
Why I am keeping the Chase Sapphire Reserve card, even at $795 a year
CNN Underscored reviews financial products based on their overall value. We may receive a commission through our affiliate partners if you apply and are approved for a product, but our reporting is always independent and objective. This may impact how links appear on this site. This site does not include all financial companies or all available financial offers. Terms apply to American Express benefits and offers. Enrollment may be required for select American Express benefits and offers. Visit americanexpress.com to learn more.
I have had the Chase Sapphire Reserve® credit card since 2017, and I've been very happy with it. It has been my primary credit card for most travel and dining purchases, thanks to its points-earning potential. With 3 Chase Ultimate Rewards points per dollar spent on travel and dining, I have earned hundreds of thousands of points over the years. And when something went wrong while traveling, like a canceled or delayed flight, the Chase Sapphire Reserve's travel insurance came through repeatedly, refunding the expenses I had incurred as a consequence.
That's why I didn't mind paying its $550 annual fee. Year after year, the Chase Sapphire Reserve has paid for itself — and then some — through points, travel credits and peace of mind. But then the bank announced that it was raising the Chase Sapphire Reserve's annual fee to $795, effective June 23, a brutal 45% hike that had many card holders wondering if they should keep the Reserve or seek less expensive alternatives.
So, I looked at the new credits and earning structure that Chase announced with the annual fee change, did the math and decided that the Chase Sapphire Reserve still makes sense for me, even at an annual fee of $795. Once the card's various credits are factored in, that intimidating figure drops, in my situation, to just $15.
And that's without counting all the credits the card offers; some are too impractical to use if you don't have time to track them, or they just don't interest me. That $15 figure is based on using only the credits that make sense for my spending habits.
Here's why the Chase Sapphire Reserve will remain in my wallet and why you might find yourself in a similar position — or not.
Annual fee equivalent after this credit is counted: $495
The new version of the Chase Sapphire Reserve keeps one of the most attractive features of the old one: an automatic credit of $300 toward travel purchases, resetting every year on your membership anniversary. Chase defines what counts as travel broadly, so this credit applies to everything from subway rides to airfare, including ride-share services, car rentals, vacation homes, hotels and more. Just put that expense on the card, and it gets erased automatically, up to the $300 limit.
Importantly, flights and hotels booked directly now earn 4 points per dollar instead of 3 points per dollar before the annual fee change. Since I spend a lot on those, that has swayed me to keep the card, even with earnings on travel other than flights and hotels slashed to 1 point per dollar instead of the previous 3 points per dollar.
Annual fee equivalent after this credit is counted: $375
I live in Brooklyn, New York, and like many Americans who live in cities, I use ride-share services often. My favorite is Lyft, mostly because it tends to be cheaper than Uber on rides to and from JFK and LaGuardia airports.
Through Sept. 30, 2027, Chase Sapphire Reserve card holders receive a $10 monthly Lyft in-app credit. This translates to a yearly total of up to $120 that helps offset the card's annual fee. (Enrollment is required, and the credit only applies to rides in the US.)
Indeed, credits don't roll over each month, and don't cover Wait & Save rides or bike and scooter rentals. But I do use Lyft several times a month, and for rides that the credit covers, so this is useful for me.
It's not great that the Chase Sapphire Reserve now earns 5 points per dollar on Lyft rides, which is half of what it earned when Lyft rides yielded a spectacular 10x points. But 5 points per dollar is still something I highly value. For example, in 2024, I spent around $3,000 on Lyft, which at 5x means 15,000 points. Those are worth about $307, according to The Points Guy. And if $3,000 seems a lot to spend on Lyft, consider that, like many New Yorkers, I do not own a car. Holding a credit card that earns a high return on Lyft ride-shares is important, and no card competing with the Sapphire Reserve would get me more than 3x on that.
Annual fee equivalent after this credit is counted: $75
The restaurant credit that comes with the Chase Sapphire Reserve card does require some effort to work, but the payoff is worth it. This benefit comes in the form of an annual credit of up to $300 at Chase Sapphire Reserve Exclusive Tables, which can be booked on OpenTable. It's split into two biannual credits: $150 from January to June and $150 more from July to December, and it requires activation.
The good news is that once you've activated it, the credit is applied automatically after you pay with the card at a participating restaurant. The bad news is that those restaurants tend to be expensive, but $150 could take a big part of the sting off. Plus, there are many restaurants to choose from, in the US, Canada and Mexico. New York City alone has dozens, according to the list published by OpenTable.
