Magnesium Has Definite Uses, But Isn't The Cure-All Social Media Says
But experts say it's tough to know if these claims are actually true.
'With supplements, in general, there's not a lot of requirements out there for good hard research,' said Jesse Wisniewski, a clinical pharmacist at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in California. 'The studies that have been done, there are usually a lot of flaws in those studies, so it's unclear how to apply it to certain groups of patients.'
That said, the nutrient does play a role in our overall health. 'Magnesium is a mineral element, so it's an essential part of helping our body function normally,' Wisniewski said. It's essential for nerve, muscle and heart function, he added. It's also important for maintaining bone health.
According to Perri Halperin, a clinical nutrition coordinator at Mount Sinai Health System in New York, the recommended daily magnesium intake for adult men is between 400 and 420 milligrams of magnesium per day. For women, that number is a little lower — between 310 and 320 milligrams per day.
Wisniewski said in a Western diet, roughly two-thirds of people are not getting enough magnesium. And according to the Cleveland Clinic, many people with a magnesium deficiency have no symptoms at all, or very mild symptoms, so you are probably unaware if you fall into this category. (For some, though, low magnesium levels may present as nausea and fatigue.)
There's virtually no risk of over-consuming magnesium when you're getting it through food, Halperin said. Plus, extra magnesium from food is pretty easily filtered out by your kidneys unless you have kidney issues, she noted.
This is not the case for supplementation, though — which can cause adverse effects like diarrhea and low blood pressure in those who have too much magnesium. '[It's] hard to reach the levels of magnesium that cause toxicity through diet alone, but much easier when you're popping a pill,' Halperin explained.
What's more, when comparing magnesium-rich food and magnesium supplements, the magnesium our bodies get through food has been highly studied; research shows it helps with the necessary functions mentioned above. However, magnesium as a supplement ― and any potential benefits that come from it ― is far less studied, Halperin explained.
All that said, the supplements still exist on the market for a reason ― and it's hard to ignore the glowing testimonials many have posted about magnesium pills. Not to mention the fact that there are multiple options out there, including magnesium glycinate, magnesium citrate and magnesium L-threonate (and that's not even all of them).
Do all of those work for the same problems? What's the difference? Do we even need it? We asked experts to find out:
'I would say the best-researched use of magnesium that we have a lot of good data on is for constipation,' said Gina Milano, a clinical dietitian at Stanford Health Care in California. 'And so there's various forms of magnesium that are used to help alleviate constipation.'
One form is magnesium oxide, which Milano said is inexpensive and easy to find at your local grocery store. Magnesium oxide is not well absorbed by the body, Milano said, so even if you are taking large doses of it, your body isn't actually soaking much of it up. 'However, it's helpful for promoting and alleviating constipation,' Milano added.
Magnesium hydroxide is also good for constipation, she said. You may have heard it referred to as milk of magnesia, which is readily available at stores as well. Magnesium citrate is good for constipation as well, she said.
According to Halperin, magnesium can be helpful for migraine pain as well. 'Studies have shown low magnesium levels in people suffering from migraines,' she said.
'In fact, the National Headache Foundation suggests a daily dose of 400 to 600 milligrams of magnesium to reduce the frequency of migraine attacks,' Halperin noted. Specifically, magnesium oxide is best for migraine treatment, according to the American Migraine Foundation.
It's worth knowing that the suggested dosage for migraine treatment might be higher than the recommended daily intake for men and especially women. 'So, there's the possibility of side effects like diarrhea, muscle weakness if you're taking magnesium supplements at that level,' Halperin said.
Social media influencers claim magnesium helped them with the brain fog that can occur as a result of a COVID infection. But experts say that isn't a definite use for the supplement — though there is some promising evidence that needs more backing.
'More recently there's been much more research about magnesium L-threonate and that's been linked to improved cognition and memory and even learning,' Milano said, noting that this type of magnesium is 'able to cross the blood-brain barriers,' making it highly absorbable by the body.
