This year is the 1,700th anniversary of a great church controversy
The first such one concerned the need for Gentile converts to Christianity to observe the rules of the law of Moses.
It was resolved by the Council of Jerusalem, recorded at Acts 15, which decided in favour of not burdening them with the regulations, except for abstaining 'from food polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from the meat of strangled animals and from blood'.
There was an element of compromise in this decision, but the main thrust of it was definitely on the liberal side.
READ MORE
Another major controversy was resolved 1,700 years ago this year by the first Council of Nicaea, which was held in the year 325. This striking anniversary is being observed in church circles around the world.
The controversy dealt with at Nicaea concerned the views of Arius, a priest in North Africa, as developed in Arianism. Arianism taught that
Jesus
was not coeternal with God, having been created by God, but nonetheless having been created before time began.
Arianism's understanding that Jesus had been created, as opposed to begotten, involved subordinationism within the Trinity and was a matter of widespread and passionate dispute within the early church.
The Emperor Constantine – who ruled from 306 to 337, had converted to Christianity and legalised its practice by the Edict of Milan in 313 – was deeply concerned about the depth of this division of opinion and convened the council which was held in Nicaea, which is now Iznik in
Turkey
, in summer 325 to establish a definitive position.
The council adopted the first version of the Nicene creed, referring to 'one Lord, Jesus Christ, the Son of God, begotten from the Father, only-begotten, that is, from the substance of the Father, God from God, light from light, true God from true God, begotten not made, of one substance with the Father'.
While some may think there was an element of compromise in the wording 'begotten, not made', nonetheless the creed is a clear repudiation of Arianism, categorically anathematising any view of Jesus as of 'a different hypostasis or substance' from God, or as 'created'.
Christian teaching distinguishes between begetting and creating. This difference was helpfully explained in a nutshell by CS Lewis in his book, Mere Christianity, thus: 'When you beget, you beget something of the same kind as yourself ... But when you make, you make something of a different kind from yourself.'
Although there understandably are differing views of the precise course of ancient history, it is widely viewed that the first form of the Nicene creed was amended in 381 by the Council of Constantinople (now Istanbul) into the present-day form, except for the
Filioque clause (that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father 'and the Son'), which was added in 1014 and was an important factor in the 1054 schism between the western and eastern church.
The 381 version of the Nicene creed is also known as the Niceno-Constantinopolitan creed. What is crucially important about the Nicene creed from its original 325 form is that it firmly establishes the trinitarian understanding of God.
Perhaps all of this may seem rather esoteric in today's church, but the importance of Trinitarianism is seen in that when one tampers with it then all sorts of theological trouble is inclined to ensue.
In terms of the today's church, Trinitarianism can be seen as underscoring certain particularly contemporary concerns. These include respect for human diversity and the value of unity-in-diversity in church relationships, given that the trinitarian God is both one and diverse in nature; the importance of human equality, the three divine people being coequal; and the fundamentally relational nature of human life – embracing personal, societal and political life – given that harmonious relationship is at the heart of the life of the triune God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
No doubt there are many other ways in which the trinitarian understanding of God can be seen as a standard and goal for the church and for human society in general.
Given the priority of the scriptural witness, some question the authority of creeds such as the Nicene creed in establishing orthodox doctrine.
Nonetheless, the church does have to organise itself – and ecumenical councils, such as were those of Nicaea and Constantinople, can rightly assert what is the common and received understanding of the mysteries of God.
Canon Ian Ellis is former editor of The Church of Ireland Gazette
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
23-07-2025
- Irish Times
If US envoy travels to the Middle East, it's a clear sign a ceasefire deal could be close
US president Donald Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff will meet Israeli minister of strategic affairs Ron Dermer and a senior Qatari envoy in Rome on Thursday, as part of his push to advance a Gaza ceasefire and hostage release deal to end the 21-month war. If sufficient progress is made, it is expected that Witkoff will travel from Rome to Doha towards the end of the week to secure a deal, according to the well-informed Axios news website, citing a US and Israeli source. Among the ebbs and flows of the negotiations over the last few weeks, and the conflicting reports of progress and deadlock, the one key sign indicating that an agreement might be close was if Witkoff would travel to the region. A senior Israeli security official was quoted as saying: 'We are in the midst of negotiations – really in the final stretch.' READ MORE Another indication that a deal may be within reach is the fact that the Israeli negotiating team has now been in Doha for proximity talks with a Hamas delegation for 2½ weeks – far longer than any period in the past when negotiations were taking place. Under discussion is an initial 60-day ceasefire, during which 10 of the 20 hostages believed to be alive would be released and talks would begin on a permanent end to the war. A few weeks ago Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu stressed the importance of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) retaining control of the Morag corridor which divides Rafah at the southern tip of Gaza from Khan Younis, the enclave's second-largest city. However, Hamas rejected the maps presented by Israeli negotiators and Israel has essentially backed down from the demand. The impending truce agreement envisages an IDF withdrawal to virtually the same Gaza security perimeter that Israel held in January, a strip of 700-1,000 metres running along the Israel-Gaza border. US special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff. Photograph: Will Oliver/EPA This prompts the question of why a ceasefire wasn't reached many months ago, which would have saved the lives of many thousands of Gazans and dozens of Israeli soldiers and brought the hostages home. Stepped-up American pressure is definitely a factor and Trump has made it crystal clear in recent months that he wants this war to end. But Netanyahu's domestic political considerations may also be a factor, although he will never admit to this. The two far-right parties in Netanyahu's coalition want the IDF to conquer the entire Gaza Strip, paving the way for a return of the Jewish settlements that were uprooted in the 2005 disengagement, when Israel pulled out all settlers and soldiers from the enclave. Both parties threatened to withdraw from the coalition if Netanyahu agreed to end the war without what they termed a 'total victory' over Hamas. Such a move could have brought down the government but the threat is no longer relevant. In a few days the Knesset parliament begins a three-month-long summer recess during which no-confidence motions cannot be submitted. [ Israel's decision to expand war in Gaza amid ceasefire talks surprises many analysts Opens in new window ] Netanyahu has a 90-day breathing space – an ideal time to clinch a ceasefire while his government remains intact. And a deal that brings about the release of all the 50 hostages – 20 believed alive and 30 believed dead – would be supported by the overwhelming majority of Israelis, and could provide the catalyst for new elections. The Hamas-run Gaza health ministry says more than 59,000 people have been killed in the war, which began with the Hamas attack on southern Israel on October 7th, 2023, during which 1,200 people were killed and 250 taken hostage.
