logo
Game-changing Australian olive processing promises fruity flavour, lower farm costs

Game-changing Australian olive processing promises fruity flavour, lower farm costs

Table olives are among one of the most polarising foods — people either love them or hate them.
A world-first processing method crafting an Australian-style table olive is aiming to change that, transforming the fruit's flavour while also reducing labour and water usage.
John Fielke, a professor of mechanical engineering at the University of South Australia, is behind the innovation set to revolutionise the table olive industry.
He is on a mission to change how people think about the complex fruit.
Professor Fielke said judges at table olive competitions he entered compared the tasting notes of his table olives to descriptors of what people would find "on a fine bottle of wine".
"The flavour comments [for the olives] are notes of passionfruit, citrus, berries," he said.
The patented method coined "Olives the Australian Way" has also proven to be more sustainable and efficient, keeping the brine to cure the olives from start to finish.
For olives to be edible, the fruit requires processing to remove its natural bitterness.
Different curing methods, like lye treatment or natural fermentation in brine, then form part of producing the olives' distinct characteristics and flavour notes.
Spanish, Greek and Californian-style olives are the most common produced on a commercial scale, but their processing methods are time- and labour-intensive, known for their high water usage and wastewater disposal requirement.
Professor Fielke's processing method relies on chemistry to capture the fruit's bitter compounds in the brine and filtration systems recirculating it.
"We are putting our olives in the brine in the orchard. [We] keep that brine clear through to our finished pack-out, and repack our brine with our olives.
Industry data shows most table olives sold in Australia are imported, with only 3,000 tonnes produced domestically.
Australian Olive Association chief executive Michael Southan sees large economic opportunities in the innovation to shift the country's industry.
"It will not only grow the production of locally produced table olives, but it's a technology that will be able to be used around the world. It has huge potential."
The table olive processing innovation is a lifeline for farmers like George Kratopoulos, who has been battling low return prices and high labour costs.
He now regrets reducing his Taylorville family grove in South Australia from the initial 14,000 trees his father planted in the 1970s to 3,000 trees today.
As olives bruise easily, he previously had about 20 workers hand-picking each table olive to be sent to produce markets in Sydney and Brisbane.
The new method gives Mr Kratopoulos the opportunity to machine-harvest his crop, making the process more efficient.
"It's going to be a lot cheaper, there'll be not much labour costs and it's a win-win on both sides," he said.
Harvesting the crop straight into brine also cuts his on-farm food waste.
"Once we've shaken the fruit, if there's any damage it stops the deterioration automatically, whereas in fresh markets that bruising will show and we'll have to take it out and there is a lot of wastage," Mr Kratopoulos said.
He described the new processing method as a "game-changer" giving him hope for a brighter future in the industry.
Supported by an Australian Economic Accelerator Seed grant, the innovation aims to raise the country's table olive production 30-fold to 100,000 tonnes in the next 10 to 15 years.
The project has reached semi-commercial scale and proven it has plated up fresh debittered olives to consumers quicker.
"That is more than halving the traditional time taken from the farm to the market."
He and his wife Sue Fielke processed 82 tonnes of table olives this season, with the aim to triple the intake next year.
Despite the opportunities the innovation offers, there are major challenges to scaling up because not enough table olives are grown in Australia, according to Mr Southan.
"We really need to see more production of olives, and that's both from a productivity point of view, so getting more olives off each tree, and we need more trees," he said.
Investment in further bulk processing facilities was an additional barrier to overcome, Professor Fielke said.
"We need larger-scale facilities that can be fully automated, computer-controlled and be reliable."
While getting table olives onto plates quicker, the new flavours are also attracting food producers and wholesalers.
Mount Zero Olives director Richard Seymour is one of the earlier adopters, who considers himself originally a traditionalist.
"I'm really interested in the thousands of years of history of fermentation of table olives, but now I'm certainly tending towards a convert to this method," he said.
"I think it's creating some really beautiful flavours."
He said he believed the surprising fresh, herbaceous, cut-grass characters akin to extra-virgin olive oil had the potential to put Australia on the world map.
Watch ABC TV's Landline at 12:30pm AEST on Sunday or stream anytime on ABC iview.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Property prices in Gladstone rebound after bust
Property prices in Gladstone rebound after bust

ABC News

time29 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Property prices in Gladstone rebound after bust

