Almost half of people do not think 10-year plan will boost GP access
More than four in 10 also believe the 10-year plan will make no difference or will not improve waiting times in A&E.
However, there is huge support for some of the ideas included in the blueprint, with the overwhelming majority backing the creation of neighbourhood health centres, the expansion of the NHS app and more mental health support in schools and colleges.
The 10-year health plan was unveiled by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer earlier this month, and set out a series of shifts to bring care much closer to people's homes, reducing the reliance on hospitals and A&E.
Key reforms include an enhanced NHS app, giving patients more control over their care, new neighbourhood health centres open six days a week and at least 12 hours a day, and new laws on food and alcohol to prevent ill health.
A survey of 1,023 adults in Britain, conducted by Ipsos for the PA news agency, asked people how they think the plan will impact access to healthcare, such as getting a GP appointment, A&E waiting times and waiting times for routine hospital treatment.
Some 35% said the plan will have no impact on getting a GP appointment, while 14% believe it will make things harder.
This compares with the 29% of people who said they think it will make getting an appointment easier.
More than a third (37%) said it will make no difference to waiting times in emergency departments, while almost one in 10 (9%), said they believe it could worsen waiting times, compared with 30% who said it will improve them.
Meanwhile, 31% said the plan will have no impact on waiting times for hospital treatment, 11% believe the plan will worsen waiting times and 34% said they think the measures will help.
However, a number of proposals outlined in the plan were strongly backed by the public.
Some 84% said they supported the creation of a single patient record, while 78% backed the creation of neighbourhood health centres, 73% support the expansion of the NHS app and 72% are in favour of more mental health support in schools and colleges.
However, more than a quarter (27%) of people do not support making hospitals fully AI enabled, compared with 44% who would back the move.
Almost one in five (18%) said they would not support so-called 'patient power payments', which would allow patients to hold back some of the payment for their care if they are not satisfied, while 42% would support the measure.
Some proposals aimed at helping people to lead healthier lives were also strongly supported.
A ban on the sale of high-caffeine energy drinks was backed by 78% of people, while 69% back plans to restrict junk food advertising.
However, almost one in five (18%) tended to disagree with measures that could see alcoholic drinks labelled with nutritional information, although 57% backed the move.
One in four people think the measures included in the plan will make no difference to patients, the poll found.
Almost one in 10 (9%) said they think the changes will make things worse, while 35% believe it will improve the health service.
A similar proportion, 23%, said the 10-year health plan will make no difference to NHS staff, while 13% said it could make things worse and 33% believe it will have a positive effect.
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'We're getting on with the job of delivering for patients, with NHS waiting lists falling by 260,000 since July 2024, delivering more than 4.6 million additional appointments since the general election and recruiting over 1,900 extra GPs to fix the front door of the NHS.
'Backed by an additional £29 billion, our 10-year health plan will seize the opportunities provided by new technology, medicines and innovation to deliver better care for all patients, no matter where they live or how much they earn, and better value for taxpayers.
'It is no surprise the plan is popular with patients, it was the result of the biggest conversation with staff, patients and the public since the formation of the NHS, with more than a quarter of a million contributions.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NHS England approach to doctors' strike ‘seriously risky', BMA warns
A senior doctors' union leader has warned NHS England's approach to the upcoming five-day strike by resident doctors is 'seriously risky' and could lead to patient harm in emergency departments. British Medical Association (BMA) deputy chairwoman Dr Emma Runswick told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Tuesday that guidance issued by the health service to keep most planned care running during the walkout could cause dangerous confusion and overstretch staff. 'We've had proven systems over the last decade that have made sure that where we have to take strike action, senior doctors cover urgency and critical care,' she said. 'This time round, NHS England are pushing for the continuation of non-urgent and scheduled care in a way that we think at best is confusing and will create on-the-day cancellations – and at worst could be risky and lead to harm in emergency departments and on wards, because senior doctors cannot physically be in two places at once. 