logo
Music industry figures rally behind Queensland music award winner after pro-Palestine controversy

Music industry figures rally behind Queensland music award winner after pro-Palestine controversy

The Guardian31-03-2025
More than 2,000 people in the music industry have signed a petition supporting a jazz musician and composer whose winning entry River to Sea in the 2025 Queensland Music Awards prompted Brisbane city council to revoke its funding of the annual event.
Australian pianist Jayson Gillham, who is locked in a legal battle with the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra, also issued a statement on Monday, condemning Kellee Green's case as yet another troubling example of the suppression of political expression by Australian artists.
Green attracted criticism after her political stance on the conflict in Gaza was called into question after her win at the state music awards last Tuesday for her instrumental composition.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
The Brisbane-based artist, who is also a teacher at the private Catholic girls' school Brigidine College in Indooroopilly, delivered an acceptance speech at the awards, during which she accused the Australian government of being complicit in war crimes 'by allowing the export of weapons and weapon parts to Israel to directly kill innocent Palestinian men, women, and children'.
She ended the speech with the phrase 'from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free'.
Both the Queensland branch of the Independent Education Union and the school declined to comment on Monday. The school's principal, Brendan Cahill, issued a statement to students' parents last week saying Green had agreed to take leave from the school and had given him assurances she had not made any political statements to students. The school had also reached out to the Queensland Jewish Board of Deputies, Cahill said in the letter, and was further investigating Green's 'personal musical recordings'.
Green has not commented publicly on her awards speech or her departure from the school.
Last week, the lord mayor of Brisbane, Adrian Schrinner, pulled the council's $25,000 funding for the awards.
'Music should be a positive force that brings people together, not tear them apart,' the Lord Mayor's statement said.
A further $450,000 in annual funding to the awards' organiser, QMusic, is now under review, with the state government's arts minister, John-Paul Langbroek, demanding an explanation from the organisation why the awards were allowed to become a platform for 'divisive commentary'.
'I will be questioning the awards process, current eligibility criteria, and comments made at the awards ceremony,' Langbroek said in a statement.
QMusic's chief executive, Kris Stewart, did not respond to the Guardian's queries on Monday.
The petition, launched by Taiwanese-Australian composer musician Matt Hsu, the founder of Brisbane's Obscure Orchestra, criticises both the 'inflammatory' and 'unfounded' claims by Schrinner, and a subsequent statement from Stewart, who said music awards should not be a 'platform for political debate'.
Hsu told Guardian Australia on Monday QMusic was using the guise of neutrality to curb artists' freedom of expression.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'QMusic should be taking a more powerful stance in support of musicians,' he said.
Stewart responded to Hsu's criticisms directly, saying in an email to him on Monday he was meeting with QMusic's board to discuss the issue.
'I've wrestled a lot with this over the last few days – actually, that's probably an understatement,' Stewart said in the email.
'I need to acknowledge that I probably have some gaps in my own cultural understanding around both sides of this debate. I'm heartbroken that we can't quite seem to find respectful ways to have a conversation on this, one in which artists should be centred, and that it seems to have become so politically divisive in our country, a place for freedom of expression and thought has always been central to our national character.'
Gillham, who is suing the MSO after it cancelled a performance after his onstage support for the people of Palestine last August, said on Monday he was deeply alarmed and concerned about the increasing pressure being applied to cultural organisations to silence and deplatform artists who make public statements in support of Palestine.
'The recent decision by Lord Mayor Adrian Schrinner to withdraw Brisbane city council funding from the Queensland Music Awards following pianist Kellee Green's acceptance speech – in which she spoke about the suffering of Palestinian civilians and urged peaceful protest and action – is yet another example of this troubling trend,' he said.
'Attempts to label such speech as 'hate' in order to suppress political expression are not only damaging to individual artists, but also to the health and integrity of our cultural institutions and public discourse.
'Now, more than ever, we must uphold the principles of artistic freedom, open dialogue, and the right to speak out against injustice – especially within the arts.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Investors need certainty to build the homes Scotland needs
Investors need certainty to build the homes Scotland needs

Scotsman

time26 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Investors need certainty to build the homes Scotland needs

