Brics leaders must take steps on policy to facilitate between member countries
Many themes are on the minds of the political leaders attending the Brics Summit in Brazil, but one aspect that is certainly important for all is easing trade friction in this group. For the long-term sustainability of Brics, there must be a stronger economic ambition that ties the grouping together beyond its political and geopolitical alignments.
Across all Brics countries, researchers, policymakers and business people have been attempting to adapt and address the restrictions caused by the United States Liberation Day tariff. There remains profound uncertainty about the path ahead, as the 90-day pause comes to an end this coming week.
What the Brics countries have not reflected on is the prohibitive tariffs they place against each other, which limit intra-Brics trade.
The blame, while correct, cannot be placed solely on the US for its higher tariffs; the Brics countries should also consider taking a serious look inward and assess how they could deepen intra-trade and increase investments.
The ideas of this path have long been documented in the business arm of this grouping, the Brics Business Council Forum, in its various annual reports. Still, few of these ideas have made their way into the political groupings' resolutions in a manner that changes the economic engagement landscape among these countries. The current environment necessitates such a strong approach.
Consider the South African agricultural sector, which, because of the lack of a trade agreement, faces higher tariffs in Brics member countries. Take China as an example; South Africa's macadamias face a 12% import tariff and the wine industry tariffs of 14% to 20%. In addition to higher tariffs, exporters also face phytosanitary barriers. I am singling out China here, but the same can be said about India, another major agricultural importer in Brics.
For South Africa, agriculture is one of the key strategic industries for driving economic growth and revitalising rural communities. Notably, the sector cannot grow robustly without an expansion into new export markets. Already, the South African agricultural industry exports roughly half of its produce in value terms, amounting to about $13.7 billion in 2024.
But the Brics countries account for a small share of these exports. Roughly two-thirds of South Africa's agricultural exports go to the African continent and the European Union.
While China has signalled optimism and an intention to lower import tariffs for various goods from Africa, there is no demonstrable evidence of the actual path of implementing this, along with the timelines. Currently, it primarily serves as a political statement.
The Brics grouping should build on these political statements, and argue for a proper framework that technocrats and business can start refining, which can be launched at the next summit in India as the Brics trade agreement. This would encompass the agricultural sector, as this grouping is a big market, accounting for roughly half of global agricultural imports, but filled mainly by non-Brics members.
The US authorities' tough trade stance necessitates this approach to trade policy, which will allow Brics countries to expand the avenues for trade for their domestic businesses and alleviate the friction in this grouping.
This economic ambition of deepening trade is vital for the long-term sustainability of Brics.
Wandile Sihlobo is the chief economist of the Agricultural Business Chamber of South Africa (Agbiz).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
5 hours ago
- The South African
Donald Trump slams 'TRAIN WRECK' Elon Musk: 'He's gone off the rails!'
US President Donald Trump on Sunday slammed former ally Elon Musk's launching of a new political party as 'ridiculous,' deepening the Republican's feud with the man who was once his biggest backer. Trump also branded the SpaceX and Tesla tycoon a 'TRAIN WRECK' who had gone 'off the rails' after Musk said he wanted to challenge the current US political system. The world's richest man was almost inseparable from Trump as he headed the cost-cutting 'Department of Government Efficiency,' but they fell out hard over the president's 'big beautiful' tax and spending mega-bill. 'I think it's ridiculous to start a third party,' Donald Trump told reporters before he boarded Air Force One on his way back to Washington from his New Jersey golf club. 'It's always been a two-party system, and I think starting a third party just adds to confusion. Third parties have never worked. So he can have fun with it, but I think it's ridiculous,' he said. South Africa-born Musk announced on Saturday that he would create the so-called 'America Party' to challenge what he called the United States' 'one-party system.' Musk says the president's massive domestic spending plan would explode the US debt, and has vowed to do everything in his power to defeat lawmakers who voted for it. The former DOGE boss, who led a huge drive to slash federal spending and cut jobs, equated Trump's Republicans with rival Democrats when it came to domestic spending. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' Musk posted on X, the social media platform that he owns. Musk gave few details of his plan and it was not clear whether he had registered the party with US electoral authorities, but it could cause Republicans headaches in the 2026 midterm elections – and beyond. In a sign of how sensitive the issue could be for Trump, he took to his Truth Social network while still on Air Force One to double down on his assault on Musk. 'I am saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK over the past five weeks,' Trump posted. 'The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS, and we have enough of that with the Radical Left Democrats.' In a lengthy diatribe, Trump repeated his earlier assertion that Musk's ownership of electric vehicle company Tesla had made him turn on the president due to the spending bill cutting subsidies for such automobiles. Musk has insisted that his opposition is primarily due to the bill increasing the US fiscal deficit and sovereign debt. Earlier on Sunday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also threw shade at Musk's attempts to enter the political fray, telling him to stick to running his companies. When asked by CNN if Musk's plan bothered the Trump administration, Bessent offered thinly veiled criticism. 'I believe that the boards of directors at his various companies wanted him to come back and run those companies, which he is better at than anyone,' Bessent said. 'So I imagine that those board of directors did not like this announcement yesterday and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities.' Musk left DOGE in May to focus full-time on his corporate responsibilities, with Tesla's sales and image especially suffering from his brief venture into Trump's inner circle. Trump gave him a grand send-off in the Oval Office, during a bizarre ceremony during which Musk appeared with a black eye and received a golden key to the White House from the president. But just days later the two were exchanging bitter insults on social media after Musk criticised Trump's flagship spending bill. Trump would not comment on Sunday when asked if he would be asking Musk to return the golden key. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
