logo
Less than half of Mass. housing voucher holders can consistently afford rent

Less than half of Mass. housing voucher holders can consistently afford rent

Yahoo07-05-2025
Less than half of low-income tenants in Massachusetts who hold state-funded housing vouchers can consistently afford their monthly rent, according to a Boston Foundation report released Wednesday.
The report, which studied the efficacy of the Massachusetts Rental Voucher Program (MRVP), revealed that 44% of voucher holders were always able to afford rent, while 33% said they could afford it most of the time and 16% said they could only afford it sometimes.
Researchers determined through surveys and interviews with tenants and landlords that while the program is a lifeline for the people it helps, it also has significant shortcomings. Those shortfalls make it difficult for people to access rental assistance and/or build long-term financial security.
'While safe, stable housing is a vast improvement on the alternative, [tenants] aspire to geographic and economic mobility,' the researchers wrote in the report. 'Voucher holders want to have a choice of decent places to live, to be able to save and someday to be able to afford homeownership.'
What is the Massachusetts Rental Voucher Program?
The state rental assistance program is the oldest housing voucher program in the U.S. and serves more than 10,000 low-income households, according to the report.
The state budgeted $219 million for the program in the current fiscal year. Gov. Maura Healey calls for raising that to $253 million in her proposed fiscal 2026 budget.
To be eligible for the program, a household must make 80% or less of the area median income for their city or town.
Voucher holders pay 30% of their monthly income toward rent, and the voucher covers the rest.
Tenants who use state-funded vouchers told the researchers the program has allowed them to improve their lives. Seventy-eight percent of tenants said it was easier to find and keep a job because of the housing stability a voucher provides, and 86% of parents said their children were doing better in school.
'My kids aren't living in a shelter apartment. My kids are with me. I'm not in fear that my children are going to be taken by DCF [Department of Children & Family] because I can't provide a stable living,' one tenant told the researchers.
Voucher recipients are generally able to access higher-quality housing. Tenants in focus groups said their homes are better, and appliances and utilities work better than in previous apartments. Sixty-four percent of survey respondents said their current home is in excellent or good condition.
Landlords who rented to MRVP tenants broadly said the program also benefits them. A large majority — 81% — cited the guarantee of consistent rent payments as one of the most helpful aspects, while 38% mentioned reduced turnover rates and 20% mentioned access to a wider pool of tenants.
Seventy percent said they were very or somewhat satisfied with the program, and 47% said they were 'very likely' to seek out voucher-holding tenants in the future, in addition to 22% who said they were 'somewhat likely' to do so.
What challenges exist for tenants with rental vouchers?
The state program currently has a waitlist of 168,000 people hoping to receive a voucher, according to the report. Of voucher holders surveyed, 45% said it took more than a year to receive a voucher after they applied.
However, even those with vouchers said they faced challenges affording basic necessities and saving money.
This was particularly true for households at both ends of the eligible income spectrum. For the lowest-income tenants, even with some of their rent covered, their remaining funds may not stretch far enough to cover bills. Participants with the highest eligible incomes experience 'cliff effects,' or the drop-off of assistance programs if their income exceeds the eligible level.
Another issue discussed by tenants and landlords is that of communication and transparency on the part of the state.
'Tenants and landlords both emphasized how much smoother their experiences were when dealing with a representative who they felt was competent and communicative,' the researchers wrote.
'They also described frustrating situations with uncommunicative representatives, long hold times on the phone, missing information or feeling lost when contact dropped off after move-in.'
What improvements can be made to the program?
The report outlines several recommendations for improving the state rental voucher program, including creating more vouchers and providing more opportunities for tenants to build wealth.
The researchers suggested providing 'bridge' financial assistance to households that lose their eligibility due to an increase in income, to offset cliff effects, and giving waitlist priority to previous voucher holders if their income drops back down below the threshold.
They suggested expanding the existing Self-Sufficiency Program within MRVP, which helps tenants develop career skills and access employment, and if their income increases, the extra funds are placed in an escrow account until they complete the program. Only some of the organizations that administer vouchers offer this program.
The report also emphasizes the need for better education for tenants and landlords about the requirements and process of the voucher program and communication with the agency.
The researchers acknowledged that most of these improvements would require more funding for the program, but did not say how much more funding would be needed.
To help provide more resources and stability to the program, they recommended that MRVP be codified into state law. Currently, money for the program is renewed annually in the state budget passed by the Legislature, which leaves tenants without a guarantee that the funds will be allocated each year.
'Codifying the program is a simple step that would give everyone who relies on it confidence that it will remain in place and continue to serve a critical function in the housing ecosystem,' they wrote.
You can read the full report on The Boston Foundation's website.
More on housing
Read the original article on MassLive.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Parents Say 17-Year-Old Daughter 'Owes' Them Rent, Totaling Half Her Monthly Paycheck
Parents Say 17-Year-Old Daughter 'Owes' Them Rent, Totaling Half Her Monthly Paycheck

