Kansas, Bill Self Receive Major Recruiting News on Wednesday
Kansas, Bill Self Receive Major Recruiting News on Wednesday originally appeared on Athlon Sports.
The college basketball recruiting cycle never really ends. As June winds down, players are still shifting schools while coaches continue shaping their rosters for the 2025-26 season.
Advertisement
Kansas head coach Bill Self got a boost on Wednesday, landing a key frontcourt addition who could make an impact in Big 12 play. The Jayhawks picked up Paul Mbiya, a 6-foot-11, 260-pound center with a 7-foot-7 wingspan. Mbiya adds size, depth and much-needed rim protection to a Kansas team with Final Four aspirations.
Joe Tipton of On3 Sports broke the news:
"Congolese big man Paul Mbiya, a former NC State signee, has committed to Kansas, source tells @On3Recruits. The 6-11, 260-pound 20-year-old center boasts a 7-7 wingspan."
Mbiya hit the open market last week after decommitting from the NC State Wolfpack, where he had been pledged for just over a month. Kansas beat out Dana Altman and the Oregon Ducks for his services.
Advertisement
Mbiya began his development at the NBA Academy Africa before moving to France to play for ASVEL Villeurbanne, where he averaged 15.5 points and 11.6 rebounds per game.
Kansas Jayhawks head coach Bill Self.© Christopher Creveling-Imagn Images
He becomes the second major pickup for Kansas in as many days. The Jayhawks also added Kohl Rosario, bringing the scholarship count to 13 of the 14 available spots.
Mbiya will likely compete with Flory Bidunga for minutes at the center position. His commitment likely ends Kansas' pursuit of fellow bigs Ege Demir and Brice Dessert.
The Jayhawks are looking to bounce back after a frustrating 21-13 campaign, including an 11-9 mark in Big 12 play. Their season began with a No. 1 ranking in the Associated Press preseason poll and ended in disappointment with a first-round loss in the NCAA Tournament to John Calipari's Arkansas Razorbacks.
Advertisement
Kansas has reloaded and retooled. With Mbiya in the mix, they're once again aiming for a deep March run.
Related: Duke Basketball Gets Good Recruiting News on Monday
Related: Khaman Maluach Sends Message to Cooper Flagg After NBA Draft Decision
This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 25, 2025, where it first appeared.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Deion Sanders shares recovery update as possible Colorado return nears
A post shared by @COACHPRIME (@deionsanders) Colorado Buffaloes head coach Deion Sanders is taking small strides in rehab after stepping away from the team to attend to an unspecified health issue. His son, Deion Jr., shared a hopeful update over the weekend. A recent post on the elder Sanders' Instagram account revealed Coach Prime wearing a weighted vest while walking with his son. The caption read, "Every little step I take, my son [Deion Jr.] has been there, so we've decided to keep stepping! Coach Prime is coming to a stadium sold out soon." Sanders' absence has had ripple effects on the Buffaloes' offseason routine after he missed spring youth camps and has not been in Boulder since April. The weighted vest could suggest that Sanders is trying to accelerate his recovery, as it helps build strength. While specifics of his condition remain private, the 57-year-old coach revealed in May, during a podcast with former NFL cornerback Asante Samuel, that he lost 14-pounds earlier this spring. A few weeks ago Sanders did update Colorado fans on his recovery saying on social media saying 'everything is okay' and that he will provide more details on his health when he returns. Sanders previously missed time due to blood clots in 2023 that forced him to miss a Pac-12 media days. A major sign in his recovery could come in a couple weeks when he is expected to attend the Big 12 media days on July 9 in Frisco, Texas. His presence there could mark a turning point, signaling readiness to return to his coaching duties ahead of fall camp. Colorado kicks off its 2025 season at home against Georgia Tech on Aug. 29. Follow Charlie Strella on X, Threads, and Instagram. Contact/Follow us @BuffaloesWire on X (formerly Twitter), and like our page on Facebook for ongoing coverage of Colorado news, notes and opinions.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Big Ten will regret bullying SEC on its college football schedule
The SEC speeds too much of its football schedule on easy street. That's the Big Ten's stance, as articulated recently by Illinois coach Bret Bielema. Bielema conveyed the mood of his conference when he called on the SEC to play a ninth conference game. If the Big Ten successfully strong-arms the SEC into reducing its number of cupcake opponents, that will be a win for college football. Advertisement The stubborn persistence of non-conference pushover games remains one of this sport's lamest elements, and no conference plays more patsies than the SEC. The surest way to reduce the number of cupcakes would be to increase the number of conference games. It's not the only way, but it's the firmest path. Left to their own devices, some schools will pursue the greatest number of non-conference cakewalks. So, I wish the