logo
US$650 million Spotify share sale funds 'military AI,' activist slams CEO Ek

US$650 million Spotify share sale funds 'military AI,' activist slams CEO Ek

Sinar Daily2 days ago
SHAH ALAM – Spotify's co-founder and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Daniel Ek is significantly increasing his investment in Europe's defence ambitions, leading a nearly US$700 million funding round into Helsing, an Artificial Intelligence-powered military tech start-up, as war escalations and geopolitical tensions fuel investor interest in the global arms race.
The investment, led by Ek's venture firm Prima Materia, also drew support from prominent investors such as Lightspeed Venture Partners, Accel, Saab and General Catalyst.
This announcement comes at a time when global conflict, from Ukraine to the genocide in Gaza, has pushed military tech into the spotlight. - AFP file photo
Helsing, founded in 2021 and operational in Germany, France and the UK, builds AI software to process battlefield data in real-time and recently expanded into drone manufacturing with its HX-2 model.
The company states this new capital will be channelled towards strengthening Europe's technological sovereignty, particularly in critical areas like defence AI.
"As Europe rapidly strengthens its defence capabilities in response to evolving geopolitical challenges, there is an urgent need for investments in advanced technologies that ensure its strategic autonomy and security readiness,' Ek said in a statement recently.
This announcement comes at a time when global conflict, from Ukraine to the genocide in Gaza, has pushed military tech into the spotlight.
However, the decision by Spotify's top executive to invest heavily in military AI has also reignited ethical concerns about the intersection of tech, warfare, and capitalism, especially in light of the ongoing Israeli aggression in Gaza.
Filmmaker and activist Sadia Hannan, known on social media as @naleybynature, voiced serious concern over Ek's investment in Helsing, drawing connections between tech funding and the humanitarian crisis in Palestine.
"Something really disturbing is happening at Spotify and I want to talk about it. I used to work at Spotify when it was still a small start-up.
"It was exciting back then, the platform was creating space for artists around the world. But the way it has grown has been violent and insidious," she said in a video uploaded to her Instagram.
Hannan pointed out that Ek has sold nearly US$650 million worth of Spotify shares to fund what she called 'military AI', referring to Helsing.
Her criticism extends beyond Ek, citing a UN report by Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese that named several global tech companies, including IBM, Microsoft, Amazon and Palantir, as aiding Israel's military operations in Gaza.
'These tech companies are not just testing their toys on Palestinians. They're killing Palestinians. And what's even worse is that they're profiting off of it.
"Military AI is big money. What we allow them to do to Palestinians is ultimately what we allow them to do to us," she said.
She also added that Spotify's largest institutional shareholders, BlackRock and Vanguard, are among the biggest global backers of companies profiting from the arms industry, including those supporting Israel's military.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘No extensions': Trump locks in August 1 deadline for US tariffs
‘No extensions': Trump locks in August 1 deadline for US tariffs

