Overseas investors make close to $100 billion from India investments
Overseas investors took back home a record $97.7 billion as their profits (dividend, interest income, etc) from their investments in debt, equity and other fixed income instruments in FY25, compared with $87.5 billion in FY24, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) data showed.
Besides foreign direct investments (
FDI
) in Indian firms, which yielded dividends and profit income for overseas shareholders, they also made money in Indian debt investments. Last year saw higher inflows in Indian debt instruments as local debt was included in the JPMorgan bond index.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
This Wrinkle Cream Keeps Selling Out at Boots Find Out Why
Skincare Magazine
Learn More
Undo
'The income earnings have been supported by gross FDI inflows that continued to rise in FY25, besides FPI inflows into the bond index' said Gaura Sengupta, chief economist at
IDFC First Bank
. 'Debt investments performed well as domestic bond yields were lower.'
Although the RBI data did not give the source of dividend and profits, a sizable portion of private equity exits comprising dividend and profits was reflected in the investment income.
Live Events
To be sure, the nation brought back home 33% higher profits, amounting to $45 billion. This was largely due to the RBI earning 37% higher returns through deployment of foreign exchange reserves. Income from reserves deployment amounted to $21.7 billion in FY25, compared with $15.8 billion in the previous year, RBI data showed.
This has helped rein in the deficit in the investment income in the current account. The deficit in investment income was lower at $52.6 billion in FY25, compared with a deficit of $53.6 billion in the previous year.
'Mirroring trends in overall two-way foreign investment flows last year, repatriation of dividend and interest income by
foreign investors
was offset by an increase in Indian companies setting out more investments in overseas markets, which likely resulted in a jump in inward flow of related income' said Radhika Rao, executive director, DBS Bank. 'These dynamics are likely to make the investment income segment better balanced, under the current account, compared to being a consistent drag in the past.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
India-US trade deal: Donald Trump administration may cut tariff to below 20%; putting India in favourable position against other countries
This is an AI image. United States is working toward an interim trade agreement with India that could reduce proposed tariffs to below 20%, giving the country a more favorable position compared to other countries in the region. Unlike many nations, India is not expected to receive a formal tariff hike notice this week, and the agreement may be announced through an official statement, Bloomberg reported, quoting sources. The proposed interim trade deal between the two nations would allow both the sides to continue negotiations, giving India time to address unresolved issues before a broader agreement expected later this year, the source added. India, US near trade deal. What happens next if New Delhi joins Trump's shortlist? The planned agreement is likely to set a baseline tariff of under 20%, down from the 26% initially proposed, with provisions to allow further adjustments as part of a final pact. However, the exact timeline for the interim deal remains uncertain. If finalised, India would likely join a select group of nations that have reached trade arrangements with the Trump administration. In contrast, several other countries were hit with surprise tariff hikes of up to 50% this week, ahead of the August 1 deadline. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 기미, 레이저말고 이렇게 해보세요 에스테틱최원장 Undo India is pushing for a more favourable deal than the one signed with Vietnam, which included 20% tariffs. Vietnam, caught off guard by the high rate, is now seeking a revision. So far, only the UK has officially signed trade deals with the Trump administration. Earlier on Thursday, Trump told NBC News that he is considering imposing blanket tariffs of 15% to 20% on most trading partners who haven't yet received specific rates. Currently, the baseline tariff for most US trade partners stands at 10%. For Asian countries, announced rates so far include 20% for Vietnam and the Philippines, and as high as 40% for Laos and Myanmar. Despite being among the earliest to initiate trade discussions this year, India-US relations have shown recent tensions. While Trump indicates an imminent agreement, he has also suggested additional tariffs regarding India's BRICS membership. An Indian negotiation team is expected to visit Washington soon to push forward trade talks. India has already made its final offer to the Trump administration and outlined its non-negotiable positions. The key sticking points remain, including the US demand for India to allow genetically modified (GM) crops, something New Delhi has firmly opposed, citing concerns for farmers, while the other unresolved issues include agricultural non-tariff barriers and regulatory hurdles in the pharmaceutical sector, the source added. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
India can deliver 52 GW RTC clean power by 2030, save ₹9,000 crore annually: Report