BRICS leaders condemn Ukrainian attacks on Russian infrastructure
The declaration made no mention of Russia's constant missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian cities, which have intensified in recent weeks and caused greater death and destruction The leaders of BRICS — including President Cyril Ramaphosa — have strongly condemned Ukraine for recent attacks on Russian railway infrastructure, but remained silent on Russia's constant bombardment of Ukraine, which has killed many civilians. The BRICS nations, meeting in Rio de Janeiro for their annual summit on Sunday and Monday, 6 and 7 July, issued a 126-point declaration covering a wide range of political, economic and security issues. It included the following: 'We condemn in the strongest possible terms the attacks on bridges and railway infrastructure deliberately targeting civilians in the Bryansk, Kursk and Voronezh regions of the Russian Federation on May 31, and June 1 and 5, 2025, which resulted in the deaths of several civilians, including children.' The declaration made no mention of Russia's constant missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian cities, which have intensified in recent weeks and caused greater death and destruction, in part because of US President Donald Trump's reduction of US military support, leaving Ukraine without sufficient anti-missile defences. Ukraine has occasionally struck back at military targets inside Russia, though its attacks have been far fewer than Russia's attacks on Ukraine. The Bryansk, Kursk and Voronezh provinces which were mentioned in the BRICS declaration 'are all located near Ukraine's northeastern border and have played a central role in Russia's war effort, serving as key logistical hubs and launch sites for missile and drone attacks on Ukrainian cities — often targeting civilian infrastructure and causing casualties', according to the Kyiv Independent. The BRICS declaration otherwise mentioned Ukraine only briefly and did not present a united position on the war, probably because of the different positions of member countries. Instead, the declaration allowed members to maintain their varying positions by stating: 'We recall our national positions concerning the conflict in Ukraine as expressed in the appropriate fora, including the UN Security Council and the UN General Assembly. 'We note with appreciation relevant proposals of mediation and good offices, including the creation of the African Peace Initiative and the Group of Friends for Peace, aimed at peaceful resolution of the conflict through dialogue and diplomacy. We expect that current efforts will lead to a sustainable peace settlement.' Russia is one of the original BRICS members, along with Brazil, India and China. South Africa was admitted in 2010, and since then, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates have also been admitted, as well as 10 partner countries that enjoy partial membership benefits. Russian President Vladimir Putin did not attend the summit in person, presumably because of the International Criminal Court (ICC) warrant for his arrest, which Brazil would have felt obliged to execute as it is an ICC member. Putin participated by video link and sent his foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, to represent him in person. Chinese President Xi Jinping did not attend either, apparently because of a clash of schedules. Strikes on Iran The presence of Iran — which has supplied drones to Russia to attack Ukraine — was felt in a condemnation of the recent US and Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. 'We condemn the military strikes against the Islamic Republic of Iran since 13 June 2025, which constitute a violation of international law and the Charter of the United Nations, and express grave concern over the subsequent escalation of the security situation in the Middle East. 'We further express serious concern over deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure and peaceful nuclear facilities under full safeguards of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in violation of international law and relevant resolutions of the IAEA. 'Nuclear safeguards, safety, and security must always be upheld, including in armed conflicts, to protect people and the environment from harm. In this context, we reiterate our support for diplomatic initiatives aimed at addressing regional challenges. We call upon the United Nations Security Council to be seized of this matter.' Though the declaration characterised Iran's nuclear facilities as 'peaceful', they have not been unequivocally confirmed as such by the IAEA. Gustavo de Carvalho, a BRICS expert at the SA Institute of International Affairs in Johannesburg, said the Rio de Janeiro declaration was more or less what he had expected. As a consensus-based body, it was difficult for BRICS to engage with divisive language. He welcomed what he said was the first endorsement by China and Russia — the two BRICS permanent members of the UN Security Council — of the aspirations to permanent Security Council membership of Brazil, India and two African countries (still to be identified by Africa). He noted that the summit had advanced the ongoing process of strengthening links between the BRICS members on issues such as artificial intelligence, health and education. He saw progress in the BRICS initiative to increase trade among member countries in their own currencies, rather than the US dollar and interbank payments. He said that every year there was an expectation that BRICS would take a strong anti-Western position in its summit declarations. 'But we never really see it, partially because most of its members don't consider themselves to be anti-Western, but rather as non-Western, with different layers of interaction and integration with Western countries.' De Carvalho said that while the BRICS countries acknowledged the threats to multilateralism posed by the Trump administration, they had chosen to take a positive, longer-term stance by emphasising the roles they could play in strengthening international bodies like the UN, the World Trade Organization and the World Health Organization — 'rather than just pointing a finger at the US, which would create a much stronger war of words but not really resolve the issues'. DM
