logo
Militarised Kashmir: Where Peace Remains Elusive

Militarised Kashmir: Where Peace Remains Elusive

The Hindu24-05-2025
Published : May 24, 2025 18:15 IST - 5 MINS READ
In the shadow of the Himalaya, the Kashmir Valley—once serenaded by poets—is now eerily quiet. The hush is not peace but paralysis, a silence heavy with occupation, suspicion, and forgotten promises. Once envisioned as a crown jewel of India's postcolonial federation, Kashmir today lies buried beneath a fortress of military installations, surveillance drones, and barbed wire.
India's claim of development is dwarfed by the reality of desolation. With nearly 700,000 troops stationed in the Valley, Kashmir holds the distinction of being one of the most militarised zones on earth. The omnipresence of military boots is not incidental; it is intentional. This is the face of state power in the 21st century—what Michel Foucault described as 'biopower', the ability to manage life by calculating what lives, and what dies.
India's defence budget swelled to $72.6 billion last year, outpacing healthcare and education combined. Pakistan, though economically beleaguered, follows a parallel track, investing in F-16s and Chinese drones while millions of its citizens struggle with food insecurity. This is not budgetary imbalance; it is a political theology that prizes territorial domination over human well-being.
Arms race
Both nations have adopted what Noam Chomsky termed the logic of the 'manufactured enemy': an ever-present threat used to justify the machinery of war and the erosion of civil liberties. Kashmir serves as this manufactured arena, a theatre where nationalism is rehearsed through force, not dialogue.
Also Read | The LoC is calm again, but Kashmiris still live under the shadow of war
The greatest casualties are not just lives lost but futures erased. In rural Kashmir, over 60 per cent of schools lack reliable electricity or clean drinking water. A UNICEF report said that 70 per cent of children in the region show signs of psychological trauma. Curfews, lockdowns, and Internet blackouts have made learning episodic and livelihoods impossible.
Media narratives from New Delhi or Islamabad rarely capture these subtleties. Instead, Kashmir is reduced to two binaries: security and sedition.
The lived experiences of farmers unable to sell fruit owing to blockades or schoolgirls whose teachers have fled for safer jobs are ignored. These human costs are not collateral damage—they are the central plot.
Colonial playbook
Both India and Pakistan emerged from the crucible of anti-colonial struggle. Yet both have internalised and intensified the colonial playbook. Surveillance, sedition laws, mass incarceration, and enforced disappearances are mechanisms inherited from imperial administrators. As the philosopher Giorgio Agamben warned, we now live in a permanent 'state of exception', a place where constitutional rights are suspended indefinitely in the name of security.
The Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act in India and Pakistan's draconian anti-terror legislation have normalised impunity. Soldiers shoot without consequence. Homes are raided without warrants. Dissenters vanish without trial. In this zone of lawless legality, human rights are not protected—they are strategically erased.
Kashmir is not just a case of state control; it is a laboratory of 'necropolitics', a term coined by the philosopher Achille Mbembe. In necropolitical regimes, power is exercised not just by preserving life but by deciding who may die, and how. The border, once a demarcation, becomes a weapon; the checkpoint, a ritual of humiliation.
The violence is intersectional. In India, Dalit and tribal soldiers, drawn disproportionately from marginalised communities, are sent to patrol territories where they are simultaneously feared and expendable. In Pakistan, it is young, jobless Pashtuns who are conscripted into the line of fire. This is a shared tragedy: militarism consuming the poor to defend the illusions of the powerful.
Kashmir's suffering
Arms dealers from the US, Israel, Russia, China, and Türkiye profit from the suffering in Kashmir. Between 2020 and 2024, both India and Pakistan ranked among the top five arms importers in the world. Surveillance systems, anti-riot gear, and sniper rifles are marketed not only for defence but for suppression. The global military-industrial complex has no morality—only contracts.
International institutions offer rhetoric but little resolve. The UN and the World Bank note rising instability in South Asia, yet the economic interests of weapons-producing states outweigh the calls for justice. This is neoliberal militarism at its most insidious: state violence funded by international finance, legitimated by silence.
If there is to be a future for Kashmir—and for South Asia at large—it must begin with moral clarity and policy courage.
What India, Pakistan must do
First, India and Pakistan must urgently recalibrate their defence priorities. Diverting even 20 per cent of military expenditure toward healthcare and education could end child malnutrition in India and rebuild Pakistan's crumbling schools.
Second, an international embargo on Kashmir-bound weaponry must be seriously considered. Countries that arm governments to suppress citizens must be held accountable. No peace is possible with rifles aimed at classrooms.
Third, a credible peace process must centre not just the states but the people. Kashmiris—Muslim, Pandit, Sikh—must be at the table. Political resolution cannot be achieved through nationalist tokenism or bureaucratic decrees. It demands listening to those who have borne the weight of war, curfew, and betrayal.
Also Read | Fragile peace, persistent tensions, and the limits of diplomacy
Arundhati Roy once distilled the region's tragedy into a single line: Kashmir remains the subcontinent's most haunting remnant of Partition. But in truth, it is also the unfinished dream of postcolonial dignity.
We must continue to believe that Kashmir, a region rich in culture and history, can rise above the barbed wire and gunfire to embrace freedom, equality, and justice.
The ghosts of the Valley are not silent. They are asking the subcontinent, what kind of nations do you wish to be? Militarised shells ruled by fear or plural democracies animated by hope? The answer may determine not just Kashmir's fate but the moral soul of South Asia itself.
Debashis Chakrabarti is a political columnist and Commonwealth Fellow, UK.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thailand-Cambodia violence: Thai military report more clashes; over 100,000 people flee, 14 dead
Thailand-Cambodia violence: Thai military report more clashes; over 100,000 people flee, 14 dead

