logo
The US said it had no choice but to deport them to a third country. Then it sent them home

The US said it had no choice but to deport them to a third country. Then it sent them home

Reuters2 days ago
WASHINGTON, Aug 2 (Reuters) - The Trump administration says that some serious criminals need to be deported to third countries because even their home countries won't accept them. But a review of recent cases shows that at least five men threatened with such a fate were sent to their native countries within weeks.
President Donald Trump aims to deport millions of immigrants in the U.S. illegally and his administration has sought to ramp up removals to third countries, including sending convicted criminals to South Sudan and Eswatini, formerly known as Swaziland, two sub-Saharan African nations.
Immigrants convicted of crimes typically first serve their U.S. sentences before being deported. This appeared to be the case with the eight men deported to South Sudan and five to Eswatini, although some had been released years earlier.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security said in June that third-country deportations allow them to deport people 'so uniquely barbaric that their own countries won't take them back.' Critics have countered that it's not clear the U.S. tried to return the men deported to South Sudan and Eswatini to their home countries and that the deportations were unnecessarily cruel.
Reuters found that at least five men threatened with deportation to Libya in May were sent to their home countries weeks later, according to interviews with two of the men, a family member and attorneys.
After a U.S. judge blocked the Trump administration from sending them to Libya, two men from Vietnam, two men from Laos and a man from Mexico were all deported to their home nations. The deportations have not previously been reported.
DHS did not comment on the removals. Reuters could not determine if their home countries initially refused to take them or why the U.S. tried to send them to Libya.
DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin contested that the home countries of criminals deported to third countries were willing to take them back, but did not provide details on any attempts to return the five men home before they were threatened with deportation to Libya.
'If you come to our country illegally and break our laws, you could end up in CECOT, Alligator Alcatraz, Guantanamo Bay, or South Sudan or another third country,' McLaughlin said in a statement, referencing El Salvador's maximum-security prison and a detention center in the subtropical Florida Everglades.
DHS did not respond to a request for the number of third-country deportations since Trump took office on January 20, although there have been thousands to Mexico and hundreds to other countries.
The eight men sent to South Sudan were from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, South Sudan and Vietnam, according to DHS. The man DHS said was from South Sudan had a deportation order to Sudan, according to a court filing. The five men sent to Eswatini were from Cuba, Jamaica, Laos, Vietnam and Yemen, according to DHS.
White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said the men deported to South Sudan and Eswatini were 'the worst of the worst' and included people convicted in the United States of child sex abuse and murder. 'American communities are safer with these heinous illegal criminals gone,' Jackson said in a statement.
The Laos government did not respond to requests for comment regarding the men threatened with deportation to Libya and those deported to South Sudan and Eswatini. Vietnam's foreign ministry spokesperson said on July 17 that the government was verifying information regarding the South Sudan deportation but did not provide additional comment to Reuters.
The government of Mexico did not comment.
The Trump administration acknowledged in a May 22 court filing that the man from Myanmar had valid travel documents to return to his home country but he was deported to South Sudan anyway. DHS said the man had been convicted of sexual assault involving a victim mentally and physically incapable of resisting.
Eswatini's government said on Tuesday that it was still holding the five migrants sent there in isolated prison units under the deal with the Trump administration.
The Supreme Court in June allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants to third countries without giving them a chance to show they could be harmed. But the legality of the removals is still being contested in a federal lawsuit in Boston, a case that could potentially wind its way back to the conservative-leaning high court.
