logo
Is US missing 'Berlin Wall' moment in Syria with foreign aid cuts?

Is US missing 'Berlin Wall' moment in Syria with foreign aid cuts?

The National14-02-2025
President Donald Trump's contentious stop to foreign assistance, including the near closure of the US Agency for International Development, threatens key humanitarian operations in Syria at a crucial moment of transition. Adham Sahloul, a former USAID special adviser focusing on China who was also Middle East policy adviser to Pete Buttigieg's 2020 presidential campaign, said the decision means Washington is 'losing an opportunity' at a 'Berlin Wall moment' for Syria and the Middle East. 'What Syria needs is investment,' Mr Sahloul told The National. Speaking at the World Governments Summit in Dubai this week, Syria's transitional Foreign Minister Asaad Al Shibani said the country's new leadership has inherited a struggling economy, partly due to the sanctions imposed during former president Bashar Al Assad's regime. Washington has historically been the largest source of humanitarian support for Syria during its decade-long civil war, allocating $16.7 billion in humanitarian funds 'using existing funding from global humanitarian accounts and some reprogrammed funding', according to a Congressional Research Service report. Mr Trump and much of his Republican Party have long maintained that Syria is 'not our fight'. The Syrian Justice and Accountability Centre has been forced to lose 70 per cent of its team, keeping only 'core' members who have been forced to lose 50 to 60 per cent of their salary, according to executive director Mohammed Al Abdallah. The SJAC's work focuses on documenting war crimes committed throughout the Syrian conflict, expanding beyond Syria's borders to 'follow war criminals' who had made it to Europe as refugees. Their portfolio spans from: the protection of mass graves inside Syria; collaboration with war crimes units in Germany, France, Netherlands and Belgium; and building an open-source collection of evidence of war crimes, including the preservation of about two million YouTube videos from the course of the civil war. Humanitarian aid, energy, health care, water infrastructure – these are all sectors that have a significant need in Syria, and it is 'questionable who will fill that void', Mr Sahloul says. China already appears to be at the ready as Syrians tackle the day-to-day impacts of a sudden halt in US aid – including accountability in the fragile aftermath of more than a decade of war. At a recent briefing on Capitol Hill, Mr Al Abdallah said a Chinese official had called him asking to speak at the UN. Mr Al Abdallah said he declined, but warned Congress that 'bad actors' could become more involved in Syria without Washington's leadership. Defunding the work aimed at achieving justice in courts of law also have impacts for regional security and the endurance of governance in Syria, he said. 'The damage is going to be really prolonged and it only will evolve into instability and chaos, because if there's no accountability mechanism, people will want to take revenge.' The aid cuts have already posed immediate security threats in Syria's north-east, where salaries were frozen for many of the prison and camp guards responsible for securing ISIS militants and their families at Al Hol and Al Roj. The guards left work until US Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a waiver. Barbara Leaf, the former assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern affairs, told the Middle East Institute last week that Syria was 'one of the first places' she thought of as the Trump administration carried out Elon Musk's promises to make major aid cuts. 'ISIS is far from a depleted organisation. In fact, it risks regenerating more rapidly within the context of Syria's current transition,' Ms Leaf added. For Syrians, the impacts go deeper than staffing measures and geopolitical strategy. 'When it comes to civil society work, when it comes to humanitarian aid, when it comes to clearing ordnance or a whole list of essential services, the Syrian civilians play the biggest price out of that,' Mouaz Moustafa, executive director of the Syrian Emergency Task Force, told The National. 'Many live under poverty. USAID cuts across the board is bad, especially for the region, but Syria is affected more than others.' The Syrian diaspora is impacted, too. At a briefing Senate Democrats hosted on Wednesday, USAID's former assistant to the administrator for humanitarian affairs Sarah Charles warned that she is 'very worried about Lebanon,' and that as of this week there is 'no food assistance in the pipeline' for the more than 800,000 Syrian refugees living there. 'At a time when this administration has decided we're going to accept zero refugees, we are also saying that we're going to cut off assistance to those countries that are hosting the largest numbers of refugees,' Ms Charles said. The world of international aid and development has faced long-standing accusations of systemic corruption and disorganisation. Aid 'often comes with conditions tied to the interests of donor countries', said Raad Al Tal, head of the University of Jordan's economics department. 'Continued dependence on it may delay sustainable development, reducing the country's ability to tackle crises on its own,' he wrote in the Jordan Times. Research on Lebanon published by the London School of Economics, for example, highlighted that 'foreign aid has also played a role in keeping this entrenched Lebanese political structure alive' and perpetuating 'structural deficiencies' in governance there. Republicans leading the charge to disrupt US aid, including Mr Rubio, say the agency is plagued with inefficiencies and that only '10 cents on the dollar' of US aid goes towards actual development projects. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jim Risch cautioned at a policy hearing this week that 'everybody needs to stay calm, we're going to get through this.' 'There's money that's been spent that shouldn't have been spent,' said Mr Risch, a Republican who has historically advocated on the importance of humanitarian funding and believes work like SJAC's is important for easing Washington's sanctions regime against Damascus. "There's going to be some aches getting there, but we will get there, for things that are necessary for the best interests of the United States to continue," he added. His Democratic counterpart on the committee, Senator Jeanne Shaheen, told The National that based on her discussions with Secretary Rubio, 'an appreciation for the importance of getting waivers, particularly in certain areas, like the detention camps' in Syria. But the abrupt – and some argue anti-democratic – execution of the halt on US aid poses significant risks for global development. Mr Sahloul says the US has 'amazing colleagues' in Japan, the Indo-Pacific, the UK and Europe who have 'been ambitious' in global aid and could take more leadership, but Washington has played a key role as a 'convener' for these countries' aid agenda.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Islamic State may be responsible for atrocities against Druze, not Syrian forces, Barrack says
Islamic State may be responsible for atrocities against Druze, not Syrian forces, Barrack says

