Nothing Phone (3) vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus: Which one is better?
So... which one should you go for? Both phones come with big screens and big batteries, but the Galaxy is notably thinner and lighter, while packing a more powerful processor. The Nothing Phone has its quirky design and an all-new camera. Let's see who wins this battle.
Nothing's latest high-class phone is available at Amazon. Right now, the 16/512GB variant is up for pre-order, with shipping set to begin on July 15. The device boasts a unique design, 6.77-inch AMOLED display, and a Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chip. Pre-order yours now and save $100! Pre-order at Amazon
$600 off (54%) Trade in your old phone to save up to $480 on the exciting Galaxy S25+. Online exclusive colors are available at the official store. The 512GB variant arrives with a $120 discount before trade-ins. Buy at Samsung
Nothing Phone (3) vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus differences explained:
Table of Contents:
Design and Display
Performance and Software
Camera
Battery
Audio
Specs
Conclusion
Both the Nothing Phone (3) and Galaxy S25 Plus are big phones, but once you actually get to hold them, you instantly notice the difference.
The Galaxy is much thinner and weighs less, so it almost feels like carrying a much smaller phone.
The Nothing Phone (3) on the other hand is big, chunky and you can kind of feel that extra heft when you have it in your pocket.
Of course, Nothing beings its quirky self, you know you will see some unique visual elements that make it stand out. The transparent back is something we have come to expect of Nothing, but not these shockingly misaligned cameras. Well, we guess Nothing wanted to stand out and they did, but while we loved the quirky style of previous Nothing phones, we are not enamored with this one.
There is also a tiny dot-matrix display on the rear of the device (the "Glyph Matrix"). You can play spin the bottle on it by long pressing a capacitive button located on the back of the phone. Uhm... okay? Or you can see a timer on the back of your phone for some reason. The most useful of these seems to be a pixelized preview of your camera, but why not just include a slightly bigger regular screen then? The Essential key is also back, after first appearing a few months ago on the Nothing A series phones. Press once to capture your screen, long-press to record voice memos, and double-press to go to the Essential Space where all of that is aggregated. We are not huge fans of the idea, but we do like having one extra physical button on board, and Samsung should take notice. As far as display quality goes, the Galaxy has the upper hand.
As you can see from our in-house lab tests, the Galaxy gets much brighter outdoors hitting nearly 2,400 nits of brightness compared to just 1,500 nits on the Nothing Phone (3) .
The Galaxy also does a better job at night when it can drop to under 1 nit, much easier on the eyes than the 2-nit minimum value of the Nothing.
As for biometrics, the Galaxy has an ultrasonic fingerprint reader compared to an optical one on the Nothing, which can again be a bit annoying at night when it lights up. The one on the Galaxy feels just a bit more responsive, too.
Nothing calls the (3) a flagship phone, but the traditional definition of a flagship usually centers around the latest processor and that is not the case for the Phone (3). It uses the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 instead, a chip comparable to last year's best, but it is definitely slower than the Snapdragon 8 Elite that you can find on the Galaxy S25 Ultra.
In either case, the performance difference can be seen only in intense tasks in gaming, while in daily use both phones feel equally snappy.
There is a big gap between the two phones when it comes to CPU performance, and it's not in Nothing's favor.
Interestingly, the Galaxy beats the Nothing in gaming BUT only for the first few runs. After a few minutes of graphics-heavy gaming, the Galaxy throttles and the performance drop below that of the Nothing Phone. Apparently, the Nothing does a much better job with cooling.We are also happy to see 256GB of fast, UFS 4.0 storage on both phones as the base model. You can also upgrade to a 512GB version, which also comes with more RAM on the Nothing - 16GB of it, while all the Galaxy storage tiers have 12GB RAM.
Both Nothing and Samsung meet the standard for a flagship camera system: three fully functional rear cameras, an ultra-wide, main one and a telephoto one.
There are some slight differences in sensor sizes, with the biggest news being the Phone (3) upgrading to a 1/1.3-inch main camera sensor. A bigger sensor is a trademark of flagships, and actually the S25 Plus has a smaller sensor than the Nothing (the Galaxy uses a 1/1.56-inch main camera sensor).