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Trump unveils 25% tariffs on goods from Japan, South Korea in letters to leaders
12 more letters expected White House says Trump to sign executive order extending deadline New tariffs rates to go into effect on August 1 Stocks add to day's losses on tariff news Treasury secretary says inbox full of trade offers Trump and EU Commission chief also held call on Sunday Trump threatens BRICS countries with additional tariffs By Jeff Mason, Bart H. Meijer and Andrea Shalal 'If for any reason you decide to raise your Tariffs, then, whatever the number you choose to raise them by, will be added onto the 25% that we charge,' Trump said in letters to the leaders of the two Asian countries, which he posted on his Truth Social platform. Later, Trump also announced the U.S. will impose 25% tariffs on Malaysia and Kazakhstan, 30% on South Africa and 40% on Laos and Myanmar. The rate for South Korea is the same as Trump initially announced on April 2, while the rate for Japan is 1 point higher than first announced. A week later, he capped all of the so-called reciprocal tariffs at 10% until July 9 to allow for negotiations. Only two agreements have so far been reached, with Britain and Vietnam. There was no immediate response from the Japanese or South Korean embassies on the announcement. About12 countries will receive letters from Trump, White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said at a briefing without identifying them. She said Trump would sign an executive order on Monday formally delaying the July 9 deadline to August 1. 'There will be additional letters in the coming days,' Leavitt said, adding that 'we are close' on some deals. The European Union will not be receiving a letter setting out higher tariffs, EU sources familiar with the matter told Reuters on Monday. U.S. stocks fell in response, the latest market ruction since Trump unleashed a global trade war on his return to office in January. His moves have repeatedly whipsawed financial markets and sent policymakers scrambling to protect their economies. U.S. stocks were driven to near bear-market territory by his cascade of tariff announcements through the early spring but quickly rebounded to record highs in the weeks after he put the stiffest levies on hold on April 9. The S&P 500 on Monday was down nearly 1%, its biggest drop in three weeks. U.S.-listed shares of Japanese automotive companies fell, with Toyota Motor down 4.1% at mid-afternoon trading and Honda Motor off by 3.8%. The dollar surged against both the Japanese yen and the South Korean won. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said earlier on Monday he expected several trade announcements to be made in the next 48 hours, adding that his inbox was full of last-ditch offers from countries to clinch a tariff deal by the deadline. Bessent did not say which countries could get deals and what they might contain. Trump has kept much of the world guessing on the outcome of months of talks with countries hoping to avoid the hefty tariff hikes he has threatened. Countries have scrambled to hammer out deals before the Wednesday deadline. South Korea and Indonesia dispatched representatives to Washington, while Thailand submitted a new trade proposal offering zero tariffs on many U.S. goods. 'We've had a lot of people change their tune in terms of negotiations. So my mailbox was full last night with a lot of new offers, a lot of new proposals,' Bessent said in an interview with CNBC. 'So it's going to be a busy couple of days.' BRICS THREAT For its part, the European Union still aims to reach a trade deal by July 9 after European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Trump had a 'good exchange,' a Commission spokesperson said. It was not clear, however, whether there had been a meaningful breakthrough in talks to stave off tariff hikes on the United States' largest trading partner. Adding to the pressure, Trump threatened to impose a 17% tariff on EU food and agriculture exports, it emerged last week. Trump had said on Sunday the U.S. was close to finalizing several trade pacts and would notify other countries by July 9 of higher tariff rates. He said they would not take effect until Aug. 1, a three-week reprieve. He also put members of the developing nations' BRICS group in his sights as its leaders met in Brazil, threatening an additional 10% tariff on any BRICS countries aligning themselves with 'anti-American' policies. The new 10% tariff will be imposed on individual countries if they take anti-American policy actions, a source familiar with the matter said. The BRICS group comprises Brazil, Russia, India and China and South Africa along with recent joiners Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates. Trump's comments hit the South African rand. EU SEEKS EFFECTIVE APPROACH TO TRUMP The EU has been torn over whether to push for a quick and light trade deal or back its own economic clout in trying to negotiate a better outcome. It had already dropped hopes for a comprehensive trade agreement before the July deadline. 'We want to reach a deal with the U.S. We want to avoid tariffs,' the spokesperson said at a daily briefing. Without a preliminary agreement, broad U.S. tariffs on most imports would rise from their current 10% to the rates set out by Trump on April 2. In the EU's case, that would be 20%. Von der Leyen also held talks with the leaders of Germany, France and Italy at the weekend, Germany said. Chancellor Friedrich Merz has repeatedly stressed the need for a quick deal to protect industries vulnerable to tariffs ranging from cars to pharmaceuticals. The German spokesperson said the parties should allow themselves 'another 24 or 48 hours to come to a decision.' Germany's Mercedes-Benz said on Monday its second-quarter unit sales of cars and vans had fallen 9%, blaming tariffs. Russia said BRICS was 'a group of countries that share common approaches and a common world view on how to cooperate, based on their own interests.' 'And this cooperation within BRICS has never been and will never be directed against any third countries,' said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov.