'We think that a notional guidance from NHS England which is saying that basically all scheduled work should continue to go ahead has potential to be seriously risky for patients.' Her comments come amid an escalating row between NHS bosses and the BMA over how hospitals should respond to the strike, which is due to begin at 7am on Friday. During previous rounds of industrial action in 2023 and 2024, NHS England told trusts to cancel large volumes of non-urgent care so that consultants could step in to cover emergency services. But under the leadership of new NHS England chief executive Sir Jim Mackey, hospitals have now been instructed to cancel non-urgent work only in 'exceptional circumstances' – and only with prior approval. The BMA argues this new approach risks spreading non-striking doctors too thinly, with Dr Runswick warning: 'Senior doctors are needed to be freed up in order to provide urgency and critical care. 'We think the vast majority of planned and unscheduled care should be shifted. 'There are always, in every hospital, local medical managers, local clinical leaders, who will make decisions about what is safe to go ahead – but trying to maintain scheduled care during this strike is not safe in many cases.' When asked why the union could not avoid strikes altogether, she said walkouts can be delivered safely if planned properly. 'Strikes by doctors do not have to be risky,' she said. 'Strikes by doctors have been run safely in 2016 and 2022, 2023, 2024. 'We are entirely capable of running strikes safely – they just have to be planned for with local medical leadership, and we've done that before. We can do it again.' She said the BMA was still hopeful a resolution could be reached before the walkout begins and was 'keen to work with NHS England to ensure they are best planned for the safest care'. Talks between the Government and the BMA have continued in recent days, with Health Secretary Wes Streeting ruling out any additional pay rise this year but indicating other aspects of the contract – such as student debt, exam fees and working conditions – may be up for negotiation. Resident doctors, formerly known as junior doctors, were awarded an average 5.4% pay increase this financial year, following a 22% rise over the previous two years. However, the BMA says real-terms pay has still fallen by around 20% since 2008, and is pushing for full 'pay restoration'.
Medscape
12 minutes ago
- Medscape
Beard Stubble: Style Statement or Pathogen Paradise?
Human skin harbours billions of microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Facial hair represents a unique microbiological environment. Beards maintain ideal temperature, moisture, pH, and nutrient levels to support a dense and diverse microbial population. Sebum, food debris, and dirt can accumulate on hair, further promoting microbial growth. Frequent touching of the beard, often with the hands, can spread germs from the environment. Research over the past 50 years has shown that bacteria and toxins can persist in beards even after washing. This has led to concerns that beards may harbour bacteria, which could increase the risk for infection. Healthcare Context In healthcare, beards remain a topic of debate, particularly regarding the spread of hospital-acquired infections. Studies have shown mixed results; some have found higher overall bacterial counts on the faces of bearded healthcare workers than on those of their clean-shaven peers, while others have reported no significant difference. One study comparing hygiene levels in human and dog MRI scans found that men's beards carried a higher microbiological load than canine fur, including potentially harmful bacteria. Interestingly, the same study also showed that bearded doctors were less likely to carry Staphylococcus aureus, a key cause of hospital-acquired infections, than clean-shaven doctors. In addition, patients treated by bearded surgeons did not have higher rates of postoperative infection. Skin Infections Beards can spread skin infections, such as impetigo, a contagious condition typically caused by S aureus, which can colonise facial hair. In rare cases, parasites such as pubic lice (Pthirus pubis) have been found in beards, eyelashes, or eyebrows, particularly in situations involving poor hygiene or close contact with an infected person. Beard Care Neglected or poorly maintained beards can cause skin irritation, inflammation, and infections. The underlying skin is sensitive, as it contains many blood vessels, nerves, and immune cells, and can be easily affected by oil, dead skin, and environmental factors. Experts recommend daily cleansing of the face and beard to effectively remove dirt, allergens, and microbes. Dermatologists also advise regular moisturisation, using a beard comb to clear out impurities, and trimming to manage stray hairs and support healthy growth. The hygiene of a beard largely depends on how well it is cared for; when cleaned daily, it does not pose a significant risk. This story was translated from Univadis Germany.
