logo
Beef wellington 'poisoner' accused of 14 'incriminating' actions as in-laws died

Beef wellington 'poisoner' accused of 14 'incriminating' actions as in-laws died

Daily Mirror3 days ago

Prosecutors allege Erin Patterson, 66, deliberately served a beef wellington laced with deadly mushrooms to her in-laws - while her defence insists it was a tragic accident
Jurors in the murder trial of Erin Patterson - accused of killing three people by serving them a beef wellington laced with deadly mushrooms - have been taken through 14 alleged acts of incriminating conduct the prosecution claims point to the Aussie's guilt.
Prosecutors allege Erin, 66, deliberately used poisonous mushrooms in the dish, while her defence insists it was a tragic accident involving mushrooms she had foraged. Her in-laws - Don and Gail Patterson, both aged 70, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66 - were hospitalised after eating the beef wellington and died days later. Ian Wilkinson, the uncle of Patterson's estranged husband, also fell seriously ill but survived after weeks of treatment. Summing up the evidence on Wednesday, trial judge Justice Christopher Beale listed the incriminating acts the prosecution argues are 'implied admissions of guilt'.


He added that the prosecution argues the only reasonable explanation for the conduct is that Ms Patterson knew she was guilty.
The allegedly incriminating conduct includes:
She lied about being unwell and faked death cap mushroom poisoning;
She lied that she used dried mushrooms from an Asian grocery;
She refused treatment on her first presentation at Leongatha Hospital and discharged herself against medical advice;
She was reluctant to accept treatment for herself on her second presentation at Leongatha Hospital;
She was reluctant to obtain medical treatment for her children on July 31;
She lied that she had fed her children the leftover beef wellingtons with the mushrooms and pastry scrapped off;
She reset Phone B multiple times commencing on August 2;
She disposed of the dehydrator at the local tip;
On August 5 she provided police Phone B instead of her usual mobile phone which has never been recovered;
She lied to police during her record of interview on August 5 that the SIM in Phone B was her usual service;
She lied in her record of interview that she'd never foraged for mushrooms;
She lied in her record of interview about never using a dehydrator or dehydrating things;
She lied in her record of interview about owning a dehydrator;
She lied in her record of interview by saying she may have owed a dehydrator years ago.
Ms Patterson, 50, is now at the centre of one of Australia's most gripping murder trials, having pleaded not guilty to murdering her in-laws. She also denies a charge of attempted murder for Ian Wilkinson - the uncle of her estranged husband.
Prosecutors allege the poisoning was no accident, pointing to online searches made more than a year earlier. Senior police forensic expert Shaman Fox-Henry told the court that a computer linked to Patterson had been used to search the iNaturalist webite for death cap mushtoom sightings in Victoria in May 2022 - narrowing in on a park in Moorabbin.

Her defence, led by Colin Mandy SC, argues the case is an accidental poisoning and his client did not intend to harm anyone.
The prosecution claims Patterson deliberately searched for death cap mushrooms using the website. Justice Beale said the jury can reasonably infer it was her who accessed the site on a computer found at her home, though there's no evidence she viewed the exact posts prosecutors allege led her to the deadly fungi.

The defence agrees it was likely her using the site - but say it was a brief visit to check if death caps grew in South Gippsland.
Photos of mushrooms on a dehydrator tray were also found on a Samsung tablet. A fungi expert said one was "consistent" with a death cap. Prosecutors say the timing of the images matches her purchase of a dehydrator on April 28 and suggest the mushrooms were picked at Loch. But the defence argued there's no way to confirm when the photos were taken.

Another key detail included a phone handed to police that had been factory reset multiple times - on August 2, August 5 and remotely wiped on August 6. The prosecution says one reset happened while police searched her home, and another while the phone was in police custody.
Justice Beale reminded jurors that Patterson accepted someone accessed the mushroom map, "possibly" her, but claimed she didn't remember. "I don't remember this internet search, it was possibly me, I remember wanting to find out at one point if death cap mushrooms grew in South Gippsland and finding out they did not," he quoted her as saying.
She also told the court she didn't recall using iNaturalist and had no real "interest" in death caps beyond local curiosity.