If you don't live in or travel to an area with eligible restaurants, this credit is of little value, but for card holders in major metro areas, it's attractive.
Annual fee equivalent after this credit is counted: $15
One of the new perks of the Chase Sapphire Reserve is complimentary membership to DashPass, which would cost $120 annually otherwise (activation required by Dec. 31, 2027). DashPass includes $0 delivery fees and lower service fees on eligible DoorDash orders for a minimum of one year.
Once membership is activated, you receive a $5 discount each month at checkout on one qualifying restaurant order on DoorDash. I often order from local restaurants via DoorDash, so I will easily use the full $60 a year from this credit.
In addition, you get two $10 promos each month to save on groceries and retail orders. I don't use DoorDash to shop for groceries, but if you do, then the complimentary DoorDash membership can total $300 a year in value.
Airport lounge access may be the best single benefit of the Chase Sapphire Reserve for me, and it hasn't changed with the higher annual fee.
The card comes with a Priority Pass Select membership (activation required), which gives access to more than 1,300 Priority Pass lounges worldwide, with up to two guests. It also grants entrance to Chase Sapphire Lounges, with up to two guests. Chase Sapphire Lounges are currently found at six airports in the US — Boston, New York LaGuardia, New York JFK, Philadelphia, Phoenix and San Diego — plus Hong Kong.
Card holders also get access to select Air Canada Maple Leaf Lounges in the US, Canada and Europe when they're flying on a Star Alliance airline, including, for example, United and Air Canada.
It's hard to quantify the value of this benefit, but if you fly with some frequency out of airports with eligible lounges, it's a very useful perk. It gets you into lounges, with free food and drink plus space to relax, even when flying economy. For the Priority Pass lounges alone, the same level of access would cost $469 a year, the cost of a Priority Pass membership with unlimited visits but no included guests.
There are other credits that come with the Chase Sapphire Reserve card and would amount cumulatively to a higher value than the annual fee, but I didn't factor them in my calculation.
The biggest is up to $500 in annual statement credit for stays booked on The Edit, a collection of luxury hotels and resorts curated by Chase (split into two biannual credits of $250). For travelers who like to stay at luxury properties, this could be a hugely valuable perk. For me, it doesn't do much, since I often prefer vacation rentals and don't spend a lot of time in hotels when traveling.
Other credits that I personally wouldn't use are the following:
Up to $300 in annual statement credit for concert and event tickets purchased on StubHub or Viagogon (split into two $150 biannual credits, activation required; through Dec. 31, 2027).
Up to $250 in annual statement credit for Apple TV+ and Apple Music subscriptions (one-time activation per service required, on chase.com or the Chase mobile app; through June 22, 2027).
Up to $120 in annual statement credits toward Peloton memberships, $10 monthly (through Dec. 31, 2027).
Together, these credits amount to $1,170, more than offsetting the annual fee. While they wouldn't be useful for me, they might well be very attractive for others.
If the Chase Sapphire Reserve's new $795 annual fee doesn't work for you anymore, you might take a second look at its direct competitor: the The Platinum Card® from American Express, the other top-end travel rewards card. For an annual fee of $695, it offers many similar benefits to the Sapphire Reserve, including excellent lounge access, a spate of statement credits and the American Express Membership Rewards ecosystem of transferable points — but at an annual cost that isn't much lower.
The Capital One Venture X Rewards Credit Card, with an annual fee of $395, earns 10x on hotels and rental cars, and 5x on flights booked through Capital One Travel. It also offers the same $300 annual travel credit as the Chase Sapphire Reserve, although only when booking through Capital One. It also offers complimentary airline lounge access, both at Capital One's own lounges and Priority Pass lounges.
The little sibling in the Chase Sapphire family of cards, the Chase Sapphire Preferred, could also be an attractive choice. For an annual fee of $95, the Preferred still earns 3x points on dining and 2x on all travel.
CNN Underscored's team of expert editors and contributors carefully reviews credit cards, travel rewards and loyalty programs to help readers navigate changes and make informed financial decisions. For this story on the Chase Sapphire Reserve, senior money editor and credit card expert Alberto Riva applied his years of industry knowledge and personal experience to ensure every detail is accurate and actionable. Our recommendations are grounded in real-world value, not hype, and backed by thorough analysis, expert insight and a commitment to clarity and transparency.
