Waqf Law Supreme Court Hearing:CJI BR Gavai ने किया खजुराहो मंदिर का जिक्र, Kapil Sibal ने पूछे सवाल
Authored by: |
Navbharat Times• 21 May 2025, 11:34 pm
Waqf Law Supreme Court Hearing:CJI BR Gavai ने किया खजुराहो मंदिर का जिक्र, Kapil Sibal ने पूछे सवाल
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Probe agencies can't summon lawyers: AG; CJI says 'ED officers crossing all limits'
Supreme Court (File photo) NEW DELHI: Admitting that ED erred in summoning senior advocates Arvind Datar and Pratap Venugopal for rendering legal opinions to clients in a laundering case, attorney general R Venkataramani Monday told Supreme Court that all probe agencies have been asked not to commit this mistake in future. 'We'll frame guidelines in this regard,' AG told a bench of CJI B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran while it was hearing a suo motu case regarding the summons, which were later withdrawn. 'ED officers are crossing all limits. They must know that under law, communication between a lawyer and his client is a privileged communication,' Gavai said. If a lawyer is involved in crime, law will take its own course: CJI However, if a lawyer is involved in a crime, law will take its own course,' CJI Gavai said. SC would take up petitions filed by various bar associations on July 29 to attempt to lay down comprehensive guidelines in this regard, he added. On the joint pleas of SCBA president Vikas Singh, SC Advocates-on-Record president Vipin Nair, senior advocates Mukul Rohatgi and Vijay Hansaria, the CJI-led bench said it would frame guidelines for agencies and bar them from summoning advocates for legal opinion or advice rendered to clients facing prosecution. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo While agreeing with AG, solicitor general Tushar Mehta pointed out another malady afflicting some in the legal professions. "It is equally wrong on the part of advocates, who appear for or advise a client, to create a planned narrative in favour of their client and against the probe agency through social media before and after filing of a petition in a court. Lawyers must stick to their duty of presenting the case before the court,' he said. Mehta said, "The communication between a lawyer and his client is no doubt privileged and which must be immune from investigation, But would a lawyer's action in creating a narrative for his client outside the court also enjoy the status of a privileged communication? Would it not amount to an attempt to influence the public and judiciary about a case?' CJI Gavai asked, 'Have you ever found a judgment or order of a court getting swayed or influenced by such narratives spun by lawyers outside the court? We go by facts and submissions in the courtroom and do not even watch or read what the lawyers speak outside the courtroom about the case.' Mehta said the issuance of summons to Datar was brought to the notice of the 'highest executive' and within six hours a circular was issued by the ED barring its officers from issuing summons to any advocate. Singh, Nair and Hansaria said issuance of summons to advocates by probe agencies would have a chilling effect on the independence of the legal profession.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Lokayukta police to question former Muda chiefs in site allotment case
Mysuru: Even as the Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Karnataka high court quashing the summons issued by the enforcement directorate to Parvathi, wife of chief minister Siddaramaiah, in the Muda case, the Lokayukta police in Mysuru have got govt's permission to question two former Muda commissioners who will be quizzed soon. The anti-corruption agency is probing alleged site swap deals developed under a controversial 50:50 scheme. Lokayukta SP TJ Udesha, who is the investigation officer confirmed to TOI that they had sought permission from the govt to question former commissioners of Muda, DB Natesh and GT Dinesh, concerning the disposal of developed sites to landowners under the contentious scheme when they were heading the urban development body and it has been approved by the govt previous week. According to Lokayukta SP, about 1,055 sites in various layouts developed by the urban body, were given away for land acquired from landlords in Mysuru. One of the beneficiaries, Parvathi, returned the sites to the urban body after an FIR was filed against her, following a direction by the special court, Bengaluru. Activist Snehamayi Krishna petitioned the special court to investigate the matter, accusing the chief minister and his family of grabbing the land and then obtaining developed sites from the urban body. The anti-corruption agency that probed the matter submitted its report to the court giving a clean chit to the CM and his family, including his wife and brother-in-law, stating there is no evidence against them in the alleged scam. However, it discovered that not just 14 sites, but the urban body had given away about 1,055 sites to various individuals and GPA holders under the scheme. As Lokayukta police have been directed by the special court to also probe other cases of giving sites under the scheme, the cops have sought permission to quiz the then commissioners under whose tenure the majority of sites were disposed of under the scheme. Investigation officer Udesha said the commissioners are likely to be summoned as part of the investigation to record their statements. Earlier, they were questioned concerning Parvathi's case and now with regard to 1,000 other sites in which, more than 130 have benefited from the scheme.
India Today
3 hours ago
- India Today
Operation Sindoor sansad showdown now, fiery debate next week
The monsoon session of Parliament began with a showdown over Operation Sindoor, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi describing it as a 'celebration of victory' following the operation's success after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. The opposition, led by Rahul Gandhi, alleged he was being gagged, with Priyanka Gandhi Vadra demanding he be allowed to speak. The opposition is demanding answers on alleged intelligence failures, the number of aircraft lost, and US President Donald Trump's claims of brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. Meanwhile, the government has expressed readiness for a discussion on Operation Sindoor next week, but the opposition claims the topic was not on the business advisory committee's agenda. The show also touches on the controversy surrounding the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, with opposition leaders protesting the exercise. The Election Commission has responded in the Supreme Court, stating that the petitions against the revision are based on misleading reports and that no eligible elector will be excluded.