New Delhi: India can deliver 52 gigawatts (GW) of round-the-clock (RTC) clean electricity by 2030 at a lower cost compared to annually matched clean energy, according to a new analysis by climate think tank TransitionZero. The 52 GW capacity would account for 70 per cent of a hypothetical RTC electricity portfolio designed to meet five per cent of India's national electricity demand. This shift to RTC procurement could result in annual savings of USD 1 billion (approximately ₹9,000 crore) for grid operators by 2030 due to avoided overbuild of generation capacity. According to the report, carbon emissions could be reduced by 2.4 per cent at the system level, with the cost of carbon abatement three times lower than annual matching of clean energy. At full 100 per cent RTC matching, India-wide emissions could be reduced by seven per cent compared to annual matching. RTC clean electricity, or 24/7 carbon-free energy (CFE), matches every hour of electricity consumption with supply from clean sources. The report noted that unlike annual renewable energy certificates, RTC ensures clean power is available consistently across all hours. This is particularly relevant for sectors like heavy industry and data centres, where electricity demand is continuous. 'Our model shows that in India commercial and industrial customers can meet 70 per cent of their hourly electricity demand with carbon-free electricity at a cost below that of annual renewable energy matching, while driving greater levels of decarbonisation and providing significant benefits to the Indian electricity system,' said Irfan Mohamed, South Asia Analyst at TransitionZero. The report highlighted that incentivising RTC electricity procurement is critical for least-cost grid planning. It noted that India can avoid issues being experienced in Europe, where excess solar capacity has contributed to a decline in power purchase agreement (PPA) capture rates, particularly in Spain. 'Round-the-clock clean electricity planning and procurement is a 'no regrets' option for India's energy planners, grid operators, and large corporations,' said Matt Gray, Co-founder and CEO at TransitionZero. 'It shows that companies can procure hourly-matched clean electricity at minimal extra cost, and grid operators can save money through least-cost grid planning. In doing so, governments can help deliver the energy transition at the lowest cost.' The findings come as the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHGP) undergoes a multi-year revision, with updates to Scope 2 guidance being considered. Hourly emissions accounting is emerging as a preferred method, though the GHGP does not set targets or rank performance levels.
NDTV
29 minutes ago
- NDTV
Reddit Post Warning Indian H-1B Holders Against Buying Homes In US Sparks Debate Online
A Reddit user has sparked a discussion online after warning Indian H-1B visa holders about the risks of owning a house in the US. In the post titled 'Please don't buy a house in this environment', the user who goes by the name 'smokyskyline', highlighted several issues faced by H-1B visa holders, including the financial burden of a mortgage and the unpredictable nature of the US immigration policies. The user also pointed to the instability in the tech sector and "lifestyle inflation" as reasons for concern. "There's a tendency for Indian H1b holders to try to buy a house a few years after they're in the US, in their 30s or so, around the time they're starting a family. There's a strong cultural belief that buying a house is an investment and renting is throwing away money. It's not," the anonymous user wrote. Please don't buy a house in this environment by u/smokyskyline in h1b The Redditor gave three key reasons to support his stance on owning a house while on a temporary work visa. "First, if you run the math on rent vs buy in this environment, rent usually comes on top. Remember, when you are buying, you are also throwing money away- to the bank as mortgage which is primarily interest in the early years. So it's really about the choice of throwing money to the bank vs landlord. Interest rates are high," they wrote. Second, the original poster highlighted lifestyle inflation and its impact on work. "Houses in suburbs typically mean a lot of commute. Less time to work or relax, more time dealing with traffic. And now that you have a house, you'll spend money customising it. You'll look around at your neighbors and start subconsciously start buying more things and more services. And you will resist leaving cities because you don't want to abandon the house you purchased," the user wrote. Lastly, the OP pointed to the instability in the tech sector and the unpredictable nature of US immigration policies as reasons for concern. "The tech environment is way too unstable. Politics follows the same environment. Before you know it, you may lose your job, or the country could be become unfriendlier to H1bs. The stress from a mortgage will be intense. Your company could change its tune any day and you are just a resource," they said. "It feels wrong to not "own", but if you reframe it as paying for the privilege of flexibility and time, it seems a lot better to rent than own. And that is assuming that it's actually more expensive to rent, which it's usually not. Your kids will not care about the difference. And you will be happier," the Redditor concluded. The post has caught the internet's attention, with many users agreeing with the OP. "Even though few may have lucked out, still one of the dumbest move is to buy a house when in H1b and still have a chance to be moved or lose a job," wrote one user. "Listen to this guy! I am the exact guy he described in the post and regret my decision everyday," commented another. "Finally someone said it right. Not worth it at least in the current administration," said a third user. However, some Redditors disagreed, saying that the decision was dependent on the area where one lived or decided to rent vs buy, plus their financial condition, and the housing market. "Owning a house is a necessity. Renting changing houses after every 2-3 years is a lot of work and trouble. Again rent keeps on increasing as per the state of the market. But if you buy a housing loan on a fixed structure with increasing salaries it becomes easier with time. After a certain point you want to settle live in a community," one user wrote.