Big Ten luck in its mission to bend the SEC toward nine conference games, a figure that would match the number played by the Big Ten and Big 12. And yet, I wonder whether the Big Ten will come to regret trying to bully the SEC on its schedule. Because, I see this ending one of two ways. Advertisement PLAYOFF TALKS: As Big Ten, SEC squabble, the CFP wins SLEEPERS: Five unlikely teams that could contend for national title Possibility 1: The SEC will dig in its heels, rebuff the Big Ten, and remain at eight conference games. If this occurs, it will show that the Big Ten doesn't possess the power it must think it has to influence other conferences. Wouldn't be the first time this happened, either. Remember when the Big Ten chose to cancel its 2020 season amid the pandemic. How'd that turn out? The SEC decided it would play in 2020, and the Big Ten came crawling back to play a truncated season, revealing itself a follower in 2020, not a leader. Advertisement More recently, the Big Ten supported a playoff format rigged with a stacked deck of auto bids. When the SEC soured on the plan, the Big Ten's idea withered on the vine. Possibility 2: The SEC will accept the Big Ten's challenge to play a ninth conference game and reap the reward by building strength of schedule metrics that dwarf most of the Big Ten. The SEC repeatedly has proven itself too chicken to add a ninth conference game. The reasons change, but the result remains the same: Eight conference games. The SEC's reluctance to add another conference game amounts to an irrational fear of the boogeyman. If it ever takes the plunge, it would learn that the rewards offset outweigh the risks. The SEC waged an offseason propaganda campaign claiming that the College Football Playoff selection committee does not value its schedule strength. That's hogwash. Advertisement In truth, the CFP committee has repeatedly valued the SEC's schedule strength. If the playoff had included 16 teams last season, the SEC would have qualified three 9-3 teams and six teams total, while no other conference supplied a three-loss team. The SEC wishes for the selection process to evolve so that strength of schedule metrics are weighted even more in the future, when determining at-large playoff bids. If it achieves that mission and also beefs up its schedule with another conference game, while the playoff expands to 16 teams, look out, Big Ten. The runway would be greased for a cavalcade of 9-3 playoff teams from the SEC. Plus, adding another conference game would help distinguish the SEC's wheat from its chaff, helping ensure that the best SEC teams made the playoff. As it is, the Big Ten owns one upper-hand on the SEC in the rhetoric wars that surround at-large bids: Its membership plays one extra conference game, and most of its members play 10 Power Four opponents, while most SEC teams play nine Power Four foes. Advertisement If the SEC adds a ninth conference game, the Big Ten would surrender that upper-hand. By trying to persuade the SEC to expand its conference schedule, though, the Big Ten must believe another potential outcome exists. Such as: Possibility 3: A ninth SEC game would cause the conference to buckle under the weight of its collective strength, losses will mount, thereby reducing the number of SEC teams with playoff résumés and allowing more access for the Big Ten. Is this possible? Yes. Probable? No. The committee already values strength of schedule, and the SEC's scheduling would be beyond reproach if it added another conference game. Advertisement Vanderbilt shocking Alabama and Kentucky upsetting a top-five opponent on the road are exceptions in the SEC, not rules. Despite those results in 2024, Alabama and Mississippi would have qualified for a 16-team playoff as three-loss teams. Now, imagine if Alabama and Ole Miss had inserted another win against an SEC opponent in place of a blowout against Championship Subdivision roadkill. That would have enhanced each team's credentials, and yet, that's what the Big Ten seems to want. It calls on the SEC to enhance its collective strength of schedule, at an inflection point when strength of schedule could be valued more than ever in the playoff selection process. Careful what you wish for, Big Ten. In 2020, when teams played conference-only schedules, the SEC put four teams in the top nine of the final CFP rankings. Playing more SEC games sure didn't hamper the league that year. If the Big Ten gets its way, and the SEC adds another conference game in place of a cupcake, that would buoy college football. Just don't think it helps the Big Ten. Advertisement Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@ and follow him on X @btoppmeyer. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Big Ten bullying SEC college football schedule ends in regret
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Why Big Ten will regret bullying SEC on its college football schedule