A 2010 study looked at the use of this kind of magnesium in rats and found that both young and elderly rats experienced improved memory and learning, Milano said. There was also a small 2022 study in humans that found magnesium L-threonate, coupled with vitamins and minerals including vitamins C and D, positively affected cognition as well. But it's unclear if it was the magnesium itself or the other items used in tandem, Milano noted.
Additional testing is needed to determine just how effective magnesium is for memory and cognition. And Milano said you should be wary of brands touting the benefits of magnesium L-threonate before more research is conducted.
'I think the thought here is, 'Oh, maybe this can be only used on a daily basis, but maybe it also could be used in prevention and treatment for elderly adults who are struggling with cognition' … that's looking a little bit more promising,' Milano said.
There is some evidence behind using magnesium for better sleep, Wisniewski said. 'Sleep ... that is definitely one of the common ones that people are using it for, and there's some limited evidence about it,' he said.
The studies on this have largely looked at older adults, but suggest magnesium can help people fall asleep faster, though it did not increase the amount of time they were actually asleep, Wisniewski explained. That said, the strongest evidence is fromshort-term studies (so the effects and risks long-term are unknown), and the favorable results could have been by chance, Wisniewski added.
Halperin and Milano both added that more research is needed before magnesium can be considered a science-backed sleep aid. Milano also said that many studies don't explicitly state the type of magnesium used for better sleep.
If you are looking to try magnesium for sleep, the Cleveland Clinic suggests magnesium glycinate or magnesium citrate, though you should check with your doctor before starting a new supplement.
'Depression is another area of interest when it comes to magnesium. I think depression, sleep, brain fog [improvements are] all related to the fact that magnesium assists with neurological pathways, and when they're not functioning appropriately due to low levels, it can lead to mood disorders [and] sleep disorders ― but it's not well understood,' Halperin said.
According to Milano, there have been a few randomized controlled trials exploring magnesium's use for depression, and some studies have shown that magnesium did improve depressive symptoms, but additional research is necessary — the studies largely saw benefits in older adults 65 and up.
When it comes to stress, Wisniewski said studies suggest that taking magnesium and Vitamin B6 together can help with mental health and stress levels. But it's unclear how much of a role magnesium plays. The study found that when magnesium was taken without Vitamin B6, it was not as effective for stress management.
'Ultimately, it's always a good idea to let your doctor know what supplements you're taking,' Wisniewski said, adding that if your doctor isn't available, then you can also speak with a pharmacist.
Again, it is possible to consume too much magnesium, which can result in diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, low mood, muscle weakness, low blood pressure and an abnormal heartbeat, according to Halperin.
Additionally, Wisniewski said magnesium supplements can interfere with certain medications for issues like thyroid disorders or HIV, and can also interfere with certain antibiotics. It's crucial that folks with any chronic conditions talk to a medical professional before taking magnesium.
'We often want our clients, patients, etc. to get micronutrients from food instead of relying on supplements to fix a problem,' Halperin said.
'If you're worried you're not getting enough magnesium or you're hearing about the powers of magnesium, go ahead and start by incorporating magnesium-rich foods into your diet,' Milano added.
This includes green, leafy vegetables like spinach and Swiss chard, nuts, seeds, beans, legumes and whole grains. For reference, 1 ounce of almonds has 80 milligrams of magnesium, 1 ounce of pumpkin seeds have 150 milligrams and half a cup of black beans has 60 milligrams, according to the Cleveland Clinic.
'Maybe even playing around with the timing of those foods to see if that does reduce your anxiety and depression in heightened moments or if it does help you sleep a little bit better,' Milano added.
If you do decide you want to try magnesium supplements for any of the uses above, be sure to buy your supplement from a reputable source, she said.
'The FDA does not regulate supplements, and many markets throw out products with big health claims,' Milano said. Look for products that are USP-certified or NSF-certified, she noted. This will ensure they are safe and the company is following high-quality practices.
