worked on the case, said it was important to remember the origin of the laws. 'Many persons believe that [they are] a part of our cultural identity and that those persons who are asking for their repeal are promoting a western, global north agenda – which is clearly not the case considering that these laws were imposed on us during colonial times,' she said. In St Lucia, the law penalised gay sex with up to 10 years in prison. While the government did not enforce the law, activists and legal experts say it remained a threat to the island's LGBTQ+ community. 'The mere existence of this provision is itself a violation of human rights and underpins further acts of discrimination,' according to Human Dignity Trust, a UK-based legal organisation that helped work on the case. In 2019, the Eastern Caribbean Alliance for Diversity and Equality began filing legal challenges against such laws in Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Grenada, St Kitts and Nevis, and St Lucia. In 2022, courts in Barbados, Antigua and Barbuda, and St Kitts and Nevis struck down those laws. Last year, a court in Dominica did the same. Describing how hearing the monumental judgment left them 'breathless', Kenita Placide, the Alliance's executive director, said: 'It is not often that we, as activists, get to see the results of our hard work.' But, they warned that, while the outcome was a 'stride in the right direction', LGBTQ+ people in St Lucia needed to remain on guard. Several gay men have been brutally murdered in the country over the years, and Placide warned that the judgment did not mean 'that all of a sudden we can do the gay parade without thinking about safety'. 'Right now, there's a little bit of a tension in country. Because almost every two males that walk around are being watched with some kind of scrutiny that they may be engaging. And people are ready to put up phones like they need to be the first to capture,' Placide said. Changing the law was 'half the battle',Placide said, adding that the other half was 'changing hearts and minds where we can actually coexist in the community without being killed' because of sexual orientation. Téa Braun, the chief executive of the Human Dignity Trust, said: 'This is a significant victory for the Caribbean's LGBT community and now leaves just five remaining jurisdictions in the western hemisphere that continue to criminalise consensual same-sex intimacy.' The judgment, Cenac said, could have 'persuasive value' in the remaining countries: Jamaica, Grenada, Guyana, St Vincent and the Grenadines, and Trinidad and Tobago. Earlier this year, the Trinidad and Tobago supreme court overturned a 2018 high court judgment to remove its 'buggery' laws. Campaigners have expressed concern about the country's case, which will go before the privy council in London, the final court of appeal for UK overseas territories and some Commonwealth countries. One of the issues, they say, is a 'savings clause', a legal technicality created to protect colonial laws. Trinidad and Tobago-based Sharon Mottley, regional programme manager for the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, and Intersex Association of North America and the Caribbean, said the ruling brought 'renewed hope and momentum' to the region. 'Here in Trinidad and Tobago, in spite of the reversal this year, the gay community came out in their numbers and we held our Pride Parade on July 20th through the streets of Port of Spain and it was really to send a powerful message that we're here and we're not going anywhere. We refuse to be criminalised and our visibilities, our pride, our resistance and our demand for full recognition will continue,' Mottley said. - The Guardian

Hen harrier halts plans for controversial Clare wind farm
Hen harrier halts plans for controversial Clare wind farm

Agriland

time2 days ago

  • Agriland

Hen harrier halts plans for controversial Clare wind farm

By Gordon Deegan The hen harrier has helped put paid to contentious plans for a three-turbine wind farm reaching almost 500ft in height 1km south of the west Clare village of Moyasta located on the Wild Atlantic Way. Over 200 objections were lodged against the plan by Adare-based renewable energy firm, Greensource for the 492ft high turbines on lands across a number of town lands at Moanmore Lower, Moanmore South, Tullabrack, Tullabrack East and Gower South, Kilrush. Greensource subsidiary, Moanmore Lower Green Energy Ltd., had entered legal agreement with five local landowners as part of its wind farm plan. A planning statement lodged with the application stated that the proposed development 'contributes to supplying the national demand for renewable energy, which in the context of the ongoing climate emergency is an urgent Irish national priority'. However, those to express concerns over the proposal included government Clare TDs - Cathal Crowe (FF) and Joe Cooney (FG). In an objection, Deputy Crowe told Clare County Council that he wishes to strongly object to the wind farm. He said his objection was based on a number of concerns such as claimed devaluation of property/properties in the area; the size of the wind turbines; the proximity from houses; potential excessive noise pollution, shadow flickering, negative impact on tourism and too many wind farms in the area and west Clare already. Deputy Joe Cooney told the council that he had 'significant concerns' over the scheme stating that the turbines would be so prominent as to have a very negative impact on the open coastal and rural landscape. Members of Clare County Council to object included Cllrs. Ian Lynch (Ind), Rita McInerney (FF) and Michael Shannon (FF). The chair of Moyasta National School, Caroline Bradley also objected on behalf of the school's Board of Management. She stated that 'we are concerned for the health and safety of our school community as we are located only 600m from the proposed development'. Now, the council has refused planning permission on four separate grounds after a 65-page planner's report into the case. In its decision, the council refused planning permission having regard to: the site's close proximity to known breeding pairs of hen harrier; the potential habitat disturbance arising from the proposed development; the declining population of this bird species in the area; and the limited long-term post-consent hen harrier monitoring data information available with regard to existing wind farms in the area. The council stated that on the basis of the available information, it cannot be concluded that the proposed development would not result in no significant environmental effects with specific reference to the hen harrier. The local authority also refused planning permission having regard to the scale and height of the proposed turbines, the location of the site in the open landscape and the existing wind farms in the vicinity of the site. As a result, the council found that the proposed development would seriously injure the amenities of residential properties in the vicinity due to noise and disturbance. It concluded that the proposed turbines would be visually overbearing on existing properties and therefore depreciate the value of property in the vicinity. The council also refused planning permission to the scheme on the basis that it would give rise to an ad hoc and piecemeal proliferation of wind turbines at this location, which would negatively alter the character of this rural landscape. The planning authority also stated that on the basis of the information submitted with the application, the council considers that the proposed development would constitute an unacceptable risk of pollution of watercourses in the area.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store