logo
Donkey Kong Might Be Nintendo's Next Cinematic Leading… Ape

Donkey Kong Might Be Nintendo's Next Cinematic Leading… Ape

Gizmodo14-07-2025
Donkey Kong is having a moment. This summer, not only did Mario's original foe get his first theme park ride in the United States, but he's also got Donkey Kong Bananza, his own mega game coming to Switch 2 later this week, and he might even be getting a movie sometime in the future.
As of right now, we know there are two Nintendo movies in the works. A sequel to the mega-hit Super Mario Bros. movie scheduled for release April 3, 2026, as well as a live-action film based on The Legend of Zelda, which is coming May 7, 2027. That's important because it sets up a quote from Nintendo president Shuntaro Furukawa that sent fan speculation into a frenzy a few weeks back. On an investors call, Furukawa said, 'Although we cannot discuss our plans beyond The Legend of Zelda movie at this time, we are working on various other projects.'
What other projects? Well, soon after, it was discovered that Nintendo Studios and Universal Pictures filed a joint copyright for an 'Untitled Donkey Kong Project' that's classified as a 'motion picture.' io9 reached out to representatives for Universal and Nintendo for comment or clarification but had not yet heard back as of publication. We'll update this piece if or when we do.
Since this appears to be a joint collaboration with Universal and Nintendo, it's safe to assume if a Donkey Kong movie is in the works, it could follow the character in animation. He appeared in The Super Mario Bros. Movie, after all, voiced by Seth Rogen, so maybe this would be an expansion of that world. Maybe it could even lead to other films in that universe—Wario, Luigi, Toad, etc.
But for now, it seems like after the second Mario movie and the first Zelda movie, a Donkey Kong movie is on the way. And, with the character returning to the spotlight in such a big way this summer, we think it makes a lot of sense. What about you?
Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ALIEN: EARTH Aims to Be the Next Big Prestige TV Phenomenon and It May Have Cost Over $250 Million — GeekTyrant
ALIEN: EARTH Aims to Be the Next Big Prestige TV Phenomenon and It May Have Cost Over $250 Million — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

time29 minutes ago

  • Geek Tyrant

ALIEN: EARTH Aims to Be the Next Big Prestige TV Phenomenon and It May Have Cost Over $250 Million — GeekTyrant

FX is going all-in with its upcoming series Alien: Earth , the first Alien project to bring those nightmare-fueled Xenomorphs to planet Earth. The ambitious new show isn't just another genre experiment as FX and showrunner Noah Hawley are reportedly positioning it as the next prestige-level hit on the scale of Game of Thrones or The Last of Us . According to Variety, FX wants Alien: Earth to be a sweeping, character-driven drama that expands the beloved franchise into new storytelling territory. And they're paying big for it. The series is rumored to have a budget that could exceed Shōgun , FX's recent historical epic that cost around $250 million. That makes Alien: Earth one of the most expensive shows ever produced for the network. This massive investment makes sense considering what the show promises. Not only is this the first time the franchise takes place on Earth, but the series introduces bold new ideas while honoring classic Alien themes. At the center of the story is Sydney Chandler as Wendy, a human child whose consciousness is transferred into a synthetic body. And yes, the Xenomorph threat is coming to Earth — along with some new, terrifying creatures. The earthbound setting also lets the show dive deep into a theme that has always been at the heart of Alien : corporate greed. As Hawley puts it, the series explores what the planet actually looks like in this future. "All I tried to do is think one or two steps ahead. Is it realistic to think that billionaires are going to be trillionaires? The planet is heating up, and the seas are going to rise - it's going to be a hot, wet planet that we live on." Hawley also acknowledges the freedom that comes with building something new instead of being weighed down by decades of rigid lore: "There's surprisingly little mythology across seven movies," he explains. "It was great to not have to jerry-rig a mythology into what's existing, but to just start again." That flexibility is key for Hawley and FX. Gina Balian, FX Entertainment president, added: "Everything doesn't have to fit together the way you expect from Marvel. Fans don't expect that in this universe. It doesn't have the same pressure." This means Alien: Earth isn't trying to create a Marvel-style shared universe, something Hawley has been clear about from the start. Alien has always thrived as an anthology-like series, with each film offering a unique tone and setting. Personally, I'm thrilled that the series seems to be sidestepping some of the lore from Prometheus and Alien: Covenant . Those films redefined the Xenomorph as a product of engineered design rather than an unknowable terror, and that never sat right with a lot of us. A clean slate opens the door for the mystery and dread that made Alien iconic. Alien: Earth is set to premiere on August 12, and if Hawley delivers what he's promising, we might be looking at the next big genre-defining series.

