'Overwhelming response': 2,000 books left after Yale-NUS adoption drive, June 14 fair open to public, Singapore News
More than 2,000 books will be put up for adoption and exchange from 9am to 3pm at the Central Library, NUS Libraries said in a Facebook post.
The first fair was held from May 28 to 30, but it was open only to the Yale-NUS alumni, staff and their guests.
A second adoption drive for the public was scheduled from May 31 to June 9, but due to "overwhelming response" for the first fair, the authorities decided not to go ahead with the second.
The fair for the public was thus pushed to June 14.
More than 8,500 books were available for adoption during the first fair, but that is down to 2,000 now.
One Yale-NUS alumni, who only wanted to be known only as James, told AsiaOne that it was great to see the overwhelming turnout for the May 28 fair and how "different books found good homes".
The 26-year-old shared that he had always been "strongly attached to the YNC Library and its books" and that he would browse the shelves when he had any excuse to.
He said he wanted to ensure that books previously called "too niche or academic" to be given away were available to collect.
But he said that some concerns remained unaddressed, particularly the library's lack of response to the student petition calling for open dialogue on their decision to "shred the books" and how NUS could adopt more collaborative decision-making in the future.
Another alumni, Ryan Yeo, shared on Instagram that he and other alumni had tried to push for more days to be open to the public.
In his post, he shared NUS Library was "worried about the potential large inflow of people" if they immediately opened the library up to the public. View this post on Instagram
A post shared by Ryan Yeo (@ryanyeokh)
Yeo added: "Hopefully it's enough for everyone to be able to grab a book or five, I can't bear to think of leftover books going into the shredder again..."
In May, Yale-NUS was in the eye of the storm after videos of books being discarded outside the library and collected by a recycling company went viral.
James added: "While the rehoming effort on NUS Libraries' part has been laudable, I do hope NUS also pays attention to the wider conversation surrounding the incident beyond the books themselves."
[[nid:718887]]
liv.roberts@asiaone.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
5 days ago
- AsiaOne
Why I said 'I do' at 26 — even before most of my friends thought about it , Lifestyle News
When I signed our marriage certificate at 26, I didn't think I was doing anything radical. After all, I was viewing almost-weekly Instagram stories of my Junior College schoolmates tying the knot, so it seemed like plenty of my peers were getting hitched. But according to the latest figures from the Ministry of Social and Family Development's Family Trends Report 2025, the median age for first-time grooms in Singapore in 2024 was 31.1; I was five years below that. And for brides it's 29.6; my wife was 24 when we were solemnised. For us, it's been six months since we locked it in (aka joined in holy matrimony). Looking back, it wasn't a teenage impulse or a fairytale moment. It was a decision born out of long-term commitment, practical SG realities like BTO eligibility (gotta maximise those gahmen grants), and, perhaps unexpectedly, my in-laws. My now-wife and I had been together for close to five years before we tied the knot. We'd already weathered university life, job hunting, and the awkward early-20s phase of trying to figure ourselves out. But when it came to living together or planning a trip for just the two of us, we hit a wall. Her parents — loving, kind, but firmly traditional — had strong reservations about cohabitation before marriage. And so, between wanting a life together and respecting her family's values, we made a choice: we got married. It wasn't some grand proposal with hundreds of rose petals and a drone show over Marina Bay (ok but it was still a super fancy omakase in Japan). Just two people who decided they were ready, even if it was earlier than what is typical. 