Editorial disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are the author's alone, not those of any bank, credit card issuer, hotel, airline or other entity. This content has not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of the entities included within the post.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he's not planning to extend a pause on global tariffs beyond July 9
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump says he is not planning to extend a 90-day pause on tariffs on most nations beyond July 9, when the negotiating period he set would expire, and his administration will notify countries that the trade penalties will take effect unless there are deals with the United States. Letters will start going out 'pretty soon" before the approaching deadline, he said. 'We'll look at how a country treats us — are they good, are they not so good — some countries we don't care, we'll just send a high number out,' Trump told Fox News Channel's "Sunday Morning Futures" during a wide-ranging interview taped Friday and broadcast Sunday. Those letters, he said, would say, 'Congratulations, we're allowing you to shop in the United States of America, you're going to pay a 25% tariff, or a 35% or a 50% or 10%.' Trump had played down the deadline at a White House news conference Friday by noting how difficult it would be to work out separate deals with each nation. The administration had set a goal of reaching 90 trade deals in 90 days. Negotiations continue, but 'there's 200 countries, you can't talk to all of them,' he said in the interview. Trump also discussed a potential TikTok deal, relations with China, the strikes on Iran and his immigration crackdown. Here are the key takeaways: Few details on possible TikTok deal A group of wealthy investors will make an offer to buy TikTok, Trump said, hinting at a deal that could safeguard the future of the popular social media platform, which is owned by China's ByteDance. 'We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way. I think I'll need, probably, China approval, and I think President Xi (Jinping) will probably do it,' Trump said. Trump did not offer any details about the investors, calling them 'a group of very wealthy people.' 'I'll tell you in about two weeks,' he said when asked for specifics. It's a time frame Trump often cites, most recently about a decision on whether the U.S. military would get directly involved in the war between Israel and Iran. The U.S. struck Iranian nuclear sites just days later. Earlier this month, Trump signed an executive order to keep TikTok running in the U.S. for 90 more days to give his administration more time to broker a deal to bring the social media platform under American ownership. It is the third time Trump extended the deadline. The first one was through an executive order on Jan. 20, his first day in office, after the platform went dark briefly when a national ban — approved by Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court — took effect. Trump insists US 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear facilities U.S. strikes on Iran 'obliterated' its nuclear facilities, Trump insisted, and he said whoever leaked a preliminary intelligence assessment suggesting Tehran's nuclear program had been set back only a few months should be prosecuted. Trump said Iran was 'weeks away' from achieving a nuclear weapon before he ordered the strikes. 'It was obliterated like nobody's ever seen before,' Trump said. 'And that meant the end to their nuclear ambitions, at least for a period of time.' Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said Sunday on X that Trump "exaggerated to cover up and conceal the truth." Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, told CBS' 'Face the Nation' that his country's nuclear program is peaceful and that uranium 'enrichment is our right, and an inalienable right and we want to implement this right' under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. 'I think that enrichment will not — never stop.' Rafael Grossi, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said on CBS that 'it is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage." Grossi also said the U.N. nuclear watchdog has faced pressure to report that Iran had a nuclear weapon or was close to one, but 'we simply didn't because this was not what we were seeing.' Of the leak of the intelligence assessment, Trump said anyone found to be responsible should be prosecuted. Journalists who received it should be asked who their source was, he said: 'You have to do that and I suspect we'll be doing things like that.' His press secretary said Thursday that the administration is investigating the matter. A 'temporary pass' for immigration raids on farms and hotels? As he played up his immigration crackdown, Trump offered a more nuanced view when it comes to farm and hotel workers. 'I'm the strongest immigration guy that there's ever been, but I'm also the strongest farmer guy that there's ever been,' the Republican president said. He noted that he wants to deport criminals, but it's a problem when farmers lose their laborers and it destroys their businesses. Trump said his administration is working on 'some kind of a temporary pass' that could give farmers and hotel owners control over immigration raids at their facilities. Earlier this month, Trump had called for a pause on immigration raids disrupting the farming, hotel and restaurant industries, but a top Homeland Security official followed up with a seemingly contradictory statement. Tricia McLaughlin said there would be 'no safe spaces for industries who harbor violent criminals or purposely try to undermine' immigration enforcement efforts. Status of China trade talks Trump praised a recent trade deal with Beijing over rare earth exports from China and said establishing a fairer relationship will require significant tariffs. 'I think getting along well with China is a very good thing,' Trump said. 'China's going to be paying a lot of tariffs, but we have a big (trade) deficit, they understand that." Trump said he would be open to removing sanctions on Iranian oil shipments to China if Iran can show 'they can be peaceful and if they can show us they're not going to do any more harm.' But the president also indicated the U.S. isn't afraid to retaliate against Beijing. When Fox News Channel host Maria Bartiromo noted that China has tried to hack U.S. systems and steal intellectual property, Trump replied, 'You don't think we do that to them?'