During his charge on Tuesday, Justice Beale told jurors they must focus only on the evidence - and must 'scrupulously guard' against feelings of sympathy for the Patterson and Wilkinson families. "Any decent person would feel great sympathy… but you must scrupulously guard against that sympathy interfering with the performance of your duty," he said.
He also urged jurors to ignore media coverage and outside opinions. "You and you alone are best placed to decide whether the prosecution has proven their case beyond reasonable doubt," he said.
As his charge to the jury continued, he joked, "No need to bring your toothbrush" on Wednesday.
The trial continues.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How a family's beef wellington lunch ended with three dead and a mother on trial for murder
How a family's beef wellington lunch ended with three dead and a mother on trial for murder

The Independent

timea day ago

  • The Independent

How a family's beef wellington lunch ended with three dead and a mother on trial for murder

No-one has disputed that death cap mushrooms were in the beef wellington that killed three people and left another in a coma for week after a fateful lunch on a July Saturday in 2023. But the key question in the Australian murder trial of Erin Patterson was how those deadly mushrooms got there. The mother-of-two has been charged with murdering her estranged husband's parents Don and Gail Patterson, as well as Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, and charged with the attempted murder of Heather's husband Ian. The trial is due to conclude next week, with the jury expected to retire to consider its verdict. Over two months the court has heard in great detail about what happened but questions about why still linger. In her own words, Patterson was a big fan of mushrooms. 'They taste good and are very healthy,' she told the regional Victorian court. 'I'd buy all the different types that Woolies would sell.' She got so into mushrooms that she began foraging for wild ones during Covid lockdowns, Patterson said, but admitted that identifying safe varieties was sometimes difficult. She testified that she couldn't remember, but it was possible she had searched online for death cap mushrooms. All the while, the accused agreed during her two weeks on the witness stand that her relationship with her estranged husband Simon Patterson had become strained. The Pattersons had separated several times after the birth of their son in 2009, and separated in 2015 but maintained a friendly relationship, as both told the court. Mr Patterson told the court that the issue seemed to begin when he had listed himself as separated on a tax return. 'She wasn't happy with that,' he said, explaining that the change would affect their family tax benefit, and they mutually agreed she would pursue child support payments. In the months before the fatal lunch she had tried to involve her in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, in their dispute over school fees. She acknowledged in court that was unfair. 'They were doing nothing but trying to support us,' she said. 'I was asking them to agree with me that I was right and Simon was wrong, and that wasn't fair.' She revealed that, in private messages to friends, she had vented frustration by calling the Patterson family a 'lost cause' and saying, 'so f*** 'em.' Growing visibly emotional in court, she told the jury she 'needed to vent'. 'The choice was either go into the paddock and tell the sheep or vent to these women,' she said, adding that she had probably 'played up the emotion' to get support from her online friends. 'I wish I'd never said it. I feel ashamed for saying it and I wish that the family didn't have to hear that I said that,' she told the court. 'They didn't deserve it.' Patterson had been a 'fundamentalist atheist' when she met her future husband, a Christian, in 2004, while working at a Melbourne council. But she told the court she had a 'spiritual experience' at the Korumburra Baptist Church, led by Mr Patterson's uncle and the only surviving lunch victim, Mr Wilkinson. The court heard Patterson inherited $2 million (£950,000) from her grandmother two years later, and she used the money to buy properties and loan money to her husband's siblings. She also admitted to having low self-esteem, and to struggling with her weight. Patterson lied to her lunch guests about having cancer because she felt ashamed that she was really having bariatric surgery for weight loss, she told the court. Her estranged husband had also been invited, but he turned the invitation down the day before, the jury heard, and in messages shown to the court she expressed disappointment at his decision. 'That's really disappointing, I've spent many hours this week preparing lunch for tomorrow,' Patterson allegedly responded. 'It's important for me that you're all there… I hope you change your mind.' In closing arguments, prosecutors in Patterson's triple-murder trial outlined four calculated deceptions at the heart of their case: a fake cancer diagnosis to lure her guests, the deliberate death cap mushroom poisoning, lies that she too had fallen ill and an ongoing cover-up to hide the alleged truth. 'She had complete control over the ingredients that went into the lunch,' chief prosecutor Nanette Rogers said. Two of the lunch guests had also noted that Patterson's lunch meal was served on a different coloured plate to that of her guests, the court heard. Afterwards, the prosecution said Patterson gave inconsistent and vague accounts about where she got the mushrooms from, and was slow to respond to the Department of Health which was trying to get to the bottom of the source of the deadly fungi. The prosecution also told the jury Patterson had pretended to be sick to family and to medical workers to suggest she had also eaten the same meal as her guests, in an attempt 'to disguise her crime'. But Patterson denied these allegations. At the end of her cross examination, three accusations were put to her: that she deliberately got death cap mushrooms, that she knowingly put them in the beef wellingtons and that she intended to kill her lunch guests. To each accusation, she said: 'disagree'. Her defence said she panicked after learning her lunch may have poisoned her guests, and she had not been prepared for the intense reaction she received when first arriving at hospital with symptoms of loose stools following the meal. Summarising the trial, Chief Justice Christopher Beale told the jury that her defence said 'she found it difficult to accept she may have suffered death cap mushroom poisoning. She had not come prepared to be admitted overnight. She needed to make arrangements for the children and the animals … and was intending to return to hospital.' From Monday afternoon, the jury will have to weigh the nine weeks of testimony to decide whether the prosecution has proven beyond reasonable doubt that Patterson committed murder.

