‘Missiles in skies': Panic in Indian frontier cities as war clouds gather
Panicked, everyone on the streets started rushing home, 24-year-old Parray said. From the terrace of his home, he said, 'I saw that the missiles were scattered in the skies.' Then his internet also went off. 'We have never seen Jammu like this.'
Two generations of Indians and Pakistanis have not witnessed a fully fledged war, with blackouts and the threat of missiles raining on them even if they are far from any battlefield. In 1999, the nations fought a war over the icy heights of Kargil, but the conflict was contained.
Now, as India and Pakistan edge closer to a fully fledged war, millions of people on both sides are witnessing scenes unprecedented in their lifetimes. They include the 750,000 people of Jammu, and millions more in Indian cities that on Thursday evening came under attack, according to the Indian government.
Eight missiles were fired from Pakistan-origin drones towards Jammu and nearby areas of Satwari and Samba, also targeting military stations in Udhampur and Indian Punjab's Pathankot, said India's Ministry of Defence. India says they were all brought down with no casualties.
Shortly after, Pakistan's Information Minister Attaullah Tarar denied that the country had targeted any locations in Indian-administered Kashmir or across the international border.
Yet the mounting anxiety across cities in India and Indian-administered Kashmir close to the frontier with Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir is real. Seventeen days after gunmen killed 26 civilians in Indian-administered Kashmir's Pahalgam, and two days after India hit at least six Pakistani cities with missiles, the prospect of a war looms over communities close to the border.
Soon after dusk, authorities in Indian Punjab issued complete blackout orders in several districts, including its capital city of Chandigarh, and Jalandhar, Pathankot and Mohali.
Sabarpreet Singh, a 46-year-old businessman from Amritsar, Punjab's second-largest city, said he is learning to react during sudden blackouts. 'Things are changing very quickly. I have not been able to sleep at night,' he said. 'I'm thinking of leaving the city with my children [and wife]; they are scared when sirens go off.'
Late on Wednesday, a blackout was imposed in parts of Kutch, in Gujarat; and in bordering areas of Rajasthan, where the border with Pakistan goes through the Thar Desert.
The situation is much more dire along the Line of Control, the de facto border that divides disputed Kashmir between India and Pakistan. Both armies traded heavy artillery as civilian injuries and deaths continued to rise. Amid gunfire, India has moved to evacuate thousands of people, who now sleep in shelters overnight.
'There were attempts to target military sites in Jammu, including the defence airport,' a local intelligence official told Al Jazeera, requesting anonymity because he was not authorised to speak with the media. 'We have confidence in [Indian] defence systems, however, the security situation is deteriorating. We are monitoring every moment closely.'
That India should be on edge is understandable, said Praveen Donthi, a senior analyst at the International Crisis Group.
After India struck deep inside Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir on May 7, killing at least 31 people – 'terrorists' according to India, civilians (including two children) according to Pakistan – Islamabad and its military are under immense pressure to respond forcefully, he said.
'Pakistan was bound to retaliate. Neither the government nor the civil society in Pakistan was willing to de-escalate without a response,' Donthi said.
In a media briefing on Thursday, New Delhi said that Pakistan had earlier that day attempted to 'engage military targets' in several cities in India and Indian-administered Kashmir, including Srinagar and Amritsar, using drones and missiles.
While Indian officials said that forces 'neutralised' these attempts, New Delhi said it responded by targeting Pakistan's air defence systems at several locations, including in Lahore, Pakistan's second-biggest city.
Islamabad said its air defence system brought down 25 Indian drones overnight in several cities, including Lahore and Karachi. At least one civilian has died, and five people were wounded, the Pakistani military said.
India's Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri reiterated on Thursday that any forthcoming Pakistani attack would be responded to by New Delhi. He insisted that India was merely responding to escalation by Pakistan, also referring to the Pahalgam attack as 'the original escalation point'.
Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs responded by denying any attacks on India or Indian-administered Kashmir, noting, 'Any escalation based on false pretences will be met with full resolve and determination.'
Referring to global calls for restraint and de-escalation, Sumantra Bose, a political scientist focusing on the intersection of nationalism and conflict in South Asia, said, 'The situation needs an urgent intervention by the international community, with effective diplomatic efforts to de-escalate.'
'There is no support in the world for this senseless conflict,' said Bose, which he said, 'has been rather mismanaged – and should never have been allowed to get to this point.'
'Things have gotten out of hand very quickly and it is looking to get worse,' he said, reacting to the drone warfare and the alleged attacks on Jammu. 'In the escalatory spiral, it is just retaliations; an endless loop of retaliations from both sides.'
Later on Thursday, US State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said, 'We are remaining engaged with both governments at multiple levels.'
