Israeli rights groups accuse Israel of genocide in Gaza conflict
B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel released reports at a press conference, alleging 'coordinated, deliberate action to destroy Palestinian society in the Gaza strip.'
'The report we are publishing today is one we never imagined we would have to write,' said Yuli Novak, B'Tselem's executive director.
'The people of Gaza have been displaced, bombed and starved, left completely stripped of their humanity and rights.'
Physicians for Human Rights Israel highlighted the destruction of Gaza's healthcare system, stating, 'Israel's actions have destroyed Gaza's healthcare infrastructure in a manner that is both calculated and systematic.'
Israel has repeatedly denied genocide allegations, including a case brought by South Africa at the International Court of Justice.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dismissed the claims as 'outrageous,' while government spokesperson David Mencer called the latest accusations 'baseless.'
'There is no intent, (which is) key for the charge of genocide ... it simply doesn't make sense for a country to send in 1.9 million tons of aid, most of that being food, if there is an intent of genocide,' Mencer said.
Israel's military also rejected the reports, stating it follows international law and takes measures to avoid civilian harm, while accusing Hamas of using civilians as 'human shields.'
The war in Gaza began after Hamas-led fighters attacked Israeli communities on October 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages.
Israel's subsequent offensive has killed nearly 60,000 Palestinians, mostly civilians, according to Gaza health officials.
The genocide accusation carries deep weight in Israel, given the term's origins in response to the Holocaust.
Israeli officials have previously called such allegations libellous and antisemitic.
International scrutiny over Gaza's humanitarian crisis has intensified, with UN agencies warning of severe food shortages.
Israel maintains it allows sufficient aid but blames distribution failures on the UN.
Public opinion in Israel has slowly shifted as images of suffering in Gaza emerge, though many still hold Hamas responsible.
'The Israeli perception is: 'what do you want from us? It's Hamas' fault,'' said Oren Persico of The Seventh Eye.
Dani Dayan, chairman of Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial, argued against the genocide label but urged recognition of civilian suffering.
'Their anguish is real, and our moral tradition obligates us not to turn away from it,' he wrote. - AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
42 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Can you bomb Iran and still win the Nobel Peace Prize? Trump thinks so
WASHINGTON, Aug 4 — A craving for international prestige, a decade-long Obama rivalry and perhaps a dash of provocation: a mercurial melange of factors is at play in Donald Trump's obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize. 'It's well past time that President Trump was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on July 31, prompting reactions of disbelief and sarcasm from the Republican leader's opponents. Since his January 20 return to power, the US president 'has brokered, on average, one peace deal or ceasefire per month,' Leavitt said, citing as examples his mediations between India and Pakistan; Cambodia and Thailand; Egypt and Ethiopia; Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC); Serbia and Kosovo; and others. His leading spokeswoman also mentioned Iran, where Trump ordered US strikes against the Islamic republic's nuclear facilities, as evidence of decisions Leavitt claims have contributed to world peace. She made no mention of the conflict in Ukraine, which Trump pledged multiple times to end on 'day one' of his term, or the war in Gaza, which rumbles on and for which the US supplies Israel with weapons. Pakistan, Israel For some foreign leaders, mentioning the prestigious award has become a sign of diplomatic goodwill toward an American president who envisions himself as a peacemaker. Pakistan nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, as did Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. During an early July meeting at the White House, a journalist asked the presidents of Liberia, Senegal, Mauritania, Guinea-Bissau, and Gabon whether Trump deserved the award. Basking in the flattering responses from the African leaders, a smiling Trump said: 'We could do this all day long.' Tens of thousands of people can offer a nomination to the Nobel committee, including lawmakers, ministers, certain university professors, former laureates and members of the committee themselves. Nominations are due by January 31, with the announcement coming in October — this year on the 10th of the month. Law professor Anat Alon-Beck, who is an Israeli-American, submitted Trump's name to the committee's five members, who were appointed by the Norwegian Parliament. The assistant professor at Case Western Reserve University School of Law told AFP she did so because of the 'extraordinary leadership' and 'strategic brilliance' he has shown, in her opinion, in advancing peace and securing the release of hostages held in the Gaza Strip. 'Never' getting the Nobel For some, the prospect of handing the prize to someone who has upended the international order is untenable. 'Nominating Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize is like entering a hyena in a dog show,' US history and politics researcher Emma Shortis wrote on news site The Conversation. 'Of course Trump does not deserve it.' The American president disagrees. Demonstrators holding a Trump balloon march front the Los Angeles City Hall to the Edward R. Roybal Federal and Detention Center building on August 2, 2025 in Los Angeles. — AFP 'I deserve it, but they will never give it to me,' Trump told reporters in February as he hosted Netanyahu at the White House, lamenting not ticking the Nobel box in his life. 'No, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, including Russia/Ukraine, and Israel/Iran, whatever those outcomes may be,' Trump griped on his Truth Social platform in June. 