A Kashmiri daughter's plea unites Valley's leaders – ‘watched him suffer in silence'
The appeal, made by jailed separatist leader Shabir Shah's younger daughter, has united leaders across the political divide — from the ruling National Conference to the rival Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Peoples Conference to Hurriyat. Shah has been in Tihar jail since 2017.
'This is not political. This is not anti-national. This is not against any country, institution, or government. This is only about my father's life. His health. His right to be treated with dignity. Is your conscience alive?' Shah's daughter Sehar Shabir posted on X.
'My father, Shabir Shah, has spent 38 years in prison. No conviction. No justice. Today, he is gravely ill. He has been advised multiple surgeries. Yet there is no proper care, no access to medical records, and not even a single phone call in two years which is a right every prisoner is entitled to,' she said.
The family has been kept away, she wrote.
'I have watched him suffer in silence, behind soundproof walls, iron grills, and broken microphones. We cannot even touch him… This is a daughter's plea for compassion, for justice, and for basic humanity. If you still have a heart, please hear me. If justice means anything, let it speak now. Not when it is too late. Because if silence wins again, remember You were told. You knew. And you chose to look away,' she wrote.
In her appeal, Sehar went on to say that his father has been advised surgery for 'possible prostate cancer' but his family is being kept away and 'not given access to his medical records for the last three years'.
Responding to her appeal, Srinagar MP and National Conference Leader Aga Ruhullah Mehdi has written a letter to Home Minister Amit Shah seeking immediate medical care for Shah.
'Shabir Ahmad Shah is now 70 years old. By every humane and legal standard, he is entitled to medical treatment with dignity and fairness. His doctors have recommended three surgeries for serious medical conditions which include life-threatening prostate cancer. Despite the gravity of his condition, he remains incarcerated since 2017, without family support,' Ruhullah said in his letter. '…Our country has legal and moral obligations, under both its Constitution and international treaties to ensure that prisoners are treated with humanity'.
Seeking fair medical treatment to undertrials, Ruhullah said that in Shah's case 'multiple obligations appear to have directly been contravened'.
'The Nelson Mandela Rules (Rules 24 and 26) mandate that prisoners must receive the same standard of health care available to the general population. In Shabir Shah's case, one can quote multiple such obligations that appear to have directly been contravened,' reads the letter.
It further says: 'There are clear precedents in domestic law in support of fair medical treatment of undertrials. Zahoor Watali and Gautam Navlakha were both granted house arrest on medical and humanitarian grounds by Indian courts…Why the same consideration can't be extended to Mr. Shah, whose legal status remains that of an undertrial, is a question his family has constantly raised…The measure of a nation is how it treats its weakest. Let us not fail that test'.
Former chief minister and Peoples Democratic Party President Mehbooba Mufti has also urged the Home Minister to take a humanitarian view in Shah's case
'Request @HMOIndia to urgently consider the heartfelt appeal of Seher Shabir whose father Shabir Shah is battling a life-threatening illness. In this critical moment we urge GOI to take a humanitarian view by ensuring he receives proper medical care. This may be the family's last chance to ease his suffering. Please let compassion guide the response,' Mufti said in a post on X.
Peoples Conference leader Sajad Lone demanded better medical facilities for Shah. 'Shabir Shah sahib is not well. And getting treatment is a very basic right. I humbly stand with his loved ones in demanding that he be allowed access to proper medical facilities — and the very basic right of being surrounded by his family as he fights for his health,' Lone said on X.
Hurriyat chairman and the Valley's chief cleric Mirwaiz Umar Farooq voiced grave concern over Shah's health and urged the Centre to 'uphold the human rights of the prisoners'.
'Reports of Shabir Shah Sahab's serious health condition in Tihar Jail, and denial of access to his family members to talk to him on phone for the past two years, or care for him when he is facing such a medical emergency and is in dire need of a surgery, is very unfortunate and disturbing,' Mirwaiz said.
