logo
Why F1 may benefit from Mohammed Ben Sulayem's V8 push

Why F1 may benefit from Mohammed Ben Sulayem's V8 push

Yahoo4 days ago
It was on the morning of the glitzy season launch at London's O2 Arena in February when Formula 1 lost its collective head. There, it's said, during an F1 Commission meeting, Christian Horner – Red Bull's then team principal – set his smartphone in the middle of the table.
'Bring back V10s' hissed the voice at the other end of the line: former F1 'ringmaster' Bernie Ecclestone. And, lo, the herd began its charge in that direction, only to crash upon the indifference of F1's engine manufacturers during a crunch meeting ahead of the Bahrain GP.
But FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem, one of those who got rather ahead of themselves on that chilly February day in London, still believes in the principle of a return to natural aspiration and set out his stall during a media briefing ahead of the British GP in July.
The new plan accommodates reservations expressed by the majority of the engine manufacturers during the Bahrain summit: that V10s were unsuitable on many levels, not least the road-relevance front; and some form of electrification would have to be included to provide synergies with road car technologies.
It's a debate which has been raging between paddock insiders for many years: should F1 slavishly mirror road car trends or should it adopt a so-called 'set controls for the heart of the sun' policy, focusing completely on noise and power even if it alienates the manufacturers? Many purists espouse the latter but acknowledge the many practical problems, such as what would happen to the manufacturer-based teams and who would actually build the engines.
V8s, as now espoused by Ben Sulayem, are more acceptable to the manufacturers since many of them still have engines of that configuration somewhere in the range. At the same time the idea of internal combustion is undergoing something of a renaissance, owing to new technologies and developments in the global trading picture.
A Ford DFV V8 engine in the back of a Brabham BT49
For a long time the direction of travel in the car industry has been towards full electrification, pushed by government legislation. But a significant proportion of consumers remain resistant, viewing electric cars as too expensive (and, of course, there are those who fear their genitals may fall off if they are seen driving anything other than a car with a loud, noisy and powerful internal combustion engine).
Faced with this and an influx of cheaper, state-subsidised vehicles exported from China, the western car industry is beginning to panic. Former Renault Group boss Luca de Meo admitted as much before he quit.
So there is still room for the internal combustion engine, provided the new generation of synthetic fuels can be produced at scale for a reasonable cost.
Assuming F1 did return to a V8 engine format, there would be details to work out regarding size and the proportion of electrification. Next year the split will be 50:50 but this has proved controversial, and the technical formula has had to be adapted to embrace adaptive aerodynamic devices to mitigate potential power shortfalls on the straights. It's understood that the solution envisioned by the FIA is to move to an 80:20 ratio in favour of the ICU, or even 90:10.
The new format would be introduced when the 2026 technical package has run its course, most likely 2030, though the president has suggested it could be earlier.
"We need to do it soon,' he said at Silverstone. 'You need three years, so hopefully by 2029 we have something there.'
2026 Formula 1 rules
Ben Sulayem has also talked about achieving radical cost savings by standardising components including the gearbox and the hybrid system. Former president Max Mosley tried to drive through something along these lines at the end of 2008, during the global financial crisis, running a tender process for a homologated drivetrain (ultimately won by Cosworth and Hewland). An additional wrinkle of the plan was to open up new grid spots and have those teams using the standard powertrain effectively running in a championship tier of their own, with a budget cap.
But that idea was ultimately too complicated and lost impetus when Mosley stood down. Jean Todt, the next president, let it die entirely.
There is an argument to say gearboxes are expensive to design, develop and build, and are no longer performance differentiators, so having a standardised component isn't necessarily a negative. There may be grumblings about whoever wins the putative tender but F1 has been here before, when McLaren Applied Technologies won the contract to supply the whole grid with homologated Engine Control Units. Fears of inequality and skulduggery proved unfounded.
Standardised hybrid components may be more difficult for the engine manufacturers to digest – but, equally, this is also an 'invisible' system so far as the audience is concerned and if it can be made less expensive, it will find support. The FIA's position is that cost saving remains one of the most important factors even at a time when F1 is thriving commercially – because that situation could change at any time based on geopolitics and the global economy.
'As the FIA we are the moderators during the discussion of the regulations, mindful to contain costs and create a level playing field for all,' FIA single-seater director Nikolas Tombazis told Motorsport.com earlier this year.
'There is some strong resistance at times, as you would expect, from teams or PU manufacturers protecting their interests or investment. Cost-cutting and level of technological freedom are at loggerheads with each other. It is not easy to have both.
'The PU manufacturers came [to discussion regarding the 2026 regulations] with many proposals for cost-cutting on a number of items relating to the engine. They centred on simplification, eliminating certain materials, processes and technologies.
'The amount of cost-cutting we've achieved is not as much as we would all have liked. While we are in a very healthy position as a sport, financially and in terms of popularity, we should never be complacent about that: cost-cutting should always have a high priority.'
The Formula One Championship-winning Power Units: Mercedes-AMG F1 M09 EQ Power+ (2018), Mercedes-AMG F1 M08 EQ Power+ (2017), Mercedes-Benz PU106C Hybrid (2016), Mercedes-Benz PU106B Hybrid (2015), Mercedes-Benz PU106A Hybrid (2014)
'Many of the manufacturers produce V8s in their cars, so commercially it's correct,' said Ben Sulayem at Silverstone. 'How much is it? The target is more than 50 percent [cheaper] in everything.'
This could be achieved not just through standardising parts but also mandating cheaper materials. It's known, for instance, that the FIA wanted to move to aluminium pistons but the engine manufacturers, having initially supported the idea, U-turned en masse.
Another issue F1 faces in its drive towards 'net zero' is the cost of the fully sustainable fuel which will be mandatory next year, said to be in the region of $275-$300 per litre. This reflects both the R&D investment which has had to go into developing these fuels and the energy-intensive means of production. As yet there is no solution to the problem of producing at scale and to a reasonable cost.
Since all the teams have commercial fuel-and-lubes supply deals, the question of who actually absorbs those costs is tricky to unpick – and likely to differ depending on how individual deals are structured. Which is why another of Ben Sulayem's proposals is likely to face resistance: a single fuel supplier.
What goes in the tank is less of a performance differentiator than it used to be – a chemical composition close to pump fuel is now prescribed, as is a sustainable element – but fuel brands still rely on performance for their storytelling. Shell, for instance, has built the identity of its VPower blend around its partnership with Ferrari.
Would the story survive if the Ferrari were to become a mere mobile billboard for the likes of Shell, while the go-juice sloshing around inside had a rather different provenance? Perhaps – after all, we live in an age of profound superficiality.
Ultimately if costs can be reduced as much as the president would like, the grid as a whole will benefit – and few will care whether you have a tiger in your tank or not.
Read Also:
Why F1 drivers don't like Pirelli's wet tyres, and how it plans to fix them
To read more Motorsport.com articles visit our website.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How to watch Luton vs Tottenham: TV channel and live stream for pre-season friendly today
How to watch Luton vs Tottenham: TV channel and live stream for pre-season friendly today