‘Full House' star Candace Cameron Bure says she was put on diet at 12 when she started filming hit show
‘Full House' star Candace Cameron Bure says she was put on diet at 12 when she started filming hit show

Fox News

time31 minutes ago

  • Fox News

‘Full House' star Candace Cameron Bure says she was put on diet at 12 when she started filming hit show

Candace Cameron Bure was just 12 years old when she was faced with the intense pressures of Hollywood. Bure, now 49, candidly shared how she was placed on a diet at a young age while starring on "Full House." The actress said the decision was made out of fear. "My parents were really afraid," she explained on "The Candace Cameron Bure Podcast." She recalled how the struggles of Tracey Gold, who co-starred with her brother Kirk Cameron in "Growing Pains," changed her parents' approach to her health – Gold had battled an eating disorder and stepped away from the show to receive treatment at the time. "I had cheeks and I had thicker arms and I was, like, a normal 12-year-old, you know?" she said. "I really was a normal 12-year-old, but I had a little bit more fat on me than other kids on TV. They were just fearful that I would develop an eating disorder, just because of all of the pressures." Bure continued to say that the focus at home quickly turned to food – although her parents framed it as a lesson in developing a healthy lifestyle. "Let's make sure we make good choices with food," she remembered. "Everyone in my house was always on a diet. My mom was always on a diet. My sisters were always on a diet. I was always put on a diet. But it wasn't like, 'Oh, you have to lose weight.'" Bure's parents told her at a young age, "We want to teach you how to be healthy and exercise." While her parents may have taken steps to help Bure maintain a healthier lifestyle at a young age, the child star admitted the mindset may have backfired. "That completely shaped my viewpoint that I had about myself and the feelings about my body," she said. "I'm on TV... and I don't want to be too fat compared to other actors. My parents never wanted a producer to come up to me and say, like, 'We need your child to lose weight,' so let's do everything preventative." Bure continued to open up about her insecurities at a young age. "That very thing just shaped the way I looked at my body, which was like, 'Oh, it's not good enough the way it is right now. That kind of started young," she said, "and continued through my teenage years." Bure rose to fame at the age of 11 when she landed the role of Donna Jo "D.J." Tanner on the family television series. She starred alongside the late Bob Saget, John Stamos, Dave Coulier, Jodie Sweetin, Lori Loughlin, Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen and more in "Full House." The popular television sitcom aired from 1987 until 1995.

'South Park' Creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone Are Now Billionaires
'South Park' Creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone Are Now Billionaires

Forbes

time2 hours ago

  • Forbes

'South Park' Creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone Are Now Billionaires

