Experts urge a new global agreement on carbon credit emission factors
WCCF measures how much wood is required to produce one tonne of charcoal, a key parameter for carbon credit accounting, as it determines the deforestation and emissions attributed to charcoal production. New scientific evidence suggests that the proposed 4:1 default value does not reflect real-world data and could potentially under-credit clean cooking projects across sub-Saharan Africa. Low emission factors would underestimate the deleterious impact of the charcoal industry on deforestation.
Field research suggests miscalculation
During a webinar hosted by PD Forum on 4 June 2025, Dr Nordica MacCarty of Oregon State University presented field research from Malawi and Ghana showing that actual WCCFs consistently exceed the current 4:1 default set by CDM Tool 30 and 33. Her study analysed 12 kiln runs in each country, measuring charcoal yield, distribution, and usage inefficiencies across the value chain.
'Our findings clearly show that the majority of emissions and material losses occur during charcoal production, primarily through the release of volatiles, water loss, fines, and wood left at harvest sites," said Dr MacCarty. "Actual WCCFs consistently exceeded the conservative 4:1 value. If the goal is accurate emissions accounting, these ground realities must be incorporated into default factors."
Nick Marshall, co-vice chair of PD Forum, said: "Under the disingenuous label of 'integrity', we are seeing the prioritisation of conservative carbon accounting over accuracy. The proposed WCCF default does not reflect sufficient accuracy in the accounting of clean cooking carbon project emissions, leading to an underestimation of their impact, which can undermine carbon finance flows to communities that need them most. We are urging the UNFCCC to review this parameter so that it reflects real-world conditions and ensures fair crediting for projects delivering climate solutions to low-income households.
'This is not only about carbon accounting - it's about fairness and equity. The communities adopting cleaner technologies deserve recognition for their contribution to global climate goals.'
Dr Rob Bailis from Stockholm Environment Institute added: "The 4:1 default is not based on actual field data, but rather a misreading of outdated IPCC text. Using 4:1 not only underestimates emissions, it also undermines project viability. If the goal is environmental integrity, we should follow the data. On that basis, 6:1 is a much more defensible default value."
Calling for alignment between emission factors and data
Nathan Gachugi, director of Carbon Operations Africa at BURN, explained how conservative defaults limit carbon finance potential: "At BURN, we are seeing firsthand how these conservative defaults are limiting the potential of carbon finance to transform the lives of hundreds of millions of low-income households in Africa. Revising the WCCF and the direct charcoal emission factors to reflect science-backed field data is critical to ensuring climate finance reaches the communities that need it most."
Traditional low-efficiency kilns in sub-Saharan Africa consume far more wood than current methodologies account for, yet outdated defaults remain in use. While methodologies like Verra's VMR0050 and the Clean Cooking Alliance's CLEAR methodology now recognise a 6:1 WCCF, the CDM Tool 33 and the ICVCM's Core Carbon Principles take the 4:1 value. This risks underestimating the emissions from upstream charcoal production, disincentivising investment in cleaner technologies and perpetuating unsustainable charcoal practices.
The PD Forum is circulating research to key stakeholders including UNFCCC, ICVCM, Gold Standard, Verra, ICAO, national carbon market authorities, and rating agencies, urging alignment of charcoal emission factors with empirical data.