Middle East Eye

time2 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Islamic State may be responsible for atrocities against Druze, not Syrian forces, Barrack says

US envoy Tom Barrack suggested that Syrian government forces were not responsible for atrocities committed against Druze in southern Syria, and that the armed fighters who carried out the attacks may have been Islamic State militants disguised in government uniforms. Barrack, who is President Donald Trump's envoy to Syria as well as ambassador to Turkey, made the comments in an interview with Reuters in Beirut on Tuesday. Syria's southern province of Sweida was the site of sectarian violence between the majority Druze community and Sunni Bedouins. The conflict was internationalised after Israel intervened, bombing Syrian government forces. Israel cast the bombings as an effort to protect Druze. Israel is home to around 150,000 Druze. Around 1,000 people were killed in the clashes in southern Syria. Barrack also cast doubt on video footage that circulated widely on social media alleged to be of Syrian government forces committing atrocities, saying it could have been easily altered. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "The Syrian troops haven't gone into the city. These atrocities that are happening are not happening by the Syrian regime troops. They're not even in the city because they agreed with Israel that they would not go in," he told Reuters. Israel's intervention in the fighting "upset" the Trump administration and Saudi Arabia, as Middle East Eye was the first to report. On Monday, the White House said Trump was "caught off guard" by Israel's bombing. Barrack is spearheading the lifting of US sanctions on Syria. He has been a vocal supporter of efforts by Gulf states to invest in the war-torn country. He has generally walked a tightrope between concerns for minorities in Syria and calls for the central government in Damascus to assert its authority. Barrack is trying to push the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) to integrate into the Syrian army as the US looks to continue reducing its military presence in northeast Syria. Barrack has been well received in Turkey. US support for the SDF has been a long-running sore point in the Nato allies ties. Barrack's messaging on Sharaa In a press conference in Beirut on Monday Barrack was asked about Israeli intervention, which he said 'came at a very bad time' and created 'another very confusing chapter' for Syria. Current and former Arab, Israeli and US officials told MEE that Israel's strikes and efforts to position itself as a defender of the Druze suggested it was bent on carving out a zone of influence in Syria that conflicts directly with the vision of a unitary post-war Syria put forward by Barrack. Barrack has repeatedly stressed that the US was not dictating Syria's form of government. He has cast his diplomacy as a test case for Trump's pledge in May to stop western 'nation builders' and 'interventionists' from working in the Middle East and instead empower locals allies such as the Gulf states and Turkey. Saudi Arabia told US that Syrian forces should deploy to Sweida despite Israeli objections, source says Read More » But Barrack said Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa should assess the fallout of the Sweida conflict, saying Sharaa should reflect: "I'm going to adapt quickly, because if I don't adapt quickly, I'm going to lose the energy of the universe that was behind me." Barrack added that Sharaa's 'theme … isn't working so well', and told Reuters he advised Sharaa to reduce the influence of Islamists in the military and cooperate on security with regional states. Sharaa was the leader of Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, a former US-designated terrorist organisation that toppled Bashar al-Assad last December. Before that he ran al-Qaeda's Syrian branch. Syria has been seen bouts of sectarian violence since Sharaa came to power. In March, Syrian security forces killed hundreds of Alawites - the sect to which Assad belonged - along the Mediterranean coast. In June, at least 25 people were killed in a bombing at Mar Elias Greek Orthodox Church. Sharaa was criticised for his handling of the fallout. He has promised to protect minorities. Barrack said that Sharaa had to address those concerns. "If they end up with a federalist government, that's their determination. And the answer to the question is: everybody may now need to adapt."

