logo
Revealed: Woman who wrongly had part of spine removed among hundreds of NHS surgical blunders

Revealed: Woman who wrongly had part of spine removed among hundreds of NHS surgical blunders

Independent18 hours ago

A woman who mistakenly had part of her spine removed is among hundreds of patients who have been the victim of NHS surgical blunders this year.
New figures show there were more than 400 serious surgical mistakes carried out on patients over the past year — including the incorrect organ being removed, the wrong body part being operated on or surgical instruments being left inside a patient's body. In some cases, entire operations were carried out on the wrong patient.
The Royal College of Surgeons has now warned that the NHS needs to understand what has led to the rise in incidents to stop these mistakes being repeated.
Among the victims is Gill, who was advised to have surgery on her right cervical rib after struggling with excruciating pain. But the surgeon performed the wrong operation and ended up removing portions of her vertebrae, leaving her with permanent damage to her spinal cord.
'I woke up the following morning and couldn't feel my arms and my legs and just thought 'oh my gosh what is wrong with me',' she told The Independent.
The part-time-cook was warned by doctors she might not be able to walk again and was left struggling to work and was unable to continue her active lifestyle, which included dancing. Her movements are limited and she struggles with the function of her right hand.
'The emotions were just horrendous, because when you are told you will never walk again, it's very daunting,' she added.
Through Been let Down lawyers Bond Turner, Gill was able to achieve a settlement for her pain and suffering and loss of amenity, loss of earnings, past and future loss of earnings; future housing adaptation costs and household expenses; past and future care; equipment; and rehabilitation.
According to NHS provisional data, between April 2024 and March 2025, there were 403 similar incidents known as 'never events'– serious and largely preventable surgical mistakes.
The year before, in 2023/24, there were 370 cases, while in 2022/23 there were 384. In 2021/22, 407 cases were recorded and in 2020/21 there were 364 — meaning more than 1,900 cases were reported over the past five years.
The most common type of surgical error, making up more than 45 per cent of all reported 'never events' in the last year, was 'wrong site surgery'. This includes procedures performed on the wrong patient or at the wrong site, such as operating on the wrong knee, eye, or limb.
Provisional data revealed that, out of the 185 'wrong site surgery' incidents, surgeons operated on the wrong body part in 46 cases. In 36 cases the wrong skin lesion was removed, while in nine cases patients received a surgery intended for someone else.
In just over a quarter of incidents, a surgical instrument, swab or part of a needle was left inside the patient.
About 50 patients have received the wrong implant or prosthesis, including the wrong hip or knee replacement.
Other mishaps included a transfusion of the wrong blood, medication given incorrectly and overdoses of insulin.
At most hospitals these 'never events' only happen once or twice a year, but NHS data reveals that, at the worst offending hospitals, these incidents can happen more than 10 times a year.
Over the past year there were 10 incidents at Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, 11 at University Hospital Southampton and 13 at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust. All these trusts have been contacted for comment.
Paul Grundy, chief medical officer at University Hospital Southampton, said: 'We take any incidents of this nature extremely seriously and are sorry that they occurred.
'No patients suffered serious harm in any of these cases, however the Trust is committed to delivering the very best standards of care and is always transparent in the reporting of mistakes, encouraging staff to report incidents if they occur.
'On the rare occasion that we get things wrong, we carry out a thorough investigation, ensuring learnings are shared to help us improve the quality and safety of the clinical care we deliver and to minimise the risk of recurrence.'
The Royal College of Surgeons said hospitals need to take steps to understand what has led to the rise in incidents to stop these mistakes being repeated.
A spokesperson said: 'Surgical teams take the safety of patients very seriously, using the World Health Organisation's (WHO) pre and post-operative check lists to help prevent mistakes.
'When mistakes do happen, it is traumatic for both the patients and staff involved.
'NHS hospitals need to consider these figures carefully and take steps to understand what has led to the rise in incidents.
'They must learn from mistakes, in an open way, involving all theatre staff in changes to policies and procedures that can stop mistakes being repeated.'
These incidents are recorded through a mandatory reporting system to NHS England and investigations are carried out by the Care Quality Commission (CQC).
In the past decade the NHS has changed how the data is measured.
Prior to 2014/15, they have only included incidents where a patient was directly harmed. But this was changed to include incidents with the potential to harm a patient – leading to a rise in the number of cases recorded. In 2017/18, the NHS made a minor change to the sub-categories it used to split never-events into different types of cases.
An NHS spokesperson said: 'NHS staff work exceptionally hard to keep patients safe and incidents like these are extremely rare, but when they do occur NHS trusts are mandated to investigate what has happened and take effective steps to learn from them and make improvements.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Times letters: Tying hospital funds to patient satisfaction
Times letters: Tying hospital funds to patient satisfaction