Acknowledging that Pakistan wants an 'independent investigation' into the Pahalgam attack, Bruce said that the United States wants 'the perpetrators to be held accountable and are supportive of any efforts to that end.'
However, Indian Foreign Secretary Misri had already rejected the calls for an independent investigation earlier in a media briefing, citing 'no confidence in the Pakistani establishment for cooperation'.
The Trump administration, Donthi said, had, at least until May 7, 'appeared willing to let the situation unfold between India and Pakistan'.
'Unless the US and other international powers intervene more proactively to defuse the situation, it could lead to a full-blown war,' Donthi told Al Jazeera.
Bose, the political scientist, argued that 'it is already a state of war.'
'It would be much worse unless there is urgent, and effective, diplomatic intervention that makes the key decision makers, namely the Indian government and Pakistan's military, to end this senseless belligerence and the spiral of escalation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
13 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Clarence Page: Donald Trump's naming game is a pitch to his restive base
As if he didn't have enough on his mind in late summer, President Donald Trump has called on two professional sports teams to revert to their former names — which unfortunately sound to many ears like racial slurs. Is he just looking for trouble? Or is he whipping up controversy to direct attention away from other trouble that he is in? Last Sunday on Truth Social, the social media platform he owns, Trump called on the NFL's Washington Commanders and MLB's Cleveland Guardians to go back to the team names they used before they rebranded in response to complaints about the use of Native American names and imagery. Referring to the Washington team, Trump posted, 'I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,' I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington.' Moreover, he wrote, 'Cleveland should do the same with the Cleveland Indians.' Ah, the old one-two punch of bigotry and extortion. For fun Trump added, 'MAKE INDIANS GREAT AGAIN (MIGA)!' Right. Somehow, I don't expect Indigenous Americans to be very impressed by his demand. Trump also has willingly used the power of the presidency to attack the bureaucracy, the universities, the media, the arts — all of them full of 'elitists' who have sought to impose their views on speech and thought about race. Trump has the power, in word and deed, to hurt these people and institutions, and he glories in doing so. That is the message to MAGA of these posts. But why now? Trump is trying to move the news cycle past the mysteries surrounding the late Jeffrey Epstein. More news has emerged tying him to the late financier and convicted sex offender who died by suicide while in prison nearly six years ago. The Epstein story took an unexpected turn earlier this month when the Justice Department announced that it would not release the so-called Epstein files, despite the fact that Trump surrogates had spent months, and in some cases years, promising to do so. Then, the week before last, The Wall Street Journal reported that a risque birthday letter sent to Epstein in 2003 bore Trump's sexually suggestive signature. Trump went ballistic, suing the Journal, its owners and the reporters for $10 billion, contending that 'no authentic letter or drawing exists.' However, he sounded a bit more muted after the Journal's subsequent report that Trump was briefed by his attorney general, Pam Bondi, in May that his name appears multiple times in FBI documents related to the Epstein case. The Epstein case is a grave vulnerability for Trump. A nontrivial segment of the MAGA movement is rebelling at his attempts to quash publication of the 'files.' Trump in turn is accusing these people of being 'duped' by Democrats. He went so far as to say that he doesn't want the votes of those who show such little faith, and he called those who continue to demand the release of the files 'weaklings.' Meanwhile, the White House has been digging deep into its repertoire of treason accusations against former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden, as well as his 2016 opponent, Hillary Clinton, complete with a fresh promise to prosecute all involved in the decade-old investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election. That's our president! Always ready, when all else fails, to play the old hits such as the familiar blame-the-media ploy. But blaming the messenger doesn't seem to be playing as well as usual. A CBS/YouGov poll published last Sunday found that 9 in 10 respondents think the government should release all of its information on Epstein. Republicans were split almost evenly on approval of the Trump administration's handling of the controversy, though self-identified MAGA Republicans were more likely to say they were satisfied. As for his overall performance, an overwhelming 89% of Republicans approved of the job he's doing as president, despite his approval slipping to just 42% of all respondents in the survey. That could be because the Epstein case isn't the most important issue respondents considered in evaluating the job he's doing. Top of the list for saying an issue mattered 'a lot' in their evaluation was immigration and deportation policies (61%), followed closely by inflation and prices and the tax-and-spending bill that recently passed Congress (both at 56%). About 36% said the Epstein case mattered 'a lot' in their assessment of Trump. Yet the case isn't going away any time soon. In order to avoid a procedural vote making information about the Epstein case public, House Speaker Mike Johnson sent House members home early for a monthlong break from Washington. The vote would have forced Republicans to pick a side. Meanwhile, U.S. Deputy Assistant Attorney General Todd Blanche, who last year acted as Trump's criminal attorney, has been dispatched twice to speak with Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's accomplice who is serving a 20-year sentence for child sex trafficking. Is Blanche visiting Maxwell as a high-ranking government official sworn to protect the people of the United States or as Trump's personal fixer? It's hard to know if there's a distinction in Trump's mind. As one who has grown quite weary of the epidemic of conspiracy theories that boiled up in the wake of Obama's presidential campaign, I am amused to see the masters of MAGA get a taste of their own paranoid theories. But I am also deeply worried about what they will permit themselves to do to get out of the Epstein pickle.
