PKK disarmament was ‘very emotional,' says DEM Party MP
PUK leader Talabani says PKK disarmament is 'historic step'
PUK leader Talabani says PKK disarmament is 'historic step'
'New era' for Kurdish politics as PKK disarms, says veteran politician
President Barzani hails PKK disarmament as 'new phase' for peace
A+ A-
ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - A member of Turkey's pro-Kurdish party said the ceremonial disarmament of 30 Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) fighters in Sulaimani province on Friday was a 'very emotional' event.
'It was a very important ceremony, a very emotional one. We experienced a truly significant day. We witnessed a significant historical moment together,' Sezai Temelli told Rudaw.
Temelli is a member of the Peoples' Equality and Democracy Party (DEM) and former co-chair of the Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP).
In front of the historic Jasana Cave, 30 PKK fighters, half of them women, placed their weapons in a large cauldron where they were burned in a symbolic disarmament ceremony as part of ongoing negotiations with Ankara to end the four-decade-long conflict.
Temelli said it was 'a very important day for Kurdish peace in the future,' and sends a message to the whole world about the 'permanence of peace in both Turkey and the Middle East, and for ensuring peace in the region.'
'I hope this step will strengthen the hopes of all the Kurdish people, all the Kurdish people in the four parts of Kurdistan, and the peoples of the region, meet their expectations, and lead to very positive developments in the future,' he added.
The PKK was founded in 1978 with the demand for an independent Kurdish state. Over the years, it shifted its focus toward securing greater cultural and political rights for Kurds in Turkey. More than 40,000 people have been killed throughout four decades of conflict.
In a video message released Wednesday, PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan, who earlier this year had called on his group to lay down arms and disband, called for the formation of a parliamentary commission to guide the peace process.
Temelli echoed that call for political steps.
'With Turkey's democratization, the Kurdish issue will inevitably be resolved,' he said. 'Therefore, the first step should be the establishment of a parliamentary commission.'
'Through these efforts, it will ensure legal safeguards that pave the way for legal amendments and constitutional amendments that stand in the way of democratic politics, and will ensure steps towards integration are taken,' he explained.
Temelli said there is not much time, because parliament will soon begin its summer recess. 'Now, the duty of the Turkish parliament, the duty of Turkish politics, is to take the steps to implement this. Parliament will be closed within the next two weeks. Establishing this commission before the parliament closes is crucial.'
Temelli said that the commission's work and the preparation of draft legislation must remain a priority, even without a clear timetable for the PKK's full disarmament.
'The faster and more groundbreaking the developments in politics and the law, the more the rest of the timetable will follow,' he said.
Turkish government officials have demanded a full disarmament of the PKK and its affiliates.
Temelli's party, the DEM Party, also welcomed the PKK's disarmament ceremony.
In a joint statement, co-chairs Tulay Hatimogullari and Tuncer Bakirhan described the ceremony as 'a call to a democratic, fair, equal, and free life,' and said that the decision to lay down arms signaled not only the potential resolution of the Kurdish issue but also the broader democratization of Turkey. 'This ceremony has strengthened the hope of our peoples for the future,' the statement read.
