
Carney effect: The G-7's new cast bodes well for the world's future
As military warfare grew menacing and fearsome in June, the 50th anniversary G-7 meeting in mid-June became a non-event. But because it was held in Canada during a Canadian presidency of the G-7, it highlighted the arrival on the world stage of Mark Carney, the new prime minister of the host country, who has a global reputation for foresight and adroit management of economic turbulence.
As military warfare grew menacing and fearsome in June, the 50th anniversary G-7 meeting in mid-June became a non-event. But because it was held in Canada during a Canadian presidency of the G-7, it highlighted the arrival on the world stage of Mark Carney, the new prime minister of the host country, who has a global reputation for foresight and adroit management of economic turbulence.
Carney could mark an important start in recognition by the G-7 leadership of the role they must play in the fight to contain the usage of—and damage from—fossil fuels.
Paradoxically, the immediate fallout feared from the West Asia war was that it would choke supplies of those very fuels on which we in India, and the rest of the world, depend so critically for our day-to-day needs. War itself is the most wasteful and indiscriminate use of fossil fuels.
Carney has the distinction of having been governor not merely of the Bank of Canada over a five-year term from 2008 to 2013 beginning six months prior to the global financial crisis, but subsequently of the hoary Bank of England over the seven years from 2013 to 2020, which covered Brexit in 2016 and post-Brexit political turmoil.
He holds a doctoral degree in economics from Oxford University. Economists like to believe that members of their profession, with the requisite macroeconomic understanding and skills, can effectively steer the monetary authority of any country.
Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | Carney's poll vault: India's impressed too
In the event, Carney's tenure as governor of the Bank of England was hugely successful. His reputation for having anticipated the global crisis of September 2008 as governor of the Bank of Canada with a policy rate cut clearly weighed in the decision to appoint him. But then again, he did not face as onerous a task as his counterpart Ben Bernanke in the US. Canadian banks had not been plunged like those in the US, because of stringent banking regulation (by an independent regulatory agency).
The British trust in Carney was well rewarded. Brexit was so messy and politically fraught that the only stable overseeing authority was the Bank of England under a Canadian governor. The late Stanley Fischer also held monetary policy responsibility in the US and Israel, but both were home countries for him.
Carney is, therefore, unique for having been invited on the strength of his known professional competence alone to steer economic policy in a major country other than his own. As Prime Minister of Canada, he can paint on a larger canvas. The G-7 is a club of first movers on fossil fuel usage and it can lead the way to contain the damage that has resulted.
Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | The G7's China alarm suits India
India, projected to be among the worst affected by global warming, was fortunately among the invitees to the June G-7 meeting. The meeting was overshadowed by compelling events for the host Prime Minister to shift to longer-term—albeit urgent—issues. But evidence of his line of thinking is obtainable from his speeches at the annual Jackson Hole meetings in the US of central bankers, where in 2019 he spoke of the need for concerted action on climate change.
As Canada's Prime Minister, he seemingly went into reverse gear when his first move was to end a nation-wide carbon consumer tax introduced in 2019, which had replaced an earlier patchwork of uneven province-level carbon taxation.
The new levy structure continued to be complicated (it was more of an administered price floor than a tax), and was unpopular despite rebates for poorer households. Carney did, however, retain the tax on large industrial emitters, including the all-powerful oil industry, and cleverly revamped it to incentivize emission reduction directly at the point of emission.
The reformed package is simpler, jettisons the previous parallel focus on revenue generation, and shifts the focus decisively towards the green objective. It is a brilliant example of effective taxation reform towards a single clearly defined objective.
Also Read: Why economist-turned-politician Mark Carney is Canada's big hope
Carney, as Prime Minister, has spoken of a low carbon housing policy favouring densification over housing sprawl. This is the direction in which settlement patterns in North America must move, but for a politician to even enunciate his support takes courage. However, any reduction in energy intensity can only result from incremental change in the location of housing, which is a slow process.
Also, at the 2019 Jackson Hole meeting, Carney suggested a new synthetic currency, as a network of central bank digital currencies, to replace the US dollar in trade invoicing.
I had difficulty at the time visualizing how that system might work, and why a readily available substitute like Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) might not do as well. Trade invoicing has to be easily understood and operable. But the actual system suggested is not as important as the sponsorship of the idea by a G-7 member.
The G-7 2025 meeting was held in Kananaskis, a 'treaty region' granted to the original tribal residents of Canada. The location offers hope that G-7 countries will take on board the obligations of winners and recognize that when disruptive events take hold, even the winners lose.
