EU state calls out ‘double standards' on Russia and Israel
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has accused the EU of double standards, noting that the bloc imposed multiple rounds of sanctions on Russia over the conflict in Ukraine but has failed to take similar action against Israel for its war in Gaza.
Speaking to reporters on Thursday, Sanchez said he would propose suspending the EU's trade agreement with Israel, whose Article 2 designates human rights as an 'essential element' of the pact.
He noted that UN reports are sounding the alarm over the 'catastrophic situation' in Gaza, where more than 56,000 Palestinians have been killed since October 2023.
'It makes absolutely no sense that we've imposed 18 rounds of sanctions on Russia for its aggression against Ukraine, while the EU, in a double standard, has been unable to suspend the association agreement with Israel, even as it flagrantly violates Article 2 on human rights,' Sanchez said.
The Israeli Embassy in Madrid condemned Sanchez's remarks as 'morally indefensible' and accused him of 'launching an anti-Israel crusade.'
'Israel, a democratic country facing existential threats on multiple fronts, has both the right and the duty to defend its citizens,' the embassy said in a statement on X.
In response, the Spanish Foreign Ministry summoned the Israeli envoy over the embassy's 'unacceptable' comments.
Israel launched its operation in Gaza following the surprise attack on October 7, 2023, during which Hamas and allied Palestinian groups killed around 1,200 people and took more than 200 hostages. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) resumed their offensive in the Palestinian enclave after a ceasefire collapsed in March.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
9 hours ago
- Russia Today
When opportunity turns to uncertainty: Indian migrants under fire in Israel
When sirens wailed across Israeli cities and missiles from Iran struck Israeli territory, about 150 Indian construction workers from the Bahraich district in the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh found themselves caught in an increasingly dangerous situation, desperately seeking a way home. The workers, who traveled to Israel over the past year seeking better economic opportunities, faced a harsh reality: trapped between the promise of steady income and the very real threat of becoming casualties in a regional conflict. Sandeep, a resident of the Mihipurwa area, spoke to his family on the phone from Hadera, painting a grim picture of daily life under fire. 'Missiles are falling here, but we get alerts before they hit,' he explained to worried relatives back home. 'When the sirens start, we run to the bunkers and hide. These daily situations are affecting our work, and now we just want to come home.' The situation created a painful dilemma for the workers and their families. While the income from Israel has provided unprecedented financial stability – with workers earning around 160,000 rupees (about $1863) per month, compared to much lower wages in rural India – the escalating violence made the cost of this prosperity potentially too high to bear. Kamlavati, whose husband Gopal has been working in Israel for a year, captured the anguish felt by families back home. 'My husband has been working safely in Israel for a year, and in this situation, we demand from the government that he be sent back home safely,' she said. 'Because now, seeing the conditions in Israel, we are getting scared.' The irony of their situation is not lost on the families. Kamlavati described how the money from Israel has transformed their lives – they've been able to build a new home and provide better opportunities for their children. Her daughter has started attending school, while her younger son is still very small. But the fear for her husband's safety has overshadowed these material gains. 'We are getting money – he gets 160,000 rupees and keeps sending money home regularly, which helps run the household,' she explained. 'But now, seeing the new house being built doesn't feel good. We just want the children's father to come back.' The workers are part of a larger Indian diaspora in Israel. According to Indian Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh, as of December 4, 2024, 6,583 Indian workers had reached Israel for employment, recruited by Israeli authorities and deployed across 195 Israeli companies. Of these workers, 2,325 were engaged in building construction, 1,906 in iron bending, 1,578 in plastering, and 774 in ceramic tiling – all essential skills for Israel's construction industry. Mihipurwa has been particularly affected by this migration. Local official Shravan Kumar Madeshia revealed that 250 people from the area had filled out application forms for work in Israel, with 150 being selected and currently working there. This represents a significant portion of the area's working-age population, making tensions in West Asia a community-wide concern. The families of brothers Sandeep and Sanjay exemplify the collective anxiety gripping the region. 'Both brothers have been living in Israel for a year, but now seeing the terrible war between Iran and Israel, we want our sons to return home safely,' their relatives said. The conflict escalated dramatically before the countries agreed to a ceasefire on Tuesday. Recent Iranian missile attacks hit residential areas in Tel Aviv, bringing the war directly to neighborhoods where many of the Indian workers live and work. The tense environment presents a stark contrast to the hopes these workers had when they first arrived in Israel. For many from rural Uttar Pradesh, the opportunity to work in Israel represented a chance to escape poverty and provide for their families in ways that would have been impossible at home. The monthly salary is several times what they could earn in similar work in India. However, the reality of living in a war zone has quickly overshadowed these economic benefits. The workers described a daily routine of constant vigilance – working while listening for air raid sirens, knowing that at any moment they might need to run for shelter. The psychological toll of this existence is evident in their desperate pleas to return home. The absence of available flights made their situation even more precarious. Commercial aviation has been severely disrupted due to the conflict, with many airlines suspending or limiting services to and from Israel. This has left the workers with no clear path home, despite their growing desperation to leave. The Indian government faces a delicate diplomatic challenge in the Middle East. India maintains strong relationships with both Israel and Iran, and has refused to join international condemnations of Israeli actions. New Delhi is accustomed to balancing ties with rival states during crises, but the most recent presented a particularly difficult test. For the families in Bahraich, the geopolitical complexities matter little compared to their immediate concern: bringing their loved ones home safely. The transformation of their economic fortunes has come at an unexpected cost – the constant fear that their primary breadwinners might become casualties in a conflict that has nothing to do with them. With hundreds of people requiring hospital treatment, the Indian workers found themselves in an increasingly untenable position. They were neither combatants nor civilians in the traditional sense, but economic migrants caught in the crossfire of a regional conflict. During the recent crisis, when families in rural India waited anxiously for news from their loved ones, and workers huddled themselves in bunkers to the sound of sirens, one could not help but be reminded that in our interconnected world, no conflict is truly local, and its human toll extends far beyond the immediate theater of war.