Times

time2 hours ago

  • Times

Times letters: Tying hospital funds to patient satisfaction

Write to letters@ Sir, There is a big difference between motivation and financial incentives ('Hospitals' funds tied to patient satisfaction', news, Jun 28). Most health and other professionals are primarily motivated by wanting to make a difference in the world and have an impact in their chosen field. They are not indifferent to money, but are far more likely to be demotivated by lack of money than motivated by financial rewards. Improved technology and better systems are vital, but the NHS is essentially a people-based service. The new NHS plan will only succeed if the people who have to implement it are personally committed to doing so — providing the extra discretionary effort and passion that money can't buy. The NHS plan of 2000 was similarly far-reaching: it enjoyed enormous support from many NHS professionals and organisations and kickstarted the major improvements of the following CrispChief executive of NHS England and permanent secretary of the Department of Health 2000-06 Sir, It's hard to see how cutting the income of a poorly performing NHS trust will result in its treating its unfortunate patients better: the reverse is far more likely. A fairer and more intelligent policy would be to replace the managers of badly run trusts with others who have a track record of serving the public ParlourLincoln Sir, Too often elaborate and expensive plans are made without any patient involvement. If the ten-year NHS plan is to be successful then patient representation on every single 'change' project should be encouraged. The patients' voice needs to be clear and loud, so as to have a real impact on future Mabs ChowdhuryConsultant dermatologist, Cardiff Sir, To achieve success during the 20-plus years that I was a clinical director in an NHS commissioning group, I spent my life explaining to the non-clinical managers why their initial ideas might not work for clinicians. Labour's suggestion will only work if the managers are willing clinicians who know the system; to think otherwise is folly. One need only look at what happened when the pandemic struck, and managers abandoned ship to the doctors and nurses, to realise Shelley HaylesOxford Sir, You report that patients will decide how much hospitals are paid by rating their treatment and that an improved NHS app will give patients more choice over who treats them and where. On the first issue there has never been a problem with staff motivation but there has been a perennial one with facilities provided (namely, operating theatres, beds and equipment) — which is hardly the responsibility of those providing the care. On the second issue there have been many studies to show that patients prefer local treatment, where any complications can be dealt with promptly by the same team and overall travel kept to a minimum. These proposals will be ineffective and wasteful. Instead we need to eliminate inefficiency and provide adequate facilities for a professional workforce that should be trusted and not treated like difficult ThomasRet'd consultant orthopaedic surgeon, Itchen Stoke, Hants Sir, I enjoyed Ben Macintyre's account of Anglo-Iranian relations ('Iranian distrust of the British runs deep', Jun 28) but I fear he is too accepting of some of the propagandist claims regularly made by the Islamic Republic. He omits to mention British support for the Constitutional Revolution between 1905 and 1909, particularly the role played by the extraordinary Philo-Persian Cambridge scholar and activist Edward Browne. He might also have recalled Lord Curzon's intense interest in the country. He cites British support for Reza Khan in 1921, but after the chaos of the previous ten years many Iranians welcomed the stability he brought. Macintyre claims that Mohammad Mosaddegh was 'left-leaning'. He was certainly reformist and nationalist, but he came from an old Qajar family and had been a high functionary in the last days of the dynasty, suggesting paternalism rather than socialism. We and the Americans were certainly involved in his overthrow. But that would not have happened if substantial elements in the army, the religious establishment and the population at large had not supported the Shah. Finally, the present regime is well aware of the decline in our international influence. They shout loudly about us not because they believe we are really capable of damaging them but because it is helpful to them in rallying nationalist John JenkinsFormer British ambassador to Syria, Iraq and Saudi Arabia; Matfield, Kent Sir, Ben Macintyre's article brought back memories from the late 1960s, when an Iranian student friend told me that in Iran, should someone trip over a stone, you could be sure that an Englishman had put it AlbrightRottingdean, Brighton & Hove Sir, As a teacher I found that gaining the trust and support of parents whose children who were a threat to good order in school was enough to resolve the problem. Jenni