Is Putting Your Legs Up On The Wall As Beneficial As Everyone Says?
What Experts Really Think About Greens Powders
Is Today Really The Saddest Day Of The Year? What To Know About 'Blue Monday.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
20 minutes ago
- Associated Press
US judge says HHS layoffs were likely unlawful and must be halted
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (AP) — A federal judge has ruled that the recent mass layoffs at the U.S. Health and Human Services were likely unlawful and ordered the Trump administration to halt plans to downsize and reorganize the nation's health workforce. U.S. District Judge Melissa DuBose in Rhode Island granted the preliminary injunction sought by a coalition of attorneys general from 19 states and the District of Columbia in a lawsuit filed in early May. DuBose said the states had shown 'irreparable harm,' from the cuts and were likely to prevail in their claims that the 'HHS's action was both arbitrary and capricious as well as contrary to law.' 'The executive branch does not have the authority to order, organize, or implement wholesale changes to the structure and function of the agencies created by Congress,' DuBose wrote in a 58-page order handed down in U.S. district court of Rhode Island. Her order blocks the Trump administration from finalizing layoffs announced in March or issuing any further firings. HHS is directed to file a status report by July 11. The ruling applies to terminated employees in four different divisions of HHS — the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; the Center for Tobacco Products within the Food and Drug Administration; the Office of Head Start within the Administration for Children and Families and employees of regional offices who work on Head Start matters; and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. eliminated more than 10,000 employees in late March and consolidated 28 agencies to just 15. Combined with previous layoffs by President Donald Trump's administration, about a quarter of the agency's workforce has been slashed, according to the lawsuit. The attorneys general argued that the massive restructuring was arbitrary and outside of the scope of the agency's authority. The lawsuit also says the action decimated essential programs and pushed burdensome costs onto states. 'The intended effect … was the wholesale elimination of many HHS programs that are critical to public health and safety,' the lawsuit argued. The cuts are part of a federal 'Make America Healthy Again' directive to streamline costly agencies and reduce redundancies. Kennedy told senators at a May 14 hearing that there is 'so much chaos and disorganization' at HHS. But the restructuring has eliminated key teams that regulate food safety and drugs, as well as support a wide range of programs for tobacco, HIV prevention and maternal and infant health. Kennedy has since said that because of mistakes, 20% of people fired might be reinstated. The states who joined the lawsuit have Democratic governors, and many of the same states — plus a few others — also sued the Trump administration over $11 billion in cuts to public health funding. A preliminary injunction was granted in that case in mid-May. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.


CNN
29 minutes ago
- CNN
These women dedicated almost 50 years to science. Their efforts may soon be trashed
For decades, researchers have been collecting samples from hundreds of thousands of women and tracking their health. The work has deepened our basic understanding of human health, but now the entire project is in danger. When nurses Patricia Chubb, 70, and her mother, Charlotte Mae Rohrbaugh, 98, joined the fledgling Harvard University-led Nurses' Health Study in 1976, they had no idea it would last for nearly 50 years. 'It's probably the longest, if not one of the longest, prospective health care studies for women that's ever been done,' said Chubb, who lives in Pennsylvania. 'They picked nurses to do the study because they know how to answer health questions correctly and can draw their own blood and the like — it's very cost-effective.' Study data gathered through the years from some 280,000 nurses in the United States has contributed enormously to improving how we live. The work has informed dietary recommendations, including national dietary guidelines; led to hormonal therapies for breast cancer prevention and treatment; and contributed to research about how nutrients, inflammatory markers and heavy metals influence disease development. Yet all of that priceless data may soon be discarded due to President Donald Trump's ongoing feud with Harvard over what Trump claims is a failure to protect Jewish students during campus protests. On Monday, an investigation by the Trump administration claimed that Harvard was in 'violent violation' of the Civil Rights Act by being 'deliberately indifferent' or a 'willful participant in anti-Semitic harassment of Jewish students, faculty, and staff.' Harvard strongly disagreed with the administration's claims. Interestingly, Trump had posted on Truth Social on June 20 that Harvard had 'acted extremely appropriately' during negotiations and that he was close to a 'Deal' with the university that would 'be 'mindbogglingly' HISTORIC, and very good for our Country.' But then, in the letter sent to Harvard on Monday, Trump officials made it clear Harvard would continue to lose 'all federal financial resources,' including millions for research, if the university did not comply with the administration's wishes. Funding for the Nurses' Health Study and its companion study for men, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, had already been abruptly withdrawn in mid-May, said Harvard nutritionist Dr. Walter Willett, who has led the studies since 1980. Willett and his team were left scrambling to find the funds needed to protect freezers stocked with stool, urine and DNA specimens gathered from thousand of nurses for nearly five decades. Just the liquid nitrogen needed to keep the specimens frozen costs thousands of dollars a month. 