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What Happened When This Founder Bought His Winery Back From Its Corporate Parent
This story is from an installment of The Oeno Files, our weekly insider newsletter to the world of fine wine. Sign up here. James Hall didn't intend to buy back Patz & Hall, the Sonoma winery he cofounded in 1988, any more than he meant to sell it in the first place. When Patz & Hall was sold to Washington State's Ste. Michelle Wine Estates in 2015, Hall stayed on as director of winemaking while his former business partner went on to establish Maritana Vineyards in Sonoma. Hall tells Robb Report that when Ste. Michelle first came knocking, the four founders (Hall, his wife, Anne Moses, and Donald and Heather Patz) had no plan to sell; they were eagerly preparing for the future. 'From production volumes and pricing to direct-to-consumer strategies and digital presence we carefully mapped out our future,' Hall says. 'We were confident in our direction and deeply committed to remaining independent.' More from Robb Report Yacht Builders Are Investing in the Art World. Here's Why. Pomellato's New High Jewelry Collection Is an Ode to Its Most Defining Decades Why Fine Dining Made a Comeback at This Year's Oscars of the Food World When Patz & Hall's chairman, Hank Salvo, approached the foursome to inform them of Ste. Michelle's entreaty, the partners were unanimously uninterested. 'We weren't looking to sell as we were committed to our new plans,' Hall says. 'Hank, ever the strategist, reminded us that even a conversation could be enlightening.' The family-run winery had never formally assessed its market value, but Salvo said engaging with Ste. Michelle could help them better understand their position and reaffirm their vision. The foursome did more than just entertain the idea; they found a price they were willing to take. But as the deal closed, Hall had one major concern: 'Could we preserve the soul of Patz & Hall?' He agreed to stay on as winemaker on three conditions. First, he wanted full creative control on items such as harvest timing, vineyard contracts, barrel selection, and blending decisions. He also requested significant upgrades to his winemaking tools, such as state-of-the-art equipment, a new lab, and expanded cellar staff. His final prerequisite was for Ste. Michelle to agree that he could continue to work with his 'cherished' vineyard partners. 'These growers are the lifeblood of our wine quality,' Hall says. 'Without them, our identity would be lost.' For the next six years, he led the team at Patz & Hall, where he continued to focus on winemaking, vineyard sourcing, and doing everything he could to improve the wines and strengthen the company. 'When Ste. Michelle Wine Estates took over, that sense of purpose didn't change,' Hall says. 'What did change was the freedom it gave me.' With a large corporation to handle things like finance, operations, and logistics, Hall was able to concentrate on what he loves most: making wine. 'It was a luxury, really. I could pour all my energy into the vineyards, the cellar, and the craft itself, knowing the broader business was in capable hands,' he says. Patz & Hall kept on making vineyard designate Chardonnay and Pinot Noir from Carneros, Russian River Valley, Mendocino, and Santa Lucia Highlands sourced from some of California's finest growers such as Larry Hyde, George Martinelli, Charlie Chenoweth, and Gary Pisoni. However, in July 2021 private equity firm Sycamore Partners purchased Ste. Michelle Wine Estates; the company then reorganized the SMWE portfolio into regional groups. With holdings in Washington, Oregon, and California, Sycamore grouped Patz & Hall into the California group alongside Stag's Leap Wine Cellars and Conn Creek, each now operating as its own business with separate financial structures. Then came what Hall calls the big shift: In May 2023, Sycamore sold Stag's Leap Wine Cellars to their minority partner, the Antinori family. That move left Patz & Hall without shared administrative support for human resources, finance, or tasting room operations, which all stayed with Stag's Leap. It became clear to him then that the winery would either be absorbed into the Washington group or sold. 'I approached management and said, 'If you're selling, I'd like to throw my hat in the ring; and regardless, I'll stay on temporarily, to help with the transition,'' Hall says. After not hearing back for several months, the call came that the winery he had founded was indeed for sale, and he put together a small group of investors to buy it back. He had already started imagining retiring and slowing down to the point that he could just tend to his home vineyard and travel. 'I was stunned. I never let myself dream it could happen,' Hall says. 'But the chance to bring Patz & Hall home? That was too good to pass up. I still have trouble believing it's happened!' Chris Hyde, second-generation grower at Hyde Vineyard in Carneros, whose family has worked with Hall for more than 25 years, is equally excited. 'What we value most is working with people who share our values and see the same future for the land and the grapes that we see,' he says. 