
Tony Blair was happy to keep guitar from Bono but not one from Mexico's president
Tony Blair
was delighted to keep a guitar presented to him by the rock star
Bono
. However, when it came to a similar gift from the president of
Mexico
, he was less enthused.
Official files released to the UK National Archives show Mr Blair was keen to take advantage of rules on ministerial gifts to buy the instrument given to him by the
U2
singer once he left office.
He did, however, question whether he would have to pay 'the full purchase price'.
Officials at 10 Downing Street suggested the prime minister – who fronted a rock band called Ugly Rumours in his student days – might want to take the same approach when it came to a white Fender Stratocaster, valued at £2,500, from the
Canadian
singer
Bryan Adams
.
However, Mr Blair was much less enthusiastic about an acoustic Vargas guitar presented to him by president Vicente Fox during an official visit to Mexico in 2001, noting: 'I don't actually use it.'
The files also show that Mr Blair rejected advice that he should not keep a Pro Braided tennis racket given to him by the manufacturer, Slazenger.
Officials feared that it was part of a 'marketing ploy' by the company and suggested it should be donated to a children's charity as 'you cannot be seen to endorse any product'.
Mr Blair, however, instructed them just to thank the company, adding: 'It is very churlish to refuse to use it.' - PA
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Tánaiste to convene Trade Forum meeting on EU-US deal
The Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Simon Harris is to convene a meeting of the Government Trade Forum on Friday to provide an update on the trade deal between the EU and US. The group is comprised of State agencies, business groups, unions and senior ministers. Mr Harris will use the forum to give an update on the latest analysis of the agreement and its implications. The meeting will also provide an opportunity for the Tánaiste to hear from stakeholders. Mr Harris said: "As we continue to analyse the full implications of the deal over the coming days, the Trade Forum meeting on Friday will be a timely opportunity to share and gain insights on what this deal will mean for the future of Irish businesses, jobs, and the economy." "Whilst the agreement between the EU and the US is welcome, we know that the imposition of any tariffs will have implications and that now is the time to intensify efforts to find and secure more markets for Irish businesses and Irish jobs," he added. The Tánaiste is also set to update the forum on other issues including plans to accelerate the passage of the Arbitration (Amendment) Bill 2025, which will allow for the ratification of the EU-Canada trade deal, known as CETA. It follows the Oireachtas Foreign Affairs and Trade Committee's decision to waive pre-legislative scrutiny of the bill following a request from the Tánaiste. An update will also be provided on the decision to defer the implementation of alcohol labelling following concerns raised at the trade forum around the potential of the labelling to impact competitiveness.

The Journal
6 hours ago
- The Journal
Scrutiny of laws to facilitate Ireland's trade deal with Canada scrapped after US tariffs
LAWS TO FACILITATE a trade deal between Ireland, Canada and other EU member states will not be scrutinised following the announcement that a 15% tariff will be placed on Irish goods exported to the US . The contentious EU-Canada trade agreement, known as CETA, is to be ratified after politicians on the Oireachtas foreign affairs committee have waived their right to investigate the potential outcomes and consequences of the bill. Amendments to the Arbitration Act, which dictates the legality of, and set petametres around, civil lawsuits that can be taken in Ireland, were due to be examined in order to facilitate the creation of a free-trade zone between Europe and Canada. Ten member states previously rejected the deal and declined to ratify it , and the Irish Supreme Court previously said that CETA would be unconstitutional over clauses that could allow foreign investors to sue the state over any potential breaches. Trade minister and Tánaiste Simon Harris announced today that he intends to bring forward and accelerate the updates to the Arbitration Act, which will allow for CETA to be ratified without any constitutional breaches. Advertisement Government previously earmarked the expedited implementation of the deal in May , following crunch talks over Ireland's challenges with economic competitiveness and the threat of harsh US tariffs. The decision to scrap pre-legislative scrutiny, when politicians invite experts to discuss the potential consequences and outcomes of new laws, was welcomed by Harris. He said that the deal will 'open the door to one of the world's largest economies' and allow Irish firms, farmers and exports to have new opportunities. He claimed that Irish exports to Canada have increased 'fourfold' since its framework was agreed. 'This is about more trade, more jobs, and more stability for Ireland,' Harris added. Two members of the foreign affairs committee, Senators Patricia Stephenson and Alice Mary Higgins, have said they are alarmed by the decision. Stephenson said it was shameful that the government would ignore the Supreme Court decision. 'This is a disgraceful decision given the fraught legal background of this issue and the hugely controversial investor court system that ratification of CETA will usher in,' the Social Democrats senator said. Independent Senator Higgins, who has been a long-time critic of the trade deal, said the untested bill could have 'significant implications for our sovereignty', which could expose Ireland to millions 'or even billions' in potential claims. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Western liberalism at a political crossroads