'Of course, we would all love to have an agreement that lets us get on with research, education, and working to improve the health and well-being of everyone.' said Willett, a professor of epidemiology and nutrition at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston, who has published over 2,000 papers on nutrition. 'But this can't happen if we turn over admissions, faculty hiring and curriculum to governmental control.' Twenty-one-year-old Jackie Desmond joined the Harvard-based study when she graduated from nursing school in 1978. She considered the research so valuable that she later enrolled her 9-year-old son Kyle in a spin-off study investigating family nutrition. At 41, he still participates. 'They send us questionnaires once or twice a year about lifestyle and nutrition, what medications you're on, your lifestyle habits, when you sleep, when you eat, everything,' Desmond said. 'I've sent them samples of blood, urine, feces, whatever they need.' The study even has solicited toenails, which carry markers of heavy metals. One reason the study was so special is it was only focused on women, said Desmond, who is now 68 and lives in Connecticut. 'Before that, most studies were done only on men. So, it was about time to focus on studying women and they came up with some amazing information that's been very helpful to many of us,' Desmond said. 'You know for that reason alone, these samples are irreplaceable — losing them might put women's health research back many years,' she added. For Desmond and Chubb, the cuts in research funding make no sense. 'There's no connection in my mind between antisemitism and medical research. Why are you getting rid of decades of research? It's infuriating,' Desmond said. 'And it's very personal — I guess they'll just toss my DNA into the dump.' The threats to cuts also arrive as the Trump administration pushes its 'Make American Healthy Again' initiative, which Chubb finds ironic. 'You know what? There's lots of research going on to get us healthier and keep us healthier, and those are cuts that should not be made,' Chubb said. 'It's so shortsighted to shoot first and aim later.' Data from the Nurses' Health Study has vastly improved how all Americans live and eat while also impacting the health of people around the world, Willett said. 'From the efforts of these dedicated nurses we learned trans fats were terrible for health, and now those are basically gone from our food supply,' he said. 'We also found one of the earliest links between cigarette smoking and heart disease.' Data from the nurses' studies found red meat and alcohol can lead to breast cancer in women. Other key findings also proved lifestyle choices can improve health — the research identified diets that may reduce risk of cognitive decline. A list of scientific advances produced from the Nurses' Health Study data appears on its website. Dorothy Dodds, who died at 83, joined the original study in 1976. When her daughter Martha became a nurse in 1982, she joined the second wave of research, called the Nurses' Health Study II. A third generation of the study is still enrolling participants — the Nurses' Health Study 3. For Martha Dodds, now 68, her family's years of dedication to the study is priceless. 'You know, nurses don't get paid a lot,' Dodds said. 'We do our work because we want to help others. We took the study seriously and were careful and honest with our answers. 'My one little part may have helped women cut down on alcohol consumption, or maybe it'll help both men and women exercise more and cut back on trans fats,' Dodds added. All of the nurses CNN spoke with consider their years of dedication to the Nurses' Health Study a lifetime accomplishment. 'I'm so proud to be a participant, I'll put it in my obituary,' Chubb said. 'And my 98-year-old mom — who's still got all her faculties, and some of other people's, too — has chosen the Nurses' Health Study for donations in lieu of flowers in her funeral plans.' Chubb and her mother are in good company. Families of nurses across the country have proudly listed their Nurses' Health Study participation in their obituaries: Karen Ann Mudgett from Michigan, Donna Palmer from Georgia, Jeanette Thomas from Pennsylvania, Mary Ellen Natale from New Jersey, Patricia Anne Cobb from California, Marion Jones from Florida, Irene Rees from Virginia and many more. 'And now these hundreds of thousands of hours of work by nearly 300,000 nurses will just be discarded?' Dodds said. 'We're going to take 50 years of research and all this biodata and just destroy it, make it useless? 'It's like burning the Library of Congress — you just can't get that back.' Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.