The G-7 presidency will pass on to France next year and thereafter to the US.
The author is an economist. Topics You May Be Interested In
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
From The Hindu, July 4, 1925: The situation in China
Canton, July 3: A Commission of 16 persons has been formed to conduct the National Government including the son of the late Dr. Sun Yat Sen, as a Minister of Communications. The oath adjures the Commission to follow Dr. Sun Yat Sen's political will. All foreign consuls except the British and French were invited.


Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Ennoventure's Invisible Tech- Powers Global Brand Trust
Blurb: Ennoventure, Inc. is transforming global brand protection with invisible cryptographic signatures on packaging, empowering consumers and businesses to combat counterfeiting using just a smartphone. In a digital-first world increasingly plagued by counterfeit products, Ennoventure, Inc. is redefining brand protection through innovation that's both smart and invisible. Headquartered in Massachusetts with operations in Dubai and India, this SaaS company is quietly powering some of the world's biggest brands with cutting-edge packaging authentication technology. At the heart of Ennoventure's solution is its patented invisible signature, powered by artificial intelligence and cryptography. This encrypted layer is embedded into product packaging without requiring any changes to existing production lines—a key differentiator that has helped Ennoventure gain rapid traction across industries such as FMCG, pharmaceuticals, automotive spare parts, agrochemicals, and industrial goods. The technology operates through Ennteract, Ennoventure's end-to-end SaaS platform that enables brands to secure packaging with invisible signatures, while also offering deep analytics about product scans across geographies. At the consumer end, the Vyu mobile application—customisable and user-friendly—allows anyone with a smartphone to instantly verify product authenticity by simply scanning the packaging. With this seamless integration, Ennoventure is addressing not just the issue of counterfeit goods but also closing the information gap between manufacturers and consumers. Scans can reveal not only authenticity but also vital product details like manufacturing date, ingredients, expiry, and safety information. Speaking to The Hans India Padmakumar Nair Founder and CEO of Ennoventure, said, 'The moment that sparked it was a conversation at MIT,', 'A classmate shared how a child dies every five minutes in Africa due to counterfeit antimalarial drugs. That statistics shook me. It revealed the devastating human cost of fake products, especially in pharmaceuticals.' This emotional realisation quickly transformed into a mission-driven venture. 'We didn't want to build another expensive, disruptive solution. We needed something simple, scalable, and powerful—something that could work with what brands already have. That's how the idea of embedding an invisible cryptographic signature on packaging was born,' Nair explains. The post-COVID landscape—with its accelerated shift to online shopping—has only magnified the urgency for such solutions. In India alone, counterfeiting causes economic losses estimated to exceed ₹1 lakh crore annually. Sectors like pharma and FMCG are particularly vulnerable. Yet with smartphone usage and digital awareness at an all-time high, the moment is ripe for consumer-driven verification mechanisms. 'Today, Ennoventure is not just protecting brands. We're enabling trust throughout the supply chain—from manufacturers to end-users,' says Nair. The company's commitment to scale is backed by robust investor confidence, with $13.9 million raised so far. Its clientele spans the US, Europe, the Middle East, and South Asia, with applications ranging from personal care products to industrial components. Behind Ennoventure's technological edge is a team of experts. Prasenjit Ghoshal, Head of Engineering, brings cross-domain expertise in security, finance, and telecom, while Nikhil Narayan, VP of Data Science, leads innovation in computer vision with a decade of R&D experience and multiple patents to his name. The road ahead looks promising. With billions of product packages already carrying Ennoventure's invisible signature, the company is setting new benchmarks for scalable, cost-efficient, and covert anti-counterfeit systems. 'Our journey from prototype to deployment has been incredibly fulfilling,' says Nair. 'We've stayed true to our founding principle—solving real-world problems through innovation. While we're proud of our progress, we're even more excited about what lies ahead. The fight against counterfeiting is far from over, but we're committed to leading it—one secure package at a time.'