'Finally!' - but also, 'wah, so fast ah ?' While our closest friends were unsurprised, with their cheeky "finally lah " and "I already guessed" reactions (after all, we had been dating for close to five years), the occasional " wah , so fast ah ?" or "what's the rush?" comments from colleagues and acquaintances reminded us that our timeline was not exactly the norm. To be honest, the external chatter didn't cause us to second guess our decision; if anything, we were even more sure of it because it made us realise "actually, ya hor , what are we even waiting for?" Plus, I wouldn't say less enthu comments were "bad". The people who implied we should give it more thought or pause first didn't come across as unsupportive, it was more like checking if we had "double, triple confirmed" this momentous decision. Checking if we had the financial means to afford the coming big purchases (wedding, honeymoon, house, renovation), the maturity to weather the good and bad as a married couple when we were barely in our mid-20s, whether our careers were stable enough, and all the usual conservative Asian brakes installed on any big decision. On the contrary, while the external chatter didn't really faze us, our moments of doubt did give us pause. As two young working adults, we were not exactly rolling in disposable income. Our wedding reception at the end of this year will be intimate and modest (no swanky hotel ballroom), our BTO flat will not be ready until 2028, and our careers are still in their early stages. And my biggest worry: Would I be a "good enough" husband? Still, none of those worries outweighed the clarity I had about one thing: I wanted to do life, and everything that comes with it, with her. Marriage made the man I grew up an only child. That meant that before marriage, I was still living at home, eating my grandma's cooking, not being the one in charge of buying groceries, and relying on my parents to settle all my insurance needs. Post-marriage, I had to research insurance needs for my wife and myself (thankfully we have a super solid financial adviser), learn when the best supermarket deals are (discounted "must use by same day" proteins), and settle all the admin stuff. And while I'm still me, I'm also someone else now: a teammate, a planner, a provider (and occasional dishwasher). Essentially, a better version of myself that was, and still is, shaped by partnership, not perfection. I don't mean this in a cliche "marriage forces you to grow up" way. Rather, it gave me a reason to. When you're dating, you can still float around each other's lives. One night, maybe a month after we got married, I came home from work and found my wife sitting on the couch, unusually quiet (she's usually a yapper-cino). She had had a long day-something about a tough client, back-to-back meetings, and barely time to eat lunch. I was tired, too, but instead of letting her marinate (wallow) in her funk and retreating to my usual decompression routine (doomscrolling TikTok, or mindlessly Youtubing), I sat next to her, pulled her feet onto my lap, and asked, "Want to talk or nah ?" She said, "not really," so I understood that she just wanted to be allowed to unwind and babied. I ordered our favourite dessert, put on a favourite Mr Bean episode (she loves Mr Bean), put away the laundry, and just accompanied her till she felt more recharged. It sounds like such a small thing. But it was the first time I realised: this is what building a shared life looks like. It is not about dramatic gestures or constant romance. It is about showing up, not just when it's convenient, but when it matters. It is about adjusting your rhythm so that it matches someone else's, even if only for a night. That moment shifted something in me. I stopped thinking in terms of "my time" or "my space." I started thinking in "ours", and how I should always create a safe space for her where she can just drop everything and relax. Six months in Now, half a year later, while my friends swipe on dating apps and contemplate whether to DTR ("define the relationship"), I spend my evenings making dinner with my wife, going on long walks, or debating whether to watch the last season of Squid Game or rewatch Modern Family for the fifth time. It's quieter, yes, but it's also fuller. Do I think everyone should marry early? No. Honestly, I never even thought I would. In my teens and early 20s, I imagined myself following the Singapore script: build your career, settle down closer to your 30s, do the usual dance. But love doesn't always follow timelines. And in our case, the circumstances, the history, the values, they all made sense. I don't romanticise early marriage. It's hard work, and it asks things of you that you might not feel ready for. You learn that love is not just a feeling, but something you nurture every day. It asks for patience when you're both tired and irritable. For generosity when one of you is having a tougher week. For maturity when making decisions that shape your future as a unit. And sometimes, it asks for faith, that even if you do not have it all figured out, you will figure it out together. It may be tough at times, but I also don't regret it. Not for a second. Because when you find someone you want to come home to, build a life with, and grow alongside — not just despite your age, but because of where you are in life — you find that marriage isn't about settling down. It's about growing up, together. [[nid:718596]] This article was first published in .