The laws of hydraulics are broken. US president Donald Trump 's approval ratings have dropped to second-term lows, yet the Democratic Party 's have fallen even further. They ought to be soaring. Just a third of Americans approve of them. Much the same can be said of centrist and centre-left parties across the West. The odd one out is Canada. That is because Canadian prime minister Mark Carney 's Liberal party is the staunchest defender of Canada's sovereignty, the opposition having been too cosy with Trump. But Canada is the exception that proves the rule. Western liberalism is still on the retreat. Where liberal democratic parties are in power, normal hydraulics still work. A year after taking office, British prime minister Keir Starmer's Labour Party is lucky to poll at 25 per cent. Nigel Farage's seven-year-old populist Reform party is, meanwhile, attracting almost a third of voters. Less than three months after taking office, Germany's two big parties are neck and neck with far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD). This is despite (or maybe because) of the fact that German intelligence recently branded AfD as rightwing extremist. Of the big European nations, Italy's hard-right Giorgia Meloni has the highest approval rating In France, Marine Le Pen's far-right Rassemblement National likewise polls streets ahead of the other parties despite Le Pen having been debarred from running in the next presidential election. READ MORE Of the big European nations, Italy's hard-right Giorgia Meloni has the highest approval rating. Even Trump, who is sinking into a self-created doldrum, has his head above water. His recent 37 per cent Gallup rating is well above the Democratic Party. When the left is in office, populists make hay. When the right holds power, the left rarely does. For further evidence, see Binyamin Netanyahu's Israel and Narendra Modi's India. That there are multiple causes of western liberalism's malaise makes it harder to fix. Complexity encourages infighting. Long after Taylor Swift hits retirement age, Democrats will still be arguing over whether former US president Joe Biden was too old to run, or too selfish to step down sooner. They might also still be debating whether the left is too woke or not woke enough. Can the left in office do more to improve the economy for the blue-collar classes? Does immigration enrich society or further squeeze the working class? Should there be a wealth tax? Is Israel committing war crimes? Such questions reliably divide. Beyond the internal divisions, contemporary liberalism has two character defects that augur badly for its resurgence. The first is lack of conviction. It is all very well pointing out the dangers of Trump, Farage, Le Pen and others. It would be negligent not to. But making the negative case is not enough. 'I might not be beautiful but have you seen that ugly person next to me?' said no winner of a beauty contest ever. 'Stronger together', 'When we fight, we win' or campaign variations thereof do not mask the uncertainty beneath. As former US president Bill Clinton once said, strong and wrong always beats weak and right. Focus groups cannot solve this. Anyone entertaining the theory that the virus might have come from a Wuhan lab was dismissed as Sinophobic or worse Western liberalism's second defect is intolerance. American liberals were at their worst during the pandemic. That anti-vaxxer conservatives were even crazier should be no comfort. One day, it seemed, Dr Anthony Fauci was telling the United States that masks were not essential. The next, Rochelle Walensky, then head of the Centers for Disease Control was insisting that two-year-olds should be masked all day. Anyone entertaining the theory that the virus might have come from a Wuhan lab was dismissed as Sinophobic or worse. In December 2020, when vaccines became available, the Chicago Teachers Union tweeted: 'The push to reopen schools is rooted in sexism, racism, and misogyny.' Everyone could agree back then that otherwise liberal Sweden was foolish to take the herd immunity route. That Sweden ended up with one of the lowest mortality rates in Europe has not been similarly highlighted. Covid is not ancient history. Any survey probing why so many young voters are turning right that excludes their pandemic experience is wasting time. The road to recovery starts with looking in the mirror. The seminal book, In Covid's Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us , by two Princeton scholars, should be compulsory reading across the spectrum. That it has not been reviewed by most big newspapers is troubling. Expanding religions look for converts. Waning ones hunt down heretics. In form and content, western liberalism is dangerously close to the latter As social distancing rules go, so goes free speech. Liberals said, 'Follow the science', which confused science with faith. Science is a trial-and-error process that only works with openness to dissent. The same applies to political debate on campus, within newspapers, at think tanks and society at large. To many younger voters, particularly men, today's liberal establishment looks more like a conservative one. Educated elites confect orthodoxy on what we should say and do. The resemblance to high Victorianism is more than passing. Victorians regulated manners and etiquette. They also dreaded the mob. Expanding religions look for converts. Waning ones hunt down heretics. In form and content, western liberalism is dangerously close to the latter. The good news is that liberalism has rebounded after losing self-belief. The bad news is that it took a genocidal second World War to rediscover its necessity. Hoping that humanity is on a learning curve is not a strategy. The positive case for liberal democracy in today's world is still waiting to be heard. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025