Centre Plans To Utilise Indus Waters, Plans Public Outreach: Sources
New Delhi:
In a strategic move, the central government will launch a public outreach program to explain to citizens the motive behind putting the Indus Water Treaty with Pakistan in abeyance, sources said. The initiative aims to increase public awareness of how the suspension of the decades-old agreement benefits India.
The outreach program will be spearheaded by union ministers who will explain the strategic moves on the Indus Water Treaty in simple terms to the people, especially those living in North Indian states.
According to sources, the larger objective of the initiative is to develop a long-term water management strategy that will allow India to make better use of the Indus River waters within the states. The government is also planning to facilitate the movement of the Indus River waters from Jammu and Kashmir, Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan. The 13 existing canal systems of the four states have been connected, which will not only increase the availability of water in the areas, but India will also be able to use the surplus water for itself, sources added.
The strategic developments include building a 160-kilometre canal to connect the Chenab River to the Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej River systems. The Centre is also planning to connect the Indus River waters to the Ganga Canal in Rajasthan - and set a target for it to be completed in three years.
The Indus River system
The Indus basin is fed mainly by the Ravi, the Jhelum, and the Indus itself, all three of which were allotted to Pakistan under the Indus Waters Treaty but flow through India before crossing over. The agreement gives India rights over the eastern rivers - the Sutlej, Beas, and Chenab.
While India would get water from the Sutlej, Beas, and Ravi, Pakistan would get the water from the Chenab, Jhelum, and Indus. India, being the upper riparian state, technically has rights to the waters of all six rivers, but the agreement allowed Pakistan to get the flow of waters of the 'western rivers'.
The Indus Water Treaty - signed in 1960 - had survived through three wars fought by India and Pakistan in 1965, 1971, and 1999. But after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, in which 26 people were killed, India took stern diplomatic measures, including putting the treaty into abeyance.
By doing this, India has been able to control, to some extent, the western rivers and flow of water to Pakistan.
PM Modi on suspending Indus Waters Treaty
Prime Minister Narendra Modi last month said that "water and blood cannot flow together".
"Terror and talk cannot take place together. Terror and trade cannot take place together. And, water and blood also cannot flow together," he said - referring to a clear message to Pakistan that while India may have agreed to a ceasefire, it has no plans to lift the hold on the Indus Waters Treaty.
India on May 7 conducted 'Operation Sindoor', a targeted military strike on terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied-Kashmir (PoK), after finding cross-border to the Pahalgam attack. Pakistan then launched a massive missile and drone attack, but the threats were thwarted. In retaliation, Indian armed forces struck airfields in Pakistan. Both countries agreed to a ceasefire on May 10.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
35 minutes ago
- India.com
White House says Trump share strong ties with PM Modi, confirms US-India trade deal 'very close'
White House says Trump share strong ties with PM Modi, confirms US-India trade deal 'very close' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called India a 'key friend' of the United States in the Indo-Pacific region, during a press briefing on Monday. She was speaking about the ongoing trade talks between the two countries and said that President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi have a strong and friendly relationship. 'India remains a very strategic ally in the Asia Pacific and the President has a very good relationship with Prime Minister Modi, and he will continue to have that,' says White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt replying to ANI's question regarding how the US President sees the China's role and its influence in the Indo-Pacific region. #WATCH | 'India remains a very strategic ally in the Asia Pacific and the President has a very good relationship with Prime Minister Modi, and he will continue to have that, 'says White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt replying to ANI's question regarding how the US… — ANI (@ANI) June 30, 2025 Leavitt mentioned that the trade deal between the US and India is nearly ready. 