Critics say the removals aim to stoke fear among migrants and encourage them to 'self deport' to their home countries rather than be sent to distant countries they have no connection with.
'This is a message that you may end up with a very random outcome that you're going to like a lot less than if you elect to leave under your own steam,' said Michelle Mittelstadt, communications director for the non-partisan Migration Policy Institute.
Internal U.S. immigration enforcement guidance issued in July said migrants could be deported to countries that had not provided diplomatic assurances of their safety in as little as six hours.
While the administration has highlighted the deportations of convicted criminals to African countries, it has also sent asylum-seeking Afghans, Russians and others to Panama and Costa Rica.
The Trump administration deported more than 200 Venezuelans accused of being gang members to El Salvador in March, where they were held in the country's CECOT prison without access to attorneys until they were released in a prisoner swap last month.
More than 5,700 non-Mexican migrants have been deported to Mexico since Trump took office, according to Mexican government data, continuing a policy that began under former President Joe Biden.
The fact that one Mexican man was deported to South Sudan and another threatened with deportation to Libya suggests that the Trump administration did not try to send them to their home countries, according to Trina Realmuto, executive director at the pro-immigrant National Immigration Litigation Alliance.
'Mexico historically accepts back its own citizens,' said Realmuto, one of the attorneys representing migrants in the lawsuit contesting third-country deportations.
The eight men deported to South Sudan included Mexican national Jesus Munoz Gutierrez, who had served a sentence in the U.S. for second-degree murder and was directly taken into federal immigration custody afterward, according to Realmuto. Court records show Munoz stabbed and killed a roommate during a fight in 2004.
When the Trump administration first initiated the deportation in late May, Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum said her government had not been informed.
'If he does want to be repatriated, then the United States would have to bring him to Mexico,' Sheinbaum said at the time.
His sister, Guadalupe Gutierrez, said in an interview that she didn't understand why he was sent to South Sudan, where he is currently in custody. She said Mexico is trying to get her brother home.
'Mexico never rejected my brother,' Gutierrez said.
Immigration hardliners see the third-country removals as a way to deal with immigration offenders who can't easily be deported and could pose a threat to the U.S. public.
"The Trump administration is prioritizing the safety of American communities over the comfort of these deportees,' said Jessica Vaughan, policy director at the Center for Immigration Studies, which supports lower levels of immigration.
The Trump administration in July pressed other African nations to take migrants and has asked the Pacific Islands nation of Palau, among others.
Under U.S. law, federal immigration officials can deport someone to a country other than their place of citizenship when all other efforts are 'impracticable, inadvisable or impossible.'
Immigration officials must first try to send an immigrant back to their home country, and if they fail, then to a country with which they have a connection, such as where they lived or were born.
For a Lao man who was almost deported to Libya in early May, hearing about the renewed third-country deportations took him back to his own close call. In an interview from Laos granted on condition of anonymity because of fears for his safety, he asked why the U.S. was 'using us as a pawn?'
His attorney said the man had served a prison sentence for a felony. Reuters could not establish what he was convicted of.
He recalled officials telling him to sign his deportation order to Libya, which he refused, telling them he wanted to be sent to Laos instead. They told him he would be deported to Libya regardless of whether he signed or not, he said. DHS did not comment on the allegations.
The man, who came to the United States in the early 1980s as a refugee when he was four years old, said he was now trying to learn the Lao language and adapt to his new life, 'taking it day by day.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Serious problems' with UK's reliance on migration, warns OBR official
‘Serious problems' with UK's reliance on migration, warns OBR official