Russia Today
13 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump suspends possible Iran sanctions relief
US President Donald Trump has announced having halted plans to potentially ease sanctions on Iran, criticizing the Islamic Republic's leadership for claiming victory in its recent standoff with Israel. Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Thursday declared that Iran had triumphed over Israel and the US following 12 days of direct military hostilities. The confrontation began when Israel killed senior Iranian commanders and targeted its nuclear sites. The exchange of long-range strikes culminated in the US intervening with the use of bunker-busting bombs on Iran's fortified Fordow facility and two other locations. In a post on Truth Social on Friday, Trump – who had backed Israel's campaign – accused Khamenei of 'blatantly and foolishly' declaring victory, calling the statement 'a lie' and insisting it was 'not so.' He said he had been working in recent days on the possible removal of 'biting' US sanctions but reversed course after hearing Khamenei's remarks. 'Instead, I get hit with a statement of anger, hatred, and disgust, and immediately dropped all work on sanction relief, and more,' he wrote. Trump, who had earlier claimed that Khamenei would be 'an easy target,' insisted he knew the supreme leader's exact location during the war but refused to authorize a strike. 'I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH, and he does not have to say, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!' he wrote. He added that he had personally intervened to block a major Israeli airstrike that would have killed 'many Iranians,' describing it as 'the biggest attack of the War, by far.' Khamenei had earlier claimed that Iran's retaliatory strikes left Israel 'practically knocked out and crushed,' forcing the US to step in to defend its ally. Israel launched a series of airstrikes on June 13 targeting Iranian military and nuclear sites, as well as senior commanders and nuclear scientists, in what it described as a mission to prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Iran denies pursuing nuclear weapons, maintaining its nuclear activities are peaceful. It has repeatedly criticized the US sanctions as illegal and unjustified. The Trump administration moved to restrict Iran's oil trade as part of its 'maximum pressure' campaign reimposed after Washington's withdrawal in 2018 from the 2015 nuclear deal. Last month, Trump warned that countries buying Iranian oil or petrochemicals would face secondary sanctions. Moscow denounced the US and Israeli airstrikes on Iran as 'illegitimate' and a violation of international law. Commenting on the ceasefire announced by Trump on Tuesday, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov stated that it 'can and should be welcomed.' Moscow hopes it 'proves to be sustainable,' he added.
Russia Today
20 hours ago
- Russia Today
US divided on fate of Iran's enriched uranium after strikes
US intelligence officials are divided over the fate of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile following recent US and Israeli airstrikes on key nuclear facilities, the New York Times reported on Thursday. The hostilities began on June 13 when Israel launched strikes on Iran, claiming Tehran was close to developing a nuclear bomb – which has been denied by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and US intelligence. The US joined the campaign on June 22, striking several nuclear facilities. A ceasefire brokered by Washington came into effect on Tuesday and has so far been upheld. US President Donald Trump has said the strikes 'completely and totally obliterated' Iran's nuclear infrastructure. However, US intelligence assessments and international watchdogs reportedly suggest that while the facilities were damaged, Iran's capability to resume its nuclear program remains. US officials said intelligence assessments on the status of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile are inconsistent, with differing views among Iranian officials contributing to the uncertainty, according to the outlet. Parts of the Natanz nuclear facility, where some of the uranium was believed to be stored, were damaged but not destroyed in the US and Israeli airstrikes, the report said, citing US officials. Due to limited access and conflicting assessments, the US intelligence community has not reached a firm conclusion about how much of the material Iran has retained, people familiar with the findings told the NYT. Following a classified Senate briefing on Thursday, several Republican lawmakers stressed that destroying or seizing the stockpile was not an objective of the strikes. 'I didn't want people to think the problem is over, because it's not,' Republican Senator Lindsey Graham told reporters, noting that the nuclear sites were significantly damaged. There is also uncertainty over the original location of Iran's uranium stockpile. Trump said it was at Fordow, while others pointed to Natanz. The IAEA reported that most of it was stored at Isfahan, where Iran operates reactors and nuclear facilities. Some experts believe the stockpile was dispersed across multiple sites. IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi said Iranian officials told inspectors they would relocate the material if it was threatened. The uranium was stored in containers small enough to fit 'into the trunk of an ordinary car,' he added. In the days leading up to the US missile strike on Isfahan, surveillance reportedly shows vehicles moving items into or out of the labs. Grossi said this week he believes much of the uranium remains in Iran's hands. 'I don't know if they moved all of it,' he said. 'But the evidence points to their moving out a lot of it.'