'Yes, the President said that last week (that the US and India are very close to a trade deal), and it remains true. I just spoke to our Secretary of Commerce about it. He was in the Oval Office with the President. They are finalising these agreements, and you'll hear from the President and his trade team very soon when it comes to India, 'says White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt in response to the ANI's question, when asked about the US President's last week announcement that the trade deal with India is close and this could happen anytime soon. When asked about China's influence in the Indo-Pacific, Leavitt again highlighted the importance of India, saying, 'India is a very important partner for us in the region. The President values his relationship with Prime Minister Modi and that will continue.' Her comments came while Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar was in the US for the QUAD Foreign Ministers' meeting. The QUAD, made up of India, the US, Japan, and Australia—focuses on keeping the Indo-Pacific free, open, and secure. The group first came together in 2004 to help with relief efforts after the Indian Ocean tsunami and has since grown into a key regional partnership. Earlier on June 18, it was confirmed that US President Donald Trump has accepted Prime Minister Narendra Modi's invitation to attend the upcoming QUAD Summit in New Delhi. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri shared the update in a video message, saying, 'For the next QUAD meeting, Prime Minister Modi invited President Trump to visit India. President Trump gladly accepted the invitation and said he is looking forward to the visit.' India-US Trade Talks: Progress Toward Early Deal India and the United States started a fresh round of trade talks on June 26, aiming to finalize an early agreement before the US begins imposing new tariffs on imports from 57 countries, including India, starting July 9. According to various reports, the Indian delegation, led by Chief Negotiator and Special Secretary for Commerce Rajesh Agrawal, traveled to Washington for a two-day meeting. The main focus is to resolve ongoing trade issues and work toward an interim deal that could serve as the foundation for a full Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by September or October 2025. Once this early deal is in place, both nations are expected to move toward negotiating a complete Free Trade Agreement (FTA), with the goal of doubling their trade to USD 500 billion by 2030. India has also urged the US to cancel all current and upcoming retaliatory tariffs, including a 26 per cent duty, made up of a 10 per cent charge already in effect since April 5 and an additional 16 per cent set to begin on July 9.
Indian Express
42 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Measuring poverty shouldn't be about calories. India needs a thali index
The publication of the survey of household consumption expenditure for 2023-24 by the National Statistics Office in January 2025 has been followed by a flurry of estimates of poverty in India. Of these, two have received the most attention. The first off the block was a report from SBI in January, which was followed by one from the World Bank. They report more or less similar findings. The former flags 'a remarkable decline in rural poverty, estimated at 4.86 per cent in FY24… urban poverty estimated at 4.09 per cent'. The World Bank's report is far more optimistic, pegging 'extreme poverty' at 2.8 per cent for rural India and 1.1 per cent for urban India in 2022-23. If poverty in India is what these estimates show, it would be a matter for rejoicing, as it would have been virtually eradicated. These estimates of poverty have brought forth many responses. The Narendra Modi government's votaries have been quick to claim that the outcome reflects the success of its policies. Critics have focused on the non-comparability of the latest consumption data with those for 2011-12 as the survey methods have undergone change since. Both neglect the issue of the standard of living in India, and whether the extant methodology of poverty measurement underlying these estimates can lead to anything at all being said on the matter. Finally, more detached observers have brought up the question of what the 'historic low' in poverty implies for the subsidy regime. Officially approved poverty measurement in India has involved estimating the level of consumption expenditure sufficient to enable the minimum calorie intake necessary for living and working. As calories measure the energy ingested through food and drink, the methodology represents a physiological approach. Arguably, though, there can be another approach. This is to recognise that humans view food in terms of the energy, nutritional value and satisfaction that it provides. Societies have over time arrived at a geographically and culturally mediated norm for food consumption. In India, arguably, this would be represented by a thali, a serving of food comprising carbohydrates, protein and vitamins. Though it may be referred to differently across the country, a thali would be understood to include rice/roti, lentils and vegetables, with dairy/meat/fish extra according to diet and affordability. Indians recognise the thali as a fairly complete and nutritionally balanced unit of food consumption, a meal. Given the centrality of the thali in Indian life, it would be appropriate to treat it as the metric by which to measure the standard of living. This implies measuring the standard of living in terms of food, but then we believe that the level