The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Diminishing the idea of a university
While speaking of the idea of a university, one actually speaks of an 'ideal', that is, what a university is expected to be doing to justify its own existence as a university. As John Henry Newman, a 19th century British academic, argued, a university is the place where a certain type of valuable activity is supposed to be happening. It is the place where meaningful and productive exploration of ideas is expected to take place, where truth is sought and where critical imagination is deployed to engage with issues that confront society (which can be taken as a valuable activity). At a fundamental level, the essential duty of a university is to search for the 'truth', however unpalatable it may be. If a university is simply busy trying to follow the dominant narratives prevalent in society uncritically and unreflexively, it will necessarily lose sight of what it is supposed to look for — the truth. One of the most important things a university is supposed to promote is critical imagination, an ability to raise questions, however, unpalatable they may be, to the powerful and hegemonic sections of society. This will involve resisting the 'banking concept of education', in the language of Paulo Freire, a Brazilian educator and philosopher. What this means is that a university is not like a bank where people go and deposit money and it simply accepts that. He argued that the basic aim of education should be to 'conscientise the conscience' of those who are receiving education, not merely fill their minds with information which they are expected to receive uncritically. A university is the place where every idea or perspective is interrogated and accepted only when it stands the test of reason and criticality. Critical engagement with ideas is the basis of a healthy education. The question which comes to mind is whether or not universities are really encouraging their students and teachers to express themselves freely without any hindrance, and critical thinking is actively promoted. In the absence of an enabling environment, pursuing critical engagement with ideas will be difficult. In this context, there are a couple of things which need closer attention, though there are a few others such as a severe shortage of funds and dilution of autonomy in the name of ill-defined accountability, which are equally important but need to be dealt with separately. Rising intolerance First, there is an increasing intolerance of oppositional ideas and positions, which appears to be a global phenomenon now. When university teachers can be arrested on the basis of gross misinterpretation of what they say or write and when universities (Harvard, for example) are being penalised for taking a position in favour of those who are subjected to systematic and methodical elimination (Palestine), it is time to think what we are doing to universities. It must be remembered that any damage to the health of universities will cause irreparable damage to the health of societies in the long run. Any stifling and criminalisation of dissent on the campuses will produce universities which are conformist and afraid of expressing their point of view which will only stunt growth and development of society. Ideally, universities are spaces where contending viewpoints are advanced and allowed to contest one another. But what one is seeing on the university campuses is the shrinkage of those spaces because of fear of repercussions. Fear is increasingly being weaponised against oppositional positions and ideas. Critical enquiry is being vilified as an act of subversion. A university is supposed to be the home of 'public intellectuals', who pursue not only their academic engagements seriously but also reflect, speak and write on issues which concern all especially the marginalised and weaker sections of society such as minorities, Dalits and women. Public intellectuals are expected to take an unequivocal and uncompromising position in favour of fundamental values of dignified social existence such as freedom, equality and justice and certainly they need to speak up against injustice and discrimination. It is indeed a matter of serious reflection whether universities as they are today are able to produce such public intellectuals or not. There is a strong need to reimagine universities as spaces of articulation of dissent and critical point of view on public issues which concern all of us. Confining oneself to one's own disciplinary concerns and not reflecting on issues which concern society at large will reduce university spaces to those of ivory towers, not organically related to the societal issues. Commodification of education The increasing commodification of education, which is another factor, is severely impacting the critical quality of higher education. Higher education is seen as a commodity to be bought and sold on the market. What this means is that education is no longer pursued for its own sake, for a playful and meaningful engagement with ideas. What is happening on an increasing scale is that the use value of education, or knowledge for the sake of greater understanding of the reality around us, is being replaced by the exchange value, or how much income one can generate from the qualification. Clearly, the market has become a great determinant of which degree is desirable and which is not. A serious implication of this is that it has made education an unreflective and unreflexive activity. Critical engagement with ideas is discouraged and in fact is considered irrelevant. One of the offshoots of increasing commodification of education is the growing clamour to figure at the top in any system of ranking of universities. This ignores the fact that any system of ranking only contributes further to the commodification of education (a degree from a certain university or institute is a must for getting a good job) and tends to adopt homogenising (one size fits all) and hegemonising (publications in journals located within the West almost become mandatory) criteria. Of course, it goes without saying that the growing commodification of education is closely aligned with neoliberal reforms. Educational reforms that are being attempted today are such that they correspond to the desired changes in the economic regime thus ably functioning as an effective 'ideological state apparatus', to use an expression from Louis Althusser, who was a French Marxist philosopher. If universities are not to become irrelevant, it is critically important that they become spaces of reason, debate, free enquiry and a playful engagement with ideas instead of contributing to the growing commodification of education. (Professor D.V. Kumar teaches Sociology at the Department of Sociology, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. Views are personal)