The Star

time20 minutes ago

  • The Star

‘No extensions': Trump locks in August 1 deadline for US tariffs

US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he would officially extend until August 1 his declared deadline to impose 'reciprocal' tariffs on dozens of economic partners, indicating that this time he really meant it. The move keeps Trump's negotiating leverage at a boil even as it imposes additional uncertainty on the global economy amid new fears of a trade war. The US president also said during a cabinet meeting Tuesday he would impose a 50 per cent tariff on imported copper and planned to slap long-threatened levies on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. Trump added that ties with Beijing have improved. 'We have had a really good relationship with China lately, and we're getting along with them very well,' he said, adding that he was speaking regularly with Chinese President Xi Jinping. 'They've been very fair on our trade deal, honestly,' he added. In the past, Trump has claimed having calls that Beijing declined to confirm. The postponement of a deadline Trump had originally said would be Wednesday came as the '90 deals in 90 days' that his administration vowed to complete has run into severe headwinds, prompting the president to issue 14 unilateral letters on Monday. These notes, all but identically worded, would impose elevated tariffs of 25 per cent or more effective August 1 for major trading partners Japan and South Korea and for smaller economies like Laos and Cambodia, with more missives expected. 'In addition to letters that will be sent today, tomorrow, and for the next short period of time, TARIFFS WILL START BEING PAID ON AUGUST 1,' Trump posted on his social media account. 'No extensions will be granted.' Trump has also warned nations that any move to counter Washington would see their US duties increased by an identical amount. But even as he sent out his letters Monday, he told reporters that his new deadline was 'firm, but not 100 per cent firm', adding: 'I would say final – but if they call with a different offer, and I like it, then we'll do it'. The European Union and Japan were reportedly close to reaching trade pacts with the US. Financial markets have dubbed the president's pattern of repeated threats and climbdowns 'Taco', for 'Trump always chickens out'. Trump's declaration follows days of characteristic 'will he or won't he' drama amid his vows that America would 'no longer be ripped off'. Over the weekend, Trump threatened to impose unilateral tariffs of up to 70 per cent by Wednesday and hinted at as many as 10 imminent deals, even as he and his aides previewed a more realistic August 1 date – provided countries negotiated 'in good faith'. Broadening his injection of tariffs into foreign policy as well as domestic politics, the president also said he could apply a 10 per cent duty on Brics countries for their 'anti-American' agenda. Imposing higher duties on US-bound shipments arguably gives Trump a domestic win in line with his 'America first' narrative and bid to rejuvenate US manufacturing. But it is also likely to deepen mistrust among close allies and trading partners, erode US global leadership and, analysts said, undercut the interdependence that has informed much of the post-World War II period – issues of little apparent concern for Trump. The rush to deal in recent days stems from Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement that all US trading partners would be subject to 'reciprocal' tariffs of up to 50 per cent, from the wealthiest countries to the most impoverished. Days later, however, as markets plunged and companies yelped, Trump announced a three-month reprieve, set to expire on Wednesday, during which trading partners – except China – would be subject to 10 per cent higher tariffs pending a deal. Increasingly, as the flood of deals failed to materialise, however, the administration focused on a smaller number of agreements with major economies and take-it-or-leave-it letters for the rest. Trump said that all 100-plus US trading partners would get letters by the original Wednesday deadline. Adding to the confusion, Trump has teed up various sectoral negotiations involving steel, aluminium, autos, pharmaceuticals and semiconductors amid claims of unfair trade and national security concerns. He has also levied punitive tariffs on imports from nations he has linked to illegal migration and illicit fentanyl shipments to the US. 'It is easy to agree on wanting a quick deal – but much harder to agree on what the terms of that quick deal should be,' Nico FitzRoy, a partner at Signum Global, a financial advisory firm, said. Agreements announced in recent weeks – actually more like broad frameworks, analysts said, given the rush and lack of detail – have covered Britain, China and Vietnam. After a May deal with Britain, it appeared that the 10 per cent higher tariffs London had accepted would be the rough benchmark for future agreements. Beijing was next when it agreed to 30 per cent higher tariffs last month, though it was considered a separate category given the complexity of US-China relations and the country's huge historical trade surplus. The announcement last week, however, that Vietnam had agreed to 20 per cent higher tariffs – and 40 per cent for Chinese goods transshipped through the country – has raised concerns that Trump would push for larger average tariff increases. Some analysts now surmise that levels could settle at around half of Trump's peak threats given that the initial tariff for Vietnam was 46 per cent. But trying to predict Trump's next step is complicated by his admission that his 'intuition' is often the main factor in his decision-making. 'These tariffs aren't coming off,' said Henrietta Treyz, a founder of the Veda Partners consultancy, adding that '10 per cent tariffs are the floor, not the ceiling'. Another concern for many anxious delegations cycling through Washington is the risk that, once he agrees to a deal, Trump could turn around and threaten additional sectoral increases. 'Can Trump really be expected to agree to 'promise' trading partners they won't be hit by future tariffs?' asked Andrew Bishop of Signum. Japanese leaders voiced 'regret' on Tuesday at the announced 25 per cent tariffs but expressed hope that Washington and Tokyo would reach a mutually acceptable 'package'. In the coming weeks, look for the White House to roll out headline 'deals' to purchase US products but to 'kick thornier issues around digital taxation, labour standards and phytosanitary standards out into the future', Treyz said. As negotiations have intensified, the broad outline of Trump's playbook has become more evident: keep allies off balance with shifting demands and frequent changes; visibly and publicly threaten their core interests to increase leverage; then release pressure with a deal framed through a narrow economic lens with limited regard to broader foreign policy objectives. The lack of detail accompanying the deals, some promoted as 'historic', has also created room for misunderstanding, accusations and backsliding. After US and Chinese officials reached an agreement in Geneva in May, it quickly came off the rails and required another high-level meeting weeks later in London. In some cases, details only surfaced later: last week, three makers of chip design software, including Siemens, noted that the Trump administration had lifted restrictions on sales to China. Trump and his advisers have repeatedly claimed that tariffs cost 'nothing' and that foreign nations, not American consumers, pay. But a JPMorgan Chase Institute study last week of US companies linked to international trade found that current tariff levels would add some US$82 billion in new costs for mid-sized firms accounting for a third of US private-sector jobs. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST

Just like a real surgeon: Robot removes gallbladder with 100pc accuracy
Just like a real surgeon: Robot removes gallbladder with 100pc accuracy

Malay Mail

time37 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

Just like a real surgeon: Robot removes gallbladder with 100pc accuracy

NEW YORK, July 10 — A robot has performed realistic surgery on its own with 100 per cent accuracy, PA Media/dpa reported. Researchers at Johns Hopkins University in the United States (US) said in a 'major leap' towards using more robots in operating theatres, a machine trained on the videos of surgeries was able to precisely work on removing a gallbladder. The robot operated with the expertise of a skilled human surgeon, according to the researchers, even during unexpected scenarios typical in real-life medical emergencies. The robot was watched as it performed a lengthy phase of a gallbladder removal on a life-like patient. It was able to respond to and learn from voice commands from the team, just like a novice surgeon working with a mentor. Overall, there were 17 tasks in the surgery. The robot had to identify certain ducts and arteries and grab them precisely, strategically place clips, and sever parts with scissors. It was also able to adapt even when dye was introduced, which changed the appearance of the organs and tissue. Associate professor in mechanical engineering Axel Krieger said the advancement signifies a move from robots that can execute specific surgical tasks to robots that truly understand surgical procedures. 'This is a critical distinction that brings us significantly closer to clinically viable autonomous surgical systems that can work in the messy, unpredictable reality of actual patient care.' The work received US government funding and was published in the journal Science Robotics. Back in 2022, a robot performed the first autonomous robotic surgery on a pig. However, it required specially marked tissue, operated in a highly controlled environment, and followed a rigid, pre-determined surgical plan. Krieger said that phase was like teaching a robot to drive along a carefully mapped route. But the new system was 'like teaching a robot to navigate any road, in any condition, responding intelligently to whatever it encounters.' 'To me, it really shows that it's possible to perform complex surgical procedures autonomously,' he said. The new system, which uses the same machine learning architecture that powers ChatGPT, also adapts to a patient's anatomical features in real-time and works to correct itself. It can respond to spoken commands such as 'grab the gallbladder head' or 'move the left arm a bit to the left,' and then learns from that feedback. Ji Woong Kim, a former postdoctoral researcher at Johns Hopkins who is now at Stanford University, said this work represents a major leap from prior efforts because it tackles some of the fundamental barriers to deploying autonomous surgical robots in the real world. 'Our work shows that AI models can be made reliable enough for surgical autonomy – something that once felt far-off but is now demonstrably viable,' said Kim. Although the robot took longer to perform the work than a human surgeon, the results were comparable to an expert surgeon, researchers said. Next, the team will train and test the system on more types of surgeries. — Bernama-PA Media/dpa

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store