of food consumption should be treated as its most important constituent. Now, a meaningful question to ask would be, 'How many thalis does the daily consumption expenditure on food translate into?' We use the price of a vegetarian thali to measure the level of food consumption across the population as it is the most basic meal. The price of a thali at Rs 30 was taken from the rating agency Crisil, which calculates the cost of a home-cooked thali using data on the cost of its ingredients sourced from the east, west, north and south of India. The value of food consumption per capita given in the consumption survey for 2023-24 was expanded to include items purchased from the public distribution system and items received free as part of social welfare programmes. We found that in 2023-24, up to 40 per cent of the rural population could not afford two thalis a day. In urban India, up to 10 per cent of the population could not afford two thalis a day. These findings indicate that levels of food deprivation are much higher than what are implied by the poverty estimates using the same data, which we recounted at the outset. A possible reason for the difference between our estimate of the standard of living and the poverty estimates from the SBI and the World Bank is that we take the expenditure on food as opposed to total consumption expenditure as the relevant measure of consumption. The reasoning was as follows. There are five items of essential expenditure – housing, conveyance, telephony, health and education – that a household cannot forgo if it is to ensure its livelihood. Now, expenditure on food ends up as the residual. Therefore, when appraising the standard of living in terms of food consumption, basing it on the actual expenditure on food would be realistic. Poverty estimation needs a food standard that is based on goods. The thali index serves this purpose while being compatible with accounting for the calorific value of food intake. We may now address the issue of subsidies. Basing their argument on the much-publicised recent estimates of poverty, some observers have queried whether subsidies in general should be persisted with in economic policy. We believe that this is a discussion that needs to take place, as for too long the discourse on subsidies has been hijacked by political parties to justify competitive welfarism. However, our findings using a thali index of consumption implies that the food subsidy needs more to be rationalised rather than eliminated. For instance, in rural India, the per capita subsidy at the 70th percentile is not much lower than it is at the fifth, even though those in the former class can afford more than twice the number of thalis even without subsidisation. Eliminating the food subsidy at the upper reaches of the distribution while enhancing it at the lower levels would now be optimal. Balakrishnan is honorary visiting professor, Centre for Development Studies, Thiruvananthapuram and Raj is an economist based in Patna
News18
an hour ago
- News18
'Any State Sponsorship Must Be Exposed': Jaishankar Slams Pakistan Over 'Impunity To Terrorists'
Jaishankar outlined the core principles the world must rally behind: 'No impunity to terrorists, no treating them as proxies, and no yielding to nuclear blackmail.' In a strong message at the United Nations, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar called out Pakistan, stressing that state-sponsored terrorism must be exposed and held accountable. Speaking at the UN's anti-terrorism exhibition, Jaishankar urged the global community to unite against the growing threat of terrorism. 'Any state sponsorship must be exposed and must be counted," Jaishankar said, in a veiled yet pointed reference to Pakistan. Highlighting recent incidents, he reminded that five weeks ago, the UN Security Council issued a strong condemnation of a horrific act of terrorism in Pahalgam, demanding that the perpetrators be brought to justice. The minister further added, 'When terrorism is supported by a state against a neighbour, when it drives a whole host of illegal activities, it is imperative to call it out publicly. One way of doing so is to display the havoc that it has wreaked on global society." Jaishankar's remarks have been widely seen as a clear diplomatic signal, urging the international community to take concrete steps against nations that use terrorism as a tool of foreign policy. Jaishankar Highlights Human Cost of Terrorism Jaishankar also reminded the gathering of the UN Security Council's strong condemnation of the Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir on April 22. In direct response to the attack, India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir. The strikes reportedly eliminated over 100 terrorists affiliated with groups like Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Hizbul Mujahideen. Reinforcing his message, Jaishankar said, 'Terrorism is one of the greatest threats to humanity. It is the antithesis of everything that the UN stands for… When terrorism is supported by a state against a neighbour… it is imperative to call it out publicly." First Published: July 01, 2025, 06:51 IST