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Parents Say 17-Year-Old Daughter 'Owes' Them Rent, Totaling Half Her Monthly Paycheck

She's already paying for most of her own expenses and contributing to various household bills A 17-year-old girl's parents believe she owes them rent after landing her first job, despite already paying for "the majority" of her own expenses. The teenager took to Reddit to share her predicament, explaining that now that she has a minimum-wage job, her parents are charging "rent," which amounts to roughly "half" her total paycheck. "I recently got a part time job to help cover my personal expenses, like saving up for driving lessons, a car, university, days out, shopping trips etc," she explains. "However this job doesn't pay very well, it's minimum wage and I get my hours cut often," she explains. "I often only bring in around 250-350 a month, and my parents want me to pay 100 for 'rent' a month." If she agrees to that number, she would only be saving around $200 a month. On top of that, the poster notes that she already helps her parents out financially. "I already pay for majority things myself, like clothes, give them money for other bills, my luxuries ect, they want more ON TOP of this just for 'rent,'" she explains. "It equates to literally HALF of my paycheck, I already offered a fairer price, but they aren't having it. " Still, her parents argue it's not enough. "They think I 'owe' this to them as it's now my responsibility to make a living, but I disagree, as they are still legally responsible for putting a roof over my head and feeding me," she writes. "They said if I don't pay I can 'get out then' or I can 'buy my own food and if I don't then that's my own problem.' " The disagreement is now "causing major issues" in the family, as her parents claim she is being "disrespectful" and has a "disgusting attitude problem." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. However, commenters unanimously agreed that the teen was not obligated to pay her parents rent, as many pointed out that she's still classified as their independent. Thus, her parents are "legally obligated" to provide her with any basic needs, including housing. "It's strange to make your child pay rent to live in their own house to be clothed, fed, and provided with necessities, which is the bare minimum," one wrote. "How are you expected to reasonably save enough for your future if you have to pay them for the bare minimum?" "That said, put as much as you can away and have your documents ready," another user added. "They will charge real rent or kick you out the minute you're 18. They clearly don't care about you." Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword

A Look At The Intrinsic Value Of GDI Integrated Facility Services Inc. (TSE:GDI)
A Look At The Intrinsic Value Of GDI Integrated Facility Services Inc. (TSE:GDI)

Yahoo

time16 hours ago

  • Yahoo

A Look At The Intrinsic Value Of GDI Integrated Facility Services Inc. (TSE:GDI)