Politico
a day ago
- Politico
Trump leans into trade threats to try to stop Cambodia-Thailand clashes
His first call Saturday was with Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet, where he urged 'an END to the War' and said that if the two countries do not reach an agreement to end the war, he will 'not want to make any Deal, with either Country.' Trump is on a diplomatic trip to Scotland, and according to reporters traveling with the president, had a golf outing planned at his course in Turnberry with one of his sons and the U.S. ambassador to the United Kingdom, Warren Stephens. 'The call with Cambodia has ended, but expect to call back regarding War stoppage and Ceasefire based on what Thailand has to say,' the president wrote. 'I am trying to simplify a complex situation!' Trump posted minutes later that he spoke with the acting prime minister of Thailand, Phumtham Wechayachai, and Trump said he 'wants to have an immediate Ceasefire, and PEACE.' The clashes have left at least 33 people dead and more than 168,000 displaced across both countries. Trump compared the situation in Asia to the U.S.-mediated ceasefire agreed to by India and Pakistan earlier this year. At the time, the president said he told the countries that 'If you stop it, we'll do a trade,' adding that 'If you don't stop it, we're not going to do any trade.' But the Indian government disputed that claim from the U.S. leader. 'The issue of trade didn't come up in any of these discussions,' said a spokesperson for India's foreign ministry. Cambodia and Thailand have both been two of the hardest hit countries as a result of Trump's trade war, as the president recently announced a 36 percent tariff on most Cambodian and Thai exports, effective August 1.
San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Modi joins Maldives independence day celebrations, signals easing tensions amid China rivalry
COLOMBO, Sri Lanka (AP) — Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi Saturday participated Saturday in the 60th Independence Day celebrations of the Maldives, concluding a two-day visit to the island nation. During the trip, Modi also announced financial assistance and formally launched talks on a proposed free trade agreement. The two-day visit was seen as crucial to India's ambition to control the seas and shipping routes of the Indian Ocean in a race with its regional rival China. It signaled a thaw in diplomatic tensions that followed the election of pro-China Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu in 2023. Modi joined a distinguished gathering at Republic Square in the capital, Malé, where a military parade and cultural performances marked the anniversary of the Maldives gaining independence from British rule in 1965. On Friday, following talks with Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu, Modi announced a credit line of $565 million to support development projects in the Maldives. The visit coincided with the anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties between the two nations in 1965. It also saw the start of talks on a free trade agreement. The two leaders oversaw the exchange of signed agreements to cooperate in sectors such as fisheries, health, tourism and digital development. Modi also handed over dozens of heavy vehicles donated by India to strengthen the Maldives' defense forces. The Maldives — an archipelago nation strategically located in the Indian Ocean — is a focal point in the growing geopolitical rivalry between India and China. Tensions grew when Muizzu, who favored closer ties with China, was elected in 2023 after defeating the India-friendly incumbent Ibrahim Mohamed Solih. Leading up to the election, Muizzu had promised to expel Indian soldiers deployed in the Maldives to help with humanitarian assistance. Last year New Delhi replaced dozens of its soldiers in the Maldives with civilian experts. Measures by Modi to promote tourism in India's Lakshadweep archipelago, off the southwestern coast of the Indian mainland, also sparked anger from Maldivians, who saw it as a move to lure Indian tourists away from their country. Indian celebrities then called for a tourism boycott of the Maldives. Tensions escalated last year when President Muizzu visited China before India, a move widely interpreted in New Delhi as a diplomatic snub. On his return, Muizzu outlined plans to reduce the Maldives' reliance on India for medical services, pharmaceuticals, and essential imports such as food staples. Relations started to improve after Muizzu attended Modi's swearing-in ceremony for a third five-year term last year. Muizzu has since toned down his anti-Indian rhetoric, and official contacts with New Delhi have intensified amid growing concern about the Maldives' economy. During a visit by Muizzu to India last October, India pledged financial support to the Maldives, which has been struggling with debt. This included $100 million in short-term government loans and agreeing to a $400 million currency swap to help stabilize the Maldivian economy. India has long been a key development partner for the Maldives. However, the island nation has also deepened ties with China, joining its Belt and Road Initiative in 2013 to build infrastructure and expand trade — part of Beijing's broader effort to increase its global influence.
