logo
Guatemala's president denies new asylum deal with U.S.

Guatemala's president denies new asylum deal with U.S.

CTV News19 hours ago

U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, left, and Guatemalan President Bernardo Arevalo walk inside the National Culture Palace to their meeting in Guatemala City, Thursday, June 26, 2025. (Anna Moneymaker/Pool photo via AP)
GUATEMALA CITY — Guatemala President Bernardo Arévalo said Friday he has not signed an agreement with the United States to take asylum seekers from other countries, pushing back against comments from U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem.
Noem and Arévalo met Thursday in Guatemala and the two governments publicly signed a joint security agreement that would allow U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers to work in the capital's airport, training local agents how to screen for terrorism suspects.
But Noem said she had also been given a signed document she called a safe third country agreement. She said she reached a similar deal in Honduras and said they were important outcomes of her trip.
Asked about Noem's comments Friday during a news conference, Arévalo said that nothing new was signed related to immigration and that Guatemala was still operating under an agreement reached with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in February. That agreement stipulated that Guatemala would continue accepting the deportation of its own citizens, but also citizens of other Central American nations as a transit point on their way home.
Arévalo said that when Rubio visited, safe third country was discussed because Guatemala had signed such an agreement during U.S. President Donald Trump's first term in office. But 'we made it clear that our path was different,' Arévalo said.
He did add that Guatemala was willing to provide asylum to Nicaraguans who have been unable to return to their country because of the political situation there out of 'solidarity.'
The president's communications office said Noem had been given the ratification of the agreement reached through diplomatic notes weeks earlier.
During Trump's first term, the U.S. signed such safe third-country agreements with Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala. They effectively allowed the U.S. to declare some asylum seekers ineligible to apply for U.S. protection and permitted the U.S. government to send them to those countries deemed 'safe.'
By Sonia Pérez D.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Family fighting deportation to Italy gets another shot at staying in Canada
Family fighting deportation to Italy gets another shot at staying in Canada

National Post

time3 hours ago

  • National Post

Family fighting deportation to Italy gets another shot at staying in Canada

A dual citizen of Italy and Ethiopia who brought her two Italian children to Canada more than a decade back, using aliases and falsely claiming they were Eritrean citizens subject to religious persecution, has won another chance for her family to stay here. Article content The Refugee Protection Division, which weighs refugee claims in Canada, initially accepted the 2014 claims of Tsegereda Tsegaye Wigebral and her two kids, Nobel and Melody Esayas Fisihatsion, now 19 and 17 respectively. But it nullified their refugee status and rejected their claim in December 2022 after learning their story was fake. Article content Article content Article content That same month, the family was declared inadmissible to Canada. They were ordered deported in August 2023, but applied for a pre-removal risk assessment, their last-ditch bid to stay here. Article content Article content Last April, a senior immigration officer 'reviewed the applicants' file and held that they were not at risk of persecution, or subject to a danger of torture, and nor did they face a risk to their lives or a cruel or unusual punishment if they were removed to Italy,' according to a recent Federal Court decision out of Ottawa. Article content 'While the applicants had alleged that they faced serious discrimination, social exclusion and abuse there, due to their race, and had alleged that they could not rely on the police or authorities for protection, the officer determined that there was not sufficient evidence before them to substantiate those claims,' wrote Justice Darren Thorne. Article content The officer 'accepted that the applicants may have been subjected to 'less favourable treatment' due to their race, but found they had failed to establish that this rose to the level of persecution,' said Thorne's decision, dated June 25. 'In one of the central findings, the officer noted, in relation to mistreatment in Italy, that the principal applicant had provided 'little to no further elaboration or evidence as to how she came to the conclusion that the Italian authorities would not help her.'' Article content Article content The trouble is, immigration officials had asked the older child, who had turned 18, to file his own application, but the immigration officer handling their case didn't look at what Nobel submitted before making a decision. Thorne said the immigration officer's decision was 'clearly' made without viewing the totality of the family's applications. Article content Article content 'The right to be heard is among the most basic aspects of procedural fairness. When a decision has clearly been made without considering all of the materials submitted by an applicant, this right has been compromised,' said Thorne, who sent the family's case back to a different immigration officer to re-evaluate. Article content A lawyer representing Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, who was fighting for the family's removal, couldn't explain why that happened, although they noted the officer may not have seen Nobel's application. Article content The same lawyer argued Nobel's submissions 'were immaterial, as they contained broadly the same information as had been provided by the principal applicant,' and that the information he provided 'also did not establish that the treatment suffered by the applicants rose to the level of persecution, so it would not have changed the officer's decision, even if it had been considered.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store