'With James taking back control of Patz & Hall, we know exactly who we are working with and how decisions can get made.' Especially important to him is that Hall is 100 percent in the driver's seat and can make purchasing decisions in an instant without having to run it by anyone else. Hall believes that as long as he and the grower share the same vision, there is no need to own proprietary vineyards; he is comfortable with the long-term relationships he has nurtured during his time in the industry. At first, Hall insists that nothing has really changed. 'The vineyard sources remain the same,' he says. 'The winemaking team is still here. The native yeasts in the cellar, the barrels we love, the techniques we trust, they're all unchanged.' However, with a little digging, he admits that everything feels different. 'What has changed is the energy,' he says. 'There's a renewed intensity and urgency in everything we do. It feels like we're playing for keeps now. Every decision matters—whether it's in the cellar, the tasting room, or the vineyard. We're not just making wine; we're building something lasting, something personal.' It's clear that the 2022s from Patz & Hall—the first independent releases since the 2024 buyback—resonate with that renewed energy. Patz & Hall 2022 Hyde Vineyard Pinot Noir from Carneros has aromas of pomegranate, ripe summer cherry, and star anise. Vivid acidity bursts on the palate supporting flavors of Luxardo cherry, blackberry, licorice, and a hint of rosewater that wind down to a smooth finish. Patz & Hall 2022 Pisoni Vineyard Pinot Noir from Santa Lucia Highlands offers a bouquet of black cherry, brewed black tea, and a hint of spearmint. Smooth on the palate, it has fine grained tannins wrapped around bold flavors of raspberry, black plum, cocoa powder, and mint leaf. James Hall has a simple goal: 'To bring people joy, connection, and a deeper appreciation for what great vineyards and thoughtful winemaking can offer.' One sip is all you need to realize that he met that objective. Do you want access to rare and outstanding reds from Napa Valley? Join the Robb Report 672 Wine Club today. Best of Robb Report Why a Heritage Turkey Is the Best Thanksgiving Bird—and How to Get One 9 Stellar West Coast Pinot Noirs to Drink Right Now The 10 Best Wines to Pair With Steak, From Cabernet to Malbec Click here to read the full article.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
One of the World's Largest Alcohol Companies Isn't Giving Up on Wine
This story is from an installment of The Oeno Files, our weekly insider newsletter to the world of fine wine. Sign up here. Each time a major wine conglomerate announces it is selling brands or shifting priorities, the wine world alights with gossip, speculation, and cries that this is a sure sign of the end times. Almost two years ago, Washington State's largest producer, Ste. Michelle Wine Estates, announced it was cutting back its grape purchasing by 40 percent, and while many heralded it as a death knell to the state's wine industry, others saw a silver lining for smaller wineries. Last summer, Treasury Wine Estates revealed it was selling off several lower-priced brands—and then reversed the decision this past February when a suitable price could not be attained. Most recently, when news leaked that Constellation Brands was looking to off-load its wine portfolio to focus on core businesses, market watchers and wine prognosticators again noted it as a harbinger of doom, while a small segment of the wine world expressed premature condolences for recent acquisitions such as Sea Smoke and Lingua Franca, which had barely had time to benefit from being brought into the Constellation fold. More from Robb Report What Happened When This Founder Bought His Winery Back From Its Corporate Parent How Sullivan Rutherford Estate Made the Best American Cabernet Sauvignon of the Year A Music Industry Exec's Boldly Angled Santa Barbara Wine Country Estate Lists for $10 Million Those rumors turned out to be only half true. Constellation, a multinational beverage company whose original product was wine, is not getting out of the business; it is only selling off mass-market brands such as Woodbridge, Robert Mondavi Private Selection, Simi, and Meiomi. Meanwhile, the labels it is keeping—Schrader, Double Diamond, To Kalon Vineyard Company, Mount Veeder Winery, Robert Mondavi Winery, Booker Vineyard, the Prisoner, Sea Smoke, Lingua Franca, Kim Crawford, and Ruffino—speak volumes about its leadership's view that the future of wine is in the high end of the market. Constellation's sale of its brands to the Wine Group, which was finalized in early June, is not a first for the company; in 2021, Constellation sold E & J Gallo 30 labels, including Mark West, Clos du Bois, Franciscan, and Nobilo. Constellation, a publicly traded company, is also retaining its craft spirits portfolio, including High West Whiskey, Nelson's Green Brier Whiskey, Mi Campo tequila, and Casa Noble tequila, as well as Mexican beer producers Corona, Modelo, and Pacifico. While Constellation made a point of saying in the press release announcing the sale that it was retaining brands with wines predominantly priced $15 and above, many wineries remaining under the company's umbrella sell for much more than that. For example: Schrader Cellars RBS Beckstoffer To Kalon Vineyard Cabernet Sauvignon and two of its single-vineyard siblings retail for $525; a bottle of Robert Mondavi Oakville To Kalon Vineyard the Reserve Cabernet Sauvignon fetches $250; and in addition to two Sea Smoke Pinot Noirs that sell for $100, Sea Smoke Grand Pinot Noir Monopole, made only in the best years, carries a price tag of $725. Sam Glaetzer, Constellation's president of wine and spirits, says the decision to lean into luxury reflects what customers want: premium selections. 