
Starmer is a clueless, cowardly windsock whose deceit has taken him from loveless landslide to landfill
FOR what it is worth, I am neither surprised nor disappointed by Sir Keir Starmer's calamitous first year as Prime Minister.
Sir Shifty was always going to be a dud in Downing Street just as he was in opposition.
What has really shocked me — along with millions of Sun readers — is his swift and spiteful attack on the social fabric which binds our nation and our trust in democracy.
On July 4 last year, Britain carelessly elected an activist regime, whose sole but unstated objective is to unravel everything that makes us British.
In the blink of an eye we have been divided by a narrow socialist cult against an overwhelming majority of decent, fair-minded law-abiding citizens.
We are being routinely lied to, ordered to believe the unbelievable and threatened with jail if we refuse.
For all his fine words to Nato and to Parliament, Starmer and his socialist rabble are intent on attacking the foundations of our democracy — the rule of law and the defence of the nation.
Left-wing zealots
Thin-skinned Starmer is not just clueless as a political leader. He is a coward who runs like a yellow streak from every tough decision that crosses his desk.
Indeed, our windsock PM has just surrendere d even the pretence of leadership. This week, he became the publicly humiliated hostage of the Corbynite left he once boasted of defeating.
Close to collapse, Downing Street has abjectly surrendered over a piffling £5billion cut in the bloated welfare bill. This places Starmer at the mercy of Jeremy's loony left.
Two-Tier Keir might continue to strut the world stage as an international statesman. But this emperor has no clothes.
If he cannot cut a few quid off the handouts to nine million people on employment-related benefits, how can he persuade left-wing zealots to cough up billions for defence? Or to cut illegal immigration and 'smash the gangs'?
The people smugglers backed by the Kremlin's Vladimir Putin — as The Sun revealed this week — will keep sending us tens of thousands of bearded young men of fighting age.
Corbynites do not believe in borders. Nor do they believe in crime and punishment — unless there is a Tory in the dock.
Sir Shifty stubbornly defied calls for a proper inquiry into the rape of thousands of white teenage girls by mainly Pakistani gangs in mainly Labour-controlled authorities.
Cabinet ministers were licensed to smear protesters as 'far right dog-whistlers'. A backlash was inevitable.
Thousands of angry voters fled from Labour. Along with Tory defectors, they swelled the ranks of Reform UK and turned insurgent Nigel Farage into the man most likely to be our next PM. Now, in a screeching U-turn, there will be a national grooming gang inquiry after all. So, landslide to landfill in a single year.
Farage is entitled to celebrate. He has reaped the whirlwind from the collapse of two-party politics.
Still, Reform has only five MPs and virtually nobody in the House of Lords.
Nor is it any consolation that Labour's Pyrrhic victory last July was entirely due to 14 years of dismal Tory failure. David Cameron, George Osborne, Theresa May, Liz Truss and — not least — Boris Johnson have much to answer for.
4
Along with Rishi Sunak, Boris hammered the final nails into the Tory coffin with Covid lockdowns and one million new migrants in a single year.
The result was a great Fourth of July belch of anti-Tory revulsion, which handed Labour class warriors their 'loveless landslide' and absolute power for five years.
We know now that it was a victory based on lies.
Deceit runs through Starmer's brand of politics like 'Brighton' through a stick of rock.
Deceit is more than telling blatant porkies, such as promising not to raise tax or National Insurance.
It means concealing the truth, like Labour's plan to axe the Winter Fuel Allowance.
It involves gaslighting — coercing people to believe in fairytales, such as green energy, bending the knee to Black Lives Matter or claiming women can have a penis.
And there are petty deceits, such as the gifts to our multi-millionaire PM of free suits and specs, and designer frocks for Lady Starmer, from an ambitious party donor.
Sir Shifty stubbornly defied calls for a proper inquiry into the rape of thousands of white teenage girls by mainly Pakistani gangs in mainly Labour-controlled authorities.
Starmer's Labour was deep in such tacky mire before last year's election, and it has continued in that style since.
We were told porkies about £20billion 'black holes' in Britain's genuinely improving economy.
We were promised the 'adults were back in charge', only to see Chancellor Rachel Reeves send borrowing into orbit while trashing our reputation as a magnet for foreign investment.
We were told lies about gifting the strategically vital Chagos islands to China's military ally, Mauritius, with the true cost to the taxpayer being in excess of £30BILLION over 99 years.