Irish Examiner
14-07-2025
- Irish Examiner
Tánaiste: Religious orders cannot 'plead the poor mouth' and must contribute to school abuse redress
Religious orders at the centre of any redress scheme "cannot plead the poor mouth" and must pay their share of the bill, the Tánaiste has said. The Government last week announced that a commission of investigation into the handling of sexual abuse in schools was to be established, following a scoping inquiry last year that detailed almost 2,400 allegations of sexual abuse across more than 300 religious schools. However, while no details of a redress scheme have been discussed, there are fears it could dwarf any scheme previously seen in Ireland and cost multiple billions of euro. The potential size of any redress scheme has caused some unease in Government, with potentially as many as 40,000 survivors. Asked about the potential bill, Simon Harris said the Government will seek to have religious orders pay towards the scheme. "Children were sexually abused at schools, including special schools, especially despicable acts that happened over a sustained period of time. And I agree with the scoping inquiry report, and I agree with the survivors and families of victims of abuse who rightly want to see the perpetrators pay. "[At] a check in point after two years Government to the issue of redress. But I'm very clear, as is (education minister Helen) McEntee, that the first port of call in relation to any redress scheme that may be considered has to be the religious institutions. I think it's highly questionable some of these organisations have pled the poor mouth when many of these are very, very well resourced organisations. "I think if people accept accountability, if people want to show their Christianity, I think they have to really step up." Recent efforts to have religious orders pay for redress schemes have not been successful. In April, children's minister Norma Foley revealed that after a 20-month negotiation process with the religious bodies who ran the State's mother and baby homes and county homes, just one had made a cash offer of redress.
Irish Daily Mirror
11-07-2025
- Irish Daily Mirror
'Migrant boat' bonfire set alight in Tyrone as PSNI probe 'hate incident'
The placing of a controversial effigy of a migrant boat on a bonfire in Co Tyrone is being investigated as a "hate incident" by the PSNI. The towering pyre, which has stirred anger in previous years, was again the centre of fresh outrage after it was decorated with a model of a small boat with several figures inside along with anti-immigration placards. One sign on the structure read "stop the boats" while another declared "veterans before refugees." The PSNI said that they "have received a number of reports regarding the bonfire in Moygashel and the material that has been placed upon it". "Police are investigating this hate incident," a PSNI spokesperson said in a statement. "Police are here to help those who are or who feel vulnerable, to keep people safe. "We do this by working with local communities, partners, elected representatives and other stakeholders to deliver local solutions to local problems, building confidence in policing and supporting a safe environment for people to live, work, visit and invest in Northern Ireland, but we can only do so within the legislative framework that exists." Police have asked anyone with information on the signage to contact them. There has been widespread criticism of the display, with politicians and religious authorities condemning the structure. Claire Hanna, leader of the Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP), described the effigy as "disgusting". She said: "It would be ludicrous to call it art in any sense. "In terms of life imitating art, not three weeks ago, we had actual human beings being burned out by probably some of the same elements involved in this bonfire in Ballymena, it's a deeply dehumanising provocation." Meanwhile John McDowell, the Church of Ireland Archbishop of Armagh and Primate of All Ireland, condemned the effigy as "racist, threatening and offensive". Quoting words from scripture, he added: "'The stranger who resides with you shall be to you as one of your citizens; you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt (Leviticus 19:34).' "These are the words from the Law of God to his people. He is the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. If we compare them with the effigy of a boat of migrants which sits, to our humiliation and lasting shame, on top of a bonfire in Moygashel, it exposes that effigy for what it is – racist, threatening and offensive. "It certainly has nothing whatsoever to do with Christianity or with Protestant culture and is in fact inhuman and deeply sub-Christian. "I hope that the many people from other countries, who live in that area, and who contribute so much to the economy and to the diversity of Dungannon, can be reassured that it does not in any way represent the feeling of the vast majority of their neighbours."
