logo
'Someone's gonna die': fatal chopper crash probe ends

'Someone's gonna die': fatal chopper crash probe ends

Perth Now10-05-2025
Not satisfied with the response to one crash, Captain Danniel Lyon offered a sobering assessment of the Australian army's MRH-90 Taipan helicopter.
"Somebody is going to die from this," he said.
Months later, Capt Lyon was killed along with three of his colleagues after their Taipan plunged into the sea off Queensland's Lindeman Island.
His warning was recalled by his wife Caitland at an inquiry into the July 28, 2023 crash that also claimed the lives of Lieutenant Maxwell Nugent, Warrant Officer Class Two Joseph "Phillip" Laycock and Corporal Alexander Naggs.
The inquiry before former judge Margaret McMurdo heard Capt Lyon attended an Australian Defence Force meeting to discuss a Jervis Bay incident when a MRH-90 suffered an engine failure in March 2023, causing it to ditch into the sea.
Capt Lyon felt the issues had not been properly rectified, nor had adequate measures been put in place to prevent a similar incident from occurring.
He then offered his sadly prophetic assessment.
His wife, along with the other victims' families, are now awaiting answers after the fatal crash inquiry concluded in Brisbane after nine hearings and dozens of witnesses over nearly two years.
The Inspector-General of the Australian Defence Force Inquiry was formed in October 2023, tasked with examining the cause of the crash and whether the action or inaction of army personnel or others contributed.
As the hearings unfolded, concerns emerged among army personnel about the helicopter, the severe fatigue and high workload for pilots, and over the night-vision technology they used.
A former Taipan pilot recounted being told that the aircraft had a significant risk of engine failure.
The air crew were also briefed on the risk that the MRH-90 would be inescapable if it plunged into water due to such a failure.
Crew began flying without gloves to have a better chance of removing themselves if the craft crashed into water, the ex-pilot said.
Multiple witnesses said the MRH-90 was not fit to be in service due to the engine-failure risks and high maintenance requirements.
It would later be discontinued in favour of the US-made Black Hawks.
Major General Stephen Jobson said the MRH-90 was an "immature and under-performing system" that had a high level of risk management since its acquisition in 2007.
The Army Aviation Command's former commanding officer said he was never comfortable with the safety risk of the Taipan, but strong efforts were made to eliminate or at least minimise it.
Issues with the pilots' TopOwl night-vision helmets were also raised, with an internal army assessment finding a fault left an "unacceptable risk".
The assessment, made four years before the crash, found there was an "unacceptable ambiguity" with the helmet technology.
It meant there was the potential for a crash when a pilot looked away from the helicopter front windscreen or the axis at night or in difficult terrain conditions, the inquiry heard.
There were claims army aviation was dissatisfied with the assessment's findings and wanted the software upgrade to be rolled out despite calls for further analysis.
Issues with fatigue and workload in the months leading up to the crash were also raised, with a colleague of the late air crew claiming they were working 12 to 18 hours a day on weekdays and four to six hours on weekends.
A MRH-90 pilot said the culture was becoming "toxic", with defence headquarters not recognising the impact of fatigue or the need for time off.
In the days before the crash, which happened at the military training event Talisman Sabre, the female pilot said air crew were offered sleeping tablets after the ground trial to help them switch from day to night shifts.
She left the training exercise due to fatigue and her struggle with career pressures and a lack of progression.
The inquiry heard the final text messages she exchanged with her colleague and friend Capt Lyon.
"There is a weird vibe now you've gone," Capt Lyon texted before his final flight.
"I hope you have fun tonight," the pilot replied.
She was informed the following day there had been a fatal crash, frantically texting Capt Lyon: "F*** f*** f*** please msg me when you guys have phones."
She never received a response.
She was one of many colleagues and family members of the deceased who broke down while giving evidence.
Capt Lyon's wife Caitland tearily recalled the day she broke the news of his death to their son.
"I'm still haunted by the sound of our five-year-old's screams the day that I told him daddy wasn't coming home," she told the final hearing.
Their daughter was just 16 months old when her father died but now cries for her daddy to come back from heaven, Ms Lyon added.
"My heart shatters knowing she has lived more days crying for daddy than she ever had laughing with him," she said.
Lt Nugent's partner, Chadine Whyte, spoke of how much he wanted to become a father and her feeling of devastation that he would never be able to realise that dream, urging the defence force to do better.
"While I understand that in operational environments, risk is inevitable, we must never lose sight of the fact that behind every uniform is a person, and behind every person is a family, a life and a future," she said.
"Max's life mattered and so does the loss of it."
The final hearing finished on Friday with Ms McMurdo's findings to be handed down at an undetermined date.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

