Teen with brain damage at birth wins RM4.1m damages in Johor court
According to Free Malaysia Today, the court found a doctor and the owner of a private maternity home liable for medical negligence.
Judge Nurulhuda Nuraini Nor awarded RM600,000 in general damages and RM3.5 million for the teenager's future rehabilitation. His mother was also granted RM80,000 for emotional distress and anxiety.
The doctor who performed the caesarean section, along with the owner of the Johor Bahru-based maternity home, were ordered to pay RM100,000 in costs.
In her recently issued written judgment, Judge Nurulhuda said: 'The doctor is liable because he had neglected his duty of care to the mother and her baby, while the owner of the maternity home was vicariously liable.'
The court held the doctor responsible for the delay in performing the caesarean, which contributed to the child's condition.
The mother filed the suit in 2020 on behalf of her son, who remains dependent on her.
According to case facts, she had arrived at the maternity home — also functioning as a clinic — around 10am on September 28, 2009. The doctor advised a caesarean delivery due to the umbilical cord being wrapped around the baby's neck.
However, the procedure was only carried out at 7pm.
On October 1, at about 5.30am, the newborn was transferred by ambulance to Sultanah Aminah Hospital after showing signs of poor feeding, difficulty breathing and lethargy.
He was later diagnosed with severe hypoglycaemia (low blood sugar) and an infection.
Upon discharge on November 14, the baby showed symptoms of muscle stiffness and facial distortion. A subsequent examination at a private hospital confirmed he had sustained brain damage.
Due to financial constraints, the child was admitted to a government hospital for a week starting November 15. He was later referred to Hospital Kuala Lumpur on November 23, where a paediatric neurologist confirmed his neurological condition.
Lawyers R. Jayabalan, N. Jegatheesan, Christopher Tan and S. Shamilan represented the plaintiff, while B. Thinesh and Raja Eileen Soraya Raja Aman appeared for the defendants.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
8 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Court awards RM4.1mil to teen disabled at birth by delayed C-section
JOHOR BARU: A teenager who suffered severe brain damage at birth due to a delayed caesarean procedure was awarded RM4.1 million in damages by the High Court here, which found a doctor and the owner of a private maternity home liable for medical negligence. Judge Nurulhuda Nuraini Nor ruled that the 16-year-old boy, who now suffers permanent disability and is fully dependent on his mother, had been deprived of timely medical intervention after the doctor failed to perform an urgent C-section promptly. The boy was awarded RM600,000 in general damages and RM3.5 million for future rehabilitation care, while his mother received RM80,000 for emotional distress and anxiety. The court also ordered the doctor and the maternity home owner to pay RM100,000 in costs. In her written judgment, Nurulhuda held the doctor personally liable for breaching his duty of care to both mother and child, and found the owner vicariously liable for the negligence that occurred on their premises. The mother filed the lawsuit in 2020 on behalf of her son, who was born on Sept 28, 2009, at the privately run maternity clinic in Johor Baru. According to court documents, she had sought help at the centre around 10am, where the doctor advised a C-section due to the umbilical cord being wrapped around the baby's neck. However, the surgery was not performed until 7pm, -a delay the court found inexcusable. The newborn was sent to the Sultanah Aminah Hospital at 5.30am on Oct 1, 2009, after he displayed signs of lethargy, poor sucking reflex, and breathing difficulty. He was diagnosed with severe hypoglycaemia and infection. Later assessments confirmed he had suffered irreversible brain damage. Despite temporary discharge, the baby's condition deteriorated and he was eventually referred to the Kuala Lumpur Hospital, where a consultant child neurologist confirmed the extent of the injury. The defendants represented by counsel B Thinesh and Raja Eileen Soraya Raja Aman, have since filed an appeal against the decision.
New Straits Times
8 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Court awards RM4.1mil to teen disabled by delayed C-section
JOHOR BARU: A teenager who suffered severe brain damage at birth due to a delayed caesarean procedure was awarded RM4.1 million in damages by the High Court here, which found a doctor and the owner of a private maternity home liable for medical negligence. Judge Nurulhuda Nuraini Nor ruled that the 16-year-old boy, who now suffers permanent disability and is fully dependent on his mother, had been deprived of timely medical intervention after the doctor failed to perform an urgent C-section promptly. The boy was awarded RM600,000 in general damages and RM3.5 million for future rehabilitation care, while his mother received RM80,000 for emotional distress and anxiety. The court also ordered the doctor and the maternity home owner to pay RM100,000 in costs. In her written judgment, Nurulhuda held the doctor personally liable for breaching his duty of care to both mother and child, and found the owner vicariously liable for the negligence that occurred on their premises. The mother filed the lawsuit in 2020 on behalf of her son, who was born on Sept 28, 2009, at the privately run maternity clinic in Johor Baru. According to court documents, she had sought help at the centre around 10am, where the doctor advised a C-section due to the umbilical cord being wrapped around the baby's neck. However, the surgery was not performed until 7pm, -a delay the court found inexcusable. The newborn was sent to the Sultanah Aminah Hospital at 5.30am on Oct 1, 2009, after he displayed signs of lethargy, poor sucking reflex, and breathing difficulty. He was diagnosed with severe hypoglycaemia and infection. Later assessments confirmed he had suffered irreversible brain damage. Despite temporary discharge, the baby's condition deteriorated and he was eventually referred to the Kuala Lumpur Hospital, where a consultant child neurologist confirmed the extent of the injury. The defendants represented by counsel B Thinesh and Raja Eileen Soraya Raja Aman, have since filed an appeal against the decision. The plaintiff was represented by lawyers R. Jayabalan, N. Jegatheesan, Christopher Tan, and S. Shamilan.
Malay Mail
8 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Drug price transparency kicks in at private clinics and pharmacies, full enforcement by January 2026
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 3 — The Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Ministry of Domestic Trade and Cost of Living (KPDN) are implementing the drug price display initiative at private health facilities and community pharmacies in stages starting August 1. According to a joint statement by both ministries, the initiative, which was implemented under the Price Control and Anti-Profiteering (Price Marking of Medicines) Order 2025 [P.U.(A) 141/2025] under the Price Control and Anti-Profiteering Act 2011, began on May 1. The statement said the educational enforcement approach was implemented in the first three months ending July 31. 'During the period, 842 facilities consisting of medical clinics, dental clinics and private hospitals as well as community pharmacies were inspected and the majority of them have implemented this initiative with 57 per cent of them complying with the requirements for satisfactory drug price display,' according to the statement. In this regard, enforcement will continue in stages from August 1 through educational approach inspections and advocacy for two months until September 30 and a reminder letter may be issued in the event of non-compliance. According to the statement, starting October 1, compounds would be issued for repeat offences before full enforcement on January 1, 2026. MOH and KPDN also took note of the judicial review action filed in the High Court by seven organisations representing medical and dental practitioners and one private medical practitioner regarding the validity of Order PU (A) 141/2025. 'However, until this statement is issued, there is no court order directing the suspension of the implementation or enforcement of this order. Therefore, Order P.U.(A) 141/2025 remains valid and in force,' according to the statement. MOH and KPDN also expressed their commitment to implement the initiative in an inclusive, phased and prudent manner to ensure that its benefits are enjoyed by consumers and contribute to increasing transparency, accountability and trust in the country's health system. — Bernama