'The people will be the winners. The winners will be equality, democracy, and peace,' the co-chairs stated, adding that 'now is the time to grow the struggle for democratic politics.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
37 minutes ago
- Shafaq News
Iraq's PMF Law: A battle for state control
Shafaq News As Iraq's parliamentary term draws to a close, a controversial draft law to restructure the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) has reignited a complex political battle that reaches far beyond its military implications. While the Shiite-led Coordination Framework seeks to secure formal legal status for the PMF within the national defense architecture, internal divisions, Kurdish-Sunni bargaining, and mounting US opposition have turned the bill into a flashpoint at the heart of Iraq's statehood debate. The Political Stakes Behind the PMF Law The proposed PMF Authority Law, backed by major Shiite factions, is officially framed as part of Iraq's ongoing security reform. It aims to integrate the PMF—a force originally formed to fight ISIS—into the military chain of command. Supporters argue the law is necessary to standardize ranks, regulate funding, and clarify the PMF's relationship with state institutions. But opponents—both foreign and domestic—view it as an attempt to legitimize powerful Iran-aligned factions and institutionalize a parallel command structure, insulated from civilian oversight. The controversy reflects deeper struggles over the nature of the Iraqi state: whether it will consolidate authority through a unified military, or evolve toward a pluralistic security system shaped by competing political and paramilitary actors. Legal Background and Structural Gaps The PMF was formed in mid-2014 by government order in response to Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani's fatwa (al-jihad al-kafa'i) after the fall of Mosul. It drew tens of thousands of fighters, including from pre-existing armed factions. In 2016, Iraq's parliament passed the first PMF law, formally recognizing the force—but leaving its command structure and internal regulation vague. The current draft law, which has faced repeated delays, seeks to address those gaps. According to parliamentary sources, the amendments propose: -Military ranking and formal structures. -Defined administrative ties to the Ministries of Defense and Finance. -An internal inspectorate for discipline and oversight. -Military background requirements for PMF leadership. -Formation of internal military councils. -Unique financial entitlements for specific units. Yet critics argue that the draft preserves the PMF's administrative independence while cementing legal protections for its leadership—effectively creating a parallel army. Fragmented Support Within Iraq's Parliament While Coordination Framework blocs hold significant parliamentary sway—especially after the 2022 resignation of Sadrist MPs—consensus on the PMF law remains elusive. Internal rifts, even among Shiite factions, center on leadership appointments and control over PMF deployments in Sunni-majority areas. Kurdish and Sunni lawmakers, while less vocal in public, have played a pivotal behind-the-scenes role in blocking the bill. During the July session, both blocs withdrew in protest over the bill's inclusion on the parliamentary agenda. Their objections were procedural and political: citing Article 37 of the parliamentary rules, they argued the bill was added without proper notice, while also using the walkout to apply pressure on broader negotiations. Some Kurdish factions, according to Shafaq News political sources, have linked their support for the PMF law to concessions on unresolved federal-regional disputes, including budget allocations, oil revenues, and control of border crossings. Messages were reportedly sent through intermediaries outlining these conditions for cooperation on 'controversial legislation.' Sunni parties are also split. Most are in favor of not passing the bill most notably former Speaker Mohammed al-Halbousi's Taqaddum coalition (37 seats), which has voiced reservations tied to influence distribution and executive authority. Observers note that both Kurdish and Sunni leaders fear the law may consolidate what they see as a 'Shiite army' with disproportionate influence—yet are equally motivated by the opportunity to extract political gains in return for their votes. With Kurdish and Sunni MPs holding over 120 of 329 seats, their coordinated opposition could block passage, despite the Coordination Framework's control of at least 130 seats. The ambiguous positions of independents and small parties further complicate the math, making consensus difficult. US Pressure and Strategic Alarm The United States has expressed firm and repeated opposition to the PMF law. Pentagon officials told Shafaq News they view the draft as a direct enhancement of Iran's influence in Iraq. The US Embassy in Baghdad echoed this stance, with Chargé d'Affaires Steven Fagin warning that the legislation risks legitimizing groups the US classifies as terrorist organizations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, in a call with Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, warned that the law would institutionalize Iranian-backed armed groups and undermine Iraqi sovereignty. This message was reiterated in a State Department statement, which called the law 'deeply concerning.' A report by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy argued that the US would respond by sanctioning PMF leaders with ties to Iran, freezing components of the US-Iraq security partnership, or conditioning military aid on security-sector reforms. Despite the US warnings, the Iraqi government has stood by its position. A statement from al-Sudani's office described the bill as a sovereign initiative consistent with previous legislation for other agencies, such as the Intelligence and National Security Services. The PMF, it stated, is a 'formal military institution operating under the Commander-in-Chief.' Independent Voices, Strategic Fears Former Iraqi diplomat Dr. Ghazi Faisal told Shafaq News that the PMF law is evolving from a regulatory tool into a 'ticking political bomb.' He cautioned that enshrining the PMF's autonomy would fracture the military command hierarchy and facilitate dual loyalties within Iraq's security system. Faisal warned that unless national consensus is reached, the law could trigger a serious confrontation with Washington and contribute to the erosion of centralized authority. 'We risk institutionalizing a force whose chain of command is not fully loyal to the state.' Efforts by Shafaq News to solicit formal comments from major Kurdish and Sunni parties were met with silence. Spokespersons declined to give on-record positions, noting only that 'all matters will be resolved legally within parliament through dialogue.' Government in the Crossfire Political analysts interviewed by Shafaq News say Prime Minister al-Sudani is walking a tightrope. On one hand, his administration is beholden to the Coordination Framework's legislative agenda. On the other, it seeks to avoid antagonizing Washington at a time when Iraq remains economically fragile and engaged in sensitive IMF and financial negotiations. Strategic expert Ahmed al-Yasiri noted that the US views the PMF law as part of a larger regional contest for influence. The fear is that codifying PMF independence will entrench a legislative precedent that future governments cannot undo. Between Passage and Paralysis Shafaq News has learned from informed sources that US diplomatic efforts to halt the law remain active. While the draft may still be revived in a future session, its fate now depends on a complex equation: intra-Shiite cohesion, Kurdish and Sunni leverage, and the extent to which foreign pressure can shape Iraq's legislative agenda. Ultimately, the PMF law has become a symbol of Iraq's unresolved struggle between the logic of a unified state and the reality of competing armed power centers.