When I visited Sydney, I was shocked by the antisemitism I encountered
When I visited Sydney, I was shocked by the antisemitism I encountered

Sydney Morning Herald

time21 minutes ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

When I visited Sydney, I was shocked by the antisemitism I encountered

We found the park with relative ease. But the mysteries of Google Maps did not guide us to the entrance. We turned into Dent Street hoping that might lead us to the entrance, but in truth we had no idea where to look. Then we saw just what you're looking for when you want directions – a young family, a friendly Aussie mum, dad and kids all on bikes with smiling faces under law-abiding helmets. We pulled up and asked. They obligingly directed us to the entrance and with abounding friendliness wished us a great day in the park. The amicable civility portended a happy day. Then as I wound up the window and pulled away, the Aussie dad called out 'Free Palestine'. I was momentarily shocked. Then I turned the car around and pulled up beside him again. I wound down the window and asked why he thought it was OK to single out Jews and call out provocative slogans. His answer was at once outrageous and hilarious. 'I wasn't doing that, but I saw your kippas [skull caps]'. Perhaps I should have realised at that point that I was talking to more of an idiot than an ideologue and driven off. But I did not. I replied with the obvious: that's my point – why do you think it is OK to single out Jews for your commentary? He replied: 'I just wanted to see if you agreed with what I said.' Apparently, having thought more deeply about the matter, Aussie dad now thought that with his kids around him on bikes and my three little grandsons in the back seat eager to get to the park, this was an opportunity to call out a provocative slogan to invite discussion about one of history's most intractable geopolitical conflicts. I don't think so. Loading I told him I thought he was a disgrace to Australian society. I drove off while he continued to tell me he just wanted to see if I agreed with him. In fairness, he did so without rancour or aggression – quite a nice guy, really. Then came the jeering laugh of moral righteousness as I drove away. So, where does this leave us? What do we call it when a seemingly pleasant person singles out other people on the basis of their race, with provocations? I thought that was racism pure and simple. And when it is directed at Jews, I thought that was antisemitism pure and simple. But the man I encountered would no doubt be horrified by the suggestion that he is a racist or an antisemite. On the contrary he is the guardian of morality, the protector of the colonially oppressed. By calling out the Jew in public for the tragedy that has befallen the Palestinian people, he is a hero of good conscience. It is all the more perilous that this well-meaning chap is clueless as to his own moral failing – perhaps much like Joseph Banks himself, an unashamed champion of colonisation (and thereby forced dispossession) of a land to which his people had no right or connection. In the end, I do not think I need, and I most certainly do not intend, to hide or cower. My intuition is that the lovely Irish woman need not be as concerned, and the outwardly pleasant dad is an outlying sanctimonious fool. I am the product after all of generations in this great country. 'She'll be right' and 'no worries' have historically been effective antidotes to Australians' anxieties. They also make for good recipes for inaction. It is hard to know whether those renowned Aussie epithets are the products of cheerful optimism or national indolence. I harbour a sickening suspicion that I may be mistaken. For the sake of Australia's social fabric and the future of its communal cohesion, I hope my intuition and historic optimism is well placed.