Proximity to beaches, a bigger house and a pool, without the premium city price tag. That was what inspired Brisbane mortgage broker Stevie Gera to pack up her family and move to the industrial city of Gladstone in central Queensland. "To achieve that anywhere remotely close to Brisbane, we would be needing to increase the mortgage by a good $300–400,000 to get what we wanted, and we weren't willing to do that," Ms Gera said. The median house price in Gladstone, a city known for its boom-and-bust cycles, has risen by more than 74 per cent in the past five years, according to Cotality data supplied to the Real Estate Institute of Queensland (REIQ). Its most recent quarterly data from March revealed the annual median house price was $520,000, while units now fetched $335,000. That is an increase of more than 97 per cent for units since 2020. In 2012, Gladstone was undergoing an LNG (liquefied natural gas) construction boom, and property prices soared. But the work dried up, and by 2018 most homes were selling at a loss. It fuelled the perception of Gladstone as a boom-and-bust city, and some banks still consider it a high-risk lending location, subjecting borrowers to stricter lending conditions. However, Ms Gera said she had noticed through her work as a broker that this was shifting. "A lot of them [lenders] have taken Gladstone off that high-risk postcode register and they just see it as any other location," she said. Alicia Williams has sold homes in the region for more than a decade. "Gladstone's always been a boom-and-bust town, until I would say just before COVID it started to find its own feet and it started to find a sustainable path forward," she said. "We've got a lot of different industry now, which has been diversified over the years." Ms Williams said in her agency in June, the average four-bedroom two-bathroom home was selling for about $580,000. She said in the past two years, there was also significant interest from interstate investors, especially from Sydney and Melbourne. REIQ zone chair for Gladstone Celina Solis is a fourth-generation local who lived through the region's tumultuous crash. She said seeing the area thriving once more was heartwarming. It is a similar situation in other regional centres across Queensland, with significant growth in Bundaberg, Rockhampton and Townsville. "All these regional cities are going so well because more people are realising, 'Hey, I can come here and work and get a really good job … get a property with a shed, pool, four or five bedrooms for a reasonable price point,'" Ms Solis said. She said for Gladstone, people were attracted to the family-friendly lifestyle and the draw of well-paid jobs. Ms Gera and her husband chose Gladstone because they already had an investment property there, so they had visited before and liked the region. Her three children, aged six, eight and 16, were initially apprehensive, but she said the slower pace and larger family home had been life-changing. However, Ms Gera said prospective buyers should consider their health care needs before moving. South Gladstone resident Tracey Mullens agreed. She bought in the city after finding it impossible to find a rental in Brisbane with a yard for her children and wheelchair accessibility for her husband. "We started looking and the circle kept getting bigger and bigger until we got to Gladstone," Ms Mullens said. She said while moving was a necessity at the time, her family struggled to find reliable support workers, and it was a challenge to travel for health care. Ms Mullens said she planned to move back to outer Brisbane when it was financially possible.

House-sitting saved me enough to buy my own home
House-sitting saved me enough to buy my own home