On our in-house PhoneArena Camera testing protocol, the Galaxy S25 Plus gets a much higher score than the Nothing Phone (3) . A lot of that is due to a much better video recording quality, with big advantages in levels of resolve detail and artifacts on the Samsung phone.
However, when it comes to pure photography prowess, the Nothing holds its ground quite well, with a score very close to that of the S25 Plus.
Against the direct sun, the Galaxy is having a harder time coping with the bright light and the Nothing captures the prettier photo. Indoors, we also prefer the Nothing camera quality. The picture has more contrast and does not look washed out like on the Galaxy.
Zoom quality is comparable across the two phones.
Notice the flaring occurring on this ultra-wide photo, that's a common issue that you have to avoid and the Galaxy does a better job here.
We test both phones in 4K quality and the Galaxy has the upper hand for video recording.
We have seen the Galaxy S25 Plus score quite a few wins, but what about the battery? The Galaxy comes with a 4,900mAh capacity, while the Nothing Phone (3) features an even bigger, 5,150mAh battery.
Still, on our in-house battery tests, the Galaxy manages to get a higher score.
The Phone (3) disappoints with just 14 hours and a half on our browsing test, while the Galaxy finishes the same test with over 19 hours.
Then the roles revers for YouTube video streaming, the Phone (3) scoring an hour and a half more.
But overall, we estimate you can expect around 6 hours and 45 minutes of screen time on the Phone (3) and 7 hours and 36 minutes on the Galaxy.
Then, on the charging front, the Nothing Phone (3) takes the lead with 65W maximum wired charging speed compared to 45W on the Samsung.
In real-life, the difference is not huge, but it's there. A full charge takes an hour on the Nothing and 10 minutes longer on the Galaxy.
Both also support 15W wireless charging, but no magnets.
These two are not the greatest when it comes to loudspeaker quality, but they are not bad either. The Nothing Phone (3) speakers in particular did not wow us. They get quite boomy and have a roomy projection. There is not a lot of thumpy bass, but they don't sound thin either. The mids are pronounced, while the upper midrange is a bit "shouty." Overall, not the best phone for music, just as the Galaxy. Haptics are actually fine on both models, but not remarkable or special. Well, at least you won't miss an incoming call (like you could on the OnePlus 13 with its weaker haptics).
The Nothing Phone (3) is the one with the striking looks, gimmicks like the Glyph Matrix and Essential Key, and it's got a clean and likable user interface.
But the Galaxy S25 Plus clearly offers more, from the faster processor to the more capable camera, especially for video. We also like that you get very good battery life on the Galaxy, with the phone being much lighter and thinner than the Phone (3).
With so many deals on the Galaxy, these two end up in the same price ballpark. There seem to be a few more objective reasons to go Galaxy, but let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Phone Arena
16 minutes ago
- Phone Arena
This is it: the foldable that changes the game in 2025
Samsung's foldable phones have felt like a step behind the best from China the past few years. Whether it was Oppo's refined hinge, Honor's slim design, or Vivo's camera prowess, there was always something that made the competition look sleeker, lighter, or smarter. But with the Galaxy Z Fold 7, that's no longer the case. This is the first time Samsung isn't just responding to rivals — it's actually outpacing first, you might not think the Fold 7 is a drastic change from its predecessors. But if you take a look closer and hold it in your hand, the difference becomes clearer. The new Fold is dramatically thinner, lighter, and more practical, especially when closed. Samsung has achieved something its Chinese competitors have been pushing for years: a book-style foldable that feels just as usable as a regular phone, without compromise. After having held the phone ourselves, the Fold 7 felt like the most refined version of Samsung's vision yet. At just 8.9mm when folded, it matches the best efforts from Oppo and beats Vivo and Honor in sheer compactness. It goes further, though: at 215 grams, it's also the lightest book-style foldable to date, a title confirmed by independent tests, despite Samsung's modest marketing numbers on a spec sheet can sound boring, these tiny reductions in size and weight have a significant impact on everyday usability. Previously, Samsung foldables felt bulky, it was almost like you were carrying two phones stacked together, but not anymore with the Fold 7 .Of course, Samsung didn't achieve this by accident. The Fold 7 is built on a newly redesigned hinge that Samsung has characteristically dubbed the 'Armor FlexHinge.' It's smoother and reportedly stronger, backed by the use of tougher materials like Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 and an upgraded titanium support layer