I landed a tech job after 500 applications by networking my way to references from Microsoft and LinkedIn employees. Here's how I did it.
In the months before graduating from Cornell University in December 2023, I applied to over 500 jobs and secured five interviews, but none led to a full-time offer. As an international student, this put my immigration status in jeopardy.
Because I was on an F-1 optional practical training (OPT) visa, I had a limited window to secure some form of employment after graduating. Otherwise, I'd have had to move back to India.
I dreamed of living in San Francisco
In 2022, I earned my bachelor's degree in computer science from a university in India, where I was born and raised. That same year, I moved to the US to pursue a master's in engineering management at Cornell.
My goal was to live and work in the US after graduating. I grew up interested in technology, which inspired me to study computer science. Silicon Valley felt like the center of the tech world, and when I turned 18, living in San Francisco became a dream I hoped to achieve someday.
As graduation neared, I still had zero job offers. I began reaching out directly to startup founders — both those I knew personally and those I'd connected with on LinkedIn or through friends. That approach led to two interviews, and in early December — a few weeks before graduation — I accepted a part-time, 21-hour-a-week contract role as a product manager at a startup.
Landing the role helped me stay compliant with my visa while I continued looking for a full-time job. There was a chance of converting to full-time, but I didn't want to count on that.
What followed was a difficult eight-month job search.
Instead of relying on cold applications, I focused on building and maintaining relationships, reaching out to people at companies I was interested in, and following up regularly to stay top of mind. It was a networking strategy I'd started cultivating well before my search — and I believe it helped me secure referrals and ultimately land my full-time role.
We want to hear from job seekers and people who've recently landed a job. If you're open to sharing your story, please fill out one or more of the linked Google Forms.
I stayed in touch even when I didn't get the job
Back in October 2023, I applied to a rotational program at Persona, an identity verification startup, just minutes after the LinkedIn job post went live. The role seemed like a good fit — it would fulfill my dream of working at a tech startup in the San Francisco area, and I believed it would challenge me and offer growth opportunities.
After I was asked to interview for the position, I sent around 50 LinkedIn connection requests to relevant employees. Five accepted, and three of them were kind enough to hop on a call with me. Their insights were incredibly helpful, especially in preparing for the product case study round of the three-stage interview process. However, I ultimately didn't get the job.
In November 2023, shortly after receiving my rejection, I sent a LinkedIn connection request to the Persona recruiter I had interviewed with, hoping to stay in touch about future opportunities.
The following August, she messaged me on LinkedIn to congratulate me on landing my part-time job.
That message prompted me to check Persona's careers page, where I saw a new role of interest had been posted just a few days earlier. I submitted an application and let the recruiter know. Not long after, I was invited to interview; staying in touch with the recruiter helped make that happen.
I leaned on three long-term connections as references
Since I had previously interviewed for a junior version of this role, this time, I had just one interview call.
After that, I was asked to share three references. I leaned on strong relationships I'd built over time: my former manager at The Washington Post, a VP of product at LinkedIn, and a product manager at Microsoft.
My former manager at The Washington Post, where I interned in the summer of 2023, had directly overseen my work and knew me well.
But building the other two relationships required more time and effort.
In early 2023, I was invited to speak with LinkedIn's product leadership about Gen Z's behavior on the platform, as I've been creating tech and career content on LinkedIn and Instagram for the past few years. After the session, I followed up with everyone I met, including the VP of product.
I continued to nurture the relationship through periodic follow-ups, and by the time I asked them to be a reference, I was confident we'd built a meaningful connection.
I met the Microsoft product manager after joining Product Buds, an online networking community. I reached out on LinkedIn after I learned we were from the same hometown in India.
I continued participating in Product Buds events and regularly asked him for advice as I shaped my career path. In 2022, I asked if he'd be open to mentoring me, and he kindly agreed. By the time I needed references, I felt he could offer a unique perspective as a mentor.
There were no additional interviews beyond the recruiter call, which made the references especially important. I chose these three because I felt they could speak holistically about my background, skills, and potential.
In a follow-up conversation, the recruiter said my strong references gave the team confidence in my capabilities and what I'd bring to the role.
I landed the role and am glad I pursued it
Later that month, I received a job offer. I accepted, quit my part-time job, moved to San Francisco, and started working full time in October 2024.
Moving to San Francisco felt like a dream come true — it was surreal to see one of my biggest goals come to life.