Mint

time15 minutes ago

  • Mint

Thailand-Cambodia violence: Thai military report more clashes; over 100,000 people flee, 14 dead

Clashes between Thai and Cambodian troops took place along their border for a second day early on Friday, with Cambodia using heavy weapons including artillery and rockets, Thailand's military said. 1. "Cambodian forces have conducted sustained bombardment utilising heavy weapons, field artillery, and BM-21 rocket systems," it said in a statement, as reported by Reuters, 'Thai forces have responded with appropriate supporting fire in accordance with the tactical situation.' 2. Bangkok reported on Friday that over 100,000 people have fled the most intense border clashes between Thailand and Cambodia in ten years, as the death toll continues to climb and global powers call for an immediate ceasefire. 3. The longstanding territorial dispute escalated into heavy combat on Thursday, involving fighter jets, artillery, tanks, and ground forces. In response to the escalating crisis, the UN Security Council is scheduled to convene an emergency meeting later in the day. Cambodian soldiers reload the BM-21 multiple rocket launcher in Preah Vihear province on July 24, 2025. Thailand launched air strikes on Cambodian military targets on July 24 as Cambodia fired rockets and artillery, killing a civilian, in a dramatic escalation of a long-running border row between the two neighbours. (Photo by AFP) 4. The Thai interior ministry said more than 100,000 people from four border provinces had been moved to nearly 300 temporary shelters, while the kingdom's health ministry announced that the death toll had risen to 14 -- 13 civilians and one soldier, AFP reported. 5. The fighting marks a dramatic escalation in a long-running dispute between the neighbours -- both popular destinations for millions of foreign tourists -- over their shared 800-kilometre (500-mile) frontier. 6. Dozens of kilometres in several areas are contested, and fighting broke out between 2008 and 2011, leaving at least 28 people dead and tens of thousands displaced. 7. Several areas spanning dozens of kilometres remain disputed, with clashes occurring between 2008 and 2011. These earlier confrontations resulted in at least 28 deaths and forced tens of thousands of people to flee their homes. 8. A 2013 UN court ruling had kept the border dispute largely in check for over a decade, but tensions flared again in May when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a fresh clash. 9. According to the Thai army, Thursday's fighting centred on six key locations, including areas near two ancient temples. Ground forces supported by tanks engaged in fierce battles for control, as Cambodia launched rockets and artillery into Thai territory, prompting Thailand to deploy F-16 fighter jets to strike military targets across the border. Cambodian forces have conducted sustained bombardment utilising heavy weapons, field artillery, and BM-21 rocket systems. 10. Both sides blamed each other for firing first, while Thailand accused Cambodia of targeting civilian infrastructure, including a hospital hit by shells and a petrol station hit by at least one rocket. Thursday's clashes came hours after Thailand expelled the Cambodian ambassador and recalled its own envoy after five members of a Thai military patrol were wounded by a landmine, as reported by AFP. (With inputs from agencies) Key Takeaways The conflict has resulted in over 100,000 people being displaced, indicating a significant humanitarian crisis. Historical tensions between Thailand and Cambodia have flared up again, with recent clashes reminiscent of earlier conflicts. International calls for a ceasefire highlight the global concern over escalating violence in the region.

Death toll in Thailand rises to 14 in border clashes with Cambodia: Official
Death toll in Thailand rises to 14 in border clashes with Cambodia: Official