beneath the main display. It's both thinner and more durable, a difficult balance that most other foldables haven't quite nailed. With a wider 6.5-inch screen, the Fold 7 sheds one of the series' most annoying quirks.. | Image credit — PhoneArena One of the Fold series' rarely discussed weaknesses has always been its awkward cover screen. The tall and narrow aspect ratio made it feel more like a remote control than a proper smartphone. Typing was cramped, and basic navigation felt off. That's no longer the case with the Fold 7 . The phone comes with a new 6.5-inch cover screen which now has a 21:9 aspect ratio. That is much closer to a regular phone (those typically have a 20:9 aspect ratio), and it makes helps for more comfortable and natural use. This might be a minor tweak, but it results in a totally different feel: as if you are using a regular phone. Sharper, more detailed, and finally on par with Samsung's best — this is the foldable camera upgrade we've waited for. | Image credit — PhoneArena Samsung also did something bold with the Fold 7 's camera system that might be one of the reasons for its higher price tag. The new foldable finally gets the same 200 MP sensor found on the Galaxy S25 Ultra, complete with 2X lossless zoom. This is a clear statement that the Fold is no longer a niche product, but a full-fledged contrast, previous Fold models had merely good, but not great camera systems. In our early impressions, the Fold 7 's photos are sharper, more detailed, and more versatile than anything we've seen from a Samsung Chinese rivals have made great strides in camera tech, especially Vivo and Huawei. But with this 200MP jump, Samsung is saying loud and clear that it's playing at the top of its game — even on a there's no S Pen support — a compromise that Samsung made to achieve this new design, and one that I think was a step in the right direction. Another worrying matter is that the battery capacity hasn't increased, which could become an issue for power users — Samsung might have incorporated better battery efficiency, but it probably won't be enough to compensate. But at the end of the day, there are more positives than negatives compared to previous generations. AI is also a major part of the Fold 7 story. From smart photography tools like Generative Edit and the new ProVisual Engine to built-in Gemini Live with multimodal integration, the Fold 7 feels like a futuristic, capable machine. In our hands-on, the AI features were fast, helpful, and actually fun to use. And what's maybe even more important is that Samsung is still the only company offering this kind of foldable with robust global support, reliable software updates, and strong trade-in deals. Chinese brands like Honor and Oppo make great foldables — but most aren't available in the U.S. And even in Europe, they often come with slower updates or questionable makes the Galaxy Z Fold 7 so impressive isn't just that it's better than the Fold 6. It's that Samsung finally made the right calls. It dropped what wasn't working out in an effort to make the best foldable on the market, and by the looks of it — it did. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Phone Arena
an hour ago
- Phone Arena
OnePlus just made charging your watch and phone way less messy
OnePlus has recently released its 43mm OnePlus Watch 3 version, rocking powerful internals in a more compact body. Now, the company is somewhat surprising us with a curious new product that just hit the shelves. And nope, it's not a new smartwatch or a phone, but it's something you may need for your smartwatch and phone. And yep, you guessed it right: we're talking about a new charging cable. Usually, a charging cable won't necessarily make the headlines, but this one is a bit different. It's a cable that charges both your phone and your OnePlus Watch at the same time. Gone are the days of cable messiness all over your desk or nightstand! The new cable is red, which is nothing new, and it's also Supervooc-branded for fast charging. It charges your phone via the typical USB-C, but alongside that, it also features a mid-mounted puck with POGO pins for your OnePlus smartwatch. It will charge your OnePlus Watch 2, Watch 2R, or Watch 3. Meanwhile, if you only charge a OnePlus phone, the cable supports up to 80W fast charging. When you charge both your phone and your smartwatch, the phone gets 67W while the smartwatch gets 10W of power. This interesting cable is available right now for purchase from OnePlus for $29.99. Of course, this is just the cable, so you need your own charging brick to use with it. The cable is also equipped with an E-marker smart chip to protect your phone and smartwatch from overload, and is 120 cm long. So there you go! A dual charging cable. Yep, we've seen dual charging stands for wireless charging, but as you know, wireless charging is slower than traditional wired charging, so OnePlus is being creative and innovative here. If I had OnePlus devices, I'd definitely be equipping myself with this cable, but unfortunately, this one doesn't work with iPhones and Apple Watches, and that's what I'm currently rocking, personally. So, I'm left waiting for Apple to offer something similar. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer
