
Ontario budget 2025: Experts and opposition say it falls short where it matters most
Much of the budget is focused on responding to US President Donald Trump's tariffs, particularly in the manufacturing and auto sectors — a cornerstone of Ontario's economy that supports tens of thousands of jobs and accounts for $36 billion of the province's $220-billion export market.
The budget paints a grim economic picture: job-growth projections for 2025 have been halved, from 130,000 to just 73,000. In 2026, Ontario expects to add only 33,000 new jobs. The unemployment rate is forecast to average 7.1 per cent over the next three years.
Ontario Finance Minister Peter Bethlenfalvy, while delivering the budget at the Legislature, called it a 'foundation for Ontario's economic transformation' and warned that Canada is facing 'one of the single greatest economic challenges in modern history.'
'Tariffs threaten to slow down what we've achieved to date in our mission to build our economy,' Bethlenfalvy said. 'We must respond with strength, prudence and unity to protect our industries, our jobs — and even our national sovereignty.'
Despite the challenges, Bethlenfalvy said he believes Ontario can become less reliant on the US and emerge as a global leader by leveraging its clean energy, natural resources and skilled workforce.
Spending highlights and economic risks
Among key items in the budget: $5 billion for a 'Protecting Ontario' account to help businesses impacted by tariffs, a $1.3-billion boost to the manufacturing investment tax credit, and a $500-million fund to grow capacity for critical minerals refining. Other investments include $750 million for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education, a billion-dollar expansion of skilled trades training, and over $200 billion in infrastructure spending over 10 years.
Critics say the Ford government 2025 budget fails to address Ontarians' most pressing concerns — affordability, climate inaction, economic resilience and growing economic uncertainty driven by US tariffs.
While the budget is packed with stimulus measures and support for the industrial and resource sectors, Mahmood Nanji, a policy fellow at Western University's Ivey Business School, says it's unclear how much relief it will actually bring because it lacks details.
On the $5-billion 'Protecting Ontario' fund, Nanji said the shortage of specifics is troubling and could lead to mismanagement if the province is forced to deploy it quickly during a crisis.
'This budget doesn't offer the kind of reassurance businesses and workers are looking for,' Nanji said. 'There's no strong message that the government truly has their backs.'
The Ford government appears to be counting on the federal government to step in if the economy worsens — an assumption Nanji called risky, especially given ongoing trade tensions.
The province's expectation of federal support was clear in the lead-up to the budget, when Ford sent Ottawa a wishlist of his 'nation-building' infrastructure projects. Bethlenfalvy also reinforced this in his budget speech, repeatedly calling on the federal government to backstop Ontario's economic plans.
Several of the measures in the budget are intended to solve transportation problems, which the government identified as standing in the way of economic growth.
While Nanji welcomed long-term infrastructure investments, he criticized the continued focus on the Highway 401 tunnel, calling it a political project rather than a strategic one. Nanji argued that the gas tax cut and Highway 407 toll removal are poorly targeted and largely benefit higher-income Ontarians, while doing little to help those most in need.
Environmental advocates: budget ignores climate crisis and clean energy investment
On the environment, Mike Marcolongo, associate director of Ontario programs at Environmental Defence was more blunt. 'It's been called a plan to protect Ontario, but it's not clear where the government's plan is when it comes to protecting clean water, healthy communities and natural ecosystems.'
Marcolongo also took aim at the government's continued push to remove bike lanes in major Toronto corridors as part of its budget plans. While advocates are in court trying to stop the removal of bike lanes on University Avenue, Yonge Street, and Bloor, this budget adds Avenue Road and Queen's Park Crescent to the list of lanes slated for removal.
'For a government that claims to look after the 'little guy,' the continued attack on bicycles by budgeting more bike lane removals reveals a lack of interest in supporting the most affordable and environmental choice for short commutes,' Marcolongo said. 'Instead of attacking cyclists and the small businesses that rely on them in Toronto, the Ontario government should focus on real, province-wide congestion solutions.'
When it comes to clean energy, Alienor Rougeot, senior program manager for climate and energy at Environmental Defence, said the government is sending mixed messages. While the budget claims to support affordable energy, she says it largely sidelines the most cost-effective solutions — like wind, solar and battery storage. Rougeot also pointed to Bill 17, which she said undermines local energy efficiency rules, leaving Ontarians with higher energy bills and no clear path to reducing carbon emissions.
Opposition slams budget as out of touch
Ontario NDP Leader Marit Stiles called it 'a band-aid budget' that delivers 'less relief, and a missed opportunity to strengthen Ontario.'
'Instead of choosing a future where workers and their families can get ahead, the government missed the mark with a budget full of cuts and no new investments in the services that people rely on,' said Stiles in a statement.
Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner said the budget 'ignores the fact that people are going to be hurt by the trade war,' and accused the government of prioritizing sprawl-inducing highways over housing, health care and clean energy.
Ontario Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie said the Ford government 'chose to repaint the walls while the roof is caving in.'
