A Republican plan to sell off millions of acres of public lands is no more — for now
Senator Mike Lee (R–Utah) had advanced a mandate to sell up to 3.3 million acres of public land managed by the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management for the stated purpose of addressing housing needs — an intent that opponents didn't believe was guaranteed by the language in the provision.
Late Monday, Elizabeth MacDonough, the Senate parliamentarian — who advises the government body on interpreting procedural rules — determined the proposal didn't pass muster under the the Byrd Rule, which prevents the inclusion of provisions that are extraneous to the budget in a reconciliation bill.
The move initially appeared to scuttle Lee's plan, which has drawn bipartisan backlash. But Lee, chairman of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, took to the social media platform X to say the fight wasn't over.
'Yes, the Byrd Rule limits what can go in the reconciliation bill, but I'm doing everything I can to support President Trump and move this forward,' Lee wrote in a post Monday night.
In the post, he outlined changes, including removing all Forest Service land and limiting eligible Bureau of Land Management land to an area within a radius of five miles of population centers. He wrote that housing prices are 'crushing young families,' and suggested that his proposed changes would alleviate such economic barriers.
Utah's Deseret News reported that Lee submitted a revised proposal with new restrictions on Tuesday morning.
Environmentalists and public land advocates celebrated MacDonough's decision to reject Lee's proposal, even as they braced for an ongoing battle.
'This is a significant win for public lands,' said Jennifer Rokala, executive director for Center for Western Priorities, in a statement. 'Thankfully, the Senate parliamentarian has seen Senator Lee's ridiculous attempt to sell off millions of acres of public lands for what it is — an ideological crusade against public lands, not a serious proposal to raise revenue for the federal government."
Lydia Weiss, senior director of government relations for the Wilderness Society, a conservation nonprofit, described the rejection of the proposal as 'deafening.'
'And the people across the West who raised their voices to reject the idea of public land sales don't seem particularly interested in a revised bill,' she added. 'They seem interested in this bad idea going away once and for all.'
The proposal, before it was nixed, would have made more than 16 million acres of land in California eligible for sale, according to the Wilderness Society.
Vulnerable areas included roadless stretches in the northern reaches of the Angeles National Forest, which offer recreation opportunities to millions of people living in the Los Angeles Basin and protects wildlife corridors, the group said. Other at-risk areas included portions of San Bernardino, Inyo and Cleveland national forests as well as BLM land in the Mojave Desert, such as Coyote Dry Lake Bed outside of Joshua Tree National Park.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
11 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Judge orders halt to indiscriminate immigration operations in California
A federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration from conducting indiscriminate immigration stops in several California counties, including Los Angeles, and denying detainees access to lawyers, as the White House continues its sweeping immigration crackdown in the state that has set immigrant communities on edge and sparked protests. The lawsuit was brought this month by a group of individuals who had been detained or questioned, together with immigrant advocacy groups in Los Angeles, arguing that President Donald Trump's mass deportations involve tactics that are unconstitutional, including patrolling and rounding up individuals without reasonable justification and refusing legal counsel.
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
An Immigration Raid at two Ventura County Cannabis Farms Leads to 200 Arrests; Shot Fired
An Immigration Raid at two Ventura County Cannabis Farms Leads to 200 Arrests; Shot Fired originally appeared on L.A. Mag. Immigration raids at two Ventura County cannabis farms on Thursday led to 200 arrests, federal law enforcement officials say, and ten juveniles being taken into custody in sweeps that rapidly deteriorated into a chaotic scene that led an undocumented farmer to fall from a building and suffer a fatal head injury. The United Farm Workers said Friday afternoon that a worker had died - plummeting from a building while running from agents who raided Glass House Farms. Jaime Alanis, suffered a head injury in the fall that led to his death, family members said in a GoFundMe post. "My uncle Jaime was just a hard-working, innocent farmer. He has his wife and daughter waiting for him. He was chased by ICE agents, and we were told he fell 30ft," the worker's niece Yesenia Duran wrote on the page, which is seeking funds to send his body back to Mexico. "He was his family's provider. They took one of our family members We need justice. We are still investigating what happened." The FBI also announced a $50,000 reward after, according to a federal press release, "brave agents faced gun fire as they executed on criminal search warrants at a marijuana facility where they rescued at least 10 migrant children, arrested approximately 200 illegal aliens." The FBI released a photo of the purported gunman Thursday night. The raids led to violent clashes between agents and protestors who descended on the scene. Governor Gavin Newsom condemned the actions of federal agents, saying that children were among those fleeing tear gas and projectiles. The Camarillo raid targeted the Glass House Farms greenhouse complex on Laguna Road, which is one of the largest licensed cannabis farms in California. The company was founded by environmentalist Graham Farrar, who owns a second farm in Carpinteria that was also the scene of heavily militarized immigration actions Thursday. This story was originally reported by L.A. Mag on Jul 11, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DNC accuses NC of colluding with Trump administration over missing voter data
A plan to resolve a Trump administration lawsuit and collect missing information from nearly 200,000 North Carolina voters could wrongfully prevent many of them from voting, the Democratic National Committee contended in a letter sent to state election officials Friday. In a statement, DNC Litigation Director Dan Freeman accused the State Board of Elections, which recently flipped to Republican control, of 'colluding with President Trump's Justice Department to take away the voting rights of 98,000 North Carolinians.' In a statement, a spokesperson for the board said they believe the plan 'fully complies with state and federal law, and we expect that it will also receive approval from the United States Department of Justice.' The plan, which was approved in a unanimous, bipartisan vote last month, would attempt to collect missing driver's license or Social Security numbers from 194,000 voters. About half of those voters could face barriers to making their ballots count if they don't respond by the next election. The missing information has recently formed the basis for several high-profile legal cases, including Jefferson Griffin's unsuccessful attempt to overturn his loss to Democratic incumbent Allison Riggs in the 2024 state Supreme Court election. Following Griffin's loss, the U.S. Department of Justice sued over the issue, alleging that it could lead to fraud — though it provided no evidence of it happening. Working with the DOJ to address the issue, the board approved a plan wherein the affected voters will receive a series of mailers throughout the summer urging them to update their records with their local election board. County election boards will also be instructed to conduct their own review of the affected voters to determine if they already have the information in their records but failed to include it in the state database. Election officials have frequently noted that the missing information does not necessarily indicate fraud or an error on the part of the voter. In fact, their records indicate that roughly half of the affected voters did provide the identifying information, but it does not appear in the state's database due to clerical errors or name-matching issues. However, 98,000 voters whom the state says never provided the information will have to cast provisional ballots in future elections until they do so. That triggers a special review of each ballot after Election Day and could result in their vote being thrown out. The DNC's letter, which threatened legal action if the State Board of Elections doesn't reverse course, says this would 'effectively remove' the affected voters from the official list of eligible voters. The board has not yet released a list of the affected voters, but it plans to send out the first round of mailers notifying them sometime this month.