Russell's comment piece ('Fear of knives is destroying the social order' Jun 28) reminds us that the more young men carry knives, the more others feel forced to do so. When teenagers appear in court charged with knife crimes their parents are not obliged to attend. These are the people who have brought these young people into the world and have engaged with the responsibility of bringing them up. Owners of dangerous dogs can appear in court; why not the parents of dangerous teenagers? Then courts could demand their co-operation and InsonEast Mersea, Essex Sir, I was much impressed by Jenni Russell's views on the disturbance of social order by petty crimes. Perhaps two days in supervised stocks might provide an effective solution; why waste money on incarceration when the low-cost public shame and indignity of this suffered by offenders might well make them mend their ways within a very short time?Peter HardymentCobham, Surrey Parliament's lingo Sir, The proposed 'inclusive' makeover to parliament's 'outdated' language must be resisted ('Division bell rings for 'confusing' parliamentary terms', news, Jun 28). Such an unnecessary change is likely to be irreversible, and is yet another damning example of the Labour government's contempt for tradition and also its utmost uninterest in maintaining high standards of literacy for the future. The perverse logic underpinning this decision will no doubt have deleterious ripple effects in the education sector further down the line. The literary canon will not be taught in schools on the grounds that the 'confusing' language in these texts 'alienates' students; resultant successive generations of university students will be less willing and able to read; and the longer-term ability for students and academics to engage critically with literature — let alone write about it elegantly — will decline and fall. Edward Gibbon will be turning in his Edward HowellOxford Two-tier justice Sir, Lord Hermer, the attorney-general, describes the claim that there exists a two-tier justice system in this country as 'offensive' (Jun 28). But there is indeed a two-tier system, as justice is available only to those eligible for legal aid and those to whom the cost of it all is immaterial. The great majority of the population comes into neither category. Lawyers are fond of repeating that justice delayed is justice denied: it is also the case that justice too-expensive-to-be-afforded is also justice Davies-HumphreysChester Sir, Tim Davie's advice to employees to avoid conflict with friends and family over Gaza is no doubt well intentioned ('BBC staff told not to fight with family and friends over Gaza coverage', Jun 26). Given the BBC's Glastonbury coverage of Bobby Vylan's chant of 'death to the IDF', why should employees feel unable to defend their employer? If they are uncomfortable doing so, should they not seek to change the organisation from within — or alternatively consider whether they should change their employer?Andrew LeslauHenley-on-Thames, Oxon Sir, If, as reported (Jun 27), disability benefit changes will now apply only to new claimants, it is questionable whether the same criteria should not have been applied to the imposition of VAT on school fees, thereby preventing the enforced displacement of thousands of WellingsHalesowen, W Midlands Sir, Further to your report ('Give 65-year-olds MoT 'to keep them living at home' '), as a 67-year-old who plays hockey and cricket at club and international age group level, erects the marquees for the village fête, cleans the local church using an extendable ladder and goes mountain biking on Salisbury Plain, am I allowed to question the age criteria of the proposed care home assessment?Mark BanhamBeechingstoke, Wilts Sir, Regarding people dining alone being given a bad table (Notebook), the trick is, when entering, to ask for a table for two and order a glass of wine right away, 'While I wait for my friend'. When it comes, smile apologetically, pick up your phone and say you've just learnt that your friend can't make it and you'll be eating alone. You'll never be asked to JohnstoneLondon NW1 Sir, Dafydd Thomas's letter (Jun 28) reminded me of a dinner party in Nashville at which I was the only one of the 12 guests who did not carry a gun. The hostess said that she advised her children when returning home late to shout up 'It's only me, Mother'. Otherwise, she said, 'I'll shoot 'em'.Averil MansfieldLondon W2 Sir, Your editorial (Jun 28) accuses the M&S Red Diamond Strawberry and Creme sandwich of 'desecrating' the legacy of the 4th Earl of Sandwich, thus perpetuating the legend that the Earl created the delicacy. The Romans, among others, might contest that claim. The first Earl of Sandwich, however, whose scorched remains, recognisable only by his clothing and medals, were washed ashore after his ship was set on fire at the Battle of Solebay in 1672, could lay claim to the dubious honour of being history's first example of a 'toasted' CooteErith, Kent Write to letters@