Why a far-right party in Japan made big gains
Why a far-right party in Japan made big gains

Gulf Today

time4 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

Why a far-right party in Japan made big gains

Japan's far-right populist Sanseito party was one of the biggest winners in the weekend's upper house election, attracting many voters with its "Japanese First" platform that included calling for tougher restrictions on foreigners and the curtailment of gender equality and diversity policies. Sanseito added 14 seats in Sunday's vote to the one seat already held by its leader in the 248-member upper house, the less powerful of Japan's two-chamber parliament. The surge in the party's popularity came amid the backdrop of a historic loss by the long-governing conservative coalition of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, with Sanseito attracting frustrated voters struggling with economic woes. Sanseito leader Sohei Kamiya said on Tuesday that he has no interest in forming an alliance with conventional parties like Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party, or LDP. Kamiya said he is open to cooperating with other emerging parties, but he's expected to wait in the hopes of gaining more seats in the more powerful lower house. His ambition is to have more influence to possibly form a multiparty coalition like those in Europe. Sanseito, which translates to "Participate in Politics," started in 2020 when Kamiya gathered people on YouTube and social media to create a political group to attract voters discontent with conventional parties. The group began to grow as its members started winning seats in local assemblies, stepping up its presence and grassroots support base. After the start of the coronavirus pandemic, his online approach quickly got traction, fueled partly by an anti-vaccine stance. Sanseito achieved a foothold in national politics in 2022 when Kamiya won a six-year term in the upper house. The party won three seats in the October election in the lower house. The party holds 15 seats in the upper house, compared with the 122 held by Ishiba's governing coalition, but Kamiya has been steadily reaching a much larger audience. Sanseito has gained more than 100,000 YouTube subscribers over the past few weeks to nearly 500,000, compared to the the LDP's 140,000. Sanseito party stood out from Japan's other parties, with a tough anti-foreigner stance as part of its "Japanese First" platform, apparently inspired by US President Donald Trump's "America First" policy. Under his slogan, Kamiya proposes a new agency to handle regulations on foreigners. During the election, the party campaigned for stricter screening for allowing Japanese citizenship and to exclude non-Japanese from welfare benefits. Critics say that the party's stance has encouraged the spread of xenophobic rhetoric in the election campaign and on social media, prompting other ultraconservative candidates to be outspoken. A typical claim is that a rapid increase in foreign workers has hurt Japanese workers' wages and that foreigners use a large share of welfare benefits and have made Japanese society unsafe. That resonated with many Japanese, even though most foreign residents pay taxes and social security as required, and only account for about 3% of both Japan's total population and of welfare benefit recipients. His xenophobic views, antisemitic remarks and emphasis on Japan's ethnic purity have alarmed human rights activists and many experts, prompting protests. Kamiya's party, and another big winner, the Democratic Party for the People, which pushed for an increase of "take home wages," attracted workers who feel frustrated and ignored by conventional parties. Their advance is also part of a new move led by younger people connecting on social media with hopes of changing Japan's political landscape, Izuru Makihara, a politics professor at the University of Tokyo, toldJap a NHK television talk show. Sanseito is still inexperienced and its future success depends on whether its elected members can achieve policies, he said. Kamiya, a former Self-Defense Force reservist and an assembly member in the western town of Suita, promotes an anti-vaccine and anti-globalism platform, while backpedaling on gender equality and sexual diversity. He has repeatedly talked favorably about Trump for taking bold measures. During his campaign, he said that Trump's leadership is part of a growing anti-globalism movement in the West, and that "we share the same concern." He also told a party leaders' debate that Trump policies are for protecting U.S. national interest and are good examples that Japan should follow. Kamiya is supportive of Trump's move to repeal decarbonization and diversity, equity and inclusion policies. Kamiya, a fiery speaker, is also known for stirring controversy and has become a target of scrutiny as his party gained attention. He has blamed the government's gender equality policies for triggering Japan's declining birth rate and population. Kamiya, who opposes allowing a female-line emperor, was also criticized for suggesting that the imperial family would have to turn to concubines if the government was too slow in taking measures to ensure a stable succession. Associated Press

US envoy Tom Barrack accused of plotting Turkey's partition
US envoy Tom Barrack accused of plotting Turkey's partition