We must unlock the investment that would deliver new housing, says ​​Colin Brown Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... In May 2024, the Scottish Parliament declared a national 'housing emergency' with some councils also declaring a housing emergency in their areas. The announcement of the emergency came two months after the Scottish Government laid the Housing (Scotland) Bill before the Scottish Parliament. The Bill continues to work its way through Holyrood and is expected to come into force later this year. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Observers in the world of institutional investment and those working in the sector have been watching the progress of the Bill with interest. Of particular concern to investors are proposals around rent controls. ​Colin Brown is a Partner at TLT To give one example that has occurred recently – a London-based investment firm, was about to commit many millions of pounds to its first Scottish investment before discovering that a committee considering the Bill had voted to include purpose-built student accommodation as subject to statutory rent controls. All of the financial appraisals the firm had undertaken in making the decision to invest in Scotland were potentially being ripped up by MSPs and they had no power to do anything about this. In this situation, the Scottish Government moved quickly to make clear it would not support rent control for purpose-built student accommodation. Whilst the project is now starting to come out of the ground it remains to be seen whether they consider Scotland a safe haven for future investment. The rental income which institutional investors derive from their investments in bricks and mortar helps to fund many individuals' pensions. The investors need to understand that in exchange for making their money available they will get a return on their investment and this return has generally been left to market forces – the law of supply and demand. The housing emergency should make investment in new build housing in Scotland a win-win. The country gets much-needed new housing to alleviate the emergency, and the investment funds get to deploy their capital to deliver housing and make a return on their investment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In the UK in the first quarter of this year £1.2 billion was invested in private rental accommodation with the potential for £6bn to be invested by the end of the year. 76 per cent of this investment is being directed outside London, with Manchester, Birmingham, and Leeds leading the way. Every penny of this investment creates new housing and sustains and creates job opportunities. The fact that Scotland has not been able to open the investment tap when cities in England are seeing private rental accommodation expand, could be seen as a missed opportunity. In launching the latest consultation, the Social Justice Secretary acknowledges that rental properties are a crucial element of the efforts to tackle the housing emergency. Government policy has slowed investment into the sector in recent years and resulted in lower investor confidence in providing much-needed housing. Rent caps and controls are of course not universally despised and a balance must be struck between protecting tenants and unlocking the investment that delivers the new housing. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The latest consultation on exemptions for certain types of properties from rent control closed earlier this month. There will be investors with capital looking for a home waiting to see if the legislative and political environment in Scotland means they should be deploying more of this in Scotland or continuing to explore opportunities which guarantee a better return elsewhere.

John Swinney says an SNP majority at Holyrood is needed for a second independence referendum
John Swinney says an SNP majority at Holyrood is needed for a second independence referendum

Daily Record

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Record

John Swinney says an SNP majority at Holyrood is needed for a second independence referendum