Hans India

timean hour ago

  • Hans India

Death toll in Thailand rises to 14 in border clashes with Cambodia: Official

Fourteen Thai people were killed and 46 others injured in military clashes near the Thailand-Cambodia border, the deputy spokesperson of the Ministry of Public Health said. Cambodia had not released any information on its casualties as of Thursday evening, Xinhua news agency reported. In Bangkok, Public Health Minister Somsak Thepsuthin confirmed 14 deaths, including 13 civilians and one soldier, along with 46 injuries. He condemned what he described as Cambodian attacks on civilians and a hospital: "We urge the Cambodian government to immediately halt these war criminal actions, and return to respecting the principles of peaceful coexistence." The violence followed a landmine blast on Wednesday that wounded five Thai soldiers -- an incident that triggered the expulsion of ambassadors by both sides and a sharp diplomatic fallout. Thai officials accused Cambodia of laying new Russian-made mines, while Cambodia dismissed the claims as "baseless accusations", blaming leftover ordnance from past conflicts. On Thursday, clashes flared in at least six areas along the border, including near the ancient Ta Muen Thom temple. Thai F-16 fighter jets conducted airstrikes in response to what the government said were Cambodian truck-mounted rockets. "It was an act of self-defence," Thai Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Nikorndej Balankura said. The situation escalated following skirmishes that began Thursday morning. Each of the two sides blamed the other side for violating international law. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet urged the UN Security Council to convene an urgent meeting to discuss the matter. Cambodia's Defence Ministry claimed the airstrikes hit a road near Preah Vihear, a UNESCO World Heritage site, and vowed legal action. "The temple was declared a World Heritage site by UNESCO... and is a 'historical legacy of the Cambodian people,'" Cambodia's Culture Ministry said. Defense Ministry spokesperson Lieutenant General Maly Socheata said Cambodia had "no choice but to defend its territory against Thai threats," insisting the attacks were "focused on the military places, not on any other place". The conflict drew swift international concern. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres urged both sides "to exercise maximum restraint and address any issues through dialogue," according to deputy spokesperson Farhan Haq. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet requested an emergency session, which was held behind closed doors in New York on Friday. Thailand sealed all land border crossings and advised its citizens to leave Cambodia. All seven Thai airlines offered to help repatriate Thai nationals. Meanwhile, the conflict has added pressure to Thailand's domestic politics. Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra was suspended on July 1 amid an ethics probe linked to her handling of a phone call with Cambodia's former leader Hun Sen. Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai is now leading the response, warning Cambodia against further aggression.

Bad news for Trump, as China is making close ties with US ally, offers its most dangerous weapons used during Operation Sindoor against India, it is…, country is…
Bad news for Trump, as China is making close ties with US ally, offers its most dangerous weapons used during Operation Sindoor against India, it is…, country is…

India.com

timean hour ago

  • India.com

Bad news for Trump, as China is making close ties with US ally, offers its most dangerous weapons used during Operation Sindoor against India, it is…, country is…

Saudi Arabia has long been regarded as a strong ally of the US. However, in recent years, it has appeared to forge stronger ties with China. The US has reconfigured its efforts to engage with Saudi Arabia by offering NATO-like security arrangements in return for Saudi Arabia's recognition of Israel. But the long war in Gaza has stalled negotiations on this front. On the other hand, China has enhanced its outreach to Saudi Arabia by offering military cooperation. For its part, China has offered to provide J-10 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia, the same aircraft Pakistan falsely claimed was used to shoot down India's Rafale during Operation Sindoor. Which US Ally Is Moving Closer to China? This disinformation was heavily propagated by China, Turkey, and the USA, all acting in their strategic interests. None of these countries could provide any actual evidence for this. China is now taking this same narrative to market its weapons. It has labelled the J-10 fighter jet as a combat-verified aircraft. Despite its effort, no country—including Saudi Arabia—has yet made any formal commitment to purchase the J-10 jets. While speaking to a researcher specializing in Middle East affairs at China's Northwest University stated, 'One of the reasons why Saudi Arabia prefers western weapons over its Chinese equivalent is because Chinese weapons have not seen combat in recent years.' Furthermore, he stated, 'This may change now that the Chinese-made J-10 fighter jet has drawn its first blood.' What Deal Has China Offered? Saudi Arabia has consistently relied on the United States for both its security needs and the sustainability of its petrodollars-driven economy. Due to this, Saudi Arabia remained one of the largest defense buyers of America. However, in recent years, there has been tension in the relationship between the two countries. During Joe Biden's presidency, the U.S. appeared willing to distance itself from Saudi Arabia, most notably by stopping support for its fight against Houthi rebels; even though, at Washington's request, Saudi Arabia had created a military coalition against the Houthis. The U.S. further stressed the relationship by removing air defense systems from the Middle East in order to bolster European security because of the situation with Russia. Consequently, Saudi Arabia has sought alternative partners for defense cooperation to lessen its reliance on Washington. Meanwhile, turning fully away from the dependency on Washington and towards China is still complicated. Seeing an opening, China's intensification in its outreach has included offers of military equipment (i.e., ballistic missiles, drones, howitzers, and air defense systems), at competitive prices and unconditional options. So far, however, Saudi Arabia has exported most of its new defense systems from the United States. In May, the United States and Saudi Arabia finalized a $142 billion arms deal that the White House declared was the 'largest defense sales agreement in history.' The agreement was completed during President Donald Trump's visit to the Kingdom; this visit was the first stop on a four-day tour of the Gulf. It was the first example of the transactional nature of the foreign policy pursued by Trump.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store