South Africans unite for national dialogue
Image: Armand Hough/ Independent Newspapers
SOUTH AFRICA belongs to all who live in it, and its citizens have a collective responsibility to address its problems.
This was the sentiment of renowned humanitarian, and founder of Gift of Givers, Dr Imtiaz Sooliman who has been named among President Cyril Ramaphosa's Eminent Persons Group, selected to champion the much anticipated National Dialogue.
The president first made mention of a National Dialogue during his State of the Nation address in February. The dialogue aims to tackle the persistent challenges faced by the country despite 30 years of democracy including poverty, crime, inequality, unemployment, social divisions and a growing disconnect between citizens and institutions, among others.
On Tuesday, Ramaphosa announced 31 names set to champion the initiative. The group includes leaders in civil society, business, labour, religious institutions, cultural workers, sports organisations, women, youth and community voices.
Among those on the list are Springbok captain, Siya Kolisi; Anglican Archbishop of Cape Town Thabo Makgoba; former Minister and constitutional negotiator Roelf Meyer; peace activist Ela Gandhi, former MP Lindiwe Mazibuko; Miss South Africa 2024, Mia le Roux; former Constitutional Court judge, Edwin Cameron; chairperson of the National Planning Commission, Professor Tinyiko Maluleke and award-winning actor Dr John Kani.
The president said the dialogue would be a 'participatory process' that unfolds in phases, from local consultations and sectoral engagements to provincial and national gatherings.
The first National Convention has been scheduled for August 15.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
Sooliman expressed enthusiasm about the change this initiative could bring.
'When the government can ask the public for assistance it shows humility. No country can run without citizens getting fully involved. I also want to send a positive message. We always get negative messages; 'oh it can't be done', 'it's a rubber stamp', but I feel this time there can be a difference. We can work together and in the interest of the people of our country. I am interested because I'm a patriot, I know I can add value with my skills. But more than that, the fact that the government came and said can you guys help, it's a big ask.'
'My aim for a start is to develop to see that we have all the right people, there's a youth element missing. Youth are the best people to put forward their own vision and their own complaints. I know it's an eminent persons group, older people are experienced, but you need to get the requirements of young people.
'Secondly I would like them to consult across a wide spectrum. I want to come not only with the problems, I want to come with the solutions. I don't want to be on the rubber stamp committee, when we make a proposal we want to see action. People need help now.'
He made an example of water supply problems which needed infrastructure solutions, instead of only providing water bottles which provided short term intervention.
'Several people (in the group) are competent with different experiences. We can do multiple interventions at the same time.
'A lot of people want to give free services, they want to give advice, we need to create the opportunity for that to happen. The fact that they've asked civil society to come and help the government is a great step forward,' Sooliman said.
'There's only one way to build this country. The government is only custodians of this country, it belongs to all of us, we all have a responsibility collectively to make it work. The mechanism has to be there; the government has to allow the door for civil society to come in which they've done now. It's a very bold step, I say let's hold their hand, let's do it together,' he concluded.
Banyana Banyana coach, Dr Desiree Ellis said she wanted to contribute and make a meaningful change to the country.
Reflecting on her personal experiences she said: 'I think from where I come from, Hanover Park, the communities are not safe. It's not safe for kids, it's not safe for anyone anymore. When I grew up I used to regularly play outside. I don't think it's safe to play outside and I think that needs to change. That has helped me and it has shaped me, I could play outside without fear. (It's) very important for communities to be safe again, where we look out for each other, where we take care of each other. '
For women and sport, Ellis said participation was important.
'There are still some international players that have to pay to participate and I don't think that should happen. (I want) to make sure we also bring sports back into schools. That shaped me, I could participate in sport in school, I played hockey at school, I could do athletics at school. That is the foundation phase.'
She added that GBV needed to be addressed urgently.
'That is one of the biggest challenges we face in the country and it's something we need to make a bigger impact in making sure we reduce GBV cases.
'It's important for us all to make a contribution, to make a change. This is our country, we live here, we have a beautiful country and lets get back to making it beautiful again.'