When I visited Sydney, I was shocked by the antisemitism I encountered
When I visited Sydney, I was shocked by the antisemitism I encountered

The Age

time21 minutes ago

  • The Age

When I visited Sydney, I was shocked by the antisemitism I encountered

We found the park with relative ease. But the mysteries of Google Maps did not guide us to the entrance. We turned into Dent Street hoping that might lead us to the entrance, but in truth we had no idea where to look. Then we saw just what you're looking for when you want directions – a young family, a friendly Aussie mum, dad and kids all on bikes with smiling faces under law-abiding helmets. We pulled up and asked. They obligingly directed us to the entrance and with abounding friendliness wished us a great day in the park. The amicable civility portended a happy day. Then as I wound up the window and pulled away, the Aussie dad called out 'Free Palestine'. I was momentarily shocked. Then I turned the car around and pulled up beside him again. I wound down the window and asked why he thought it was OK to single out Jews and call out provocative slogans. His answer was at once outrageous and hilarious. 'I wasn't doing that, but I saw your kippas [skull caps]'. Perhaps I should have realised at that point that I was talking to more of an idiot than an ideologue and driven off. But I did not. I replied with the obvious: that's my point – why do you think it is OK to single out Jews for your commentary? He replied: 'I just wanted to see if you agreed with what I said.' Apparently, having thought more deeply about the matter, Aussie dad now thought that with his kids around him on bikes and my three little grandsons in the back seat eager to get to the park, this was an opportunity to call out a provocative slogan to invite discussion about one of history's most intractable geopolitical conflicts. I don't think so. Loading I told him I thought he was a disgrace to Australian society. I drove off while he continued to tell me he just wanted to see if I agreed with him. In fairness, he did so without rancour or aggression – quite a nice guy, really. Then came the jeering laugh of moral righteousness as I drove away. So, where does this leave us? What do we call it when a seemingly pleasant person singles out other people on the basis of their race, with provocations? I thought that was racism pure and simple. And when it is directed at Jews, I thought that was antisemitism pure and simple. But the man I encountered would no doubt be horrified by the suggestion that he is a racist or an antisemite. On the contrary he is the guardian of morality, the protector of the colonially oppressed. By calling out the Jew in public for the tragedy that has befallen the Palestinian people, he is a hero of good conscience. It is all the more perilous that this well-meaning chap is clueless as to his own moral failing – perhaps much like Joseph Banks himself, an unashamed champion of colonisation (and thereby forced dispossession) of a land to which his people had no right or connection. In the end, I do not think I need, and I most certainly do not intend, to hide or cower. My intuition is that the lovely Irish woman need not be as concerned, and the outwardly pleasant dad is an outlying sanctimonious fool. I am the product after all of generations in this great country. 'She'll be right' and 'no worries' have historically been effective antidotes to Australians' anxieties. They also make for good recipes for inaction. It is hard to know whether those renowned Aussie epithets are the products of cheerful optimism or national indolence. I harbour a sickening suspicion that I may be mistaken. For the sake of Australia's social fabric and the future of its communal cohesion, I hope my intuition and historic optimism is well placed.

The warning sign about Chinese steel before Kew pool roof collapse
The warning sign about Chinese steel before Kew pool roof collapse

Sydney Morning Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

The warning sign about Chinese steel before Kew pool roof collapse

Lab testing detected 'inconsistencies' in the Chinese steel used to support the roof of a $73 million Melbourne public pool before it caved in during a construction collapse, a court has heard. A court heard imported steel used by construction company ADCO to build the Kew Recreation Centre was found to have a range of issues, including insufficient yield stress, tensile strength and excessive aluminium. The company's procurement manager, responsible for sourcing the steel, told the Melbourne Magistrates' Court that late changes to plans for the trusses were also not resubmitted for approval as it would have caused a 'big financial and time impact' for its client, the City of Boroondara. The roof of the $73 million Kew Recreation Centre redevelopment on High Street caved in at 10pm on October 20, 2022, causing a deafening bang locals likened to an explosion. Twisted metal members, which had been holding up the roof, fell from both sides. The Victorian Building Authority (VBA) has filed 18 charges against ADCO Group and its director John Conroy following a two-year investigation into the major construction collapse. After ADCO's procurement manager Richard Zhang failed to provide a witness statement, the VBA applied to the court to conduct a compulsory examination of him. Under cross-examination from VBA council Chris Carr, KC, on Wednesday, Zhang said senior ADCO engineers raised concerns about the accuracy of mill certificates for imported steel they had used on previous projects and, as a result, agreed the material for the Kew pool would need to be independently tested by Australian labs. He said the testing was undertaken when the steel arrived in Australia after his role on the project had finished, though he was still included in email chains that raised concerns about the steel before the collapse.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store