Starmer promised Labour would repair the sacred NHS, only for Health Secretary Wes Streeting to admit it is getting worse.
But if there is one single issue that sums up the cant, hypocrisy and contempt for voters by both major parties, it is the flood of uncontrolled mass immigration.
4
4
Labour's traditional working class supporters, many in Red Wall seats, were shamed and silenced after Gordon Brown opened the floodgates to cheap imported labour.
Those daring to protest are slandered as 'racist' or 'Islamophobic'.
Yet the UK population has boomed by millions since, with a dire impact on the wages and living standards of voters Labour took for granted.
Rightly or wrongly — rightly in my view — voters believe this inevitable clash of cultures has led to dangerous divisions in cities and major towns.
It remains shocking that police failed to act against Pakistani grooming gangs for fear of stoking 'community tensions'.
Growing anger
Last year's Southport riots, stridently denounced by Starmer, were blamed on police silence over the racial background of the man who fatally stabbed three schoolgirls at a Taylor Swift dance class.
There is growing anger over Labour's plans to create new blasphemy laws, meaning criticism of Islam would be a criminal offence, while police turn a blind eye to intimidation by pro-Palestinian protesters.
Keir Starmer is a lifelong pro-Palestinian. His party and his government are beholden to Muslims who vote Labour.
Labour lives in fear of moves by Muslim hardliners to set up their own party in Parliament with enough MPs to dictate coalition terms.
The question now is whether Starmer can cling on for four more years as Prime Minister.
Can his Labour government survive in power?
More to the point, how do we as a country escape from the vicious cocktail of tension, deceit and distrust created not just by Sir Shifty's Labour, but by every government since Tony Blair took office in 1997?
People want to feel change so speed up delivery. There is still time to turn it around
By David Blunkett, Former Home Secretary
IF I wrote here that everything had gone well in the last year in politics, you would stop reading.
So this is an honest appraisal of how I think the Government, which I support, has fared since winning the election on July 4.
The first big decision, which was intended to secure the confidence of the international bond markets, created a major political hit.
Namely, the now-reversed decision on Winter Fuel Allowance, affecting up to 10million people in retirement.
The intention was to offer economic rectitude and stability, but the consequence was an immediate collapse in popularity.
This was matched by the 'miserabilist' messages that they were picking up the pieces from years of chaos.
It was true that there were major gaps in public finances, which somehow had to be filled if services weren't to fall apart.
But the electorate had already got that message.
That's why, across the whole of the country, the Conservatives lost so badly.
What people wanted was hope, and what they got was downbeat at best, doom and gloom at worst.
Steadying the ship and balancing the books is worthy, but in a world of political turmoil, of populists and chancers, the electorate were looking for precisely what Keir Starmer had promised — 'change'.
The truth is, there has been genuine action to put things right. Enormous cash for the NHS; a commitment to a dramatic housebuilding target; and investment in transport, clean energy and education to bring success in the long term.
The problem is that they are 'long term' at a moment when so many people are looking for dramatic improvement in the here and now.
That is why the opinion polls are so devastating for the two traditional mainstream political parties.
As with American President Donald Trump, the audacious, bizarre, sometimes off-the-wall and completely incredible catch people's attention.
The 'same old' of tinkering and ticking along feels like business as usual.
But it is 'business as usual' that many people just do not want.
So, if the first 12 months have been a learning curve, what are the lessons for the years ahead?
Quite simply, build on what you've done best.
'The best' includes Britain's standing on the world stage.
Dealing with world security and defence; alliances to tackle conflict across the world; reaching trade deals and even managing to square the circle of relationships with the US President.
All of this in the last six months has been both impressive and vitally necessary.
More of this decisiveness, and grasping of nettles here at home, would make all the difference.
For instance, stop using phrases like 'working at pace' and actually get on with the job. One of the features of the last year, and long before that, is a kind of inertia.
I'm sure that civil servants genuinely believe they're working hard. I'm sure that ministers believe they have joined up policies and that, when they pull a lever, something is happening on the ground.
For millions of voters, however, nothing has changed.
That is why action in the pipeline now needs to be accelerated.
That is why relentless focus on delivery at local level is so vital, and tangible change in the lives of men and women who can only watch on as global conflict and turmoil unfold.
However — and it has to be said — not everything is down to government.