Australia's mushroom trial
Australia's mushroom trial

Reuters

timea day ago

  • Reuters

Australia's mushroom trial

Follow on Apple or Spotify. Listen on the Reuters app. A triple murder case with a culinary twist is transfixing Australia and the rest of the world. Erin Patterson is accused of using poisonous mushrooms concealed in a Beef Wellington lunch to kill three elderly relatives of her estranged husband. The jury in her trial is expected to begin considering its verdict next week. In this special episode of Reuters World News, we look at the prosecution and the defense in this case. Sign up for the Reuters Econ World newsletter ⁠⁠here⁠⁠. Listen to the Reuters Econ World podcast ⁠⁠here⁠⁠. Visit the ⁠⁠Thomson Reuters Privacy Statement⁠⁠ for information on our privacy and data protection practices. You may also visit ⁠⁠ to opt out of targeted advertising. Further Reading Erin Patterson trial: Australia awaits verdict in mushroom murder case Key facts in Australia's mushroom murder trial

Erin Patterson mushroom murder trial LIVE updates: Judge gives instruction jury must disregard major argument as trial hits final days
Erin Patterson mushroom murder trial LIVE updates: Judge gives instruction jury must disregard major argument as trial hits final days

Daily Mail​

time3 days ago

  • Daily Mail​

Erin Patterson mushroom murder trial LIVE updates: Judge gives instruction jury must disregard major argument as trial hits final days

22:15 Patterson judge tells jury when it's their time to decide accused killer's fate Justice Christopher Beale commenced his address to the jury - or 'charge' - on Tuesday after giving jurors a four-day weekend to prepare for the closing stage of the marathon Erin Patterson murder trial. On Thursday, Justice Beale indicated that his address will conclude on Monday and then two jurors will be balloted out before the remaining 12 decide Patterson's fate, Patterson, 50, is accused of murdering her in-laws, Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, after allegedly serving them a beef Wellington lunch made with death cap mushrooms. Patterson is also accused of attempting to murder Heather's husband, pastor Ian Wilkinson, who survived the lunch after spending several weeks in an intensive care unit. The court heard Patterson's estranged husband, Simon (pictured), was also invited to the gathering at her home in Leongatha, in Victoria's Gippsland region, but didn't attend. Witnesses told the jury that Patterson ate her serving from a smaller, differently-coloured plate to those of her guests, who ate off four grey plates. Patterson told authorities she bought dried mushrooms from an unnamed Asian store in the Monash area of Melbourne, but health inspectors could find no evidence of this. 22:16 Patterson wanted to be 'truthful and accurate' about mushroom source Patterson agreed she never mentioned dried mushrooms to Dr Webster but she did mention them when phoned by Matthew Patterson later. The jury heard Patterson said she knew it was important to be 'truthful and accurate' because she knew Don's health was at stake Justice Beale said Patterson gave evidence she later provided more information on the mushrooms to other doctors. Patterson also agreed she told paramedics she spoke of the dried mushrooms but couldn't remember where she'd got them. The jury heard Patterson agreed she told several others she believed she bought the mushrooms from an Asian grocer. Patterson claimed on August 1, while at the Monash Medical Centre, she mentioned to Ms Cripps several locations where she may have purchased the dried mushrooms. Justice Beale also said Patterson accepted the mushroom source was a 'public emergency' while the jury was reminded about the various different locations Patterson told different people. 22:15 Jury told about Patterson's 'alleged incriminating conduct' Towards the end of Wednesday's proceedings, Justice Beale spoke to the jury about the topic of Patterson's 'alleged incriminating conduct'. 'The prosecution (Crown prosecutor Dr Nanette Rogers SC pictured) argued Patterson knew she was guilty and did what she did to conceal her guilt,' Justice Beale said. However, Justice Beale told the jury the defence has reasons for Patterson's behaviour. 'The defence claimed there were innocent explanations for that behaviour,' he added. Justice Beale listed some of that alleged 'incriminating' conduct: 1. She lied about being unwell after the lunch 2. Patterson lied about the Asian grocer mushrooms 3. She refused treatment at hospital and left against medical advice 4. She had reluctance to accept treatment the second time at hospital 5. Patterson was reluctant to get kids treated on July 31 6. Why would she have fed the kids leftovers? 7. She reset Phone B multiple times on August 2 8. She dumped the dehydrator 9. On August 5, she provided Phone B instead of Phone A 10. Patterson lied to cops about her phone number 11. She lied about foraging 12. She lied about owning a dehydrator Justice Beale has been going through the topics listed with the jury.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store