I f you piss off South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone, they will make you pay—both financially and satirically. On July 2, after Comedy Central delayed the Season 27 premiere of the show because Paramount, the network's parent company, was locked in a contentious negotiation for its streaming rights—in the midst of months-long acquisition of Paramount by David Ellison's Skydance Media—Parker and Stone issued a statement on and let it rip: 'This merger is a shit show,' the duo wrote, 'and it's fucking up South Park .' Both transactions were resolved this week, as Parker and Stone agreed Monday to a five-year, $1.5 billion streaming deal that will bring South Park to Paramount+ globally. And Thursday, the FCC officially approved the Skydance acquisition. The deal cements the duo's place as the highest-paid TV showrunners in Hollywood and made the 55-year-old Parker and the 54-year-old Stone billionaires—worth an estimated $1.2 billion each. But the new agreement—which will pay the pair at least $250 million per year—didn't end Paramount's headaches. In South Park 's season premiere, which aired Wednesday, Donald Trump is depicted in bed with Satan, and Jesus is seen warning the show's young protagonists about the dangers of provoking him. 'You guys saw what happened to CBS? Well, guess who owns CBS? Paramount,' says the Jesus character. 'You really want to end up like Colbert?' The comedically fearless Parker and Stone now enter television's rare billionaire creative class, joining Oprah Winfrey, Tyler Perry, Dick Wolf and Jerry Seinfeld in the three-comma club. That astonishing amount of money is a testament to the enduring popularity of South Park , which has been a cultural phenomenon since its debut on Comedy Central in 1997, becoming, in just its second season, the highest-rated non-sports program in basic cable history, with nearly six million viewers. Over the years it became indispensable to Comedy Central, and its 300-plus episodes have now become bulk inventory that re-air dozens of times per week. Kenny Money: The new deal with Paramount will pay Parker and Stone $250 million a year to create new 'South Park' episodes through 2030. Bob Riha, Jr./Getty Images Parker and Stone's real coup came in 2007, when the creators and their lawyer and business partner, Kevin Morris, struck a deal with the network to play South Park episodes online using a rudimentary Flash video player, agreeing to split the then-non-existent digital revenues 50-50 'in perpetuity.' Then came the streaming revolution. Hulu licensed the show's streaming rights in 2014 for $87.5 million and reupping for $110 million through 2019. HBO Max then won a bidding war over Peacock, Netflix and others to become South Park 's exclusive domestic streaming home for $550 million over five years. That deal expired in June. Instead of just pocketing their half of the HBO deal, in 2021 Parker and Stone negotiated for a new arrangement with Paramount (which owns Comedy Central) for a guaranteed $155 million a year in exchange for creating new episodes of the show and their portion of the streaming revenue. Monday's agreement renegotiated the terms of that deal, upping the annual payout to $250 million. Parker and Stone pour that wealth into Park County, not only the location of South Park 's fictional town but also the name of their production studio, which is owned almost entirely by the pair. Founded in 2012, they route all income from their TV show, movie projects and stage productions of The Book of Mormon (which they cowrote) through the company, taking only an estimated $10 million per year in salary. It's a common corporate structure among Hollywood's top earners, but unlike other companies such as Reese Witherspoon's Hello Sunshine or Brad Pitt's Plan B Entertainment, Park County has never taken on equity partners or investors. Instead, in 2012, Parker and Stone leveraged the existing and projected future income generated by South Park and other projects to score $60 million in convertible debt funding from media-focused merchant bank The Raine Group. As long as they paid off the loan on time, they would keep all of the equity. The bet on themselves paid off as the streaming dollars began to flow in, and in 2016 Parker and Stone bought out Raine, maintaining full ownership ever since. Park County continues to use debt to fund the company's growth, including securing an $800 million credit line from private equity giant The Carlyle Group in 2023. Using the cost of the debt and some clever Hollywood accounting around depreciating catalog value, Park County has been able to lower and delay its tax bills considerably. The ultimate exit plan would be to one day sell the company, settle up with creditors and tax collectors, and pocket the remaining cash. Sources tell Forbes that Viacom (Comedy Central's then-parent company) and Park County discussed doing exactly that in 2019, a deal reminiscent of Disney's acquisition of valuable brands such as Lucasfilm or Marvel. The two sides got as far as a $1 billion valuation before talks broke down. That same year Viacom was, just as it has been lately, in the midst of a messy merger with CBS that made high-priced acquisitions difficult. When the companies returned to the negotiating table in 2021, Park County's overall production deal rang in at $935 million over six years—nearly the same price tag as the acquisition, without ownership changing hands. Given Park County's guaranteed revenue and strong profitability, Forbes estimates the enterprise value of the company could now reach as much as $3 billion in a potential sale, netting Parker and Stone more than $1 billion each. Paramount and Park County's most recent round of negotiations proved to be the toughest yet, and became an early referendum on the stewardship of Skydance's David Ellison, son of the world's second richest man Larry Ellison. He told analysts he wants his new Paramount to be 'a creativity-first studio and the first stop for best-in-class storytellers.' Where previous owners had licensed some of the company's biggest shows, like South Park and Yellowstone , to other streaming services for a short-term cash influx, it seems Ellison is prioritizing bringing everything back under the company's own streaming platform, Paramount+. It hadn't gone entirely smoothly. In late June, Park County threatened legal action against Skydance, which they believed was tampering with their talks with Netflix and Warner Bros. about potentially obtaining South Park's streaming rights. Paramount was motivated to make a deal and eager to avoid more negative publicity, like that which followed a $16 million settlement paid to Trump over a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris and the recent cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. Facing the prospect of another season premiere delay and potential trash talking on stage at San Diego Comic-Con this week—where Parker and Stone took a rare high road—Skydance and Paramount agreed Monday to rework Park County's production deal in conjunction with the new streaming rights agreement, a sticking point in the negotiations. With their pockets sufficiently lined by the $1.5 billion deal, Parker and Stone will produce 10 new episodes of South Park each year until 2030, and there's little doubt they will continue to poke fun at both their parent company and a very litigious president. When asked at during a Comic-Con panel Thursday evening what to expect from the rest of this season, Stone quipped, 'no politics,' drawing laughter from the crowd. And Parker, when asked about Trump's negative reaction to the first episode, answered with similar deadpan: 'We're terribly sorry.' More from Forbes Forbes How This Hollywood Producer Turned Brad Pitt Into A $40 Million 'F1' Ad By Matt Craig Forbes Can Netflix Become The Netflix Of Gaming? By Matt Craig Forbes J.K. Rowling Is A Billionaire—Again By Matt Craig Forbes The Highest-Paid TV Showrunners 2024 By Matt Craig

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store