The lousy service you receive (public or private), gross incompetence and indifference to the wellbeing of others is as likely to be the fault of someone living down your street as it is elected politicians.
This government has three years to demonstrate that they can really make a difference.
Three years in which to stop Reform UK leader Nigel Farage deluding the nation into believing there are simple and easy answers to the greatest questions of our time.
Failure to live up to those expectations or get it wrong, the consequences will be felt for generations to come.
Self-evidently, I didn't get everything right in my time in government.
So, learning from mistakes and shifting up a gear is the way forward for Keir Starmer and his ministerial team.
There is still time to turn this around.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
37 minutes ago
- Reuters
Tens of thousands expected to attend Budapest Pride in defiance of ban
BUDAPEST, June 28 (Reuters) - Tens of thousands of LGBTQ+ rights supporters are expected to attend the Budapest Pride march on Saturday, defying a police ban as the event has become a symbol of the years-long struggle between Hungary's nationalist government and civil society. Prime Minister Viktor Orban's government has gradually curtailed the rights of the LGBTQ+ community in the past decade, and its lawmakers passed a law in March that allows for the ban of Pride, citing the need to protect children. Opponents see the move as part of a wider crackdown on democratic freedoms ahead of a general election next year when Orban will face a strong opposition challenger. Organizers said they expect tens of thousands to attend, with participants arriving from 30 different countries, including European Commissioner for Equality Hadja Lahbib and about 70 members of the European Parliament. More than 30 embassies have expressed support for the march and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen called on Hungarian authorities to let the parade go ahead. Seventy Hungarian civil society groups, including the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, Transparency International Hungary and the Hungarian Helsinki Commission, published an open letter on Friday in support of the march, saying the law that led to the police ban "serves to intimidate the entire society". Budapest mayor Gergely Karacsony tried to circumvent the law by organising the march as a municipal event, which he said does not need a permit. Police however banned the event, arguing that it fell under the scope of the child protection law. Orban, whose government promotes a Christian-conservative agenda, provided some clues on Friday about what participants can expect when he warned of "legal consequences" for organising and attending the march. Earlier this week Justice Minister Bence Tuzson warned in a letter sent to some foreign embassies in Budapest that organising a prohibited event is punishable by one year in jail, while attending counts as a misdemeanour. The law that allows for the ban of Pride lets police impose fines and use facial recognition cameras to identify people who attend. When asked about the threat of a one-year jail term, Karacsony said at a press briefing on Friday that such a sentence would only boost his popularity. "But I cannot take it seriously," he said. Making the march a key topic of political discourse has allowed the Orban government to take the initiative back from the opposition and mobilise its voter base, said Zoltan Novak, an analyst at the Centre for Fair Political Analysis think tank. "In the past 15 years, Fidesz decided what topics dominated the political world," he said, noting that this has become more difficult as Orban's party has faced an increasing challenge from centre-right opposition leader Peter Magyar's Tisza party, which has a 15-point lead over Orban's Fidesz in a recent poll. Tisza, which has been avoiding taking a strong position on gay rights issues, did not specify in response to Reuters questions whether it believed the Pride march was lawful, but said those attending deserved the state's protection. "Peter Magyar has called on the Hungarian authorities and police to protect the Hungarian people this Saturday, and on other days as well, even if it means standing up against the arbitrariness of power," its press office said. Magyar himself would not attend.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
David Crisafulli found to be ‘careless' in not declaring $200,000 in payments related to company he ran
The Queensland premier, David Crisafulli, was 'careless' in not declaring $200,000 in payments he made after a company he had run became insolvent, the state's parliamentary ethics committee has found. Crisafulli became sole director and chief executive of Southern Edge Training Solutions after losing his north Queensland seat at the 2015 election. The company had been financially stressed before he took over on 1 December 2015 and went into liquidation months after he left on 1 April 2016. After being re-elected in 2017, Crisafulli made three payments as a result of a claim of insolvent trading by liquidators: $80,000 on 12 March 2020, $60,000 on 30 July 2020 and $60,000 on 19 July 2021. He did not declare them on parliament's register of interests, though parliamentary rules required MPs to declare any liability worth over a threshold of $19,000 at the time. From October 2020 onwards, the threshold for declaration was $19,399. A report by the parliament's ethics committee, which is made up of three Labor and three Liberal National party MPs, was tabled on Friday. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The committee ruled the premier was 'careless in the discharge of his obligations as a member by not including the liability on the register of interests'. But it found that 'on balance, it did not have evidence to meet the threshold required to prove that the premier knowingly did not disclose the liability'. As a result, it found his non-disclosure was not a contempt of parliament. Crisafulli argued to the committee that he did not have a liability because no claim had been litigated, and asked for the complaint to be dismissed. But the committee determined that there was a liability as a result of an agreement 'which created a legally binding obligation to settle a debt'. It noted that he had not approached the clerk of the parliament for clarification of the rules. 'While I did receive legal counsel, in hindsight, it is clear to me I should have consulted with the clerk on this matter,' Crisafulli told the committee. 'If the committee decides I should have declared a liability, I can only apologise and assure the committee it was an honest mistake and by no means deliberate or knowing.' On Friday, the premier said he had 'acted in good faith'. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'The report is very definitive. It has cleared me. There was no further actions,' he said. Crisafulli did not answer a series of questions about how he made the $200,000 payments and whether anyone had assisted him. 'This was subject to this analysis, and I have met my obligations. And a bipartisan committee has shown that,' he said. The deputy Labor leader, Cameron Dick, referred Crisafulli to the ethics committee on 22 October last year, four days before the state election. On Friday, Dick said: 'David Crisafulli has been saying over and over that he has complied with his obligations. Well, he did not, and that is in black and white in this report today.' The report says that the payments did not create any conflict of interest or the perception of any on the part of the premier, and that assessing the matter was a 'novel issue' involving 'ambiguity in the definition of liability'. Crisafulli was the subject of an earlier ethics inquiry, in April 2020, between the first and second payments. He was late to disclose interests as director and secretary of Revalot Pty Ltd. The committee 'determined these failures were not undertaken knowingly'. Southern Edge Training Solutions, which traded as SET Solutions, taught a range of training courses. Based in Melbourne, it went into voluntary liquidation on 30 June 2016. Crisafulli has repeatedly said he only joined the company after being assured that there would be an imminent capital injection to keep it afloat. The committee recommended that no further action be taken.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Berlin to simplify rules in bid to speed up defence surge, draft law says
BERLIN, June 27 (Reuters) - The German government seeks to speed up defence procurement by simplifying legal procedures, fostering European cooperation and facilitating orders to start-ups to make its military combat-ready, according to a draft law seen by Reuters late on Friday. The speedy surge of the German military's capabilities "must not fail due to overly complex procurement procedures or lengthy authorisation processes", the document said, while warning of signs that Moscow's war objectives reach beyond Ukraine. "The time factor is crucial." At a NATO summit in The Hague, leaders on Wednesday agreed to hike the alliance's defence spending target to 5% of national GDP, with 3.5% dedicated to core defence and 1.5% to related security issues. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's government on Tuesday approved a budget framework which is expected to see Berlin's total military spending rise from 95 billion euros in 2025 to 162 billion euros in 2029, equalling 3.5% of GDP. The new defence procurement law is part of efforts to speed up military purchases that in the past have been plagued by lengthy delays, project failures and cost overshoots. The draft law determines that all procurement that contributes to Europe and NATO's military readiness inherently touches upon vital national security, which constitutes a basis to invoke an exemption under European public procurement law. That would amplify a trend that Berlin has been following for some time by more often making use of a national security clause under EU law to prioritize domestic procurement, while also seeking to minimize delays caused by legal challenges. The hurdles for cash-strapped start-ups and innovative companies to join competitions are to be lowered by enabling advance payment to these firms, according to the draft, dated June 25. The paper also makes provisions for a future simplification of European defence procurement rules, something now under discussion at the EU level, by stating that the German law should not be tougher than European law but facilitate joint European defence procurement across the board. The law will entitle contracting entities to limit tenders to bidders inside the European Union or the European Economic Area, and to determine that a certain share of the contracted goods or services must originate in the EU, according to the document. The draft law does not, however, attempt to change the rule that all defence purchases with a volume of 25 million euros or more must be approved by parliament, a requirement seen by many experts as a major hurdle against speeding up procurement. At the start of June, Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said Germany would need up to 60,000 additional troops under the new NATO targets for weapons and personnel, effectively expanding the military to some 260,000 troops. The Bundeswehr has not yet met a target of 203,000 troops set in 2018, and it is currently short-staffed by some 20,000 regular troops, according to defence ministry data.