'It's infuriating to watch taxpayer money funneled to insider friends, lobbyists and donors while Ontarians are told to settle for less,'Crombie said in a statement. 'This isn't fiscal responsibility. This is political favouritism.'
But Bethlenfalvy, in delivering his budget, called for unity across partisan lines.
'We cannot do it alone,' he said. 'It's time to put aside our party stripes, set aside our differences, and work together — not just at the national level, but here at home in Ontario as well.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Limited options for Democrats to retaliate if Texas Republicans redraw congressional map
WASHINGTON (AP) — As Republicans move to redraw legislative maps in red states to pad their narrow House majority in Washington, some Democrats are rethinking their embrace of a nonpartisan approach to line-drawing that now complicates their party's ability to hit back before next year's midterm elections. In many Democratic-controlled states, independent commissions rather than the state legislature handle redistricting, the normally-once-a-decade task of adjusting congressional and legislative districts so their populations are equal. Parties in the majority can exploit that process to shape their lawmakers' districts so they are almost guaranteed reelection. The commission model limits parties' ability to game the system, leading to more competitive districts. Not all redistricting commissions were created at Democrats' insistence. And, like Republicans, the party has exploited line-drawing for its own gain in the handful of states where it controls the process. But unlike Republicans, many Democratic Party leaders have embraced the nonpartisan model. That means Democrats have fewer options to match Republicans, who are redrawing the U.S. House map in Texas at President Donald Trump's urging to carve out as many as five new winnable seats for the GOP. That could be enough to prevent Democrats from winning back the majority next year. Democrats have threatened payback. During a gathering Friday in Wisconsin of Democratic governors, several of them said they wanted to retaliate because the stakes are so high. Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers, who has pushed for a nonpartisan redistricting commission in his state, said Democrats must 'do whatever we can' to counter the Republican efforts to redraw congressional maps. 'When you have a gun against your head, you've got to do something,' he said. Despite the ambitious talk, Democrats largely have their hands tied. Democratic states have limited ability to redistrict for political edge California Gov. Gavin Newsom has said he and the Democratic-controlled Legislature will try to redraw his state's congressional map. But they would need to repeal or defy the 2008 ballot measure creating an independent redistricting commission. Voters extended its authority to congressional districts two years later. Newsom supported the constitutional amendment at the time, when he was mayor of San Francisco. The Texas redistricting, which is expected to pass the Legislature next week, led him to modify that position. 'We can act holier than thou, we can sit on the sidelines, talk about the way the world should be, or we can recognize the existential nature that is this moment,' Newsom said earlier this month. In New York, which also has a commission, the state constitution bars another map this decade. Democrats have moved for a change, but that could not happen until 2027 at the earliest, and then only with voter approval. In other states where Democrats control the governor's office and legislature, including Colorado and Washington, the party has backed independent commissions that cannot redraw, let alone rig, maps in the middle of the decade. Democrats say 'foundations of our democracy' at stake When the redistricting cycle kicked off in 2021, after the last census, independent commissions were in charge of drawing 95 House seats that otherwise would have been drawn by Democrats, but only 13 that would have been created by Republicans. In a marker of the shift among Democrats, former Attorney General Eric Holder, who heads the party's redistricting effort and has called repeatedly for a more nonpartisan approach, seemed to bless his party's long shot efforts to overrule their commissions. 'We do not oppose – on a temporary basis – responsible, responsive actions to ensure that the foundations of our democracy are not permanently eroded,' Holder said in a statement last week. In states where they weren't checked by commissions, Democrats have redistricted just as ruthlessly as Republicans. In Illinois, they drew a map that gave them a 14-3 advantage in the congressional delegation. In New Mexico, they tweaked the map so they control all three House seats. In Nevada, they held three of its four seats in November despite Trump winning the state. Even in states where they have a lopsided advantage, Democrats are exploring ways to maximize it. On Friday, Maryland's House Majority Leader, Democratic Del. David Moon, said he would introduce legislation to trigger redrawing of the congressional lines if Texas moves forward. Democrats hold seven of the state's eight congressional seats. 'We can't have one state, especially a very large state, constantly trying to one-up and alter the course of congressional control while the other states sit idly by,' he said. Commissions promote 'fair representation,' advocates say Advocates of a nonpartisan model are alarmed by the shift among Democrats. They say the party would redistrict just as aggressively as the GOP if not held in check, depriving voters of a voice in districts whose winners would essentially be selected in advance by political leaders. 'We're very desperate — we're looking for any port in a storm,' said Emily Eby French, Common Cause's Texas director. 'This Democratic tit for tat redistricting seems like a port but it's not a port. It's a jagged rock with a bunch of sirens on them.' The group's director of redistricting, Dan Vicuña, said using redistricting for partisan advantage — known as gerrymandering — is highly unpopular with the public: 'This is about fair representation for communities.' Politicians used to shy away from discussing it openly, but that has changed in today's polarized environment. Trump earlier this month told reporters about his hopes of netting five additional GOP seats in Texas and more out of other Republican-controlled states. He has urged new maps in GOP-controlled states such as Indiana and Missouri, while Ohio Republicans are poised to reshape political lines after neutralizing a push to create an independent redistricting commission. Democrats are divided over how to respond to Texas In a sign of the party's divide, Democrats have continued to push for a national redistricting panel that would remove partisanship from the process, even as some call for retaliation against Republicans in defiance of state limitations. 'No unilateral disarmament till both sides are following the law,' said Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego, like Newsom a possible 2028 presidential contender, wrote on X. Gallego's post came a day before his Democratic colleagues gathered to announce they were reintroducing a bill to create the national commission. An identical bill died in 2022 when it couldn't overcome Republican objections despite Democrats controlling Congress and the presidency. It has no chance now that the GOP is in charge of both branches. Sen. Chris Murphy, another potential 2028 contender, didn't express regret over past reforms that have implemented independent redistricting boards in Democratic states, saying the party 'should never apologize for being for the right thing.' But he added that Republicans 'are operating outside of the box right now and we can't stay inside the box.' 'If they're changing districts in the middle of the 10-year cycle, we have to do the same thing,' he said. That approach, however, hasn't caught on across the party. 'We shouldn't stoop to their tactics,' Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut said. 'It's an ideal that we have accurate and fair representation. We can't abandon it just because Republicans try to manipulate and distort it.' ___ Riccardi reported from Denver. Associated Press writers Scott Bauer in Madison, Wisconsin, Jaimie Ding in Los Angeles, Anthony Izaguirre in Albany, New York, and Brian Witte in Annapolis, Maryland, contributed to this report.