ABC News

time29 minutes ago

  • ABC News

House-sitting saved me enough to buy my own home

I'm a 42-year-old divorced stand-up comic. This isn't a cry for help — I'm merely putting my life in context. I'm allergic to working in the corporate world despite an MBA and multiple burnouts to prove my eligibility as a capitalist stooge. And I'm also approaching one of the most vulnerable groups of people at risk of homelessness: single women over the age of 45. After my favourite uncle passed away in Pakistan, I was forced to confront the fragility of life and how I want to live; that I want to be of service while also being a creative. And lay down my roots, find my ground. At the time I was bouncing between sublets because I didn't want to rent a shoebox for $2,000 a month, nor live in a share house. It's bad enough doing stand-up comedy in my middle ages, let alone being part of a share-house gang. I don't like chore charts. Property ownership has always been a strange concept to me, but the older I get, the more I understand that without it, I'm at the mercy of others to not evict me. But there's the catch-22 of trying to save money while renting in the current market. A friend told me about a Victorian housing scheme where the government contributes up to 25 per cent of the property price for a share of the property — which you buy back over time. But first I'd need to qualify for this scheme and a bank loan. So my task became finding a meaningful, stable job, saving a deposit — and not living in a share house until I had bought my own place. In my previous life I was a market research consultant in the corporate sector. That was until I couldn't take the soul-crushing, profits-focused approach anymore. Then I tried surviving on an array of casual gigs: Urdu translator, mental health support provider, medical typist. Going back to a more stable role, I wanted to have an actual career that worked for me. Luckily, after a few months of job hunting I landed a social policy adviser role at a not-for-profit that I genuinely love. It's not as lucrative as my former corporate roles but it's fulfilling and it's sustainable. To avoid living in a share house as I waited to buy my own place, I turned to house-sitting. I'd previously forayed into this nomadic lifestyle when I'd quit a high paying corporate job to do my personal Eat Pray Love journey around Australia. This time, in Melbourne, I started with looking after a friend's three cats for a month. It was lovely until the fattest jumped on my bare back and dug it's claws in for grip.' Then I minded another friend's cat for a couple of weeks whose sweetness restored my faith in the feline race. And so it continued. I joined some house-sitting Facebook groups, which led to more gigs. Pretty soon I was going from house-sit to house-sit; cat to dog. My house-sits ranged from a week to several months. In between, I stayed with generous friends and was able to line up house-sits in a way that I didn't overstay my welcome with them. Most people upon finding out I house-sat for 18 months express awe, bordering on disbelief. No-one was more surprised than my family in Pakistan, where you have security guards to make sure no-one gets inside your house, while in Australia people freely give you their key. Over the 18 months I sampled a buffet of accommodation types and suburbs: from CBD flats to suburban homes. The collection of books and music were varied from place to place, as was the spice collection; some people don't even have salt while others have imported saffron. It helped me discover the kind of place I wanted to live in; the type of suburb that was right for me and the kitchen gadgets I could no longer live without (hello air fryer!). The main challenge was the lack of stability and not knowing where I'd live next. The memory foam pillow in a new home would take a couple of days to take note of my skull and I'd get used to the animals, only to repeat this cycle in a few weeks. Not to mention there are only so many wardrobe combinations of three pants and five tops that come with this lifestyle. Was it better than sharing? Having a place to myself was helpful as a creative introvert and it never got isolating because of the cute pets. Plus, house-sitting and a frugal lifestyle allowed me to save almost $60,000. Have you chosen a particular lifestyle as a way to save money or make life more affordable? We'd love to hear from you. Share with us here. When I qualified for the housing scheme, I started property hunting. After six weeks of crowded inspections, I viewed a sunny two-bedroom unit with a courtyard and decided this was it. Good location, good size, good price. I promptly sent my offer and fortunately the owner accepted. Now I've a job I love — that I would probably never have found had I not decided on this goal — and a property I'm stoked about. And thanks to saving on rent for 18 months, even after the deposit I have a healthy offset account that I hope will allow me to pay off my mortgage by retirement age, despite buying at 42. Would I house-sit again? Yes, but just on holidays and in the meantime, I'll get a cat — and a house-sitter when I go away. Amna Bakhtiar is a stand-up comic and writer from Pakistan living in Naarm/ can find her on Instagram.

Tax reform talk heats up after Treasury FOI error, and that might just suit Jim Chalmers nicely
Tax reform talk heats up after Treasury FOI error, and that might just suit Jim Chalmers nicely

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Tax reform talk heats up after Treasury FOI error, and that might just suit Jim Chalmers nicely