Phone Arena
2 hours ago
- Phone Arena
Siri is holding Apple back. A new AI smart assistant is the only way forward
Immediately, soothing tunes start playing, and after a short five-second wait, your iPhone gently utters,You immediately get a booking confirmation email for a gorgeous Airbnb by the lake reserved three weeks from now at an excellent price. Life suddenly feels good. You pat yourself on the back for getting a phone with such a smart assistant. "Done. Do you want me to pack your bag as well?" Suddenly, you wake up. Your phone's screen reads, " Sorry, I didn't quite catch that. Did you mean 'Play Led Zeppelin'?" I think that the onlyway Apple could save Siri is by actually killing it off. It's been, what, more than thirteen years since iPhones have had access to Siri, and it has never felt like Apple has the upper hand in digital assistants. Google has been dominating the field since the early days of Google Now, through the golden age of the Google Assistant, and is now pretty much impossible to catch due to the next-gen Gemini assistant, which combines the forte of a smart assistant with the intelligence chops of an LLM agent. By now, the damage is done: Siri will probably always be known for its poor capabilities, inability to decipher natural-language queries, and overall ineptitude. It's pretty much impossible to bounce back from such a negative image that has been picking up all kinds of slack throughout the years. Apple Intelligence features eventually arrived on the iPhone, it's the glaring omission of the revamped Siri assistant that damaged Apple's prestige the most. The Apple Intelligence rollout disaster in iOS 18 has hurt Siri the most and is certainly the biggest nail in the coffin. We were promised a smarter and more capable Siri, which could potentially alleviate some negativity surrounding the assistant. While all advertisedfeatures eventually arrived on the iPhone, it's the glaring omission of the revamped Siri assistant that damaged Apple's prestige the most. That's probably the reason we basically heard nothing about Siri during the Apple WWDC'25 developer summit when iOS 26 , macOS 26, and iPadOS 26 were announced, and instead we got the proverbial sand in the eyes that was the Liquid Glass redesign Apple's next smart assistant needs a reputation makeover I am convinced that Apple needs to give Siri a major reputation makeover when it eventually fixes Siri, which might happen in 2026, 2027, or beyond. A name change should be the bare minimum here: no matter how much more capable Siri becomes, it will always be just that, "Siri." It's a well-known and established part of Apple's ecosystem, which is generally great for brand recognition, but in this particular case that's actually hurting Apple. For example, Google hasn't been afraid to "move fast and break things," making Gemini the spiritual successor to the Google Assistant, which automatically plays with the psychology of it all and subconsciously convinces you that Gemini is much more powerful and capable (which it objectively is). The only way to fix things is to let Siri die and emerge from the ashes reborn as a new smart assistant. What Apple's next smart assistant should be like The most recent scoop on the matter suggests Apple's next version of Siri will be powered by large-language models, which would help it become that much more conversational and interactive. However, it doesn't seem that Apple is aiming to develop an in-house LLM from the ground up but will instead collaborate with Anthropic or OpenAI. These two companies pull the strings behind Claude and ChatGPT, which are among the more capable and well-known models out there. A few months ago I kept hearing the rumors that Google itself could be viewed as a partner in revamping Siri, but Cupertino is probably weighing its options too carefully so that it won't give its rival too much power. With that in mind, I can imagine a future Apple smart assistant that is more proactive, conversational, and capable of executing complex multi-step app actions (which was already advertised as a future capability of the assistant anyway). As usual with Apple, the focus with this assistant will be the privacy and on-device processing of all data, but for the sake of sparing user resources, we might see some offloading to dedicated Apple servers that will take care of any heavier AI requests. And, of course, all of that goes along with a nice name change, a new interface following the Liquid Glass design language, and a promotional campaign to showcase the much better capabilities of the new assistant in comparison with the Siri of old. I don't know, maybe I'm asking too much. Maybe people are content with an assistant that's best at setting alarms and timers. Maybe nobody wants a futuristic smart assistant that knows you and understands you. One can dream.