If the Big Ten strong-arms the SEC into reducing its number of cupcake games and beefing up its schedule, that will be a win for college football. Just not a win for the Big Ten. The SEC speeds too much of its football schedule on easy street. That's the Big Ten's stance, as articulated recently by Illinois coach Bret Bielema. Bielema conveyed the mood of his conference when he called on the SEC to play a ninth conference game. If the Big Ten successfully strong-arms the SEC into reducing its number of cupcake opponents, that will be a win for college football. The stubborn persistence of non-conference pushover games remains one of this sport's lamest elements, and no conference plays more patsies than the SEC. The surest way to reduce the number of cupcakes would be to increase the number of conference games. It's not the only way, but it's the firmest path. Left to their own devices, some schools will pursue the greatest number of non-conference cakewalks. So, I wish the Big Ten luck in its mission to bend the SEC toward nine conference games, a figure that would match the number played by the Big Ten and Big 12. And yet, I wonder whether the Big Ten will come to regret trying to bully the SEC on its schedule. Because, I see this ending one of two ways. Possibility 1: The SEC will dig in its heels, rebuff the Big Ten, and remain at eight conference games. If this occurs, it will show that the Big Ten doesn't possess the power it must think it has to influence other conferences. Wouldn't be the first time this happened, either. Remember when the Big Ten chose to cancel its 2020 season amid the pandemic. How'd that turn out? The SEC decided it would play in 2020, and the Big Ten came crawling back to play a truncated season, revealing itself a follower in 2020, not a leader. More recently, the Big Ten supported a playoff format rigged with a stacked deck of auto bids. When the SEC soured on the plan, the Big Ten's idea withered on the vine. Possibility 2: The SEC will accept the Big Ten's challenge to play a ninth conference game and reap the reward by building strength of schedule metrics that dwarf most of the Big Ten. The SEC repeatedly has proven itself too chicken to add a ninth conference game. The reasons change, but the result remains the same: Eight conference games. The SEC's reluctance to add another conference game amounts to an irrational fear of the boogeyman. If it ever takes the plunge, it would learn that the rewards offset outweigh the risks. The SEC waged an offseason propaganda campaign claiming that the College Football Playoff selection committee does not value its schedule strength. That's hogwash. In truth, the CFP committee has repeatedly valued the SEC's schedule strength. If the playoff had included 16 teams last season, the SEC would have qualified three 9-3 teams and six teams total, while no other conference supplied a three-loss team. The SEC wishes for the selection process to evolve so that strength of schedule metrics are weighted even more in the future, when determining at-large playoff bids. If it achieves that mission and also beefs up its schedule with another conference game, while the playoff expands to 16 teams, look out, Big Ten. The runway would be greased for a cavalcade of 9-3 playoff teams from the SEC. Plus, adding another conference game would help distinguish the SEC's wheat from its chaff, helping ensure that the best SEC teams made the playoff. As it is, the Big Ten owns one upper-hand on the SEC in the rhetoric wars that surround at-large bids: Its membership plays one extra conference game, and most of its members play 10 Power Four opponents, while most SEC teams play nine Power Four foes. If the SEC adds a ninth conference game, the Big Ten would surrender that upper-hand. By trying to persuade the SEC to expand its conference schedule, though, the Big Ten must believe another potential outcome exists. Such as: Possibility 3: A ninth SEC game would cause the conference to buckle under the weight of its collective strength, losses will mount, thereby reducing the number of SEC teams with playoff résumés and allowing more access for the Big Ten. Is this possible? Yes. Probable? No. The committee already values strength of schedule, and the SEC's scheduling would be beyond reproach if it added another conference game. Vanderbilt shocking Alabama and Kentucky upsetting a top-five opponent on the road are exceptions in the SEC, not rules. Despite those results in 2024, Alabama and Mississippi would have qualified for a 16-team playoff as three-loss teams. Now, imagine if Alabama and Ole Miss had inserted another win against an SEC opponent in place of a blowout against Championship Subdivision roadkill. That would have enhanced each team's credentials, and yet, that's what the Big Ten seems to want. It calls on the SEC to enhance its collective strength of schedule, at an inflection point when strength of schedule could be valued more than ever in the playoff selection process. Careful what you wish for, Big Ten. In 2020, when teams played conference-only schedules, the SEC put four teams in the top nine of the final CFP rankings. Playing more SEC games sure didn't hamper the league that year. If the Big Ten gets its way, and the SEC adds another conference game in place of a cupcake, that would buoy college football. Just don't think it helps the Big Ten. Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@ and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.