Telegraph

time6 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

‘Serious problems' with UK's reliance on migration, warns OBR official

Immigration is creating 'serious problems' for public services and living standards, a senior official at the Government's fiscal watchdog has warned. David Miles, an executive at the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), said Labour must prioritise getting Britons back to work instead of relying on overseas workers to grow the economy. Only by achieving this will Sir Keir Starmer be able to slash the welfare bill and tackle the country's 'explosive' debt pile. The economics professor, who has also served on the Bank of England's interest rate-setting Monetary Policy Committee, said the UK was already on course to become the most populous country in Europe by the middle of this century. He added that depending on an increasing population to expand the economy 'could not be sustained', as migrants themselves use schools, hospitals and other public services as they get older, have children and become eligible to claim benefits. Writing in an essay published by the Common Good Foundation, Mr Miles said: 'Immigration – which primarily involves those of working age who are many years away from retirement – both delays the impact of the ageing of the population and is the driver of population growth. 'Some conclude from this that a faster rise in the population ... will be beneficial in alleviating acute underlying fiscal pressures. 'But, even setting aside the fact that it is GDP per capita that matters for average standards of living – and growth in population does not obviously boost it – there are serious problems with the idea that faster population growth can consistently alleviate fiscal problems.' Mr Miles also suggested that tackling worklessness among working-age Britons was more important than attracting the most highly paid migrants to the UK. Almost the entire rise in economic inactivity since Covid has been driven by people born in the UK, many of whom are also claiming sickness benefits that do not require them to look for work. Mr Miles said: 'The fiscal benefits of raising the incomes of those who are born in the UK and who might be on a trajectory of consistently below average wages are as great as the benefits of having more people come and stay in the UK with average or, especially, well above average earnings.' It comes after the OBR has faced scrutiny for overstating the economic benefits of migration, with Morgan McSweeney, Sir Keir's chief of staff, reportedly concerned that the watchdog does not properly account for the burden on public services. The watchdog has previously admitted that low-paid migrant workers are a drain on the public purse – costing taxpayers more than £150,000 each by the time they hit state pension age. However, calls for restrictions on overseas workers are likely to be uncomfortable reading for Rachel Reeves, with Treasury officials warning successive chancellors that a big reduction in migration would substantially reduce the Government's headroom. Ms Reeves is already likely to have to raise taxes by £20bn this autumn, following a series of about-turns on welfare and winter fuel payments. 'Substantial' burden Official data shows that immigration has fuelled the two biggest population increases in peacetime. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has found that the population of England and Wales grew by more than 700,000 in the year to June 2024 to nearly 62 million. This is the second-biggest annual jump since records began in 1949 and only beaten by the 800,000 rise in the population in the previous 12 months. This stemmed from record rises in net migration – the number of people entering the UK minus those leaving. Mr Miles said continuing these trends was unsustainable because it would pile a 'substantial' burden on the public finances. He highlighted that even if all the future migrants arriving in the UK were all aged 24 and would not reach retirement for more than four decades, the population would have to rise by 20m to balance the split between pensioners and workers. He said: 'Twenty million extra young people would need to arrive in the UK over the next 40 years to stabilise the dependency ratio at its current level. That would imply a UK population of around 100 million by 2064.' Worklessness crisis OBR analysis published last year showed the average low-earner who comes to Britain aged 25 costs the Government more overall than they pay in from the moment they arrive. The cumulative bill rises to an estimated £150,000 each by the time they can claim the state pension at 66, according to the watchdog. This is because low-paid migrants, who the OBR assumes earn half the average wage, demand more from public services compared to what they contribute in tax. Mr Miles suggested that tackling the substantial rise in young Britons claiming they are too sick to even look for work would be more beneficial for the public purse. He said: 'The fiscal benefits of helping people, especially young people who potentially have many years of work ahead of them, back into employment are substantial. 'There is a great deal of evidence that mental health in particular is typically improved by being in work. And mental health problems have been a very significant factor behind the recent rise in illness-related inactivity.' Calls for lower migration come amid growing scrutiny of the UK's benefits bill, particularly after Labour watered down welfare reforms earlier this year following a backbench rebellion. The benefits bill for people on sickness or disability benefits is currently on course to hit £100bn by the end of the decade. Mr Miles said: 'The higher population route to fiscal sustainability by slowing the ageing of the population is uncertain. Today's young people are tomorrow's old people, so fiscal benefits fade. And the rise in the population needed to completely offset ageing in demographic structure is very great and gets bigger over time. It could not be sustained.'

US Rep Nancy Mace joins race for South Carolina governor
US Rep Nancy Mace joins race for South Carolina governor

Reuters

time6 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US Rep Nancy Mace joins race for South Carolina governor

WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - U.S. Representative Nancy Mace said on Monday she was joining the 2026 Republican race to become South Carolina governor, announcing her candidacy in a video that portrays her as a "firebrand" who has been praised by President Donald Trump. Mace criticized Trump for his role in the January 6, 2021, attack by his supporters on the U.S. Capitol, but she has since embraced his MAGA movement. She endorsed Trump, a fellow Republican, in his 2024 presidential run. The online video announcing her candidacy featured a string of commentary about Mace. "She's a fighter. I know about that. She's a fighter," Trump says in the video, opens new tab. "When she sets her sight on something she's tough." At the start of another clip, a presenter reads: "The House Republican has drawn the ire of both Democrats and members of her own party." Mace told her supporters later in Charleston that she will fight crime and push back against "gender ideology", presenting herself as having an independent streak. "It's not about me, it's about the people of South Carolina. I didn't come to join the Club. They don't want me, and I don't want them," she said. Mace joins a crowded field of Republican candidates including Lieutenant Governor Pamela Evette, U.S. Representative Ralph Norman, Josh Kimbrell - a state senator, and Alan Wilson, South Carolina's longtime attorney general. Mace drew attention with a speech on the House floor in February, when she accused her former fiancé and three other men of drugging and raping her and other women, and filming and photographing women and underage girls without their consent. Her former fiancé has denied the allegations.

Universities face ban on foreign students over asylum 'backdoor' rules
Universities face ban on foreign students over asylum 'backdoor' rules

Daily Mail​

time6 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Universities face ban on foreign students over asylum 'backdoor' rules

Universities are set to be banned from accepting foreign students if they fail to stop their courses being used as a 'back door' for asylum claims, it has emerged. The Government is expected to announce plans next month to clamp down on the number of migrants using study visas to enter Britain before claiming asylum. Home Office figures show that 16,000 of those who claimed asylum last year had arrived in the UK on a study visa. According to The Times, universities will be penalised if fewer than 95 per cent of international students accepted on to a course start their studies, or fewer than 90 per cent continue to the end. Labour's plans will also reportedly see institutions that accept foreign students face sanctions if more than 5 per cent of their visas are rejected. The worst-performing universities are set to be named and shamed as part of the crackdown, with limits imposed on the number of new foreign students they can recruit until they improve. Those that fail to do so will be stripped of their ability to sponsor study visas altogether, the newspaper reported. There were 108,000 people who claimed asylum in the UK in 2024, of which slightly more than one third (40,000) did so after travelling to Britain on a visa. This was more than the 35,000 migrants that arrived on small boats without permission to enter the UK. Almost 10,000 people who claimed asylum after having entered on a visa were provided with asylum support in the form of accommodation during 2024. The Home Office said, of those asylum seekers who had originally entered on a visa and are currently in supported accommodation - regardless of the year of their claim - the most common nationalities were Pakistan, Nigeria and Sri Lanka. Tory MP Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said Labour's plans represented 'minor tinkering around the edges'. He called for a complete ban on people on study visas being able to claim asylum. 'These proposals amount to minor tinkering around the edges and will make little real difference, which is typical of announcements by this Government,' Mr Philp said. 'Far too many foreign students are using the pretext of study as a route into the UK. Some courses are extremely low quality and have students who barely speak any English. A number of universities are essentially selling UK visas rather than selling an education. This abuse needs to be shut down. The last Conservative government rightly ended the farce of students being able to bring family in with them but a lot more real action is now needed. No one who says they are coming here as a student should be able to later claim asylum or use a student visa as a basis to be able to stay permanently.' It comes as the Home Office is giving £100million in extra funding to support the pilot of a new 'one in, one out' returns agreement between the UK and France and other efforts to crack down on small boat crossings. The cash will also pay for up to 300 more National Crime Agency (NCA) officers and new technology and equipment to step up intelligence-gathering on smuggling gangs. There will be more overtime for immigration compliance and enforcement teams as well as funding for interventions in transit countries across Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia. Labour is seeking to deter smuggling gangs in a bid to bring down small boat crossings, which have topped 25,000 for the year so far - a record for this point in the year. The 'one in, one out' deal agreed last month means the UK will for the first time be able to send migrants back to France in exchange for asylum seekers with links to Britain. Anyone who advertises small boat crossings or fake passports on social media could be face up to five years in prison under a new offence to be introduced under the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper (pictured) said Labour had set the foundations for a 'new and much stronger law enforcement approach' over the last year. She said: 'Now this additional funding will strengthen every aspect of our plan and will turbo-charge the ability of our law enforcement agencies to track the gangs and bring them down, working with our partners overseas, and using state-of-the-art technology and equipment. Alongside our new agreements with France, this will help us drive forward our plan for change commitments to protect the UK's border security and restore order to our immigration system.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store