Keir Starmer's war on quangos is doomed to fail unless he is bolder
Over the years the Palace has developed organically, with bits bolted on as and when they have been required: gas pipes, electricity wires, phone lines, TV cables, Wi-Fi and the rest. Many disappear into a wall and emerge no one knows where. Each year the bill for essential maintenance runs into many millions of pounds, but it is all patching-up and bodging. The dangers are evident, especially in a building that replaced one that burned to the ground in 1834, but MPs have been unable to agree on what to do about repairing it.
As a metaphor for the way we are governed it could hardly be bettered. The machinery of Whitehall makes a Heath-Robinson device look positively straightforward. Starry-eyed ministers, buoyed by an election victory, arrive in their departments eager to shine and implement their pet projects only to find that when they pull a lever there is nothing on the other end. The power they thought they possessed had been proxied out to an arm's length, non-departmental body, colloquially known as a quango.
Back in the day their number could be counted on the fingers of one hand. The BBC was one of the first and biggest. But in the 1970s and 1980s they grew like Topsy, hundreds of them often replicating decision-making being undertaken elsewhere.
Political hostility to quangos goes back decades. In 1995 the then shadow chancellor Gordon Brown said: 'The biggest question… is why our constitution is over-centralised, over-secretive and over-bureaucratic and why there is not more openness and accountability. The real alternative is a bonfire of the quangos and greater democracy.'
Labour's 1997 election manifesto attacked the Conservatives for supporting 'unaccountable quangos'. Tony Blair even promised to dump them in the 'dustbin of history'. But by the time Labour left office in 2010 there were still hundreds of them. Perversely, given Brown's strictures, they included one of the most powerful – the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England which assumed control over interest rates from the Chancellor.
The Coalition decided that a 'bonfire of the quangos' was needed and earmarked around 300 advisory bodies, consumer watchdogs and public service organisations for the torch. Out went the Audit Commission, the Animal Welfare Advisory Committee and Cycling England. Others, like the Zoos Forum, the Herbal Medicines Advisory Committee and the Air Quality Expert Group, were replaced by 'committees of experts'. Dozens were merged.
Did it make any difference? Are we better or more cheaply governed? Apparently not because Sir Keir Starmer now wants another conflagration as part of his somewhat nebulous plan to 'rewire the state'. Pat McFadden, who runs the Cabinet Office responsible for Whitehall, has asked every department to justify the existence of quangos within their bailiwick. Those that cannot be sufficiently justified will be closed, merged or have powers brought back into the department.
As a signal of intent, McFadden is drafting legislation that could shut down a swathe of quangos using a single Act of Parliament rather than requiring individual laws to abolish each one. The Government got off to a good start by closing down the mother and father of them all, NHS England. But the big, so far unanswered, question is what is to replace its functions and will it be an improvement or just as wasteful and unresponsive?
Look at what happened when Public Health England was abolished during the pandemic. It was replaced by a new body, the UK Health Security Agency, which has seamlessly adopted the 'nanny state' mantle of its predecessor. We can expect this to expand further, like the nation's waistlines, as Wes Streeting unveils his NHS reforms centred mostly on prevention.
But even as McFadden calls on departments to identify quangos for the chop, the Government is creating more of them, around 20 since July. They include Great British Energy, a Government-owned retail company that seeks to invest in, manage and operate clean energy projects alongside private sector firms.
Then there is the Industrial Strategy Advisory Council and National Infrastructure and Service Transformation Authority. Great British Railways will soon be up and running alongside a Passenger Standards Authority. Then we have Skills England, a Regulatory Innovation Office, a Fair Work Agency, a Border Security Command, a National Centre for Policing and an Independent Football Regulator. There are others, and even more are in the pipeline.
When Sir Keir talks about 'rewiring the state' it is not because he wants it to be smaller or cheaper to run. It is to make it responsive to his desire for 'active government', an old Wilsonian Labour belief in the paternalistic nature of the state. We are not going to be governed less – quite the opposite – just in a different way.