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How to watch Luton vs Tottenham: TV channel and live stream for pre-season friendly today

Tottenham's second pre-season outing of the weekend is against Luton this afternoon. Spurs, who beat Reading in Thomas Frank's first game in charge a week ago, have organised an additional friendly against Wycombe that will take place at Hotspur Way this morning. Once that game wraps up, Tottenham's focus will immediately shift to Kenilworth Road and a meeting with Luton who are now a League One side after suffering relegation in successive seasons. The two teams met as recently as March 2024 in the Premier League as a late goal from Heung-min Son handed Spurs all three points. That result ensured the Lilywhites completed the double over the Hatters that season after coming out on top 1-0 in the reverse fixture. Frank has made it clear that he will "play two even, strong teams" across the two games as he seeks to give as many players as many match minutes as possible before heading off on tour to Asia next week. Below is everything you need to know about where to watch Tottenham's second pre-season friendly of the day... How to watch Luton vs Tottenham TV channel: The game will NOT be broadcast live on TV in the UK. Live stream: Subscribers will be able to stream the game live on SPURSPLAY. A 12-month subscription costs £45. Live blog: You can follow all the action with Standard Sport's LIVE blog!

Arsenal line up Eberechi Eze bid as Viktor Gyokeres talks continue
Arsenal line up Eberechi Eze bid as Viktor Gyokeres talks continue

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Arsenal line up Eberechi Eze bid as Viktor Gyokeres talks continue

Arsenal are working on a payment structure for a bid that could allow them to sign Eberechi Eze without a substantial sale this summer. Mikel Arteta went into the window with a budget for Martin Zubimendi and a forward - currently expected to be Sporting's Viktor Gyokeres - as well as one or two less expensive signings like Brentford's Christian Norgaard, with any further signings expected to be funded by outgoings to comply with the Premier League's profit and sustainability (PSR) rules. Arsenal are nevertheless serious about doing Eze and this summer, and there is a hope that a suitable deal can be worked out. The 27-year-old's current contract runs until summer 2027, albeit with a release clause that comes to around £60m but then additional fees in bonuses. Arsenal are aiming on a structure that will amount to three instalments of £20m to match Crystal Palace's payment terms. Eze's preference is understood to be Arsenal should he leave Selhurst Park, although sources close to the situation believe Liverpool may yet activate long-standing interest. No club has yet made a concrete approach to Crystal Palace. Some of Arsenal's expenditure is going to be dictated by the striker situation. The club are negotiating with Sporting over Gyokeres, but the Portuguese champions are keeping a hardline and insisting on a total package that comes to £70m. Arsenal have advanced on that deal right now because of frustrations with Leipzig over Benjamin Sesko. There is a feeling that the German club have kept an unnecessarily hard line on price, when the two clubs were on good terms last summer. Viktor Gyokeres looks to be Arsenal's favoured striker target (AFP via Getty Images) Sesko at that point decided to stay for another year because he believed it would be best for his development, when a deal could have been struck for £50m. It was felt that Leipzig would then be willing to let him go this year for the right package, and at least £10m more in price, but the German club have held firm on a total fee of €80m. Arsenal had been working on the purchase of Sesko for 18 months.

Arsenal ramp up bid for Crystal Palace star
Arsenal ramp up bid for Crystal Palace star

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Arsenal ramp up bid for Crystal Palace star

Arsenal are aiming to swiftly move to secure Crystal Palace's Eberechi Eze once the deal for Sporting's Viktor Gyokeres is complete. The Independent understands the Swede is currently in London for his medical, allowing Arsenal to turn their attention to other targets. Mikel Arteta's side are Eze's top choice, as has previously been reported by The Independent, and those close to the player are confident a deal will be done in the next few weeks. Arsenal are hoping to agree a fee that comes to £60m, rather than the reported £68m clause, although on terms that are also amenable to Palace. Although there has not yet been any formal contact between the two clubs, the suggestions are that both will be flexible, amid good relations between the two boardrooms. The Independent has previously reported that Arsenal were constructing a deal that they hoped could be split into three instalments of £20m each. Arsenal's preference would be to sell a player before they move on to the Eze deal, but it is understood the signing is not contingent on that. There is a possibility Reiss Nelson could be included in any deal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store