"Tax should be raised as part of broader tax reform." It's the kind of headline that typically has treasurers ducking and weaving. It certainly had the opposition salivating over an early opportunity to draw some political blood after its own crushing election defeat. "What Mr Albanese needs to explain to the Australian people is what those higher taxes are," Liberal Leader Sussan Ley opined. But, confronted with the accidental release of typically confidential parts of his department's Incoming Government Brief, the treasurer didn't flinch. "I'm pretty relaxed about it, to be honest," was Jim Chalmers' response. No denial, and not even really any concerted attempt to distance the government from what is as close to independent as Treasury advice ever gets (although the treasurer is decamping this week to the G20 meetings in South Africa). Chalmers instead chose to own the leaked advice on tax reform. "We have made it clear that we need to build on the progress we've made in repairing the budget so that we can make the budget even more sustainable," he told reporters. "So, the priorities which are being reported today are the sorts of things that I have mentioned before, including at the National Press Club." For those who missed it, having emerged from an election campaign where Labor played small target and saw its political rivals decimated across the country, the treasurer stood up in a room full of journalists saying he was "personally willing to grasp the nettle". "No sensible progress can be made on productivity, resilience or budget sustainability without proper consideration of more tax reform." The treasurer sounded like he could have been reading straight from his department's brief. A happy accident for Chalmers? With the rebadged Economic Reform Roundtable just a month away, confirmation that Treasury would like to see both the tax take rise and spending fall to finally fix a long-term structural hole in the budget adds further urgency to the task. Economist Nicki Hutley believes the treasurer will not only be relaxed, but even "happy" that the headings around tax reform got out into the public domain. "It helps to promote the conversation ahead of what is a very important round table," she told me. "And the more those issues, particularly challenging ones like tax reform, are aired prior to the round table, the better it is." So, what did we learn about Treasury's views on tax reform? Probably not a huge amount that we couldn't guess. It thinks we need to raise more revenue and spend less. It also thinks those tax increases shouldn't come from workers or businesses, which are already carrying too much of the burden. Although, on the latter point, it seems the nation's biggest company disagrees, breaking ranks with virtually every business lobby group. "We do not believe that lowering the company tax rate should be a priority, provided there is no change to Australia's imputation credit regime," the Commonwealth Bank noted in an official corporate submission to the government's Productivity Commission. "While we, and no doubt other large companies, would welcome a lower company tax rate, we believe there are other priorities which should lead the productivity reform agenda." Regardless of whether income and corporate taxes go down or stay the same, that really leaves those sitting on wealth as the prime targets for more taxation — whether that's through their superannuation, trusts, housing or consumption. The two big hints in the leaked headings are "building on your reforms to superannuation tax" and "reforming the indirect tax system to support budget repair and the fiscal sustainability of Commonwealth and state governments". CBA backs 'superannuation cap' As much as those who hold large superannuation balances, and those who profit from managing them, decry the frequently changing rules around the sector, while it remains an attractive tax shelter for the very wealthy super will continue to be an obvious target for reform. As my colleague Ian Verrender eloquently pointed out, the Albanese government's current proposal to up the tax paid on income from balances above $3 million goes only a little way towards evening the ledger with the wage slaves who still work for a living. In another statement sure to ruffle feathers across the top end of town, CBA put forward a far more radical proposal in its Productivity Commission submission. "Uncapped superannuation concessions appear to be unsustainable," the Commonwealth Bank noted. "We would support a superannuation cap, set at a level that encourages aspiration, and set well above the level where there is dependence on the state for support in retirement." So forget taxing earnings on super balances above $3 million at a mere 30 per cent. What CBA is proposing is that you simply won't be allowed to hold a huge amount inside super, and presumably, earnings on any wealth you hold above that super cap will be taxed at your marginal tax rate. The level of assets at which the part pension cuts out for a single non-home owner is currently $962,500, so let's say the super cap was set at $2 million, more than double that. Such a change might see a person with $4 million in super savings, currently complaining about paying perhaps $15,000 a year extra in tax under Labor's existing proposal, paying an extra $26,000 with part of their earnings likely subject to the top marginal tax rate of 45 per cent. As with all these things, there's no complete absence of self-interest here. The big four banks have all reduced their exposure to superannuation and wealth management after a series of scandals, although CBA does still own a sizeable chunk of Colonial First State. And the tax-advantaged super system is siphoning money away from the place most retirees in my grandparents' generation stuck their savings — the bank, where interest earnings are taxed like income from wages. Capping super balances may shift some of the savings from the wealthy back into the banking system, expanding the pool of cheaper deposit funding for the banks. Nonetheless, it is surprising to see Australia's biggest bank voluntarily weigh into the tax debate. "The Henry Review remains the most comprehensive assessment and blueprint for tax reform in Australia," CBA observed. "It is a sensible starting point from which to launch a national conversation." A starting point we've now been stuck at for more than 15 years. Will Chalmers dare look at the GST or land taxes? Treasury's call for "reforming the indirect tax system" is one area where there's a bit more ambiguity as to exactly what it might be recommending. An obvious, although controversial, target would be raising the rate of the GST or broadening the base of goods and services the tax applies to. While excluded from Ken Henry's otherwise comprehensive tax review due to instructions from then-treasurer (and Chalmers' former boss) Wayne Swan, most economists have long argued that the exclusions from the GST negotiated by John Howard to get it past the Australian Democrats in the Senate should generally be ditched. That would, they argue, not only raise more revenue but reduce the economic distortions caused by the tax and also make compliance much easier for businesses. Pradeep Philip from Deloitte Access Economics says the extra revenue could, as was promised when the GST was first introduced, also be used to eliminate a range of other inefficient state taxes. "We know that while the GST is a highly regressive tax, it is also an incredibly efficient tax," he told The Business. "What's really important in this tax reform debate is to not have piecemeal tax changes, but to have true reform. "And if reforming the GST could see us get rid of inefficient taxes, particularly at the state and territory level, then that could be a really good boost for the Australian economy." The other area few are mentioning is land tax. It's the economists' holy grail, one of the few things that almost all economists, from the most progressive to conservative and in-between, can agree on as a good idea. Land can't be moved or hidden and, thanks to land title registries, we know exactly who owns it. It's easy to confiscate and sell if the tax isn't paid. And taxing it doesn't reduce the supply of it — if anything, it pushes people to sell land they aren't using efficiently. But, despite the economic consensus, the general feeling is that Australians won't stomach a land tax, even though we already effectively pay one via council rates and even if it was set at a level to simply replace the revenue collected by economically destructive stamp duties on real estate transactions. In his Press Club speech, Jim Chalmers said, "this is about testing the country's reform appetite". A proposal to tax all land, including the family home, would certainly reveal just how hungry Australians are for serious productivity-enhancing economic reform. Read the headings of Treasury's policy advice on tax and productivity in full

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store