Cape Times
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
11 hours ago
- IOL News
Herman Mashaba stands firm on ActionSA's backing of police commissioner amid serious allegations
ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba says the party is not apologetic for supporting KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. Image: Itumeleng English / Independent Newspapers ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba says the party is not apologetic for standing in support of the KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner, Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. Mashaba was responding to forensic investigator Paul O'Sullivan, who accused the party of misleading the public for supporting Mkhwanazi without having any knowledge of his hidden history. This was after Mkhwanazi last month alleged that the country's criminal justice system has been infiltrated by criminal syndicates. He made these remarks during a media briefing where he claimed that Police Minister, Senzo Mchunu, has connections to members of a crime syndicate. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading Mkhwanazi also accused some senior police officials of being involved in corruption. O'Sullivan said he was certain that Mkhwanazi has allegedly been involved in serious organised crime for a long time and has somehow managed to stay below the radar. He said ActionSA's support for Mkhwanazi has merely served to embolden his criminal conduct. Mashaba said the party advised him to exercise his constitutional right if he felt the party violated his rights by supporting Mkhwanazi. "ActionSA is unapologetic for our support of General Mkhwanazi's allegations to be investigated. If Paul O'Sullivan has something on General Mkhwanazi, we invite him to provide it to the law enforcement agencies, instead of threatening us," said Mashaba. On Monday, the party's parliamentary leader, Athol Trollip, laid criminal charges against O'Sullivan for threatening him. Trollip said O'Sullivan sent the threatening messages via WhatsApp. He said these messages were not only personal attacks, but also interfered with his work as an elected official in Parliament. He described O'Sullivan's actions as a direct assault on democracy and said such behaviour must face legal consequences to protect public representatives. This was after Trollip posted on his X account that he wants to know how O'Sullivan has inveigled his way into the safety and security system and who appointed him the spokesperson for the SAPS or police commissioner at large, adding that his comments and insinuations were frankly alarming. Responding via WhatsApp last week, O'Sullivan said: "I have been looking at your misinformed attacks on me on social media because someone forwarded them to me. You are clearly an arrogant fool who doesn't have a clue what's going on. Mkhwanazi is one of the biggest criminals that ever wore a police uniform; his crimes, when they are finally exposed, will shock the nation. "Best part is, unlike you, you are in receipt of my taxpayer rand. I don't get a single cent, then he said you attacked me personally on social media as if you're Mkhwanazi's right-hand man, which means that you must be supporting his criminal conduct. Either that, you are far too stupid to know a criminal when you see one," the message read. O'Sullivan added that: "As a result of your patently criminal conduct in aiding and abetting Mkhwanazi, you are now on my radar. When I'm done with Mkhwanazi and Masemola, I am going to take you on." O'Sullivan said he would take the ActionSA on as well and expose the party for being involved with a "criminal like Trollip". Responding to the messages, Trollip said: "If you think these are public attacks, you must have a very thin skin, especially for one who seeks the public limelight. As for supporting Mkhwanazi, let alone aiding and abetting him, you clearly haven't read the meaning of what I said in my posts that you are complaining about. "But one thing is for sure is that you've now threatened me and called me a criminal, which is clearly your modus operandi." Speaking to the media, Trollip said he was simply doing his job as a public representative and member of Parliament, adding that he was calling for the allegations, both O'Sullivan's and Mkhwanazi's, to be investigated. He said O'Sullivan also threatened Mashaba, saying he would tell everyone he knows not to support ActionSA. O' Sullivan, who claimed that he donated and prompted others to make donations when the party was established in 2020, wrote an email informing Mashaba and the party's national chairperson, Michael Beaumont, that he dissociated himself from ActionSA. He added that he would warn the public not to vote for the party or make donations because it cannot be trusted. However, Mashaba said this is something that should not worry ActionSA and its members. "We are not going to lose any sleep as a result. We advised him to exercise his constitutional rights if ever he feels ActionSA violates his rights by supporting Mkhwanazi," he said. In his affidavit, O'Sullivan said his comments were about exposing wrongdoing in the police service, not personal vendettas.
