
Fate of Trump's $9.4 billion spending cut package hangs on House GOP moderates
The House of Representatives is set to consider the measure on Thursday afternoon, which cuts $8.3 billion in funds to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and just over $1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which routes federal funds to NPR and PBS.
But at least four GOP lawmakers are known to have expressed at least some concerns about various aspects of the package.
House Republican leaders have a razor-thin, three-seat majority in the chamber, which means any dissent beyond that could sink the bill.
None of the four Republicans – Reps. Mark Amodei, R-Nev.; David Valadao, R-Calif.; Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y.; and Don Bacon, R-Neb. – have said how they will vote on the bill, however. They also all approved a procedural vote to allow for debate on the measure.
But Amodei, co-chair of the Public Broadcasting Caucus, told Fox News Digital on Wednesday afternoon that he was not worried about NPR and PBS' national brands, with which he acknowledged the GOP's bias concerns, and that his fear was gutting funding to smaller local outlets that rely on federal funding to keep people informed in areas with less access.
"These aren't the people that are doing editorial boards that are flipping you the bird," Amodei argued to his fellow Republicans. "They're kind of important pieces of infrastructure in their communities."
Amodei, who is intimately familiar with the government funding process as a House appropriator, said "a whole bunch of red counties" depend on public broadcast funding.
"It's easier for the nationals to raise money if they've got to make up for some funding they lost than it is these guys," he said.
Valadao, who represents a California swing district, told Politico he was not sure if the measure would pass.
He declined to elaborate on his concerns to Fox News Digital, however, and his office did not respond to a request for clarification.
Meanwhile, Malliotakis told reporters on Wednesday that she met with Republican voters in her district who wanted PBS funding preserved – but that her real concern was the process.
"I think that there's a lot of questions that members have regarding what programs specifically are going to be cut. This is a broad look at general accounts. We are, at the end of the day, the Congress that holds the power of the purse. We're the ones who we're supposed to be identifying where funding is going. And this gives a lot of discretion to the White House to be doing that unilaterally without Congress," Malliotakis said.
"I think there's a large number of members that do have concerns about that. And whether members are going to vote yes or no is a different story in this place. But I have, certainly, reservations…and we'll see how things go."
Bacon, one of three House Republicans representing a district that former Vice President Kamala Harris won in 2024, told reporters Tuesday morning that he was feeling better about the legislation after getting assurances that the foreign aid cuts would not gut money for critical medical research.
He did not say whether his earlier concerns about PBS and NPR were alleviated, however, nor did he say how he would vote on the bill.
Bacon told reporters last week, "It does bother me, because I have a great rapport with Nebraska Public Radio and TV."
Fox News Digital reached out both to Bacon directly and to his office for clarification on his current stance.
The $9.4 billion proposal is called a rescissions package, a mechanism for the White House to block congressionally approved funding it disagrees with.
Once transmitted to Capitol Hill, lawmakers have 45 days to approve the rescissions proposal, otherwise it is considered rejected.
Such measures only need a simple majority in the House and Senate to pass. But that's no easy feat with Republicans' thin majorities in both chambers.
If passed, Republican leaders hope the bill will be the first of several rescissions packages codifying spending cuts identified by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Musk set out with a goal of finding $2 trillion in federal waste, but wound up identifying about $180 billion.
House GOP leaders lauded the proposal during their weekly press conference on Tuesday.