Shah was arrested in 2017 in an alleged terror funding case and has been lodged in Tihar jail since. In 2023, the centre banned the Democratic Freedom Party (DFP) headed by Shah as an unlawful organisation. A separatist leader, Shah has spent over 38 years of his life in prison.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Why Statewise representation in IITs, NITs is essential for national integration and education equity
The premier engineering colleges of India draw largely from an all-India pool of students, irrespective of States. Statewise representation is not a factor although this is the fundamental structure of the Indian Union. But statewise representation needs to be implemented in admissions to IITs and NITs so as to sync with the general structure of the Indian Union that the Constitution held to be key to promoting national integration and unity. These will address regional imbalances too. In the past, there were 17 RECs (Regional Engg Colleges). Many of the bigger States had their own REC and the smaller ones were grouped and allotted one REC. Fifty percent of the seats in each REC was for students from the State where the REC was located. The remaining half of the seats in that REC was filled by students from other States. A seat matrix was followed to implement this in such a way that if an REC had 100 seats, 50 seats would be filled by students from that State and 50 students from that State would be allotted seats in other RECs. This process was designed to give an opportunity for each State to grow educationally. In this process, in every REC, students from each State, or region, studied, although half the students were from the home State where the REC was situated. This ensured that the student population was always diverse and representative, promoting national integration. By 2005, when the RECs were converted to National Institutes of Technology (NIT), this admission process was changed. Half the seats in an NIT were filled by students from the home State or region where the NIT was situated. But half the seats were filled from a common all-India pool based on merit and reservation. The purported reason given behind admitting half the students on a 'general, competitive basis' was that students from State having more score in their competitive exams were being denied seats in NITs that were next only to the IITs. But this process led to skews among States in terms of the number of students from that State studying in RECs, now renamed as National Institutes of Technology (NIT), outside their State. The student population in RECs became unrepresentative. For this reason, the old admission process should be restored in NITs and, for the same reason, introduced in IITs also. In the past, only five IITs were there. Hence admission to the IITs was based on an all-India ranking. There were no Statewise quotas. Today, there are 23 IITs, spread across the nation. If admission in IITs are also followed similar to that RECs, then every State will benefit and grow together academically. For example, students from Nagaland may be able to study in an IIT located nearby. At present about 12 lakh students appear for main JEE and about 2.5 lakh are selected to write Advanced JEE for about 14,000 seats in the IITs. The present admission process for IITs should change to follow the old REC pattern of admissions. The student of one State would then only compete with students from his or her State. The pressure of a rat race will reduce too. (M. Chidambaram is a retired professor at the Department of Chemical Engineering, IIT Madras. He has also served as Director of NIT - Trichy)
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Fear of crushing defeat in upcoming polls': BJP slams INDIA bloc over Bihar electoral roll revision
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) National General Secretary Tarun Chugh on Thursday termed the meeting of a delegation of the INDIA bloc leaders with the Election Commission of India over the Bihar voter list overhaul as an "insult" to democracy and India's institutions. The 'Jan Vishwas Yatras' will be flagged off by veteran BJP leaders – including the state's chief minister Yogi Adityanath and several Union ministers. (File Photo / Representational Image) The BJP leader also claimed that the INDI alliance is in "deep shock" due to the "fear of defeat" in the upcoming Bihar assembly elections. "The INDI Alliance is in deep shock due to the fear of their crushing defeat in the upcoming Bihar assembly elections. The leaders of the INDI Alliance aim to discredit the Election Commission, a world-renowned, independent, and impartial institution" "Actually, they know they are going to lose, so now they want to blame the Election Commission... This is an insult to democracy and the institutions of India...", Chugh told ANI. A day earlier, delegation of INDIA bloc leaders from 11 political parties met with the Election Commission of India (ECI) in the national capital to register their opposition to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls currently underway in Bihar, calling it the "worst attack on the basic structure of the Constitution." Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi, part of the delegation that met Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, questioned the timing of the SIR exercise, noting that it is being carried out only months before the upcoming Assembly elections. "Firstly, the last revision was in 2003. For 22 years, more than four of five Bihar elections have happened. Were all those elections faulty?... Secondly the Special Intensive Revision which was held in 2003, was held one year before the Lok Sabha Elections, two years before the Assembly election. Today you are having in July, a maximum period of one or two months for an electoral revision exercise of the second most largest electoral populated state in India, want to have it in one and a half to two months," the Congress leader told reporters after the meeting. Representatives of the Communist Party of India, CPI (Marxist-Leninist), Samajwadi Party, Nationalist Congress Party (Sharadchandra Pawar), Rashtriya Janata Dal, Congress and other parties were present. The ECI has claimed that the SIR is only meant to verify voters and to identify any 'ineligible voters' ahead of the Assembly elections which are expected to be held later this year in Bihar. However, multiple political parties part of the Opposition, including Congress and Bihar's Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), have raised objections to the exercise, claiming that it will be used to deny people their constitutional rights. The Bihar Legislative Assembly elections are expected to be held later this year, however no official date has been announced by the ECI as of yet.