From Brazil to Westminster: How health pilot is proving a force for good for patients and the NHS
From Brazil to Westminster: How health pilot is proving a force for good for patients and the NHS

Sky News

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News

From Brazil to Westminster: How health pilot is proving a force for good for patients and the NHS

Jessica Ellis is a Chewie. She's not from a galaxy far, far away but here, right now, working in one of our most deprived communities. To the people she helps, she is a force for good. We are standing in front of a large block of council flats in Westminster, central London. The entrycom buzzes. "Hi Mrs Dikir, how are you?" Jessica asks. And then "thank you" as we're let in and make our way up five flights of stairs. Inside the flat, in the living room, Mr Jaber Dikir sits on a soft, plush armchair. It has to be comfortable because Mr Dikir spends most of his days sitting here. "I have a heart problem, I have open heart surgery and now I have heart failure," Mr Dikir explains. "I have water in my chest and that gives me big trouble to sleep, to breathe," he adds as he begins to wheeze. I ask Mr Jaber how Jessica has been able to help him. "She hears you, she listens to you," he replies. "She understands everything. She even called the doctor and he gave me permission to stay at home (for my blood tests). That's really appreciated. I couldn't walk properly, I couldn't go to the clinic." Jessica is a community health and wellbeing worker (CHWWs). That's where the nickname comes from. CHWWs work in small teams, going door to door in some of the most deprived areas of the country. It's part of an NHS pilot inspired by a successful programme in Brazil. A simple but effective intervention Jessica says her role is "to make life easier". Mr Dakir, she tells me, is struggling with his mobility. So is organising a designated disabled bay. "Mr Dakir is struggling to get out to his appointments, and the GP needs a blood test from him. So I was able to speak to the GP and he's been labelled as temporarily housebound so the district nursing team can come in now and take the bloods for him at home." A simple but effective intervention that has a huge impact on Mr Dakir and the NHS. The project is currently being used in 15 neighbourhoods around the country. In Westminster, there has been a 7% drop in A&E admissions and an 11% reduction in hospital admissions year on year. There has also been a 47% increase in the likelihood of households having vaccinations, an 82% increase in cancer screenings and a 7.3% drop in unscheduled GP consultations. Taking community care right to the patient's door Dr Melinda Creme is a local GP. Jessica acts as a conduit between Dr Creme and her patients. "We need to look at the costs of what might happen downstream if disease is not picked up earlier, if health inequalities are not addressed sooner, and so there should be potential huge savings down the line. "It might take five years, 10 years to make a difference and that's the issue, because obviously governments change within that time. "But if there's a long-term lens on this, then we stand a chance of being able to afford a health service free at the point of delivery." This is exactly what the government wants, what the NHS wants, to bring care into the community. With this project, they are taking community care right to the patient's door. Dr Creme says the days when people would go to their GP and expect their family doctor to look after anybody and everybody about everything are gone. "We can't possibly do that. We're not equipped to do that because the population is expanding and we cannot address all needs." Labour's 10-year health plan set for launch The government is expected to focus on personalised and community care in its 10-year health plan when it is published on Thursday. It will look to ease pressure on buckling emergency departments and models like this have shown early signs of good results, but they require time and investment. Projects like this can help ease the strain on services facing record pressures and tight budgets. They could be a significant part of a wider NHS plan.

MasterChef star Amina Elshafei reveals devastating health diagnosis
MasterChef star Amina Elshafei reveals devastating health diagnosis

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

MasterChef star Amina Elshafei reveals devastating health diagnosis

MasterChef Australia star Amina Elshafei is battling a devastating autoimmune disease. The beloved reality TV star shared the news on Instagram on Sunday evening, alongside a gallery of images, hoping to bring awareness to the crippling condition. 'For the last 18 months, I've been treated with a newly diagnosed condition called myasthenia gravis,' she wrote alongside the carousel, adding that June was Myasthenia Gravis Awareness Month. Amina went on to thank her healthcare providers. 'Thank you to my amazing specialists, especially my neurologist, the beautiful nurses at the dialysis and day infusion units at Royal North Shore Hospital.' From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. She continued: 'And to all the blood donors who humbly share the gift of their blood to help others like myself get treatments dependent on blood products and to provide blood products in emergencies.' Myasthenia Gravis is a chronic autoimmune disorder that disrupts communication between nerves and muscles, leading to muscle weakness, fatigue, and difficulty with everyday tasks like speaking, swallowing, and walking. There's no cure, according to the Mayo Clinic. It wasn't long before the post was showered in well wishes. 'Stay strong and get well soon. Thank you for the awareness about this disease,' wrote TV star Barry Du Bois. 'Ohhhh my love!!!! So much love and power to you!!! ❤️❤️❤️,' added MasterChef star Sarah Tiong. 'Thank you for sharing this with us, sending you so many positive vibes and wishing you the best with your health,' commented a fan. 'Sorry to hear this news sis. Sending healing vibes and love your way ❤️,' added one more. 'Sending strength! ❤️ love and health!' wrote another. Amina rose to fame on season four of MasterChef Australia in 2012. She returned to the kitchen to compete in the 2020 season, Back to Win. Amina is a mother to two young children, and works as a paediatric nurse. Born in Saudi Arabia to a South Korean mother and Egyptian father, Amina and her family immigrated to Australia in 1989 to start a new life.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store