Key Insights Using the 2 Stage Free Cash Flow to Equity, GDI Integrated Facility Services fair value estimate is CA$34.26 GDI Integrated Facility Services' CA$31.86 share price indicates it is trading at similar levels as its fair value estimate The CA$44.13 analyst price target for GDI is 29% more than our estimate of fair value Today we will run through one way of estimating the intrinsic value of GDI Integrated Facility Services Inc. (TSE:GDI) by taking the forecast future cash flows of the company and discounting them back to today's value. This will be done using the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model. Don't get put off by the jargon, the math behind it is actually quite straightforward. We would caution that there are many ways of valuing a company and, like the DCF, each technique has advantages and disadvantages in certain scenarios. If you still have some burning questions about this type of valuation, take a look at the Simply Wall St analysis model. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. Crunching The Numbers We use what is known as a 2-stage model, which simply means we have two different periods of growth rates for the company's cash flows. Generally the first stage is higher growth, and the second stage is a lower growth phase. To start off with, we need to estimate the next ten years of cash flows. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren't available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years. Generally we assume that a dollar today is more valuable than a dollar in the future, so we discount the value of these future cash flows to their estimated value in today's dollars: 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 Levered FCF (CA$, Millions) CA$54.7m CA$62.6m CA$51.5m CA$45.6m CA$42.2m CA$40.3m CA$39.4m CA$39.0m CA$39.1m CA$39.4m Growth Rate Estimate Source Analyst x2 Analyst x1 Est @ -17.66% Est @ -11.62% Est @ -7.38% Est @ -4.42% Est @ -2.35% Est @ -0.90% Est @ 0.12% Est @ 0.83% Present Value (CA$, Millions) Discounted @ 6.9% CA$51.1 CA$54.8 CA$42.2 CA$34.9 CA$30.3 CA$27.1 CA$24.8 CA$23.0 CA$21.5 CA$20.3 ("Est" = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St)Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = CA$330m The second stage is also known as Terminal Value, this is the business's cash flow after the first stage. For a number of reasons a very conservative growth rate is used that cannot exceed that of a country's GDP growth. In this case we have used the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield (2.5%) to estimate future growth. In the same way as with the 10-year 'growth' period, we discount future cash flows to today's value, using a cost of equity of 6.9%. Terminal Value (TV)= FCF2035 × (1 + g) ÷ (r – g) = CA$39m× (1 + 2.5%) ÷ (6.9%– 2.5%) = CA$926m Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= CA$926m÷ ( 1 + 6.9%)10= CA$477m The total value is the sum of cash flows for the next ten years plus the discounted terminal value, which results in the Total Equity Value, which in this case is CA$807m. In the final step we divide the equity value by the number of shares outstanding. Compared to the current share price of CA$31.9, the company appears about fair value at a 7.0% discount to where the stock price trades currently. Remember though, that this is just an approximate valuation, and like any complex formula - garbage in, garbage out. Important Assumptions The calculation above is very dependent on two assumptions. The first is the discount rate and the other is the cash flows. Part of investing is coming up with your own evaluation of a company's future performance, so try the calculation yourself and check your own assumptions. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company's future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company's potential performance. Given that we are looking at GDI Integrated Facility Services as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we've used 6.9%, which is based on a levered beta of 1.007. Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business. Check out our latest analysis for GDI Integrated Facility Services SWOT Analysis for GDI Integrated Facility Services Strength Earnings growth over the past year exceeded the industry. Debt is well covered by cash flow. Weakness Interest payments on debt are not well covered. Opportunity Annual earnings are forecast to grow for the next 3 years. Current share price is below our estimate of fair value. Threat Annual earnings are forecast to grow slower than the Canadian market. Looking Ahead: Whilst important, the DCF calculation is only one of many factors that you need to assess for a company. The DCF model is not a perfect stock valuation tool. Preferably you'd apply different cases and assumptions and see how they would impact the company's valuation. If a company grows at a different rate, or if its cost of equity or risk free rate changes sharply, the output can look very different. For GDI Integrated Facility Services, there are three important elements you should consider: Risks: Take risks, for example - GDI Integrated Facility Services has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is concerning) we think you should know about. Future Earnings: How does GDI's growth rate compare to its peers and the wider market? Dig deeper into the analyst consensus number for the upcoming years by interacting with our free analyst growth expectation chart. Other Solid Businesses: Low debt, high returns on equity and good past performance are fundamental to a strong business. Why not explore our interactive list of stocks with solid business fundamentals to see if there are other companies you may not have considered! PS. Simply Wall St updates its DCF calculation for every Canadian stock every day, so if you want to find the intrinsic value of any other stock just search here. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio

How The Big Beautiful Bill Changed 529 Plans For The Better
How The Big Beautiful Bill Changed 529 Plans For The Better

Forbes

time16 hours ago

  • Forbes

How The Big Beautiful Bill Changed 529 Plans For The Better

University student, woman and outdoor for graduation with memory, smile or thinking or achievement ... More at campus. Girl, Japanese person and graduate with memory, decision or choice for future at college We've been saving into a 529 plan quite aggressively since the birth of our first child over ten years ago. As we had more kids, we continued to make these contributions because you can always change the beneficiary of a 529 plan without penalty. If our first child didn't end up needing it, our backup plan was to change the beneficiary to our second. With how much college costs these days, and will likely increase in the next decade, chances are our 529 plans were going to be emptied. If you don't have four kids, the idea of putting too much into a 529 plan is a big risk. A good risk but a big one nonetheless. But when the SECURE Act 2.0 was signed into law, it changed everything. There's now no risk to funding a 529 plan. 529 Plans Can Be Rolled into Roth IRAs The big headline change was that, subject to state laws, you can now roll over up to $35,000 of unused 529 plan funds into a Roth IRA for the beneficiary. There is no tax and no penalty if you follow certain conditions: This means you can contribute more into a 529 plan knowing that $35,000 of unused funds could eventually be moved into a Roth IRA. 529 Plans Are More Versatile Than I Remembered The ability to rollover unused 529 plan funds was the only major change in SECURE Act 2.0, there were additional changes to 529 plans that you may have missed. There were three major changes by SECURE Act back in 2019 and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. 529 Plans can now be used to cover K-12 tuition of up to $10,000 per student as long as your state allows it. Previously, you couldn't use it for K-12. The SECURE Act of 2019 made it possible for you to use 529 plan funds to pay for apprenticeship program expenses, with no cap, as long as the program is listed with the U.S. Department of Labor. This includes fees, books, supplies, and any other required equipment. Finally, you can now use up to $10,000 of 529 plan funds to pay for qualified student loans per person. The $10,000 is a lifetime limit that applies to the beneficiary and each of their siblings. Also, the interest paid with 529 plan funds isn't tax deductible. With the cost of college higher than ever, increasing the versatility of 529 plans helps more people pay for college.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store