But even then Sir Keir will still have his hands tied. The quangos that have the most power are those that effectively determine core economic policies – the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the Monetary Policy Committee and the Climate Change Committee. In one of its first acts Labour gave the OBR more powers, not fewer, putting the Chancellor in a budgetary straitjacket from which she cannot escape.
If Sir Keir really wants to reform Whitehall and save money then he could do worse than scrap a few departments in their entirety. What is the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology for if there is an array of quangos doing the same job? Why do we need a Department for Culture, Media and Sport which works with 42 agencies and public bodies?
Sir Keir may be determined to 'rewire government' but without a clearer, bolder idea of how to do it he will end up in just as big a tangle as still exists under the Palace of Westminster.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Anti-Trump Protests Hit Scotland Amid Military Lockdown
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A number of anti-Trump protests took place in Scotland on Saturday as the president began a five-day visit centered around visits to his golf courses near Turnberry, in West Ayrshire, and in Aberdeenshire. Meetings with British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen are also planned. Why It Matters President Trump was met with large demonstrations during visits to the U.K. in his first term. He is due to visit Britain again later this year for a state visit during which he will meet King Charles III. What To Know Trump landed at Glasgow's Prestwick airport just before 8:30 p.m. BST on Friday where he was greeted by Ian Murray, Scottish secretary in the British government, and U.S. ambassador to the U.K. Warren Stephens. He made his way to the Trump Turnberry golf course, the BBC reporting he traveled in a motorcade of more than two dozen vehicles, with police closing off a number of roads and British military personnel carrying out a security sweep around the course. On Saturday anti-Trump demonstrations took place in Edinburgh, Aberdeen and Dumfries with photographs shared on X showing protesters holding signs bearing slogans including "Stop Trump, Free Gaza" and "Pipe Down Donald." According to Scottish newspaper The National the demonstrations in Aberdeen and Edinburgh each involved hundreds of people, with Green Party Members of the Scottish Parliament present at the former. Hundreds of protesters gather outside the office of the Consulate General of the United States against a visit to Scotland by the President of the United States, Donald Trump on July 26, 2025 in Edinburgh,... Hundreds of protesters gather outside the office of the Consulate General of the United States against a visit to Scotland by the President of the United States, Donald Trump on July 26, 2025 in Edinburgh, Scotland. More Ian Forsyth/GETTY The publication reacted to Trump's upcoming arrival in Scotland on Friday with the front page headline "Convicted US Felon to Arrive in Scotland." However Trump did receive a positive reception from some, with video shared on social media showing people waving to his motorcade, while two people held up a banner reading "Trump The Legend." Saturday also saw a demonstration in Glasgow, Scotland's most populous city, by the right-wing UK Independence Party, calling for "deportations now" with marchers waving Union Jacks and Scottish Saltires. Immediately after Trump arrived in the UK on Friday he sparked controversy by claiming Europe was facing a "horrible invasion" adding: "You better get your act together or you're not going to have Europe anymore." What People Are Saying Earlier Herald Scotland reporter Josh Pizzuto-Pomaco shared images from Aberdeen on X adding: "Here in Aberdeen, ahead of large anti-Trump protests this afternoon. The city centre is full of police officers." GB News reporter Ben Leo shared a photograph from the Edinburgh demonstration adding: "A few Palestine flags, Extinction Rebellion flags and 'migrants welcome' signs at the Edinburgh Trump protest. It's like an excuse just to protest *something* - if not particularly anything." What Happens Next Trump's Scotland visit is due to head to Aberdeenshire where he is open a new course at his golf club dedicated to his Scottish mother who was born on the Isle of Lewis. He is also due to hold meeting with Starmer and von der Leyen before returning to the U.S. on Tuesday.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
UK condemns Hong Kong cash offer for help in arresting activists