"These are commonsense cuts. And I think every member of this body should support it. It's a critical step in restoring fiscal sanity and beginning to turn the tides and removing fraud, waste, and abuse from our government," Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
McDonald's is adding a Spicy McMuffin to its breakfast lineup
You can find original article here Nrn. Subscribe to our free daily Nrn newsletter. McDonald's 50th anniversary celebration of its signature Egg McMuffin continues with the introduction of a Spicy McMuffin, available starting July 8 at participating restaurants for a limited time. The offering includes melted cheese, an egg, Canadian bacon, and Spicy Pepper Sauce served on a toasted and buttered English Muffin. The summer lineup also includes the Spicy Sausage McMuffin and the Spicy Sausage McMuffin with Egg. According to the company, the popular Egg McMuffin was created by Herb Peterson, a franchisee in Santa Barbara, Calif., who presented the concept to founder Ray Croc in 1971. The idea was to create a portable Eggs Benedict. Breakfast is a priority for McDonald's value platform, as its McValue menu, introduced in January, includes items like the Sausage McMuffin, Sausage Biscuit, Sausage Burrito, and Hash Browns, available for a "Buy One, Add One for $1" deal. During the company's fourth quarter earnings call earlier this year, chief financial officer Ian Borden said breakfast has been a strong daypart for the domestic business. 'It's an area where we're taking share,' he said. During the first quarter earnings call in late April, however, chief executive officer Chris Kempczinski said there has been a decline in frequency during the 'bellwether' breakfast daypart. 'Morning now is a place that you're seeing people are choosing either to skip breakfast or they're choosing to eat at home for breakfast. And I think that's more to explain what's going on in the U.S. versus any kind of segment shift,' he said. The Spicy McMuffin comes on the heels of two other menu launches for McDonald's, a new Blueberry & Crème Pie and a new premium burger called the Daily Double. These launches come as the chain has experienced two rare and consecutive quarters of same-store sales declines and traffic softness. Contact Alicia Kelso at Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bitcoin Bulls Should Be Wary of the Dollar Index's Death Cross: Technical Analysis
Bitcoin (BTC) bulls are optimistic that the U.S. dollar's broader sell-off will continue in the second half of the year, fueling the crypto bull run. However, one chart warrants caution when relying on bearish dollar predictions. That's the dollar index's weekly chart, which shows the 50-week simple moving average (SMA) is on track to cross below the 200-week SMA in the near term, forming the notorious death cross. While the ominous-sounding pattern is widely regarded as a long-term bearish signal, historically, it has proven to be a bear trap, consistently marking bottoms and bullish trend reversals in the US dollar. The chart below shows that DXY has chalked out four weekly chart death crosses since 2009, and each of those marked the end of downtrends (marked by vertical lines), setting the stage for sharp rallies. The last one occurred in January 2021, marking the bottom at around 90. The dollar caught the bid in the subsequent months, with the index eventually hitting a high of over 114.00 in September 2022. Note that price patterns do not always unfold as expected, meaning the impending death cross may not necessarily trap bears; however, being aware of its past tendency can help traders manage their positions more effectively. The dollar index, which tracks the greenback's value against major fiat currencies, tanked by 10.78% in the first half of the year, its worst performance since 1991.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elevance Health Insiders Sold US$6.9m Of Shares Suggesting Hesitancy
Over the past year, many Elevance Health, Inc. (NYSE:ELV) insiders sold a significant stake in the company which may have piqued investors' interest. When evaluating insider transactions, knowing whether insiders are buying is usually more beneficial than knowing whether they are selling, as the latter can be open to many interpretations. However, if numerous insiders are selling, shareholders should investigate more. While insider transactions are not the most important thing when it comes to long-term investing, we would consider it foolish to ignore insider transactions altogether. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. In the last twelve months, the biggest single sale by an insider was when the Executive VP & President of Commercial Health Benefits, Charles Kendrick, sold US$3.2m worth of shares at a price of US$432 per share. That means that an insider was selling shares at around the current price of US$396. While insider selling is a negative, to us, it is more negative if the shares are sold at a lower price. Given that the sale took place at around current prices, it makes us a little cautious but is hardly a major concern. Elevance Health insiders didn't buy any shares over the last year. The chart below shows insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last year. If you want to know exactly who sold, for how much, and when, simply click on the graph below! View our latest analysis for Elevance Health If you like to buy stocks that insiders are buying, rather than selling, then you might just love this free list of companies. (Hint: Most of them are flying under the radar). Over the last three months, we've seen significant insider selling at Elevance Health. Specifically, Executive VP & CFO Mark Kaye ditched US$1.9m worth of shares in that time, and we didn't record any purchases whatsoever. In light of this it's hard to argue that all the insiders think that the shares are a bargain. For a common shareholder, it is worth checking how many shares are held by company insiders. A high insider ownership often makes company leadership more mindful of shareholder interests. Elevance Health insiders own 0.1% of the company, currently worth about US$103m based on the recent share price. This kind of significant ownership by insiders does generally increase the chance that the company is run in the interest of all shareholders. An insider hasn't bought Elevance Health stock in the last three months, but there was some selling. And there weren't any purchases to give us comfort, over the last year. The company boasts high insider ownership, but we're a little hesitant, given the history of share sales. So while it's helpful to know what insiders are doing in terms of buying or selling, it's also helpful to know the risks that a particular company is facing. To assist with this, we've discovered 1 warning sign that you should run your eye over to get a better picture of Elevance Health. But note: Elevance Health may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with high ROE and low debt. For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.