Refinery29
an hour ago
- Refinery29
Why People Are Swapping Vapes For Cigarettes Despite The Risks
'Cigarettes for me were a form of nicotine that I was able to have more 'control' over than vaping,' says Ellie*, 29, from New York. It isn't just Ellie who thinks this. When vapes spiked in popularity, the marketing of them as a way to cut back on cigarettes pervaded. This messaging is even backed by the NHS, where the advice on nicotine vapes is that they are 'one of the most effective stop smoking aids'. The FDA however, hasn't approved of vapes for this use in the U.S. The science repeatedly says they're less damaging than cigarettes. And yet, people are now switching back to smoking in an attempt to cut out vaping for good. What's more, they're convinced it's better for them. There's a disconnect between what the experts say and what smokers think about the health risks. Ellie is a prime example of this. 'While cigarettes are indisputably dangerous and cancer-causing, I actually know what's in them, and the long-term effects are documented,' she says. 'Because vapes are a newer invention, we don't yet know what the full risks are,' Ellie adds. She isn't alone in her perspective. A survey on smoking in England, updated this month, found that current smokers believe vapes are 'equally or more harmful' than cigarettes, despite the NHS again affirming that vaping more frequently than smoking doesn't make them worse. New research from Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) concludes that vapes are being 'underused' to quit smoking and that the public is 'confused' about the health risks posed by vapes. Their data found that 63% of young people think vaping is as harmful or more harmful than smoking. Just last year, their survey showed 50% of people felt this way, so the public health disconnect is growing. Perceptions have shifted back in favour of cigarettes, not because people are misinformed and unaware of the cancer risks. They know them well. Instead, it's the lack of decades long research on vapes that we have on cigarettes that's swinging people away from vaping. Ellie's smoking habit began, like many people, as a result of working around other smokers. 'I realised while working at a restaurant that my coworkers who were smokers (which was most of them) were able to get 'smoke breaks' during their shifts that non-smokers were not given. It was both a way to be social with my coworkers during and after shifts, and gave me a reason to step outside for a moment during the work day.' Then as a sophomore in 2015, she swapped cigarettes for vapes for the next five years. The lure was strong, and strawberry-flavoured. 'The thing about vaping is that unlike cigarettes, I could use them anywhere and everywhere. In bed before I fell asleep and immediately when I woke up, in the bathroom at work or restaurants, and while sitting at my desk when working from home, while sitting on the couch watching a movie with friends,' says Ellie. When she looked into it, she found that one Juul pod has the same amount of nicotine as around 20 cigarettes. At the height of Ellie's addiction, she was 'easily' going through a pod every day and a half or so — whereas during her first time as a cigarette smoker, she was smoking five or six cigarettes a day at the peak. Upon doing the maths, she became deeply concerned about the amount of nicotine she was consuming. 'I had read studies about how long-term vaping can damage your blood vessels and cause ' popcorn lung ' [ editor's note: Diacetyl is the risky ingredient linked to popcorn lung. In the UK it's banned from vapes, but is still allowed in the U.S. Vaping without this ingredient does not cause popcorn lung ]. After a friend posted about how they were hospitalised for possibly permanent damage to their blood vessels as a result of heavy vaping, I decided I wanted to stop, and used cigarettes to help me wean off.' Ellie shared some of her research with me, and it is alarming. There's concern about the toxic metals contained within them, for example, and concerns around their regulation globally. These scares have contributed to the false idea that vaping is worse than smoking. The new generation of nicotine-users are worried about the speed at which they run through a vape. So, after briefly fading from fashion among younger people, cigarettes now had a place in their eyes once more. Hazel Cheeseman, chief executive of Action on Smoking and Health, tells Refinery29 this trend is a serious concern. 'While we may not have decades of data we have on smoking we have more than enough to know that smoking is so much more of a risk to your health,' Cheeseman says. 'People are not 'addicted to smoking' or 'addicted to vaping' — they are addicted to nicotine. When people feel they vape more than they smoke, this is because the vape delivers nicotine in a different way to cigarettes [which is far less rapid], not because they are more addicted.' Cheeseman is clear that much more needs to be done to make sure people understand the risks better. Up to two thirds of long-term smokers die prematurely from smoking related illness. 