The UK has condemned the latest cash offer from Hong Kong authorities for people who help in the arrest of pro-democracy activists living in Britain. In a joint statement, Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper described the move as "another example of transnational repression". People are being offered between $25,000 (HK$200,000) and $125,000 for information leading to the arrest of 19 individuals, all of whom are pro-democracy activists living abroad. China has denounced as "interference" criticism over this type of appeal, which it has made three times previously. The 19 people are accused of violating Beijing's national security law imposed in 2020 in response to the 2019 anti-government protests that rocked the city for months. The amounts on offer vary depending on the individual. Among the highest offers on the list are those for Choi Ming-da and Fok Ka-chi, who Hong Kong police said operated a social media channel named "Tuesdayroad". Politician Nathan Law – who had been a lawmaker on the Legislative Council of Hong Kong – and activist and commentator Yuan Gong-Yi also appear on the lists. The first such rewards were issued in July and December 2023. They targeted Mr Law - who told the BBC that his life became more dangerous after a bounty was announced - and Simon Cheng, a former UK consulate employee detained in 2019 in a high-profile case. The third series of rewards targeted six pro-democracy activists living in the UK and Canada, including Tony Chung, the former leader of a pro-independence group. A special visa scheme introduced in 2021 saw around 150,000 Hong Kong residents move to the UK, according to the Home Office. In November last year a Hong Kong court sentenced dozens of pro-democracy leaders to years in jail for subversion, following a controversial national security trial. In their statement in response to the latest bounty, Ms Cooper and Mr Lammy said: "This government will continue to stand with the people of Hong Kong, including those who have made the UK their home. "We take the protection of their rights, freedoms, and safety very seriously." Their joint statement added: "The UK is committed to human rights, the rule of law, and the safety of all individuals in the UK. "That's why we have taken further steps to complete the severing of ties between the UK and Hong Kong extradition systems by removing Hong Kong from the Extradition Act 2003." Who are the activists jailed in Hong Kong's largest national security trial? HK bans 'seditious' mobile game about fighting communists Silenced and erased, Hong Kong's decade of protest is now a defiant memory


Boston Globe
10 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Today in History: Americans with Disabilities Act signed into law
In 1863, Sam Houston, former president of the Republic of Texas, died in Huntsville at age 70. In 1945, Winston Churchill resigned as Britain's prime minister after his Conservatives were soundly defeated by the Labour Party. Clement Attlee succeeded him. In 1947, President Harry S. Truman signed the National Security Act, which reorganized America's armed forces as the National Military Establishment and created the Central Intelligence Agency. In 1948, President Truman issued Executive Order 9981, which desegregated the US military. In 1953, Fidel Castro began his revolt against Fulgencio Batista with an unsuccessful attack on an army barracks in eastern Cuba. In 1971, Apollo 15 was launched from Cape Kennedy on America's fourth successful manned mission to the moon. Advertisement In 1990, President George H.W. Bush signed the Americans with Disabilities Act, prohibiting discrimination based on mental or physical disabilities. In 2002, the Republican-led House voted to create an enormous Homeland Security Department in the biggest government reorganization in decades. In 2016, Hillary Clinton became the first woman to be nominated for president by a major political party at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia. In 2018, the last six members of a Japanese doomsday cult who remained on death row were executed for a series of crimes in the 1990s, including a gas attack on Tokyo subways that killed 13 people. Previously, seven other cult members were executed on July 6 of that year. Advertisement In 2020, a procession with the casket of the late US Representative John Lewis crossed the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Alabama, where Lewis and other civil rights marchers were beaten 55 years earlier. Birthdays: Former Australian Prime Minister John Howard is 86. Football Hall of Famer Bob Lilly is 86. Rock and Roll Hall of Famer Darlene Love is 84. The Rolling Stones' Mick Jagger is 82. Actor Helen Mirren is 80. Rock musician Roger Taylor is 76. Olympic gold medal figure skater Dorothy Hamill is 69. Actor Kevin Spacey is 66. Actor Sandra Bullock is 61. Actor Jeremy Piven is 60. Actor Jason Statham is 58. Actor Olivia Williams is 57. Actor Kate Beckinsale is 52. Former New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern is 45. Actor Juliet Rylance is 45. Actor Monica Raymund is 39. Actor-singer Taylor Momsen is 32. Actor Elizabeth Gillies is 32. Actor Thomasin McKenzie is 25.