Rudaw Net
2 hours ago
- Rudaw Net
Baghdad says ready to receive any amount of oil from KRG
Also in ECONOMY KRG registers over 800k employees for digital financial initiative Erbil hands over oil to Baghdad, receives budget share Baghdad to resume payment of KRG salaries Tuesday: Deputy PM Iraq approves deal to resolve financial, oil disputes with KRG A+ A- ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - The head of the Iraqi Oil Marketing Company (SOMO) said on Monday the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) has yet to hand over its oil to the federal company, adding that they are ready to receive any amount. Erbil recently agreed to hand over all oil produced in the Region to Baghdad in return for its share of the federal budget. Ali Nizar Faiq, General Director of SOMO, told the state-run Iraqi News Agency (INA) late Monday that the KRG has not delivered any amount of oil to the company. A recent agreement between Erbil and Baghdad obliges the Kurdish government to export all of the oil produced from its fields - estimated at 230,000 barrels per day - through SOMO while retaining 50,000 barrels per day for local consumption. SOMO 'has completed all contractual procedures for exporting oil through the Turkish port of Ceyhan, and is ready to receive any quantities delivered from the Region,' the head of the company said. The KRG said in a statement last week that it is ready to export all its oil through SOMO, reiterating its adherence to 'mutual understanding between both sides.' Following the agreement, the Iraqi government disbursed May salaries for the KRG's civil servants after nearly three months of delay. The fate of the remaining unpaid salaries remains unclear as Baghdad has conditioned any future payments on the resumption of Kurdish oil exports. Oil exports from the Kurdistan Region through the Iraq-Turkey pipeline have been halted since March 2023 when a Paris-based arbitration court ruled in favor of Baghdad against Ankara, saying the latter had violated a 1973 pipeline agreement by allowing Erbil to begin exporting oil independently in 2014. A final agreement between the KRG, the Iraqi government, and international oil companies operating in the Kurdistan Region on the future of Kurdish oil exports has not yet been reached.
Rudaw Net
3 hours ago
- Rudaw Net
Hezbollah censures Iraqi PM over deadly Baghdad clashes
A+ A- ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - The powerful pro-Iranian group Kataib Hezbollah on Monday criticized Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia' al-Sudani for his response to a recent deadly attack on a branch of the agriculture ministry in Baghdad, accusing him of incompetence. The United States has blamed the group for the incident. Armed men affiliated with the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF, or Hashd al-Shaabi) attacked an agriculture ministry office in Baghdad's Karkh district late last month leaving three people dead - a policeman, a civilian, and a member of Kataib Hezbollah. Baghdad confirmed that the perpetrators of the attack were PMF members. Abu Ali al-Askari, the head of Kataib Hezbollah Security Bureau, said in a statement on Monday that the Baghdad incident was a 'trap whose treads were tightened by the hand of one of the Shiite traitors,' without naming anyone. He claimed that "corrupt security leaders are working to serve the American and Israeli project represented in chaos and division' and accused Sudani of lacking military experience and the characteristics of a good leader. Askari also called on the ruling coalition to replace Sudani with a "qualified" individual. A day after the attack, the US embassy in Baghdad blamed Hezbollah for the incident and called on the Iraqi authorities to hold the faction responsible. Washington holds Kataib Hezbollah, a key player in the Iran-led "Axis of Resistance," responsible for numerous attacks on US assets in the region since the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas conflict in October 2023. Sudani has vowed to hold the perpetrators accountable and ordered a probe into the attack. The pro-Tehran group has denied involvement in the attack. Iraq's Shiite-led Coordination Framework also condemned the attack as a 'violation of the law and state procedures.'