NDTV
4 hours ago
- NDTV
Can Trump Beat The Second Term Curse That Haunts The White House
Hamilton: While he likes to provoke opponents with the possibility of serving a third term, Donald Trump faces a more immediate historical burden that has plagued so many presidents: the 'second term curse'. Twenty-one US presidents have served second terms, but none has reached the same level of success they achieved in their first. Second term performances have ranged from the lacklustre and uninspiring to the disastrous and deadly. Voter dissatisfaction and frustration, presidential fatigue and a lack of sustainable vision for the future are all explanations. But Trump doesn't quite fit the mould. Only one other president, Grover Cleveland in the late 19th century, has served a second nonconsecutive term, making Trump 2.0 difficult to measure against other second-term leaders. Trump will certainly be hoping history doesn't repeat Cleveland's second-term curse. Shortly after taking office he imposed 50% tariffs, triggering global market volatility that culminated in the ' Panic of 1893 '. At the time, this was the worst depression in US history: 19% unemployment, a run on gold from the US Treasury, a stock market crash and widespread poverty. More than a century on, Trump's ' move fast and break things ' approach in a nonconsecutive second term might appeal to voters demanding action above all else. But he risks being drawn into areas he campaigned against. So far, he has gone from fighting a trade war and a culture war to contemplating a shooting war in the Middle East. His ' big beautiful bill ' will add trillions to the national debt and potentially force poorer voters – including many Republicans – off Medicaid. Whether his radical approach will defy or conform to the second term curse seems very much an open question. No kings The two-term limit was enacted by the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution in 1951. Without a maximum term, it was feared, an authoritarian could try to take control for life – like a king (hence the recent ' No Kings ' protests in the US). George Washington, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson all declined to serve a third term. Jefferson was suspicious of any president who would try to be re-elected a third time, writing: should a President consent to be a candidate for a 3d. election, I trust he would be rejected on this demonstration of ambitious views. There is a myth that after Franklin Delano Roosevelt broke the de facto limit of two terms set by the early presidents, the ghost of George Washington placed a curse on anyone serving more than four years. At best, second-term presidencies have been tepid compared to the achievements in the previous four years. After the second world war, some two-term presidents (Eisenhower, Reagan and Obama) started out strong but faltered after reelection. Eisenhower extricated the US from the Korean War in his first term, but faced domestic backlash and race riots in his second. He had to send 500 paratroopers to escort nine Black high school students in Little Rock, Arkansas, to enforce a federal desegregation order. Reagan made significant tax and spending cuts, and saw the Soviet Union crumble in term one. But the Iran-Contra scandal and watered down tax reform defined term two. Obama started strongly, introducing health care reform and uniting the Democratic voter base. After reelection, however, the Democrats lost the House, the Senate, a Supreme Court nomination, and faced scandals over the Snowden security leaks and Internal Revenue Service targeting of conservative groups. Truly disastrous examples of second term presidencies include Abraham Lincoln (assassination), Woodrow Wilson (first world war, failure of the League of Nations, a stroke), Richard Nixon (Watergate, impeachment and resignation), and Bill Clinton (Lewinsky scandal and impeachment). Monumental honours It may be too early to predict how Trump will feature in this pantheon of less-than-greatness. But his approval ratings recently hit an all-time low as Americans reacted to the bombing of Iran and deployment of troops in Los Angeles. A recent YouGov poll showed voters giving negative approval ratings for his handling of inflation, jobs, immigration, national security and foreign policy. While there has been plenty of action, it may be the levels of uncertainty, drastic change and market volatility are more extreme than some bargained for. An uncooperative Congress or opposition from the judiciary can be obstacles to successful second terms. But Trump has used executive orders, on the grounds of confronting 'national emergencies', to bypass normal checks and balances. As well, favourable rulings by the Supreme Court have edged closer to expanding the boundaries of executive power. But they have not yet supported Trump's claim from his first term that 'I have an Article 2, where I have the right to do whatever I want as President'. Some supporters say Trump deserves a Nobel Peace Prize. And he was only half joking when he asked if there is room for one more face on Mount Rushmore. But such monumental honours may only amount to speculation unless Trump's radical approach and redefinition of executive power defy the second-term curse.