'But the people know, and that's all that matters to me!' Trump is well-known as someone who is particularly fond of accolades and prizes, Garret Martin, a professor of international relations at American University, told AFP, 'so he would welcome this major international recognition'. And since the beginning of his presidential ambitions 10 years ago, 'he has put himself in opposition to Barack Obama, who famously won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009,' Martin added. The prize awarded to the Democratic former president, barely nine months after he took office, sparked heated debate — and continues to do so. 'If I were named Obama I would have had the Nobel Prize given to me in 10 seconds,' Trump bellyached in October 2024, during the final stretch of the presidential campaign. 338 candidates Three other US presidents have also been so honoured: Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Jimmy Carter. The prize was also awarded to Henry Kissinger in 1973 for his efforts to help end the war in Vietnam. The choice of the one-time US secretary of state was heavily criticised. The full list of Nobel Peace Prize nominees is confidential — except for individual announcements by sponsors — but their number is made public. In 2025, there are 338 nominees. Some betting sites have Trump in second place to win, behind Yulia Navalnaya, the widow of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny. — AFP
New Straits Times
8 hours ago
- New Straits Times
New York Declaration fails Gaza's reality
THE New York Declaration on the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine, issued late last month and endorsed by the Arab League, the European Union and 17 states is a masterclass in political evasion — fine words that dare not confront the central facts of the Israel-Palestine conflict. The declaration bluntly demands that Hamas relinquish power in Gaza and disarm, handing authority over to the Palestinian Authority (PA). Yet when it comes to Israel's decades-long occupation, its illegal blockade and devastating military campaign that has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians — most of them women and children — it retreats into euphemism. It is a deliberate choice to privilege political convenience over legal obligation. Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, Israel, as the occupying power, must protect the civilian population. The destruction of homes, hospitals, schools and water systems; the starvation of civilians; and the displacement of nearly two million people are not "collateral damage" but grave breaches under Articles 53 and 147, attracting individual criminal responsibility. The declaration rightly condemns Hamas' Oct 7 attacks as war crimes and crimes against humanity. But justice cannot be selective. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court applies equally to armed groups and states. If its authors truly believe in the rule of law, then they must apply it without fear or favour. The declaration's vision for Gaza's future is equally troubling. By proposing the transfer of authority to the PA backed by an international stabilisation mission, it risks turning the PA into an unelected subcontractor for the occupation — administering Gaza without real sovereignty. History shows that transitional administrations, from Timor-Leste to Kosovo, succeeded only when paired with credible elections, clear timelines for self-governance and respect for self-determination. The declaration offers none of these guarantees. Most tellingly, it evades the root cause of Palestinian resistance: the occupation itself. The International Court of Justice's (ICJ) 2024 advisory opinion reaffirmed that Israel's occupation is illegal and must end "as rapidly as possible" while the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 2334 demands the cessation of all settlement activity, calling it a "flagrant violation" under international law. Yet the declaration treats these binding norms as optional talking points. It says nothing of the siege imposed on Gaza since 2007, or the refugees' right of return under United Nations General Assembly Resolution 194. There is no insistence on lifting the blockade, opening humanitarian corridors or securing reparations for the destruction. In short, it offers Palestinians process without protection and symbolism without sovereignty. If the world is serious about peace, any credible agreement must meet three minimum standards: Impartial investigations into all alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity — whether committed by Hamas, Israel or any other actor — under ICC jurisdiction or an independent UN mechanism. Enforceable timelines for ending the occupation, dismantling illegal settlements and lifting the blockade, in compliance with the ICJ's opinion and existing UNSC resolutions. Guarantees of Palestinian self-determination through internationally supervised elections in Gaza and the West Bank, and constitutional processes reflecting the will of the Palestinian people — not the dictates of external powers. Without these, the declaration is not a peace plan but a blueprint for managing Palestinian submission. Some will argue that half-measures are better than none. But unjust peace is no peace. I have spoken to Palestinian children who have lost their entire families and represented them in legal proceedings. I have read the legal texts meant to protect them — and seen how those protections collapse when expedience trumps principle. The world does not need more declarations that appear balanced on paper but tilt towards power in practice. It needs the courage to hold every violator of international law accountable, and the resolve to end an occupation that is both illegal and immoral. Until then, Gaza will remain not a test case for peace, but the gravest indictment of the international system's unwillingness to enforce its own laws.
The Star
9 hours ago
- The Star
Trump, Carney to speak soon, Canadian official says
FILE PHOTO: Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney arrives at a press conference to make an announcement on recognizing Palestinian statehood, in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, July 30, 2025. REUTERS/Patrick Doyle/File Photo