New Paper
5 days ago
- New Paper
Woman demands refund after finding mouldy strawberries in dessert order
What was meant to be a sweet treat turned sour for a stay-at-home mother who discovered a mouldy strawberry tiramisu in her dessert order. Ms Nasriah Aziz had ordered a selection of cakes from online seller Strictly Dessert for her family but was appalled to find mould growing on one of the items. The $109 order had been paid for using CDC vouchers. When she asked for a full refund, she was told it was not possible as her purchase was made with the vouchers. The outlet initially offered a refund for the affected item but later offered a replacement instead. "I ordered three choco moist cakes, one original tiramisu, one pistachio tiramisu, and of course, that strawberry tiramisu that was mouldy," Ms Nasriah told The New Paper. "It was super disgusting and scary! And there was no apology from the Strictly Dessert." She said that she wanted a full refund on her order because she could not be certain that the other items were fit for consumption. She added that the remaining cakes did not look fresh or appetising, and her family did not dare to eat them . "To be fair, when we informed her about the mould in the strawberry tiramisu, she agreed to refund us for it. However, when we informed her to arrange for the driver to take back all the dessert orders and demanded a full refund, she refused," Ms Nasriah, who declined to share her age, said. In a Facebook post that was shared on Reddit , Ms Nasriah said: "The decent thing to do is to apologise and give a refund." "Just because I paid with CDC vouchers doesn't mean it's okay to serve expired cake. What if my kids had eaten it?" she added. "Who would dare eat the other cakes after seeing this? Makes you wonder how long they've been keeping their desserts." PHOTO: NASRIAH AZIZ/FACEBOOK Netizens were largely sympathetic. One Redditor, Mesapholis, wrote: "I am amazed how shops in a competitive environment like SG would rather be known as the shop that sells rotten dessert than refund the customer." "Report to SFA. Don't try to argue any further," added Redditor Tehogaokosong. Another Redditor, ChanPeiMui, said: "I can understand why they can't refund you because you used CDC voucher, but they should compensate you with something." Another Facebook user, Darwisy Nazz, said they had a similar experience. "I bought their fruit cup a month ago and the strawberry was spoiled too," they wrote, adding that the seller had offered a refund for just the strawberries. They added that they had reported the incident to the Singapore Food Agency (SFA), which said it would look into the matter. Ms Nasriah has also filed a report with the SFA. TNP has reached out to SFA for comments. "At this moment, we wish to move on. The purpose of the post is not to bring down her business but to create awareness. As a consumer, I have never come across such a vendor, she said. Strictly Dessert, which lists an address at Changi Village on their TikTok and Instagram accounts, did not respond to messages left for them by TNP.
Business Times
22-07-2025
- Business Times
US authorities probing airliner's close call with B-52 bomber
[WASHINGTON] US aviation regulators said on Monday they are investigating a recent close call in which a passenger plane took emergency action to avoid a mid-air collision with a US military bomber. A Delta flight operated by SkyWest took off Friday from Minneapolis and was approaching the city of Minot, North Dakota when the pilot rapidly rerouted after seeing another aircraft nearing from the right. 'I don't know how fast they were going, but they were a lot faster than us, I felt it was the safest thing to do to turn behind it,' the pilot told passengers, according to recorded audio of the commercial pilot. 'Sorry about the aggressive maneuver,' he said. 'This is not normal at all.' The Federal Aviation Administration said in a statement that US officials are 'investigating the event involving SkyWest Airlines Flight 3788 at Minot International Airport on Friday, July 18. SkyWest said it has also begun a probe. The flight was cleared for approach by the tower 'but performed a go-around when another aircraft became visible in their flight path,' the carrier said in a statement reported by US media. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The US Air Force base near Minot confirmed in a statement that a B-52 bomber performed an approved flyover Friday night at the North Dakota State Fair, and said the crew was communicating with air traffic controllers at Minot's commercial airport. 'The B-52 crew contacted Minot International Airport tower and the tower provided instructions to continue two miles westbound after the flyover. The tower did not advise of the inbound commercial aircraft,' it said. It provided no further details about the near miss. The northern city, about 80 km from the Canada border, is home to a commercial airport and a US Air Force base. In a passenger video posted to Instagram and verified by Storyful, the SkyWest pilot told passengers he was not made aware about the B-52. He said the Minot tower, which does not use radar - a common situation in smaller, more remote airfields in the United States - offered guidance that could have put the passenger jet in jeopardy. 'He said 'Turn right.' I said there's an airplane over there. And he says 'Turn left,'' the pilot said. 'I don't know why they didn't give us a heads up because the Air Force base does have radar and nobody said, 'hey there's also a B-52 in the pattern,'' he said. The passenger who recorded the video, Monica Green, said she was 'sick to my stomach' about the near miss. Green, quoted by NBC News, said she felt the jet take a hard turn and then 'I just remember the plane going, like, sideways... and just looking straight out the window and just seeing grass' with no visible skyline. The incident comes less than six months after a US Army helicopter collided with an American Airlines jet approaching Washington's Reagan National Airport, killing all 67 people aboard both aircraft. The disaster prompted federal authorities and Congress to review coordination between military and civilian aircraft flying in the same airspace. AFP