'If people believe cigarettes are a healthier choice they are completely misguided,' says Cheeseman. It's a damning reality, but one that isn't seeming to impress itself on people, who truly believe cigarettes have helped them. Jenny*, 27, who lives in London, thinks vapes made her 'way more addicted to nicotine' compared with when she socially smoked cigarettes, having been an on and off smoker since her teenage years. Like Ellie, she would vape at any given opportunity at home or out of the house. Jenny began to notice she was becoming short of breath at the gym. Though aware of the risks attached to cigarettes, she's found it easier to have periods where she completely stops smoking compared with when she vaped. At the start of this year, Jenny decided to quit for two and a half months. Now that it's festival season, she wants to socially smoke again. But the kicker for her though, is cigarettes haven't become a daily habit like vaping grew to be. 'I see it now as a treat,' says Jenny. 'Switching back to cigarettes has given me a better relationship with my smoking. I've seen friends who never touched cigs now be in a complete state of panic and distress when they lose their Lost Marys. It's insane. The fact we can do it anywhere, just makes it far too accessible.' And while it's less of a concern than the health side of things, Jenny adds: 'You look impossibly unchic having a vape'. Mistrust of vapes, in the UK at least, seemed to gain momentum in some circles when the disposable vape ban came into effect in June this year. Lewis*, 31, from London, previously smoked, quit, started to vape, then decided to switch back in line with the ban. 'It seemed like a good moment to finally kick the habit,' he says. 'Plus a lot of my friends used this arbitrary date too, so there was strength in numbers.' When socialising, Lewis says he needs something to 'break up' the night. 'The pub setting is the most challenging, with the combination of beer, friends, and outdoor space. It's just too tempting, and I saw the occasional fag as a much less unhealthy and expensive than chugging three to four vapes a week.' Although he too knows the risks of cigarettes, he found quitting in the past easy so isn't worried about that side of things. 'I much prefer vaping. It's tastier, doesn't make your clothes smell, and for me it's much more addictive, so I'm not concerned I'll become a full-time smoker as I genuinely don't like it as much,' says Lewis. Since smoking cigarettes, Lewis says his 'vape cravings' have lessened and that he's barely thought about them. 'I know the science says vaping is less harmful, however there are still a lot of unknowns, especially related to heavy metals, microplastics, and the long term effects. Most people aren't chain-smoking one after another. So for me, it's definitely a 'healthier' choice considering that I smoke much less than I vaped.' Currently, he smokes five to 10 cigarettes a week and plans to keep an eye on it so the habit doesn't grow. He's also considered snus (a smokeless tobacco people place under their lip), but that doesn't always react well with him. The people I've interviewed aren't stupid: they know the risks, they never were chain-smokers, they think there's nuance missing from the advice for people like themselves with more socially-led habits. Dr Deborah Lee, of Dr Fox Online Pharmacy, says that yes, it's true that cigarettes contain less nicotine than many vapes. 'Some vapes contain 40 mg of nicotine — 400-600 puffs. This is equivalent to smoking one to two packs of cigarettes. Illegally sold vapes may contain even higher amounts of nicotine. So, converting from vapes to cigarettes would result in less nicotine exposure, depending on how many cigarettes are smoked.' But, Lee makes it clear this isn't where the health piece ends. 'When you light a cigarette, tobacco is burning, and you inhale cigarette smoke into your lungs which contains over 5000 noxious substances including over 50 known carcinogens. E-cigarettes and vapes deliver nicotine without exposure to the harms of cigarette smoke.' Nicotine is the lesser evil, and yet it's what many smokers tend to focus on. Vaping isn't perfect, though, and it doesn't come without its own risks to a person's health. Lee shares that a 2020 review concluded that vaping has a similar effect on respiratory and cardiac function as smoking. 'Over time, vaping causes constriction of the smaller airways and damage to the lung epithelium like smoking. Vaping also increases blood pressure and causes arterial stiffness.' Essentially, more research is needed. For a generation of people used to getting answers at the tap of a search bar, the lack of data isn't helping faith in vaping over smoking. 'While research shows the most successful ways to stop smoking involve behavioural treatment programs with nicotine replacement products (which can include vapes), varenicline and bupropion, a 2017 meta-analysis of 38 studies found that smokers were 28% less likely to quit if they used e-cigarettes. Other studies have had similar results,' Lee adds. This is where people are turning to what feels best for them personally. Ellie says going back to cigarettes helped her quit vapes in just a few days. 'If it was freezing cold or rainy outside, I'd find myself not willing to go out for a cigarette. Cigarettes helped me lessen the oral fixation as I can't smoke them at my desk, and I feel satisfied with smaller hits of nicotine spaced throughout the day. I can't imagine ever going back to vaping. The convenience of it made my addiction feel stronger and more constant than anything I'd experienced before. While I could easily finish a Juul pod in a day or so, I couldn't possibly smoke 20 American Spirits in 24 hours without feeling seriously ill.' There's no data on how effective smoking can be to quit vapes, but Ellie is giving it a try nonetheless. She wants to quit everything before turning 30. *Names have been changed to protect identities.