EXCLUSIVE: The First Minister has laid out his plan to secure another referendum after the first vote in 2014. John Swinney has declared the SNP will need to win a Holyrood majority next year to secure a second independence referendum. ‌ In a major shift, the First Minister has moved away from Nicola Sturgeon's position of claiming a majority of SNP and Green MSPs is enough for indyref2. ‌ He will table a motion to his party's conference arguing that the SNP winning outright is the mechanism for triggering another referendum. ‌ Sturgeon's SNP fell short of winning on their own in 2021, but she demanded indyref2 after her party and the pro-independence Greens won a majority of MSPs. Westminster knocked back her call and the Supreme Court later ruled that indyref2 is outwith Holyrood's powers. Swinney will now go back to the approach of former SNP First Minister Alex Salmond fourteen years ago. ‌ Salmond secured an outright majority for the SNP at the 2011 Holyrood election, a result that led to a joint agreement with the UK Government on a referendum. In his column for the Daily Record, Swinney wrote: 'For us to achieve that independence, the first step is to secure a legal referendum recognised by all. In 2011 we secured that reliable and dependable route when the SNP achieved a majority of seats at Holyrood. 'That is the only mechanism that has been proven to deliver such a vote - so that is what we need to deliver again. ‌ 'That is why I have submitted a motion to the SNP conference proposing that we work to deliver a majority of SNP MSPs in the Scottish Parliament to secure that referendum on Independence. 'The SNP has high ambitions for Scotland, and we must be bold to deliver on those ambitions. We must be ready to follow the path which we know can lead us to an independent state.' Swinney has been under pressure to produce a route map and strategy for delivering independence. ‌ Senior activists believe the Supreme Court decision created a vacuum that the Scottish Government has struggled to fill. A senior SNP source said the Government still believed an SNP/Green majority 'should' be enough for indyref2, but the experience of the past four years showed 'this is not going to happen'. The insider claimed the new position is a 'pragmatic' change based on an outcome the pro-UK parties could not ignore. ‌ Swinney's Record column also underlines his personal commitment to a referendum as the route to independence. Some independence activists believe an SNP majority at either Holyrood or Westminster is enough to deliver independence without another vote. The source said Swinney is firmly of the view there must be a referendum. ‌ Scottish Lib Dem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton said: "At last year's election the SNP took an all mighty beating because people were tired of them obsessing over one issue. It seems like John Swinney is a glutton for punishment. "Perhaps rather than focusing on what the SNP membership cares about, he should focus on what the country needs. The health service and the state of our schools has been neglected for too long because all the SNP care about is breaking up the UK." Scottish Tory Deputy Leader Rachael Hamilton said: ' John Swinney is like a broken record on this divisive issue. He should stop trying to placate the fanatics in his own party and accept the fact that most Scots firmly rejected the SNP 's plans to break up the UK and have no desire to revisit them. 'Instead, he should be trying to repair the immense damage his party's policies have inflicted on Scotland's economy and essential services such as our schools and NHS.'

We're (finally) making moves: Australia just achieved its best gender equality ranking in history
We're (finally) making moves: Australia just achieved its best gender equality ranking in history

Time Out

time6 hours ago

  • Time Out

We're (finally) making moves: Australia just achieved its best gender equality ranking in history

Australia still has a long road ahead when it comes to gender equality – but we're all about celebrating the small wins. This year, we've climbed from 24th to 13th place in the World Economic Forum's Global Gender Gap Report. It's our highest-ever ranking out of 148 countries, and proof that we're heading in the right direction. Now in its 19th edition, the 2025 Global Gender Gap Index tracks countries against four key benchmarks: economic participation and opportunity, educational attainment, health and survival, and political empowerment. Australia's 13th-place ranking marks our best performance since the report launched in 2006, and is a huge leap from our record-low 50th place in 2021. Australia's rise in the rankings was largely driven by improvements in political empowerment, where we placed 19th overall – including 30th for the percentage of women in parliament and eighth for women in ministerial roles. We also came 32nd in economic participation and opportunity, with standout results in labour-force participation (21st) and the proportion of professional and technical workers (joint first), where the gender gap was just 9.78 per cent. When it comes to education, Australia scored top marks – ranking joint first in literacy, primary education and university enrolment. However, our overall ranking of 79th in this category was dragged down by lower enrolment rates in secondary education. We also have progress to make in the health and survival category, with Australia slipping from 88th to 96th, driven by women facing a lower healthy life expectancy. Minister for Women Katy Gallagher said, 'Whether it is investing in women's wages and economic opportunities, investing in sexual and reproductive healthcare, or investing in policies to address women's safety and tackling gender-based violence, our government is backing up words with action…However, we know there is always more work to do, and this report will help to inform our work on gender equality over the next three years.' While not reflected in this year's report, the May election saw the first majority-women cabinet in Australian history and the highest proportion of women in government, including 56 per cent of Labor reps. Iceland retained its top spot on the Global Gender Gap Index for the 16th year running, followed by Finland, Norway, the United Kingdom and New Zealand. And while the global gender gap has narrowed to 68.8 per cent, the report estimates it will still take around 123 years to reach full equality. These are the 15 best countries for gender equality Iceland Finland Norway United Kingdom New Zealand Sweden Republic of Moldova Namibia Germany Ireland Estonia Spain Australia Denmark Barbados Stay in the loop: sign up for our free Time Out Australia newsletter for more news, travel inspo and activity ideas, straight to your inbox. 🏝️ Fun fact: Australia has 8,222 islands — and you probably never knew they existed ✈️ Australia has one of the most powerful passports in the entire world for 2025 🥳

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store