Middle East Eye

time7 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

US envoy Tom Barrack accused of plotting Turkey's partition

When billionaire-turned-diplomat Tom Barrack arrived in Ankara in May as US President Donald Trump's ambassador to Turkey, he delivered an unexpectedly emotional speech. 'I think it's a really monumental day for me, feeling the echo of this land from which my ancestors came,' he said. 'But I come with a really simple message from President Trump: his desire to raise the level of the alliance between Turkey and the United States to where it rightfully belongs.' Two months later, Turkish officials are convinced that Barrack is among the most influential US ambassadors ever to serve in the country. His ever-expanding portfolio, now encompassing both Syria and Lebanon, aligns with Ankara's priorities, such as preserving a unified Syrian state under President Ahmed al-Sharaa with a single military. Both Ankara and Barrack seek a stable region. Turkish officials hope that Barrack, who has a direct line to Trump, could help resolve longstanding issues, from the stalled purchase of F-35 fighter jets to the removal of sanctions on Turkey over its purchase of Russia's S-400 missile system. Barrack also made several remarks expressing his admiration of Turkey and its history. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters However, Turkish public opinion paints a starkly different picture. Newspapers and political influencers have launched a campaign against the US envoy, accusing him of attempting to break up the country. Despite Turkey's longstanding history of anti-American sentiment, rooted in the US partnership with Syrian Kurdish groups and its harbouring of the late Fethullah Gulen and his supporters, for the first time in years, an American ambassador is under attack not from government media, but from the opposition, over his conduct. Misquoted The controversy began with Barrack's interview with Turkey's public Anadolu news agency in late June, where he referenced the Ottoman Empire's millet system, which oversaw religious communities from Christians to Jews. Barrack explained that the millet system, which granted religious communities limited autonomy over their own affairs, ensured the survival of diverse groups in the region. He added that a new dialogue between states and cultures was needed today. 'To me, Izmir is the example of how you blend all these communities - Jews, Muslims and Christians living side by side,' he said. 'I see this as the model of what needs to happen in the Middle East and the world. And I think Turkey can be the centre point of it all.' Why Turkey abruptly cancelled an Iraqi oil pipeline agreement Read More » Within days, a flurry of social media posts and newspaper articles misquoted him, claiming that he had advocated for the millet system as the ideal order for modern Turkey, a statement he never made. For many Turkish citizens, the millet system evokes painful memories of a weakened Ottoman Empire in the 19th century, teetering on the brink of partition along ethnic and nationalist lines. 'US Ambassador Tom Barrack showered praise on the Ottoman's religion-based millet system!' wrote Arslan Bulut, a journalist for the nationalist opposition newspaper Yeni Cag, earlier this month. 'For this, Turkey must be stripped of its nation-state status!' Husnu Bozkurt, a former parliamentarian from the Republican People's Party (CHP), took it further: 'For years, we've warned that imperialist America seeks to divide the secular Republic of Turkey by transforming it into a religiously-governed state under its control, destroying the unitary nation-state structure, turning it into a federation, and eliminating linguistic unity by splitting the nation along sectarian and ethnic lines - the ultimate goal of the Greater Middle East Project (BOP).' Barrack is viewed as unconventional among western ambassadors in Turkey, spending much of his time in the region and in Istanbul. His candid interviews with various publications are often taken out of context, as he speaks without reservation. PKK peace talks As Barrack grapples with these reactions, Turkey is engaged in peace talks with the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) and its jailed leader Abdullah Ocalan, after more than 40 years of conflict. Earlier this year, the PKK announced an end to its armed struggle and, in a symbolic ceremony this month, burned its weapons, a development that has left many Turks uneasy about the country's future. Retired Colonel Unal Atabay argued that Barrack's alleged suggestion to revive the Ottoman religion-based millet system would undermine Turkey's status as a nation-state. Syrian Kurds face 30-day ultimatum from US and Turkey Read More » 'Isn't it interesting… This is exactly what Ocalan refers to as Middle Eastern unity,' he said. 'It's about ensuring the formation of a separatist Kurdish region while transforming Turkey into an Ottoman-like state.' Barrack's recent interview with the Associated Press about Israeli strikes on Damascus and Sweida in Syria over the weekend did little to help his case. He suggested that Israel would rather see Syria fragmented and divided than governed by a strong central state. 'Strong nation-states are a threat - especially Arab states are viewed as a threat to Israel,' he said. But in Syria, he noted, 'I think all the minority communities are smart enough to say, 'We're better off together, centralised.'' Turkish media and commentators interpreted Barrack's criticism of Israel as indirect approval of US efforts to partition strong nation-states in the region. At the same time, Devlet Bahceli, a Turkish nationalist leader within President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's ruling coalition, proposed that Turkey could, in the future, appoint two vice presidents, one Kurdish and the other Alevi, a minority religious group that has sometimes reported persecution. Mehmet Ali Guler, a columnist for the opposition Cumhuriyet daily, argued that Bahceli's proposal and Barrack's comments on the Ottoman millet system all serve the same purpose: 'The Lebanonisation of Turkey'. Bahceli in a statement strongly rebuked the allegations, calling them 'distortions'. The US Embassy in Ankara has remained silent in the face of these accusations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store