All rights reserved. © 2022. Bizcommunity.com Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
2 days ago
- Zawya
African central banks' gold rush faces liquidity, price risks, Fitch unit says
Sub-Saharan African central banks that have added gold to their reserves in recent years could face price and liquidity crises if the value of the precious metal slides, BMI, a unit of Fitch Group, said on Wednesday, 30 July 2025. Ghana, Tanzania and Nigeria have been buying gold domestically to beef up their reserves, BMI said, a move accelerated by this year's broader market volatility stoked by US trade tariffs and other geopolitical risks. Policymakers in Kenya and Uganda are exploring a move into gold, Rwanda and Namibia have taken active steps towards adding the metal into their reserves, while Burkina Faso has indicated it will build up its stockpile and Zimbabwe has said its new ZIG currency is backed by gold reserves, BMI said. "Gold is increasingly being used by sub-Saharan African markets as a strategic store of value," said Orson Gard, senior sub-Saharan Africa analyst at BMI, during an investor presentation. The move, however, comes with various risks, he said, citing Ghana where an aggressive gold purchase programme has led to the metal accounting for a third of its reserves according to BMI calculations, driving a surge in the cedi currency and potentially making the country's exports less competitive. Governor of the Bank of Ghana, Johnson Asiama, said on Wednesday that while the West African country was heavily exposed to movements in commodity prices, it was taking measures to protect itself against potential price shocks. "Any sharp price drop would have impact for international reserves... That is why we are starting with the hedging programme," Asiama told a news conference, referring to an arrangement which is expected to limit consequences of unexpected market fluctuations. The price of gold, which touched a record high earlier this year, may have peaked, BMI said, and it faces potential downward pressure from any reduction in US interest rates. "Any sudden drop in global gold prices would have significant implications for those markets in sub-Saharan Africa which have rapidly increased gold as a share of their total reserves portfolio," Gard said. A gradual price decline over the medium-term could also have a negative impact for countries that started buying gold around its recent peak, he added. "This would not only weigh on reserve adequacy but would also undermine the perceived credibility of central bank policy," he said. Ghana and Tanzania, which also rely on gold exports, could be hit by the "double whammy" of a drop in the value of their reserves and lower export earnings, he said. Governments could also struggle to convert their gold holdings into liquid assets like hard currencies, Gard said, pointing to India and Argentina when they faced acute balance of payments challenges in the 1990s and 2000s, respectively.
Zawya
3 days ago
- Zawya
Technical mission to Ghana on the deployment of Système Interconnecté de Gestion des Marchandises en Transit (SIGMAT) between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire
From the 21st to 25th of July 2025, the ECOWAS Commission conducted a technical mission to Ghana as part of transit reforms aimed at ensuring the efficient cross-border movement of goods in the region. To this end, an IT solution called SIGMAT – ' Système interconnecté de gestion des marchandises en transit ' (Interconnected System for the Management of Goods in Transit) – was established to enable the electronic exchange of data between Member States. Since the launch of SIGMAT in 2019, the Member States that have implemented this tool have reported its significant impact on transit procedures and the benefits it has brought to the countries. It is in this context that ECOWAS Ministers from the Member States of the Abidjan-Lagos Corridor (ALCO), meeting in Cotonou on the 5th of October 2023, requested the ECOWAS Commission to ensure the prompt deployment of SIGMAT in the five Member States of the corridor. This is to facilitate the smooth cross-border movement of goods along the corridor. Consequently, the ECOWAS Commission carried out a technical mission to Ghana from 21st to 25th July 2025 to assess and address the interconnection challenges between Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire in order to ensure seamless SIGMAT connectivity along the Abidjan-Lagos Corridor. The mission brought together technical and functional experts from the Commission, Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana. During a meeting with the Commissioner of Customs of Ghana, the Director of Customs Union and Taxation, Mr. Salifou TIEMTORE, on behalf of the ECOWAS Commissioner for Economic Affairs and Agriculture, Mrs. Massandjé TOURE-LITSE, reiterated the commitment of the ECOWAS Commission to support Member States in their efforts to ensure the deployment of SIGMAT on all trade corridors to facilitate the efficient movement of goods in the region. For his part, the Commissioner of Customs of Ghana, Brigadier General Glover ASHONG ANNAN, expressed the Ghana Revenue Authority's gratitude to the ECOWAS Commission for this timely intervention aimed at securing transit trade in the ECOWAS region and reducing transit-related fraud that threatens the revenues and security of Member States. At the end of the mission, the technical and functional challenges hindering the proper functioning of transit between Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana were resolved. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS).