Globe and Mail
15 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Ford's Earnings Call: Record Revenues Amid Challenges
Ford Motor Company ((F)) has held its Q2 earnings call. Read on for the main highlights of the call. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. The latest earnings call from Ford Motor Company presented a mixed sentiment, reflecting both commendable achievements and notable challenges. The company reported strong revenue performance and market share gains, alongside strategic improvements in cost efficiency and credit performance. However, it also faced significant challenges, including tariff headwinds, quality and recall issues, and pressure in the commercial vehicle market. Record Revenue Achievement Ford reported a record $50 billion in revenue for the second quarter, underscoring the strength of its product lineup. This milestone highlights the company's ability to leverage its diverse offerings to capture market demand effectively. Ford Pro Performance Ford Pro's revenue grew by 11% to nearly $19 billion, achieving a 12.3% EBIT margin. This growth was driven by a robust product lineup and disciplined pricing strategies, showcasing Ford's strategic focus on its professional segment. Market Share Gains Ford increased its market share in the U.S. by 1.7 points sequentially, marking the best sales quarter for trucks in 20 years. This gain reflects the company's competitive positioning and strong consumer demand for its truck offerings. Improved Cost Efficiency Ford achieved its fourth consecutive quarter of year-over-year cost improvement, excluding the impact of tariffs. This demonstrates Ford's commitment to operational efficiency and cost management. Positive Credit Performance Ford Credit delivered $645 million of EBT, up $300 million, supported by a strong financing margin and receivables growth. This performance underscores the strength of Ford's financial services arm. Strong Free Cash Flow Ford generated $2.8 billion in adjusted free cash flow, maintaining a strong balance sheet with $28 billion in cash. This financial strength provides Ford with flexibility to invest in future growth opportunities. Tariff Headwinds Ford expects tariffs to be a net headwind of about $2 billion for the year, impacting adjusted EBIT. This challenge highlights the external pressures affecting Ford's profitability. Recall and Quality Challenges Ford faced a record number of recalls, although many were software-related, which are less costly than mechanical recalls. This indicates ongoing quality control challenges that the company needs to address. Model e Margin Pressure Despite revenue growth, Model e faced margin pressure due to high fixed costs associated with EV production. This reflects the broader industry challenge of balancing growth and profitability in the electric vehicle market. Price Pressure in Commercial Vehicles Pricing pressure was noted in the commercial van segment, although full-size pickup pricing remained strong. This suggests competitive dynamics in certain segments of Ford's commercial vehicle offerings. Forward-Looking Guidance Ford updated its full-year guidance, expecting adjusted EBIT between $6.5 billion and $7.5 billion, with adjusted free cash flow forecasted at $3.5 billion to $4.5 billion, despite a net tariff headwind of approximately $2 billion. The company highlighted a record quarterly revenue of $50 billion, with adjusted EBIT at $2.1 billion. Ford Pro maintained strong performance, while Model e more than doubled its revenue, achieving significant margin improvement. Ford also emphasized ongoing cost improvements and a reduction in CO2 credit purchases. In summary, Ford's earnings call presented a balanced view of its current performance and future prospects. While the company celebrated record revenues and market share gains, it also acknowledged challenges such as tariff impacts and quality issues. The forward-looking guidance reflects Ford's strategic focus on sustaining growth and improving operational efficiency amidst external pressures.


CBC
18 hours ago
- CBC
Should supermarket chains be allowed to sell their own private-label booze?
Ontario alcohol producers are urging Ford to say no to so-called private-label booze products, such as Costco branded wine and spirits. CBC's Lorenda Reddekopp explains why.