'This is supported by insights that show that higher-end wine segments are forecast to grow, while that is not the case for mainstream wine segments,' he tells Robb Report. Constellation is responding to a phenomenon known as 'premiumization' in the trade, says industry analyst Rob McMillan. The EVP and founder of Silicon Valley Bank's wine division publishes the highly anticipated State of the Wine Industry Report each year, so he keeps a close eye on economic trends in the wine world. 'The business model focusing on low-cost, high-volume production efficiency has been in decline for well over a decade, replaced by growing demand for better-quality, higher-priced wine made in smaller quantities,' McMillan says. This shift in consumer behavior that began in 2018 has now created the demand that moved Constellation to retain higher-growth, luxury brands. Focusing on the upper end of the market makes a lot of sense for a company in the here and now, but increased premiumization could pose a threat to the future of the wine industry. In McMillan's 2022 report, he wrote that 'the issue of greatest concern for the wine business today continues to be the lagging participation in the wine category by the large millennial generation.' One factor he cited was a lack of discretionary income compared to previous generations. 'That's a primary reason that millennials have gravitated to beer and spirits rather than wine,' wrote Eric Asimov in The New York Times in the wake of the report. 'The difference between a mass-market brew and a world-class beer is just a few dollars. By comparison, good wine is more expensive than beer or spirits of comparable quality.' Without a focus on affordable, quality, mid-tier wines, the industry may run the risk of not cultivating new wine drinkers among the next generations. Of course, if consumers are ignoring wine as a mass-market product—as Constellation's earnings reports suggested last year when the company announced up to a $2.5 billion write-down on its wine and spirits business—then focusing on making a premium offering could be the most beneficial path for a brand like Constellation. That's how Glaetzer is approaching it now. Hailing from a well-known Australian winemaking family, he's at home with a portfolio of high-end winemakers committed to practicing their craft and wants to give them space to do just that. He says Constellation acts a foundation that provides resources like a global sales network, capital for growth, and infrastructure, but allows individual wineries to work independently. 'Each has the latitude to operate according to its unique identity and perspective so the teams can focus on what matters most: crafting wines true to their terroir,' Glaetzer says. Hilary Graves, Booker's senior manager of vineyard and grower relations, says that while she and her team in Paso Robles are free to make their own decisions around farming practices, having corporate support enables her to engage in experimental practices to solve problems and keep sustainability at the forefront. 'Using sheep to do our first mowing pass, for example, has given us the opportunity to cut down on our use of fossil fuels and trim our farming costs,' she says. 'Using a drone to drop lacewings as a means of controlling leafhoppers results in increasing biodiversity in our vineyard while also reducing tractor passes.' And Don Schroeder, director of winemaking at Sea Smoke in Santa Barbara County (which only joined Constellation a year ago), says he's already seen the upside of the company's approach. 'We have benefited from a tremendous amount of support and additional resources,' Schroeder says. 'This includes Constellation's internal team taking on compliance and regulatory reporting, which allows our core Sea Smoke team more flexibility to focus solely on our vineyard and the quality of our wines.' It's a further example that Constellation isn't giving up on wine; it's setting its sights more squarely on fine wine. Do you want access to rare and outstanding reds from Napa Valley? Join the Robb Report 672 Wine Club today. Best of Robb Report Why a Heritage Turkey Is the Best Thanksgiving Bird—and How to Get One 9 Stellar West Coast Pinot Noirs to Drink Right Now The 10 Best Wines to Pair With Steak, From Cabernet to Malbec Click here to read the full article. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data