IOL News
12 hours ago
- IOL News
ActionSA introduces performance tracker and discusses Mettler's future
Tshwane Mayor Nasiphi Moya has reiterated that the multiparty coalition in the city remains stable, despite potential threats from the ANC to remove City Manager Johann Mettler, a move opposed by ActionSA. Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Newspapers ActionSA has taken a decision to desist from speaking out about potential threats to remove City of Tshwane municipal manager Johann Mettler, who has faced recent criticism from the ANC over the legitimacy of his 2022 appointment. Party national chairperson Michael Beaumont made this assertion during a media briefing in Pretoria on Tuesday, where the party launched the Tshwane mayor's performance tracker that shows how the city is performing under the leadership of ActionSA Mayor Nasiphi Moya. The controversy surrounding Mettler's appointment has been ongoing, with the ANC announcing plans to request a special council meeting to debate the validity of his appointment. The party has raised concerns about alleged irregularities in the selection panel's composition and questioned whether Mettler met the required minimum competency levels. Mettler's appointment has been surrounded by controversy following a letter from Gauteng MEC for Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs, Jacob Mamabolo, to Moya, inquiring about the integrity of the appointment process for a senior manager. Asked to clarify ActionSA's stance, Beaumont said the party will not engage further on the issue of threats to remove Mettler from his position. 'We ventilated our opinion on the issue. It is a matter of public record and particularly in light of our view that we should not invite unnecessary instability in the city that is starting to move forward for the first time in a long time. In our view this is a governance issue and we would like to draw a very big wall between governance and the party political issues,' he said. He had previously stated that ActionSA does not support Mettler's removal, citing that stability in senior city management is crucial to the formula that has begun to yield success. On a lighter vein, Beaumont responded to speculation about a potential motion of no confidence against Moya, saying that it is a trend in South Africa for people to start plotting a mayor's removal from day one. He taunted those planning the motion, saying: 'If you think the reaction to General (Nhlanhla) Mkhwanazi was big, I would like to consider carefully how the residents would respond to anyone who tries to remove this mayor. I wish that political party good luck with their idea.' Meanwhile, ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba said threats to remove Mettler will be handled by Moya in a proper and professional manner at the appropriate time. Beaumont explained that the Tshwane mayor's performance tracker is updated in real-time with data from the city, allowing residents to monitor the city's progress on the party's website. The ActionSA-initiated government tracker monitors key areas such as financial stability, infrastructure, economic revitalisation, safety and cleanliness, governance, and customer care. Moya said the tracker is going to take the city far and reiterated that the coalition is stable. 'There is a lot that we have been doing as the coalition partners. In case and when we have disagreements, which we have had, we have to find ways to resolve those,' she said. [email protected]
IOL News
14 hours ago
- IOL News
Gauteng High Court dismisses Labour Party's bid to halt National Dialogue
The Labour Party representatives packed the Pretoria High Court earlier with its urgent application opposing next month's proposed National Dialogue. Image: Zelda Venter The Labour Party of South Africa failed in its urgent legal bid for an interim interdict to halt the National Dialogue set to commence on August 15. The party turned to the Gauteng High Court, Pretoria, to urgently halt the President's decision to convene a National Dialogue and two related conventions. At the heart of its objections were the costs associated with this. It argued that the National Dialogue is not a genuine democratic exercise, but a costly and dangerous duplication of the national legislature. It argued that the National Dialogue Preparatory Committee estimates that the initiative will cost over R700 million, according to an announcement dated June 12. Government, however, in its argument to court, denied this amount. According to the State respondents, a final budget will only be developed following engagements with the National Treasury and other potential partners. The Labour Party's approach to the court was motivated by constitutional concerns. It questioned what power the President has to establish a National Dialogue. It argued that if its ultimate aim is to ensure public participation, create policy and make binding decisions, this is a duplication of the functions of Parliament. It also questioned whether it would be lawful to attach a R 700 million price tag for a part of this endeavour. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ They ask the court to halt the National Dialogue, pending an opportunity to later review the President's decision. Acting Judge I de Vos said the Constitution mandates the President to promote national unity and the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court has repeatedly asserted this process is ongoing and that this duty falls to the President. 'The court is not, based on the text of the Constitution and the jurisprudence from the Constitutional Court, persuaded that the President is acting outside his powers,' she said. The judge added that the court is not persuaded that the applicant has made out a prima facie case on this basis or that it bears strong prospects of success in the review on this ground. 'The court is not empowered to determine if a National Dialogue is the best method for promoting national unity. Or if the same people that have been invited to the table to do the preparatory work are the ones the court would have chosen. Or even if it would rather spend money on a National Dialogue or on health care or some other issue.' Judge de Vos added that the goal of the National Dialogue, which consists of public participation and engagement, is to promote national unity. 'There is a rational link between the National Dialogue, particularly one premised on public participation, and the promotion of national unity,' she said. In turning down the application, she concluded that the Labour Party has failed to meet the threshold to show irrationality in the method employed in announcing the National Dialogue. 'The court is not convinced that the Labour Party has proven a prima facie right in this regard and is doubtful as to its prospects of success at the hearing of the final relief,' she said. As to the money involved, the judge said the court is not empowered to ask whether this is the best use of money. That is the domain of the executive.