Zawya
3 days ago
- Zawya
Op-Ed: Financing Energy Access in Africa: Leveraging Fossil Fuel Revenues to End Energy Poverty
NJ Ayuk, Executive Chairman of the African Energy Chamber In an emissions-focused world, do oil and gas revenues have a role to play in ending energy poverty in Africa? It may sound counterintuitive, but many would argue that they do, albeit as enablers of a future powered by alternative energy sources. The key lies in recognizing that Africa's situation is unique, and solutions take time, building on what we have and what we can do with it. This means that, in working towards a just energy transition, the continent's oil and gas resources shouldn't be viewed as obstacles that need to be immediately replaced by renewable energy sources. Instead, rather than prematurely phasing out fossil fuels in response to global pressure, Africa should harness these revenues responsibly to finance its energy transition and ultimately eradicate energy poverty. Prioritizing Development Alongside Sustainability Nearly 600 million Africans still live without access to electricity ( This access is a fundamental human right, yet energy poverty remains one of the continent's most significant barriers to development. This undermines health systems, education, industrialization, and dignity. As the world debates how to rapidly achieve net-zero, Africa's priority is different: how to power its people now, while building a sustainable future. Measuring Africa's energy transition progress against external calls for an abrupt end to fossil fuels risks leaving millions behind. Our continent contributes less than 4% ( to global emissions, yet we are expected to decarbonize at the same pace as industrialized nations that built their wealth on hydrocarbons. Instead, the continent's abundance of fossil fuels should be viewed as a bridge, not a barrier. The African Energy Chamber (AEC) Africa-Paris Declaration ( underscores this principle – Africa's oil and gas revenues can and must be used as a financial lever to invest in electrification, clean energy, and infrastructure projects. This pragmatic and just approach prioritizes development alongside sustainability, not instead of. There are several ways to achieve this. First, reinvesting oil and gas revenues into rural electrification can transform communities. Decentralized solutions like off-grid solar and mini-grids offer practical ways to reach remote areas. Although urban dwellers do experience power outages, for many rural populations, it's a way of life. For the mother cooking with firewood or the student studying by candlelight, a small solar grid is life-changing. Fossil fuel revenues can finance these systems at scale, bridging the immediate access gap while longer-term grid expansions are in progress. Second, establishing innovative financing mechanisms is essential. For instance, the fledgling Africa Energy Bank ( aims to bridge the continent's estimated $31 billion to $50 billion annual energy funding gap by focusing predominantly on financing energy projects. Launched in 2025, the bank is poised to play a transformative role in mobilizing capital for African energy projects. Additionally, global investors are increasingly exploring energy investment opportunities in Africa. In support of this, development finance institutions, such as the African Development Bank, the World Bank, and the International Finance Corporation, are de-risking investments by offering concessional loans, guarantees, and technical assistance, making investment in African energy projects more attractive. Third, policy reforms that create enabling environments are critical. Here, governments have a role to play in prioritizing revenue-generating projects, creating stable regulatory frameworks, and offering incentives for public-private partnerships. This will support investment, reduce risks, and unlock the transformative power of energy access. These solutions demonstrate the importance of a fair and equitable transition and the vital role that fossil fuels will continue to play in achieving this goal. They also prove that this goal is achievable, even if it is on the continent's own terms. Unique Solutions to Africa's Energy Challenges Africa's path to net-zero has the same end goal as the rest of the world, but it can't mirror their journey. Our starting points are different, and our development needs are urgent. We understand that climate action can't be delayed. But it can be just, inclusive, and rooted in African realities. And it can also be supported by revenues from our abundant natural resources. The Africa-Paris Declaration notes that 'a fair transition recognizes that fossil fuels remain valuable for Africa's development, prosperity, and energy access goals. Africa doesn't need to choose between oil and gas or renewables. Given our current position, all are important and require both strategic and sensible deployment. Fossil fuels generate the revenues to invest in solar, wind, hydropower, and grid infrastructure. They fuel industries that create jobs. They support healthcare, education, and innovation. When managed responsibly, Africa's fossil fuel revenue can serve as a bridge to a brighter, greener, and more prosperous continent. Will it be quick and easy? No. Will some question the approach? Most certainly. But the alternative is leaving hundreds of millions of people in the dark. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of TotalEnergies.