Health Line
29 minutes ago
- Health Line
A Guide to Medicare Advantage HMO-POS Plans
Medicare Advantage offers various plan types to choose from. One such option is the Health Maintenance Organization Point-of-Service (HMO-POS) plan. This type of plan is similar to an HMO plan but offers different costs and benefits. Medicare Advantage plans are an alternative to Original Medicare (parts A and B). While each Medicare Advantage plan is required to offer the same coverage as Original Medicare, they may also offer other benefits. These additional benefits may include vision, dental, and hearing, among others. There are six options for Medicare Advantage plans: Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) Health Maintenance Organization Point-of-Service (HMO-POS) Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) Medicare medical savings account (MSA) Private Fee-For-Service (PFFS) Special Needs Plan (SNP) Glossary of common Medicare terms Out-of-pocket cost: This is the amount you pay for care when Medicare doesn't pay the full cost or offer coverage. It includes premiums, deductibles, coinsurance, and copayments. Premium: This is the monthly amount you pay for Medicare coverage. Deductible: This is the annual amount you must spend out of pocket before Medicare begins to cover services and treatments. Coinsurance: This is the percentage of treatment costs you're responsible for paying out of pocket. With Medicare Part B, you typically pay 20%. Copayment: This is a fixed dollar amount you pay when receiving certain treatments or services. With Medicare, this often applies to prescription medications. What does HMO-POS mean? An HMO-POS plan is an HMO plan that offers point-of-service payments in certain circumstances. This means that HMO-POS plans work in basically the same way that HMO plans do. For example, you still have to choose a primary care physician (PCP) and use in-network providers most of the time. But in certain situations, you can go outside of the network for care and pay a higher copayment or coinsurance. This is similar to a PPO plan but may cost less. »Learn more: Medicare Advantage HMO plans How do HMO-POS plans work? Generally, HMO-POS plans work the same way regular HMO plans do: You typically must choose a PCP. You typically have to use healthcare providers within your plan's network. You typically must have a referral to see a specialist. HMO-POS plans tend to offer a bit more flexibility. They allow you to get some services using out-of-network providers for a higher cost. This allows you similar flexibility to PPO plans at a lower cost. Vs. PPO plans PPO plans offer more flexibility than HMO-POS plans. With PPO plans: You have a list of in-network providers. But you can also see out-of-network providers at a higher cost. You do not have to choose a PCP. You do not need a referral to see a specialist. Summary HMO-POS plans generally work the same way HMO plans do. But they offer some of the flexibility of PPO plans as well. This means, in some circumstances, you can see out-of-network providers. You'll have to pay more for these services. But you have the option to use them if you need them without changing plans. The information on this website may assist you in making personal decisions about insurance, but it is not intended to provide advice regarding the purchase or use of any insurance or insurance products. Healthline Media does not transact the business of insurance in any manner and is not licensed as an insurance company or producer in any U.S. jurisdiction. Healthline Media does not recommend or endorse any third parties that may transact the business of insurance.