Accomplishing this has made me realize that if you work hard, even your wildest dreams can come true. That's what motivates me to keep going: to dream bigger, work harder, and hopefully achieve even more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
3 hours ago
- UPI
Boeing machinists who build fighter jets reject contract, plan strike
A large American flag is hoisted behind a Boeing F/A-18 E1 Super Hornet jet before dedication ceremonies at the National Museum of Transportation in Kirkwood, Mo., on August 3, 2024. Machinists at three plants in the St. Louis area the product fight jets rejected a contract. File Photo by Bill Greenblatt/UPI | License Photo July 27 (UPI) -- Several thousand Boeing union workers at three St. Louis-area plants who build fighter jets are planning to go on strike after rejecting a proposed contract Sunday that would pay an average of than $100,000 per year. Members of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers at Boeing factories in St. Louis and St. Charles in Missouri and Mascoutah in Illinois voted against the new contract that included a 20% wage increase over four years. The contract for District 837 members will expire at 11:59 p.m. CDT at which point there is a seven-day cooling-off period before a strike could start. In all, there are 16,000 employees at the three locations, according to St. Louis Business Journal Research. "IAM Union members delivered a clear message: the proposal from Boeing Defense fell short of addressing the priorities and sacrifices of the skilled IAM Union workforce," the union said in a news release. "Our members are standing together to demand a contract that respects their work and ensures a secure future." Boeing and the union representing the machinists on Thursday reached an agreement on a four-year contract that would boost annual salaries to $102,600 with an 8% increase in the first year and 4% for the other three years. "This contract puts money in members' pockets, protects healthcare access, and ensures our members have a voice in future health decisions all while respecting the skill and dedication IAM workers bring to Boeing's critical defense programs," IAM Union International President Brian Bryant said after the tentative contract. The total increase would be 40% when including other benfits. There was a $5,000 ratification bonus. Boeing said the current average hourly pay of $35 is $6 higher than three years ago. "The IAM Union remains committed to achieving a fair contract that meets the needs of our members," the union said. "The IAM Union looks forward to returning to the bargaining table with Boeing's leadership to deliver meaningful improvements that support the well-being and livelihoods of IAM members and their families." IAM, with approximately 600,000 active and retired workers, is one of North America's largest and most diverse industrial trade unions. They represent workers in aerospace/airlines, defense, shipbuilding, railroads/transit, healthcare and automotive in the United States and Canada. "We're disappointed our employees voted down the richest contract offer we've ever presented to IAM 837 which addressed all their stated priorities," Dan Gillian, Boeing Air Dominance vice President, said in a statement, obtained by KSDK-TV. "We've activated our contingency plan and are focused on preparing for a strike. No talks are scheduled with the union." Last year, Boeing machinists in the Pacific Northwest were in a 54-day strike that shut down airplane production. Ultimately, they agreed to an immediate pay boost of 13% and a total of 44% over four years when compounded. Boeing has more than 170,000 employees worldwide. The vote came two days before Boeing plans to announce its second-quarter earnings.
Business Insider
5 hours ago
- Business Insider
Torn between Amsterdam and the US for grad school, she made a pros and cons list to guide her decision. Take a look.
When Royanne Ng got into Columbia University last year, she should have been elated. Instead, the nearly $80,000 first-year tuition and fees — not including housing — made her stomach turn. The Singaporean student turned the Ivy League program down and chose one across the Atlantic instead for a fraction of the cost. At Columbia, she was offered a spot in the Film and Media Studies MA with a concentration in emergent media — a track that explores formats like virtual and augmented reality. The 28-year-old is now pursuing a one-year master's in cultural data and AI at the University of Amsterdam, a program that blends machine learning with theory and tech policy. Ng also applied to NYU but wasn't accepted, and she ultimately dropped her application to the University of Edinburgh in the UK. Her postgrad degree had to be "very strategic," she told Business Insider — a move to boost her job prospects and reposition her career in Singapore. "If I'm going to spend this much of my financial savings on a degree, it has to be really, really worth it," she said. The US once had a near-monopoly on elite higher education. But as tuition rises, safety concerns grow, and political rhetoric turns hostile toward international students, the calculation is shifting. Here's how Ng made her choice. Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . Prestige vs practicality Columbia's program offered big advantages: name recognition, accomplished alumni, and the implicit promise of career opportunities, Ng said. The brand name, she added, carried the common assumption that it gives students "a head start when it comes to job opportunities." But the costs were impossible to ignore. Columbia's program ran for two years and charged nearly $80,000 in tuition and fees just for its first-year students. In contrast, the University of Amsterdam's fees were about €17,000 for a one-year program. "The difference is just so stark," she said, especially when Columbia required a hefty deposit that felt like too much commitment. It wasn't just about money. She said many US courses were "more traditional" — rooted in legacy disciplines and slower to adapt. Europe had programs that were a lot more novel and flexible, often designed with interdisciplinary or future-facing themes, she added. Amsterdam's curriculum hit the mark. Ng said it aligned with her goal of transitioning from tech communications and a humanities background into a career that connects AI and policy — one she hopes to pursue in Singapore. Safety and geopolitical concerns Ng's family was also worried about her safety if she chose to study in New York — and so was she. For someone who had lived in Singapore her whole life — a country known for its low crime rates and political calm — she was concerned about gun violence, racial politics, and geopolitical uncertainty in the US. Still, she said the right school depends on the student's goals after graduation. Students hoping to stay and work in the US might prioritize a school's brand, alumni network, and credentials. But Ng plans to return to Singapore, so standing out in the local job market mattered more. Ng is set to finish her program in August. Here's her pros-and-cons list of US graduate schools: Ng had created a rough version at the end of 2023 while debating whether to choose the US for graduate school. When BI reached out to her in June, she pulled it together into a neat table: Pros Cons 1) Education quality Vibrant and mentally stimulating study environment, with motivated students and highly reputable professors. There's also an assumption that many top US schools have extremely good courses and teaching 1) Health and safety Worries among family members about safety of living in certain cities, with more risk due to geopolitical instability. Not sure if causing my loved ones to constantly worry would be a worthwhile trade-off for great education 2) Reputation and optics Excellent brand name, which would be helpful for future job securing and possible advancement 2) Financial costs Some schools I applied to cost about 5x more than graduate schools in Europe. Not sure if this cost difference can really be compensated by an equivalent degree of education quality. There were also a lot of miscellaneous fees involved just in applying to schools and securing spots when offered. 3) Solid alumni network Would be in connection with illustrious alumni network, which could also be helpful for career and job advancement 3) Local labour market incompatibility Given that I was looking at programmes within humanities and social sciences departments, I was also very conscious about whether certain courses would help me stand out or gain an edge in the Singapore job market. I had to consider the possibility that even excellent brand names might not be able to change the fact that many companies still look for science, tech and data roles. 4) Course material and programmes During my research of graduate schools, I observed that many US schools offered relatively traditional programmes, based on the write-up and descriptions of Masters courses. I did tend to see more exciting and novel courses offered in the UK and Europe, marketing interdisciplinary skills combining humanities/social sciences, data science or specific sector knowledge. I felt that this interdisciplinary angle was of particular interest as someone wanting to stay relevant in the job market, so this was a major consideration in choosing my graduate programme.
New York Post
7 hours ago
- New York Post
Boeing machinists reject new contract as company now preps for imminent strike
Union members who assemble Boeing's fighter jets in the St. Louis area have 'overwhelmingly voted' to reject the company's contract offer on Sunday, with the company now preparing for an imminent strike. Boeing's proposal, which was sent on Tuesday to more than 3,200 members of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers District 837, included a 20% general wage increase over four years and a $5,000 ratification bonus, as well as more vacation time and sick leave. 'The proposal from Boeing Defense fell short of addressing the priorities and sacrifices of the skilled IAM Union workforce,' the union said. 3 Boeing 737 MAX aircraft are assembled at the companys plant in Renton, Washington, US June 25, 2024. via REUTERS 3 An employee works on the fuselage of a Boeing 737 MAX 9 test plane. outside the company's factory, on March 14, 2019 in Renton, Washington. Getty Images Dan Gillian, Boeing's Air Dominance vice president, general manager and senior St. Louis Site executive said in an emailed statement that it is disappointed Boeing employees voted down 'the richest contract offer we've ever presented to IAM 837 which addressed all their stated priorities.' 'We've activated our contingency plan and are focused on preparing for a strike. No talks are scheduled with the union,' Gillian added. 3 This graphical rendering provided by the U.S. Air Force shows the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) Platform, the F-47. On Friday, March 21, 2025. AP The current contract expires on Sunday following which there is a seven-day cooling off period before a strike would begin, the union added. Boeing's defense division is expanding manufacturing facilities in the St. Louis area for the new US Air Force fighter, the F-47, after it won the contract earlier this year. The Next Generation Air Dominance fighter jet program, initially conceived as a 'family of systems' centered around a sixth-generation fighter jet, is meant to replace the F-22 Raptor.
